This is an archive of past discussions with User:GlassCobra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
My roomates going home this weekend, so I'll have a bathrobe picture within a week. Now, I need to find a white door? Haha. нмŵוτнτ01:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy Valentine's Day!
User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mischa Barton. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. QTC03:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Re Mischa Barton
We are Mischa Bartons representation, trying to make informed factual updates to this page why would you make nonsensical reversions when we have hardly got past the first line??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maniainc (talk • contribs) 03:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I have protected this page due to edit warring between you, Maniainc, OverlordQ and JetLover. You and Maniainc have both broken 3RR, and you should really know better. You should also know better than to use your rollback tool in a dispute. I'm not blocking you or anyone else, but I was very close to doing so. Stifle (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I have noticed that you continually and persitently keep editing the pop punk band list to include Paramore on it. Can i categorically state that Paramore are not a pop punk band and i would appreciate it if you would cease and desist editing information you clearly have no idea about. If it is the case of you editing just to get your little tracker up then this is even worse. Either way stop undoing what i do, as unlike you i actually know about this particular subject.
Ah, it's me again. I'm a former IP, the one who noticed the Wayne Static page a while back. Anyways, I've got a question. I have a friend of mine who wants to start a bona fide username on Wikipedia. The only problem is, his idea is DethLeppard666. He wanted me to ask you to check it out. Not sure if that works here on Wikipedia. That's actually my Youtube account name, but I told him that if Wikipedia would accept it, it was his. I like my name enough. Hope to hear from you soon! Paragon of Arctic Winter Nights (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your support, and your two additional questions. I thought I'd drop you a quick note to let you know that I've posted my replies to the latter. GBT/C00:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 58 supporting, 0 opposing, and 2 neutral. I hope to demonstrate that your trust in me is rightly placed and am always open to critiques and suggestions. Cheers. MBisanztalk03:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for !voting in my RfA which resulted in the collapse of civilization with 92 (94?) support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral. Blame jc37 and Hiding for nominating me, everyone who had questions or comments, everyone who !voted, everyone who tallied the numbers correctly, and WJBScribe who closed without shouting, "No mop for you!"
Seriously, your response has overwhelmed me. I am deeply grateful.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Breshna Orya, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Breshna Orya. Edcolins (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Re Donald Faison
Dear Glass Cobra, I have no memory of making any changes to the article Donald Faison, let alone incorrect. Could you please cite what it is I am supposed to have written. Thank you. User:6afraidof7 —Preceding comment was added at 21:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
....so as a result I come to you, isn't that flattering? :) I was checking out about starting my own Wikipedia kinf off stuff, not necessarily on the internet as I don't have my own webspace and server etc, but probably on my own computer to categorize some stuff and to create my personalized kinda databases. I know you can run html stuff on your own computer without uploading it on the internet, so I'm looking for something similar, but with wiki software. Do you know how to do such a thing and if not, do you know someone who can help me out on that? Thanks ;) AmandaT/C22:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Easy easy, I wasn't really thinking you were ignoring me, it was just a reminder and it seems like it helped :) I will check the reference desk, thanks for your help. AmandaT/C23:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear GlassCobra, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind vote on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (29/5/5).
I cannot thank you enough for you're support on my RFA. And now that I am a sysop, I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Hi, GlassCobra, thanks for voting in my RfA, which passed with 47 supports (I hoped for a perfect square, but two away is close enough!), 3 opposes (the first odd prime), and 0 neutrals. I'm glad the community has decided to trust me with the mop and bucket (the flamethrower isn't supported). Of course, special thanks goes to my nominators Auawise and that one guy who buried stuff (not that the thanks I give to the you isn't special!). If you ever need a hand with something, or just want to say hello, toughfeel free to drop a line! Best wishes, Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood23:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
This doesn't even vaguely resemble a mop, but I couldn't find a picture of one.
No seriously, thanks for contributing at my RfA which ended 68/0/0. I'm amazed and humbled by the result, and the warm and supportive comments that went with it. I've put the pic of Tiger here because although I know not everyone appreciates lolcats, to me it illustrates the possibility of taking things seriously with a light heart. I will try to do so, and remain open to the being slapped down if I do start being impossibly pompous.
