User talk:Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry was to supposed to put on my page. Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 10:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I’m from Pittsburgh and Bobby Ianniello is the underboss. So are you gonna list bobby as underboss? Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Philadelphia crime family, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Philadelphia crime family was changed by Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971658 on 2020-04-12T18:34:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get unblocked please I’m sorry I’ll stop. Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 07:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry I’ll stop editing, I won’t do it. here Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 07:20, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 07:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry for editing I accept that I was being disruptive and I take responsibility. So please unblock me I won’t edit articles that I’m not supposed to edit. Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't convince me you understand why your edits were disruptive. Or if you do, it doesn't explain why you were being deliberately disruptive, even after you were warned. Yamla (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How do I provide reason Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the block one day or lifetime Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 10:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey vaselineeeee why do you hate me? When I actually made helpful edits you delete them, so tell me why you hate me. Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look I’m sorry for editing I won’t do it so can I pls Be unblocked because I want to make a article because I want to share interesting information. Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gennaro "Jerry" Di Gregorio, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

RedRiver660 talk 15:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]