Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Deathcore, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Internet access. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Technical death metal, you may be blocked from editing. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's simple really. There's a reliable source calling them technical death metal, so they remain on the list. What else is there to understand? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 20:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The reliable source would be the Allmusic review by Phil Freeman. Please make sure you understand the difference between reliability and what you personally consider to be "reliable". Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
