User talk:GTrang/Archive 4

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

Chocolate Jesus

Just pointing out to you that your notification here isn't as helpful as you no doubt intended. By reviewing the history of the page, you would see that the editor who you notified created a redirect, not the article itself. That was created by Pedant six months later. While I know that Twinkle doesn't give you the flexibility to do the notifications any way other than how it is programmed, and I'm also aware that Pedant hasn't edited in over a year so is unlikely to respond (and further that another editor has added multiple references to mainstream media, so the tagging may not even be appropriate anymore), I'd like to encourage you to actually look at the history of the article before tagging it using Twinkle. If you still believe it should be prodded, you can still do so manually, while ensuring that the most appropriate editor is notified. It's uniquely irritating to receive a PROD notice for an article one didn't create and, in particular, didn't think was notable enough for an article of its own at the time of creating the redirect, as I am sure you would appreciate. Risker (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

I do check in from time to time but I mostly edit anonymously.User:Pedant (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request GTBot

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GTBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

January 1901 (month) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect January 1901 (month). Since you had some involvement with the January 1901 (month) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 08:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

The Redirect from Bobby Cash (Singer) to Bobby Cash (singer) published along with article in mobile version of wikipedia

Thank you for the correction. In some versions of wikipedia i.e. the mobile version for one, the sentence concerning the Redirect from Bobby Cash(Singer) to Bobby Cash(singer lower case),still appears along with the article. Can it be rectified? And could you please address the matter. Thank you.(Catulet (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC))

Template editor granted

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Useful links

Happy template editing! Nakon 02:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Template edit request for {{LSR}} and {{LPR}}

These templates used to display the latese stable or preview version number and date, and provide an edit link. Their edit links currently only works with desktop editor even if you are using a mobile phone. I have a solution to making the edit link works proper with both desktop and mobile browsers, since these templates are fully protected, I hope you to make this optimize, open their sandbox page you can get the solution. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 14:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

You can go to their test cases to see the effect. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

FYI, I have reverted your move of this user talk page to Draft talk:SeptimusDaisy.

Can you please advise where I can find my article content. This is my first article and I find this all very confusing. SeptimusDaisy (talk) 09:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi GeoffreyT2000. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Biblio (talk) WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia. 01:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, GeoffreyT2000, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

MikhaY/Ilovsky theatre

I wonder what might be the reason for moving the article back to the MikhaYlovsky, if the theatre itself, international press, and the academic sources refer to it as the Mikha-I-lovsky? I will be most happy to get to know what you think, so we might agree on the best way forward.

https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2014/nov/23/mikhailovsky-ballet-new-york-review-lincoln-center-american-debut http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/arts/dance/22mikhailovsky.html?_r=0

Teatrplusnane (talk) 07:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

@Teatrplusnane: I moved the page back because the move that you have done was opposed in an RM from 6 years ago. I will ask with a message on your talk page for you to start a new RM next. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Year article header/test zc

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Year article header/test zc, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 ([User talk:MrLinkinPark333|talk]]) 02:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

UNPROD Dialling (telephony)

This is not within my focus at the moment- but there is huge potential. I have done a little on Strowger- and given some rich references- do you fancy getting involved- there is the whole nerdy field of touch tone frequencies, dialing pad layout- the 1950 three letter dialing codes (different mappings in US, Europe and UK). --ClemRutter (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:Infobox video game

On 17 July 2016, Nakon explained to you "This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus." I don't see any consensus for this edit to Template:Infobox video game, nor do I believe it was done wisely; do you? --RexxS (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Localisation of modules

Hello,

you had the audacity of reverting one of my perfectly crafted edits. Let me explain why this was foolish. </irony>

We could use a different construction than the one given above, and what you changed would be right. This is, we could make a module into an module by defining

.

But even this would first require the notion of a ring of fractions (although this wouldn't be a particular obstruction). The point is, as it is right now, we don't even have defined a multiplication on the given object, for we only have a multiplication

,

where now is the module defined from R as an R-module as in the first section of the article. At most, the underlying sets are equal, but we don't get a ring structure. --Mathmensch (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Warning tags about article Allan J. Stitt

Hi GeoffreyT2000, Thank you for reviewing, accepting and cleaning the article Allan J. Stitt. I appreciate. After your intervention, I just noticed that someone has put a couple of warning tags on top of the article. This really baffles me after the fact that you just accepted it and cleaned it accordingly. Can you please help about this situation? Much appreciated. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acumenmeister (talk • contribs) 14:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Round robin and subpage

Regarding this move.

