User talk:Gaelan/Archives/2020/April


Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14

On my edit to the World Trade Center page.

Sorry for the confusion! I was moving the content on Austin J. Tobin plaza from the Criticism section to the Complex section of the World Trade Center article, as the content about the plaza had little to no parochial concern, and more content that is simply relevant to the history and general placemaking of the complex itself. I also wanted to avoid having overly duplicate and redundant content on the same page. Again, sorry for the confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omnificent879 (talkcontribs) 04:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar!!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 07:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
@Path slopu: Thanks! I really appreciate it. Gaelan 💬✏️ 07:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Gaelan - disrupt

You are a bunch of Snowflake hacks who would know the truth it it hit you in the face. I am reposting all of your comments to my many platforms to show the world that Wikipedia does not like the facts unless it suites your narrative and I am shutting down my account. I used YOUR PLATFORM regarding Charles Taze Russell and his Theology & Teachings to state my case. But I offended one of your sheep. So i will make our conversations public and close my account. Have a great day. Daniel Mower (talk) 02:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

15:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools

Read this in another languageSubscription list

Screenshot showing what the Reply tool looks like
This early version of the Reply tool automatically signs and indents comments.

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

Reply tool improved with edit tool buttons
In a future update, the team plans to test a tool for easily linking to another user's name, a rich-text editing option, and other tools.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

  • On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
  • The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
    • an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
    • a rich-text visual editing option, and
    • other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Shahid Buttar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahid Buttar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahid Buttar (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – MarkZusab (talk) 18:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

18:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020