Thanks Pedro : Chat for your generous nomination, and also to Master of Puppets for ripping off his thankspam without so much as a by-your-leave. To all who contributed - especially the eventually withdrawn (but very interesting) neutral and oppose - thank you! Now it's off to new admin school for me, before I dare do anything for real...
I dread a possible recall, due to some of my recent mistakes. How is that process going? How long of a probation period is granted? Bearian (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much. I will be adding more photos, Can you check them for me afterwords, I really appreciate your help. This has been a very trying experience, William —Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamkieffert (talk • contribs) 17:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
JIM BAILEY ENTERTAINER PAGE
Thank-you soooo much for your help...
can you please let us know if there are ANY problems which might get this page - jim bailey entertainer -deleted?
Can we change female impersonator and leave it as actor singer comedian or add impressionist or
anything else?.
I put sources on but they are gone? is this a problem?
can the links because these they are more thorough
Sources have to be independent of the subject. The myspace and youtube links don't really meet that criterion, although a link to IMDB credits probably shouldn't have been deleted. Psu256 (talk) 20:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
JIM BAILEY ENTERTAINER PAGE
Thanks again for your help....I wish we could understand this better...can i call you briefly
We got your message about issue with photos.
The photos are all owned by Jim bailey and myself including the carnegie hall record cover because Jim and I purchased all rights to this and plan on re-release. I'm his business manager and co owner of his company if you check his website i'm the contact. As for the other photos alot of them I took personally and the others Jim gets ownership of as part of the agreement when you do a performance.
.... thanks again for your help.....we are pretty much done
Can you tell me how to put back in some of Jim Bailey's television and movie work... on other actors pages ive noticed they are more detailed. I wondered why alot of the stuff was deleted and I thought maybe it should be verified.It can either go in the body of the page or at the bottom.Can you give me an idea of which of the following can or cannot be put in.--Campbellman222 (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
EVERTHING ON IMDB IS VERIFIED.
RFA
Thanks for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully with 40 supports, 13 opposes, and 4 neutrals. For those of you who supported my RFA, I greatly appreciate it. For those who did not, I'm also thankful for your constructive criticism. If you need some advice or have some pointers for me, you know where to reach me! A special thank you to Majorly for all his time and effort he has placed in my nomination. Once again, thank you all for your helpful comments. Now off to new admin school! Cheers, Icestorm815 • Talk01:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
crips r us
Looks like a bunch of nonsense to me. This kid needs to be blocked on sight from now on, but for some reason we can't get enough "Evidence" for these obvious sock puppets to be blocked, which is ridiculous. DietLimeCola (talk) 09:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello
I am just curious as to why you say that I should not be editing the article on Jim Bailey when I am the one who created it. I have created this article at the request of many Wikipedia users who wish to have "Factual" information on Mr Bailey, and I feel that my contribution is non biased. Although I am an acting agent for Mr Bailey, I have been asked by his publisists and managers to create such a page. I have published many articles,(Not neccessarily pertaining to Mr. Bailey) from a non biased stand Point. I am a translator for Airbus Industrie in Toulouse, France and have produced and translated many articles for them, always from a non biased stand point, even though I believe wholeheartedly in the product which I am representing. I think that all of us here on Wikipedia are passionate about the subject matter that we turn into a Wiki Page. Otherwise, we would not be creating it.
I do however want to thank you for the help and support that you have given me in this endeavor, for without it I would be totally lost!!! This is my first Wiki contribution, and it has been trying to say the least. I just want to support my subject matter the best that I can.
Alao, when It says Citation needed, what do I need to include there and Hoe do I do this. You are so very helpful and I appreciate every bit of info that you have given me, William Kieffert —Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamkieffert (talk • contribs) 21:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I want to bring it to your attention that you are perverting facts. The LCV's appraisal of Sen McCain's environmental position is not my opinion. In a category about McCain's ratings by political interest groups that is perfectly relevant, factual, and properly-cited.
