Hello, Gantuya eng! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 05:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oriflame, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Oriflame. Argyriou(talk)17:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gantuya, please never ever edit the contributions of other editors on talk pages. In a discussion, every editor will offer their opinion in the way they themselfes want to state it. If another editor goes and changes that, then they will put words in somebodys mouth that the person never intended to say. That's very bad style, just as it would be bad style in a real-life discussion. You don't like it if other people "correct" your opinions either, do you? Also, {{fact}} tags are meant for article pages, not for discussions. There is no requirement that an editor provide sources for every statement they make in a discussion. Because of all that, I'm going to restore the contribution by Bogomolov.PL on Talk:Ulan Bator to what he really wanted to say. --Latebird (talk) 06:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's right. That's why it shouldn't be "gh". As I understood (I may have misunderstood) from a discussion with User:Nanshu, "gh" is a "g" with 2 dots before a masculine vowel. Gantuya eng (talk) 05:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding is that 'gh' is just the g that comes with vowels like a. 'g' without 'h' is the g that comes with vowels like e. But these are just conventions anyway. I reverted your edit mainly because it turned a blue link red. Regards, Yaan (talk) 11:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But it's impossible to pronounce that hard "g" with "h" (meaning g with 2 dots) before a consonant. It will require a hard (masculine) vowel like "a". Pls understand. Gantuya eng (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid I don't understand. If you can pronounce Hutagt, then you should also be able to pronounce Khutughtu - my understanding is that when the word contains vowels like 'a' (masculine vowels?), then you don't write 'g', you write 'gh' (or γ "gamma"). Whether the 'gh' has dots or not is a different question: If it is followed by a vowel, the 'gh' gets dots (lest it be mistaken for a 'kh' or 'q'), if it is followed by a consonant, it gets none (because there is no 'kh' before consonants). So you write khaghan and khutughtu, but köbsögöl and ligden (not so sure about the correct spelling of the latter in the traditional script, but you get the idea). Yaan (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked up that discussion with User:Nanshu and seen I misunderstood what he explained. gh represents masculine forms of g and just g represents the feminine forms of g. It's not about the 2-dot form. Regards, Gantuya eng (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ulaanbaatar
Plese never move articles while the discussion is still going on. Wikipedia does things based on consensus. Your personal perception (or mine) of what may have been "proven" is of no importance. --Latebird (talk) 02:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1696 Battle of Zuunmod(?)
Hi,
I am currently a bit confused about where that decisive battle in 1696 took place. I think the place is called Juun modu in a book I have, and it is said to be at the Tuul river and not too far from Ulaanbaatar. The first and the last bit seem to be consistent with a battle at what is now the center of Central Aimag, but the Tuul river thing is apparently not. Is Juun modu the same word as Zuunmod, and is this a case of several places having the same name, or a case where a place name migrated some dozen kilometres? Regards, Yaan (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. I actually found a source stating the battle took place near what is now UB, and directly south of it, but just to be on the safe side I will still remove this stuff from the Zuunmod article. Yaan (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The battle place was near the site where the Terelj river joins the Tuul river. A site with a group of a few trees standing separately is called "Zuunmod" (hundred trees). There are many places with that name -- to the north, east, south of UB. I think I saw somewhere that text speculating the battle site to have been to the south of UB. The author seems to have assumed (erroneously) it's the same as town Zuunmod. Gantuya eng (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it is very easy to make this confusion. My source was in German, so maybe you saw something else. In any case it did not go into any further detail, so it is probably not reliable enough. Yaan (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good question. I remember the school map of history showing arrows under legend "the troops of the Far Eastern Republic" for the 1921 events. As I understand the Far Eastern Republic was indeed part of the the Soviet Russia, but was formed by Moscow in the conditions when Siberia was cut away by Kolchak. Gantuya eng (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sain baina uu!
Sain baina uu!
End zarim hesegt mongoliin tuuhtei hesegt guivsan esvel dutuu medeelel mash ih baina. Ene talaar yamar bodoltoi baina ve.
Thank you for the news and your efforts to bring the Tibetan naming to order. I will have a look and see if I can contribute any idea. You know, this's not aiming to blame you, I received a notification about your message on my email. I didn't receive any such notification to my email from Wikipedia before (except direct emails from a few users). It frightened me "What have they done to me again?". Is there a way to disable receiving notifications about changes in my TalkPage to my email? Please understand right, I don't want to offend you with this emotion. Gantuya eng (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adding red or black links to this article is not the correct solution to your problem. Please create List of Buddhist temples in Mongolia, then link it as the "main article" under Mongolia. We cannot list every Buddhist temple in the world in a single list article. Not only is it completely impossible, but it would make the article useless as a directory to other Wikipedia articles and would encourage other editors to add entires that are neither notable nor useful. Please use subarticles to accomplish your goal. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 16:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In recognition of your 4 years of service with over 4000 edits, I present you with this service award, which you may place on your user page if you like. You will find other variants and userboxes equivalent to this award here. Yworo (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This editor is a Yeoman Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion,
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
