User talk:Fuckwitt

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Vinland has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Fuckwitt, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. 

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Closedmouth (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|your new username here}PteHook

Rename

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Fuckwitt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. It is also only fair to tell you that unblocking was not an automatic decision, and required much thought, because of your history of disruptive editing. No matter what username you use, or whether you edit without using one at all, you will be likely to be blocked again if you continue with some of the editing problems you have exhibited hitherto. You need to realise that Wikipedia is a cooperative project, and you must accept consensus, even when you are convinced that consensus is mistaken. You need to be civil to other editors, and refrain from any kind of personal attack, such as telling other editors to "try to get this into your thick skulls", to "Read a fucking book", calling editors you disagree with "clouds of dust", saying "Ignorance such as yours is not welcome here", and so on. You must not edit war, that is to say you must not keep repeatedly reverting content of a page to your preferred version in the face of other editors disagreeing. I also see that at least twice you have admitted that you have deliberately vandalised an article, which is the one thing which gave me greatest pause in deciding whether to unblock you. Any more of the same and you may well be blocked again, without further warning. (Note: While you know this perfectly well, for the benefit of anyone else reading this, I will explain that this takes into account your anonymous edits as well as your edits from this account.) JamesBWatson (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. I am sorry, I am guilty. I apologise to all those that I insulted. I value Wikipedia (despite it's eternally flawed veracity). I was in high personal pain and anger at the time of my disruption, which is not a validation, but merely an explanation. Thankyou for releasing me Jamie.

You have not yet applied for the name change. You need to go: Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple and do so. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers dude.Fuckwitt (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okey Dokey Botey Wotey.

  1. Have you forgotten to request a change of username?
  2. Remember that the talk page of a Wikipedia article is for discussions related to editing the article, not for general chat about the subject of the article, or asking for information about the subject.
  3. There is usually not much point in posting a reply to a talk page post that was made several years ago, especially if the post was made by a user who has not edited at all for several years. 79.123.76.184 (talk) 15:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ok. I'll get on to it. Fuckwitt (talk) 15:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

  • You continued to edit without requesting a username change, even when twice reminded to do so. In case it was not already clear, following Wikipedia's username policy is not optional. Furthermore, you have continued to edit in unacceptable ways without logging in, including trolling and posting offensive anti-semitic remarks. I believe I made it clear that your unblock was conditional on your not continuing to edit in such unacceptable ways, so you will not be surprised to learn that the indefinite block has been restored. Do not edit again unless and until this account is unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I didn't quite know how to do it, and I was lazy. Otherwise I cannot see how posting on a talk page area from a POV that is anti-"semitic" as you claim, is worthy of any attention at all. I haven't read all about Wikipedia, but even if it has been cowered into a Current Conformity position of officially excluding text that is anti-semitic, or anti anything, I consider that this should be challenged at every instance. The issue of offense is also a subjective creation in the mind of the beholder, not a creation of the author, and the implication that users must not write anything that others can be offended by is as ludicrous as your highlighting of 'anti-semitic remarks' as an issue. Furthermore, I challenge you to demonstrate that my "anti-semitic" -(I think you mean anti-Jew, or religiously factual) remarks are factually incorrect. While you may be doing a neccesary job well and correctly in blocking me for my user name, you do not have the right to control others contributions to Wikipedia, even though you have the authority. "I believe I made it clear that your unblock was conditional on your not continuing to edit in such unacceptable ways" -Unacceptable to who? Tell me why you have the right to decide that?

Hello again George William Herbert, I am interested to know of the justification for your identification and designation of me as a 'suspected abusive user of one or more accounts'. As with your fellow editors you are able to follow all of my activity on Wikipedia, and they would all concur with the obvious opinion that there is no evidence or suggestion at all that I have used accounts abusively, or have used multiple accounts. I suggest that the only possible situation here is that you are deliberately slandering me in a cheap attempt to exclude me from Wikipedia because I do not conform with your world-view. It remains to be determined -who will hold you to account? Who will be the editor (or slanderer) of your opinions?Fuckwitt (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You admitted above to the IP edits, taking responsibility. Using an IP to edit logged out is one of the sockpuppet policy violations. If you keep this up we will revoke your talk page access. If you intend to be unblocked at some point you need to not be attacking people. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]