User talk:Geach

Spam in Sugar Puffs

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sugar Puffs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sugar Puffs is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sugar Puffs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Foreign Affair.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Foreign Affair.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "No More Nails"

A page you created, No More Nails, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. res2216firestar 19:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Life's what you make it.

Thanks for that, I will improve the overview section a bit later but your edit has made a vast improvement already! kiwiteen123 (talk) 22:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miriam O'Reilly

The article Miriam O'Reilly has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Feezo (Talk) 22:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SnuggleBumms

The article SnuggleBumms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable toy. No claim to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Chris Chittell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wild Geese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverhampton in 1927

Hello Geach. You recently edited the Traffic light article and changed the word "city" to "town" because you stated that Wolverhampton wasn't a city in 1927 when they installed their first traffic light. A review of this section shows a 1921 population of over 102,000 and a 1931 population of over 133,000 (which probably explains why they needed the light, but that's a discussion for another time). Given the population of the time, I'm wondering why you don't consider Wolverhampton to have been a "city" in 1927?  Etamni | ✉  22:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Very Best of Cilla Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anyone Who Had a Heart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Let Them Eat Bingo

The article Let Them Eat Bingo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable ablum. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Efua

Hi, this is not really related to wikipedia, but since you started the Efua Baker page I thought I'd ask if you'd ever seen the music video for "Strawberry Boy"? There was one made for it, but I've never seen it.Nqr9 (talk) 08:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No I've never seen it and it doesn't appear to be available anywhere. I do own the 12" single though. ;) Thanks for your help with the various articles. :) --Geach (talk) 12:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through the edit history of the Efua page and found the user who added her date of birth - it's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Djlollyb . I've asked this user if they can provide a source for her birth date, given that the Billboard article mentions she was 26 in 1993 - making her year of birth 1967 at the latest, not 1970 as currently listed. Looking at this user's talk page, there are a number of posts from other users asking this user to stop adding unsourced information, and at least one post I saw there about making disruptive edits. I think the date of birth is looking rather unreliable unless they can provide a source.Nqr9 (talk) 05:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the date of birth should be removed until a more reliable source can be found - if ever! Although I've seen you've added a citation needed thing. I've seen some articles say "born c.1967" but this probably isn't factual enough. Maybe with your good research skills you could contact Ms. Baker herself to ask. ;-) --Geach (talk) 12:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did actually contact her by email over a year ago to ask a) whether a video for 'Strawberry Boy' exists, b) if she has a copy, and c) whether I could obtain a copy if so. The answer to all 3 questions was yes, but I'm still waiting. I offered something for her, too, in that I've got a demo cassette tape from October '93 with 4 demos (though they sound like finished songs) on it for a second Efua album that never eventuated. She was amazed, and didn't even remember the songs, so I sent her mp3 rips of them. I said I'd be happy to pay her for a copy of the 'Strawberry Boy' video. I don't think I suggested that she could just send the tape to me so I could digitise it myself; I didn't want to appear too pushy. The only excuse I can think of contacting her again without seeming pushy is if I get better (maybe professionally done) rips of those demo tracks, as some of them are a bit poor (mono) sound-quality wise. I'm not sure I'd feel brazen enough to email her to ask her when her date of birth was - even if I was, you can't easily use that as a 'reliable source' on wikipedia, even though it's directly from her... unless taking a screen-shot of the email, which would maybe be a bit rude without asking her if that was OK. I had some edits reverted last year when I started adding ARIA peaks outside the top 100 from those emails, using "personal communication" as the source - before I thought of taking screen-shots. I'm not hopeful on ever receiving a copy of the video, as in the last correspondence we had she said "one day I will get the video copied for you somehow", or something to that effect. I'm pretty sure "Strawberry Boy" was not released as a single in Australia (we got 'Down Is the Drop' as the follow-up to 'Somewhere'), either. I think the date of birth should be removed altogether, because when I googled her date of birth, I saw the wikipedia date crop up everywhere, as though it was fact, when it probably isn't.Nqr9 (talk) 23:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. I did notice the other day that on Efua's website it featured the "Somewhere" video which had been uploaded by you - which I've watched myself numerous times, and shown other people! But I agree that asking her age outright may not be the nicest thing to do, even if you were still in contact with her. I bought a second hand copy of the "Strawberry Boy" 12" single from a local charity shop about a year ago - it's got a big rip on the front cover though. I also bought "Down Is the Drop" at the same time. I had no idea until recently when you added the info what order the singles were released in in the UK - I was only aware of "Somewhere" at the time of release as it was played a fair bit on the radio, but of course that wasn't a Top 40 hit in the UK, unlike Australia where it seems to have done quite well. Removing the alleged date of birth is probably a good idea. By the way, did I read in that 1993 article you showed me that she was born in Ghana? Maybe that could be added too along with any other bits and pieces, if it's a reliable source. --Geach (talk) 00:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I thought of adding that she was born in Ghana, too. Interesting to read that her dad is/was an entomologist. I think putting her date of birth as ca. 1967 with a reference link to that Billboard article mentioning she was 26 in 1993 would be alright. Although 'Somewhere' peaked at #16 in Australia, it hung around for a bit (16 weeks in the top 50). Charting singles generally hung around for longer here than in the UK back then. I'm not sure why it did better in Australia than in the UK. Radio certainly weren't playing it; the FM stations didn't really play pop or dance music outside of the top 40 or evening listener-voted countdown programs aimed at teens until 1995. I emailed Efua through her site (there was a contact link there somewhere). I'd have to find where I saved it, but I saw a UK promo CD for 'Strawberry Boy' on eBay a while back that had a release date sticker on it for some time in March 1993 (I think it was the 29th).Nqr9 (talk) 01:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Show Me Love (album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Show Me Love (album), Geach!