Generally, it's preferred to keep redirects of moved talks/talk subpages per WP:PMVR#rr step 4, the second/third bullet points. (Image to the right about the scenario (second diagram)).

Though I'd agree there's legitimate reason this particular redirect was suppressed, because the purpose of its root talk page changed, and now redirects to the dab talk. On the other hand, there are incoming links to that now redlinked talk subpage, so I'm personally unsure what is the best approach. I personally would have kept the redirect to avoid the link breaks. Anyway, not expecting a reply, just an FYI.

— Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

It wasn't exactly a swap, but ...along similar lines :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi GeoffreyT2000. Thought I'd do a quick followup and plug a new script I wrote that semi-automates the round-robin process. The script is here (js). Essentially, you'd simply click "Swap" and enter a page destination, the script performs the 3 moves as necessary (saves time having to manually go through the move form 3 times). (It doesn't correct redirects afterwards, that's still manual)
Anyway feel free to adapt this script as you see fit, cheers :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 02:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

WBLN/WCBD-DT2 issues

Hey GeoffreyT2000, I'm sorry for noticing that WBLN should have redirected to The WB 100+ Station Group page. :) — Anthony Abate (talk · ctb) 23:51, 02 September 2016 (UTC)

Deprod

I think the article is notable, see edit summary at [1]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Luris and Lurs

Is there really no connection? How can one discern لوری from لور as different any more than one can discern کوردی from کورد ? Aren't their etymologies synonymous, just as Parsis (in India, that is) are to Persians or Iranis (in India) are to Iranians? Please explain the difference to me. 

Shadzad (talk) 21:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Faithfully flat

If you haven't seen it & you're still interested, just noting I replied to your question on ff ring extensions in the archives a few days ago.John Z (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surel's Place (2nd nomination)

Respectfully, I'm going to ask you to revert your close of the above and let an administrator close it. The only keep ! Vote that expressed a policy based argument qualified his arguement with a statement accepting redirect to the community, an outcome that would also be acceptable to me. The other keep votes didn't rise above ilikeit. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 22:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Grand Duke or Monarchy of Luxembourg

Greetings GeoffreyT2000. You recently moved Grand Duke of Luxembourg to Monarchy of Luxembourg although I don't see a clear consensus emerging from the discussion, especially taking into consideration the repeated move requests that were opposed earlier this year. I would suggest a relisting of the discussion to gather further input. — JFG talk 16:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of the Waitlist Management page

Hi there GeoffreyT2000,

I see that you've proposed the Waitlist Management page for deletion because of notability requirements. However, there are a lot of independent sources that discuss strategies and methods for waitlist management and this field is becoming one of increasing concern for both academics and urban businesses. Some of these sources include;

http://streetfightmag.com/2014/06/17/6-waitlist-management-tools-for-restaurants/

http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1415&context=articles

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875898/

I wanted to write a page about waitlist management particularly because it's becoming an increasingly notable area of concern but doesn't have much light shed on it yet, and a Wiki page for it that connects multiple credible sources on the topic could become a growing center of information on the topic. Would it be possible to bring the page back under the pretense that I would revise it and incorporate sources that establish the topic's notability?

Best, Pantelo (talk) 18:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Pantelo

Deletion of MacroGeo

Dear Geoffrey hope you are well. I am really sorry for the deletion of the MacroGeo article but I must accept that your arguments stand. May I ask you on when it can be considered that the subject has enought notability in this case in order to relaunch it? Thank you. William MI6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by William MI6 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Rodney Howard-Browne

You removed the edit that noted this person's support for Trump after the recent tape emerged. I tried to link to his Twitter page but it did not take. Please see the following. I assume there is a reliable way to do so that I am not familiar with...

https://twitter.com/rhowardbrowne?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.85.125 (talk) 02:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Niter

I'm curious about this close. May I know your reasoning behind closing this as keep? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: I closed it as keep given that a week has passed with only keep votes. The article was latter renominated by Marvellous Spider-Man, and Robert Niter was finally deleted by Black Kite. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Mouthwash (number) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mouthwash (number). Since you had some involvement with the Mouthwash (number) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Granger (talk · contribs) 10:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm RollingFace99. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Achomi Language, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. RollingFace99 (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Mark Jennings (Dynasty)

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for the move! Pyrusca (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/RickinBaltimore#Oppose

