|
User talk:GMH Melbourne/Archive 2021Welcome G'day GA Melbourne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au. If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 03:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jahan Kalantar (lawyer) (November 8)
Thank you for the feedback. I will find more sources and resubmit a better quality article GA Melbourne (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2021 Your submission at Articles for creation: Census and Statistics Act 1905 has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Edit to Talk:Underbelly (series 1)Hi, I noticed that you recently edited Talk:Underbelly (series 1) and removed the WikiProject banners for both the Crime and Television WikiProject banners, saying they were redundant. This is not the case. The Crime and Television parameters in the Australian WikiProject produce assessment data for WikiProject Australian crime and WikiProject Australian television respectively. These projects are really "task forces" of WikiProject Australia. However, Crime and Television WikiProjects are worldwide projects are both separate and different from WikiProject Australia. These other banners and are NOT redundant, as they apply to their respective worldwide WikiProjects. Those WikiProjects are distinctly separate assessments to Australian Crime and Australian Television. To save you the trouble, I have put the Crime and Television WikiProject banners back. I know this may seem odd to do things, especially to someone so new to Wikipedia, but it is the way the WikiProject banners work currently. If you think things could be improved, perhaps you could raise the issue with the Version 1.0 Editorial Team - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC) As a new editor, it is well worth knowing that project tags are never redundant - unless they are wrong outright. Which what you removed is not the case... There is a whole side of the Austrayian project that many editors do not touch - which is the talk page and project tags. It is a vital area of assessment -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment - and just a friendly note - many aspects of the oz project do go quiet, and under attended over time - it is always worth looking at article/item last edited date in the history - it does give you an idea if an editor has been anywhere near there in recent times- there can be also the possibility that some items actually drop of watch lists - and there can be black holes where some new editors do get lost - simply because of nobody anywhere near the item either editing or watching... every edit is traceable/findable - so when the assertion as he is a household name in VIC and is very well known in the legal field is made - some editors crazy flashing lights go wild - such assertions on/in wikipedia are WP:OR - unless a WP:RS is provided - specially WP:BLP - it is a case of unless backed up - better left out - and as to the relative importance aka notability - we then go back to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment Attrition and reverse engineering are your best guides, it takes x number of years to get a law degree, similarly here it takes x number of edits to get a hange of things and it is always worth a good look into articles as they exist, can help very much to understand the place and how it works.JarrahTree 09:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC) take carehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jahan_Kalantar_(lawyer) smells like ( that is there are particular parts of the editing ) a selfie - despite your assertions on your user page. Take care! |