Wikipedia editor Nepaxt just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great job!

To reply, leave a comment on Nepaxt's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Orphaned non-free image File:Madonna Rescue Me UK single cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna Rescue Me UK single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to discuss a merge proposal

Hi there,

As a recent contributor to the Boomania article and someone focused on music articles in general, I thought you might be interested in contributing to the discussion at Talk:Boomania regarding a merge proposal.

Thanks, Ubcule (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: The Ecstatic

Hi. Would you be interested in reviewing or commenting at my nomination of The Ecstatic for featured status? Dan56 (talk) 08:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Tina Moore self titled album cover.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Tina Moore self titled album European version.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Geach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel formatting

Hello. i've noticed on your page Kiss of Life (Siedah Garrett album), the formatting for the personnel section is incorrect. Please format it: "Name - function". The function part should be lowercase and have no brackets. Like "A&R direction" would be fine. this is per WP:MOSALBUMS. thanks --Jennica✿ talk / contribs 11:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Geach, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 18:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Bell and Alexandra Burke association

Hey, I noticed that you removed Alexandra Burke from the list of associated acts for Melissa Bell. And then you're edit summary was "as already discussed, Alexandra Burke is her daughter but professionally they're not associated". So respectfully my question is, where was this discussed at? Horizonlove (talk) 04:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the Melissa Bell talk page, but Alexandra's name had already been removed in a previous edit by another user. The 'Associated acts' listing is for acts who have professionally worked together, and as far as I'm aware despite being mother/daughter Melissa Bell and Alexandra Burke didn't work together professionally. Of course, if you have alternative info then feel free to have your say on there - I only really stopped by on that page to do a bit of tidying up as a casual fan of Soul II Soul's music! --Geach (talk) 12:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock report you might be interested in

Editing Matt Goss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Luke Goss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970 Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Geach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited To Whom It May Concern (The Pasadenas album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaka Demus & Pliers Tease Me album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 21:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mica Paris Born Again album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rozalla Everybody's Free album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Basia

Basia

Hi. I've seen your edits on various Basia articles and that you've added a number of links to her songs which don't currently have a Wikipedia page. I'm sure these redundant red links aren't encouraged on Wikipedia, and they do make an article look a bit untidy. Are you considering creating new articles for those songs? --Geach (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed I am going to create pages for those songs. In fact, I already have drafts of those articles, which after some final changes will be added this week. 1000MHz (talk) 21:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hits 93 Volume 1 album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sydney Youngblood Feeling Free album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Geach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia Fordham The Julia Fordham Collection album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia Fordham Happy Ever After single cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia Fordham That's Life album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Then Jerico The Big Area album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Samarsky

Hello, Geach I do not know English well, could you please check the article for errors Mikhail Samarsky. Thank you in advance.--Den1980- (talk) 20:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julia Fordham and Paul Reiser Unusual Suspects album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nightcrawlers Lets Push It album cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woman to Woman (Beverley Craven, Judie Tzuke and Julia Fordham album) has been accepted