Hello GeoffreyT2000, please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/RickinBaltimore#Oppose - you may restore your opposition that was removed by The ed17 should you desire or have an amended discussion point to raise. — xaosflux Talk 23:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

FYI: Another editor has restored your !vote. You may still want to review the comments made on it. — xaosflux Talk 15:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Somali Faces

You based the deletion on an old message from 6 months ago. More credible references have been added and credibility is established. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anabahmed (talk • contribs) 21:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

11:02:46, 7 November 2016 review of submission by StenhoBJ


Thanks for reviewing my article on CAPE-OPEN. I wish to improve it based on your comments but wanted to clarify your feedback. Is there a problem with the references already quoted or is there a need for more references for the article. I thought the latter case but wanted to clarify.

@StenhoBJ: You need to know the URL of the online sources and use citation templates where appropriate. Offline sources need an ISBN. Until you address these issues, I will not accept the draft. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

I have now added ISBN or DOI numbers for each of the references used plus the URl for the CO-LaN website. Let me know if OK now, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by StenhoBJ (talk • contribs) 17:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@StenhoBJ: OK, I have now accepted the draft and moved it to CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Help

Dayao is a subdivion of Liuyang city, Hunan. i think the name Dayao, Liuyang is better than Dayao, Hunan. help me moving Dayao, Hunan to Dayao, Liuyang, thanks. Cncs (talk) 06:08 November 11, 2016

@Cncs wikipedia: OK, I have now done the move that you have requested here. Since the target as well as its talk page had only one edit in their histories, you could have just done the move yourself instead of asking someone else to do it for you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

AFDs

Hi, When closing AFDs you need to make sure they're the full 7 days, On quite a few you've closed them at around 9-10pm (UK time) when in those 2/3 hours someone could've !voted delete,
I'm not a bureaucratic person so I'm not gonna sit here and tell you you need to close them bang on when they were nominated (which actually we are supposed to do) however I would ask infuture you close them at perhaps around 12-1pm if you're in the UK (Go to AFD and click "closing" if that's easier),
You can be blocked for closing AFDs earlier even if it's a whole 1 hour!,
Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 00:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

@Davey2010: I do not live in the United Kingdom, but rather in California, where the Pacific Time Zone is used. Anyway, I will try to close AfDs within 2 hours of 00:00 UTC, which is 4:00 PM PST or 5:00 PM PDT, as you have suggested here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Oh damn sorry for some bizarre reason I thought you lived in the UK, It's a shame timezones aren't the same everywhere - Life might be a might easier for us all lol :), Anyway thanks for your contributions at AFD, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 02:19, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Please help

Hi. I did a mistake and used "cut-paste" method to move two articles, because I thought it would preserve revision history jut like typical move process. I've explained my mistake (see [2] and [3]). I saw that you have fixed one of them. would you please fix Talk:Muhammad of Ghor too (the name is fixed but it needs to restore revision history)? Unfortunately, I was on a rush to restore original/sourced name of those articles and I edited those articles carelessly. Those edits disappointed myself too, because I see my carelessness caused a lot of errors. --Wario-Man (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

@Wario-Man: I have now requested a history merge of Talk:Muhammad of Gaur into Talk:Muhammad of Ghor in Special:Diff/749558201. Since you are a page mover, you should probably use Andy M. Wang's page swap script for doing round-robin moves. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. Cheers! --Wario-Man (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

IP edits, I don't know which are valid

Hi Geoffrey2000. Please have a look at the new edits here. IPs are adding and removing actors. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

User group: New Page Reviewr

Hello GTrang.

Based on the patrols you made of new pages during a qualifying period in 2016, your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed.

New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your feedback invited: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Reconciling_Legality_of_cannabis_by_country_and_Legal_and_medical_status_of_cannabis.3F

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 02:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GeoffreyT2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello GTrang,
Breaking the back of the backlog
We now have 822 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.
Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello GTrang,
Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

09:52:47, 12 December 2016 review of submission by IceKoobs


Hello GeoffreyT2000, I'm submitted a re-review for my draft of The Little Acre. Your previous review stated that there was not enough coverage and I wanted to know if I added enough references this time around? If not how many more should I look for? Thank you for your time.

@IceKoobs: OK, I have now accepted the draft and moved it to The Little Acre. That article still has bare URLs that need to be fixed, but drafts can be accepted before bare URLs are fixed. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File mover granted

Hello GeoffreyT2000. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Widr (talk) 09:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Redolta is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!


Redolta📱 Contribs 00:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)