en User talk:Friviere

If possible, use my discussion page at Wikipedia in catalan language. Thanks. Bústia de missatges

Plaease, send comment to the bottom. Thanks!

/archives

Image:Cabina_Cessna_182.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cabina_Cessna_182.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lluís Maria Xirinacs

Done. In the future, if you upload an image to Commons under the same filename, please use {{subst:ncd}}. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 15:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, this mistake was mainly my fault. I didn't check commons explicitly to make sure this image had the same filename, so when the deletion was executed by an automated tool (WP:TW - way useful), it commented out all instances of image use. There are a few quirks in sharing images between the commons and individual Wikipedias, but using the same filename is definitely the way to go. On Wikipedia, there's a specific mechanism to delete on-commons images, and {{db-nowcommons}} is the preferred shortcut. Sorry for the misunderstanding, I did not mean to imply that your actions caused any problem. Regards, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 16:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lluís Maria Xirinacs

Refering apparent suicide reported by a reputable source, pls. indicate what is a reputable source for you. When I writed the sentence you deleted, I gave all sorts of reasons, policies and references. May you please correspond before deleting?. I you had given me the opportunity to disccus the subject, as used here, I could have given you even more reasons, sources, and references--Paco ✉ 15:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lluis killed himself. Why are you so reluctant to accept the truth? See many references on Google. WWGB 15:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to this Wikipedia content guideline, "the most reliable sources [include] mainstream newspapers". The Independent (generally recognised as a mainstream newspaper) reported that "he (Xirinacs) had apparently committed suicide". Therefore I believe that my edits were consistent with Wikipedia guidelines. WWGB 02:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan

I honestly thought it was vandalism. But even if it isn't, I don't see the relationship. Especially because it's not an image of just the letter. I would discuss it with people who made the template you attached it to. Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 21:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I was unclear. My point was that, like Template:Spanish, there should be an image on the template itself. But now I see that it's designed to have a different image if people so choose. Go ahead and put it back if you'd like. If a better image comes along we can always replace it. Æµ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 19:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH MIDDLE DOT.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on the conduct of a user

Since you seem to be very interested on catalan history, and since you edited Coat_of_arms_of_Catalonia next to the user I opened the RFC on, I thought that you would be interested on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sclua. Feel free to comment there

I sent you an email on catalan so it's easier for you to understand --Enric Naval (talk) 07:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Commonwealth of Catalonia

The article Commonwealth of Catalonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there have been no improvements of sources given in over 2 years. Time to get in or get out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tribunal de Cassació

The article Tribunal de Cassació has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there have been no improvements of sources given in over 2 years. Time to get in or get out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Berenguer de Cruïlles

The article Berenguer de Cruïlles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

there have been no improvements of sources given in over 3.5 years. Time to get in or get out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tribunal de Cassació for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tribunal de Cassació is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribunal de Cassació until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Commonwealth of Catalonia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commonwealth of Catalonia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonwealth of Catalonia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dialectal map of Catalan Language.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Catalan culture challenge

I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 08:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Friviere. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CA-Paper plane diagram.SVG

The file File:CA-Paper plane diagram.SVG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
Update your signature to fix the error.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]