Woman to Woman (Beverley Craven, Judie Tzuke and Julia Fordham album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 20:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for adding a table of chart positions for the album Ancient Heart, and for leaving a message on my talk page alerting me to this table. Vorbee (talk) 18:18, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Aloof Seeking Pleasure album cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Aloof Seeking Pleasure album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'Albums produced by...' category

Hi Geach,

Hey, I hope doing well! Just dropping you line about my thoughts on adding compilation albums like The Hit List (Cliff Richard album) to the categories 'Albums produced by Alan Tarney' and 'Albums produced by Stock Aitken Waterman'. For me, when those albums are compilations with few songs by those producers (in this case Tarney 2 and SAW 1), or those albums haven't had any new songs produced/recorded for them by that that producer, it doesn't seem right to add that album to the 'Albums produced by...' category. I don't know if there is a rule or guide defined anywhere about this, but to my thinking it doesn't pass the "pub test".

If I was to be strict, it even feels misleading to add compilation albums of exclusively previously released material to a producer's 'Albums produced by...' category at all, because the producer hasn't contributed any new work to it beyond the previous or original release. That may be too strict for some, so an exception to that perhaps would be where the person or team is a producer of a significant proportion of the songs across the compilation album, and then you could mount an argument that they are the producer, even though it is just a compilation album. However I could see this making for messy category lists that contain long lists of compilation albums, particularly for older successful artists that have many Wikipedia pages for compilation albums. I would think that what readers probably really want to know is which studio albums was the producer involved in and any compilation albums where new songs have been recorded.

I do see that compilations are commonly credited to particular producers in the category pages (and I assume that is why you added these examples), but I don't know if any rules have been followed where albums are being added to these category pages. Do you know of any guidelines around this? What are your thoughts on this otherwise?

Regards,

AusChartMan (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! To be honest, adding producer categories is one of the more recent things I've started doing - it's a rather pedantic thing to do to try and improve articles! Over time I'd noticed some other compilation articles with them, even when that producer only produced the one song on it, such as Cliff's "I Just Don't Have the Heart" being the only track on his compilations being produced by Stock Aitken Waterman. I'm not sure what the official Wikipedia protocol is and I admit, like you, I've even wondered if it's the right thing to do or not. Despite having been editing on Wikipedia for about 100 years, when tentatively adding something like this I still often simply look at similar, albeit far better-constructed articles to see what other editors have done - often high traffic articles by acts such as the Beatles, Michael Jackson, Madonna etc. The latter's The Immaculate Collection compilation article for instance includes each producer in the categories section, with Lenny Kravitz featuring despite only producing one of the tracks on there.
But I have no problem if you feel the need to remove the producers from any of Cliff's compilation articles as I know you keep a watch over those and I'm not 100% sure about this myself. Have a further look around yourself to see what other editors have done with similar compilation articles by other artists.
On a separate, but related note, I was surprised when I realised a prolific producer such as Alan Tarney hadn't got his own albums category, then found even more albums that I didn't realise he'd produced so ended up with a very healthy-looking category! I originally thought it would just be Cliff and A-ha. I was tempted to create one for Alan Tarney's produced singles but I think there are even more of those - the albums category, along with all the adding of links and such, took long enough to create!--Geach (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Geach, sorry not to get back to you sooner. I trust what you say about it being done elsewhere. Although it doesn't make sense to me, I'll just leave it with you and others that have done likewise. An Alan Tarney produced singles category does make sense to me though, I think that could be a interesting one if you are inclined. For many of his singles I've found, I've added them to his wiki page. AusChartMan (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: Love for Sale

Hi. I saw your name on my watchlist and wanted to ask if you would comment on or review my nomination of Love for Sale (Bilal album). It has been stale for a few weeks, and there are ambiguous or reluctant takes on the sourcing in the article that could use further discussion. The criteria for featured articles is WP:FA?, if you choose to do so. Thanks. isento (talk) 21:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turning track listings into tables

Hi. Because you didn't provide one, I don't understand your reason or the benefit for changing the track listing on Age of Reason (album) to a wikitable. Even if you were to have turned it into a track listing template, this isn't necessary to do, and a compelling reason would need to be provided to change something that's been in place for years. Ss112 09:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, although I've made several edits on that article it absolutely wasn't me who made that change - it's awful formatting! Seems it was a user called Jonesey95 in October. --Geach (talk) 00:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diana Ross Every Day Is a New Day album cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diana Ross Every Day Is a New Day album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Larry Adler The Glory of Gershwin album cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Larry Adler The Glory of Gershwin album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]