Please end your attempt to stifle the facts about John McCain's anti-environmental positions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grizzlyone (talk • contribs) 00:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I need guidance in some disputes over at Flyleaf. There are four referances that clearly state that they are a chirstian band, but Flyleaf 833 insists on changing the genre again and again, without an edit summary or replying to the very lengthy discussions in the talk page. The said user has been warned twice, if not more, and will not reply or comply. Any tips? Wanna head over and check it out? ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk.19:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
Thanks for your help. The photos we put in were deleted when Mr. Bailey and his manager campbellman222 own them all.
They gave up any rights by putting either public domain or GFDL what should they be put under.
Thanks
Williamkieffert has been given permission to put the photos into the article that Mr. Bailey and I own. Were they uploaded wrong? We are giving up ALL rights to public domain...--Campbellman222 (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Sock
I have reason to believe that User:Frost2k2 is a sockpuppet of User:Flyleaf 833. Evidence at Flyleaf. He is making the exact same edits as Flyleaf 833 was, in the exact same manner: reverting others' edits three times. He also fails to give an edit summary at all, and has not discussed the issue. Thanks, ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk.18:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hahaha, dude, saying I edit Wikipedia is my pick-up line. That's how I get guys during happy hour. You know, cite Wikipedia policy while dancing on the bars. I mean come on! нмŵוτнτ20:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
flyleaf
I am a bit confused, I first thought the same rules applied to everyone. I didn't realize that during an edit war one side was blocked and the other was told to keep up the good work. I will admit that I am new to wikipedia, but certainly not new to Flyleaf. The fact that someone like you is allowed to be an administrator really makes me lose faith in Wikipedia. How can you support the Christian Rock genre knowing it can not be properly sourced? The sources for that say nothing more than they are Christians, not a Christian band. I have seen them in concert three times now, they are always introduced as alternative rock or metal. I their official webpage their is a direct quote of lacey's saying they deal with the 'Christian band' thing and that she doesn't know the answer. She says if them being Christians make them a Christian band than she guesses they are. That in no form or fashion suggests they are a Christian rock band. Do you know anything about Flyleaf? Several of their songs have nothing to do with God or any form of Christianity. You ppl keep making the first sentence of the artice "flyleaf is a Christian alternative metal or Christian Band. neither are even musical genres. If they are a Christian rock band why do they not put that on their website or myspace. Why is it that everywhere they sell or promote their music their genre is listed as either alternative rock or metal. I can see where the article needs to say that some ppl label them a Christian band because they are Christians and is the fuel for what they do, but certainly not have that mere interpretation listed before what they consider themselves to be. I am in my third year of surgical residency, so when I do an appendectomy is not a normal appendectomy, but a Christian appendectomy? Because I am a Christian, and it did and does inspire me in what I do. How in the world did you become an administrator. The person that engaged in the war with me is still reverting the genre to suit her own beliefs. What exactly is the criteria for being thanked instead of blocked? You are a joke, and a disgrace to wikipedia. I know that wikipedia is your entire life and all you do, but you suck at the administrative role. Administrators should be fair to everyone. An administrator worth their salt would block both participants in an edit war, not just the one that goes against their personal opinion. Once again, you are a disgrace and a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyleaf 833 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't really think you are a joke. I just don't understand why you would block me, and thank the other person. They were guilty as well. You block me, then post on her talk page to come get you if I do it again. That just hardly seems fair to me. The same rules should apply to everyone. She reverted the same thing over a dozen times, I didn't see you block her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyleaf 833 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Flyleaf article
I have been attempting to resolve the genre dispute on the Flyleaf article, but the revert war rages on. The two biggest offenders appear to be Hoponpop69 and ElisaEXPLOSiON. They are simply ignoring the discussion on the Talk page, to which most of the editors have chipped in, sometimes thoughtfully, sometimes not. (These two also leave very rude comments on my talk page any time I switch the genre back to alt rock and alt metal.) We had this dispute settled months ago. I'd like to keep it that way, honestly. No new sources are backing up their claims, but they ignore that fact. I think we need an admin to resolve this dispute, or to at least block these two until they calm down. Jparenti (talk) 10:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
.svg)
reverse.jpg){kind=link}
