|
User talk:Fransplace/Archive 1Your contributed article, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Millicent Preston-Stanley. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Millicent Preston-Stanley – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 17:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC) Thank you Chess Your contributed article, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Millicent Preston-Stanley. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Millicent Preston-Stanley – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC) A sincere thank you to you, Blue Rasberry (talk) for taking the time to let me know about this. I'm sorry for not replying sooner to your earlier comment on my talk page about the Millicent Fanny Preston Stanley page. This item was listed as an editathon subject (University of Sydney Wikibomb on 31 October) and the organisers didn't realise there was already an article about her (because the pre existing article didn't include her middle name so didn't appear in a search). So I worked on it and after moving it to the mainspace, found that an article already existed in a much more rudimentary form. I reported it and, after reading your first notice, I moved the information from my article that was new into the older article. It is therefore fine to delete the page I created. Is there anything else that I need to do? Thank you Frances Di Lauro 20:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2015 newsletter
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorialHello, Fcia0423. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC) Hi, Your draft article, User:Fcia0423/draft article on Confucius StatueHello, Fcia0423. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "draft article on Confucius Statue". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia Education Projects in AustraliaHi Fciao423, I'm Nichole the new regional focal point for the Wikipedia Education program in the Asia region. I wanted to introduce myself and see if there are any updates on Wikipedia Education Program projects in Australia. Feel free to reach out on my talk page or by email: nsaad@wikimedia.org Cheers! NSaad (WMF) (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Fcia0423. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussionAs an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC) This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery Fair Use in Australia campaign update
AfC notification: User:Fcia0423/draft article on Confucius Statue has a new comment Your submission at Articles for creation: draft article on Confucius Statue (June 2)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorialHello, Fransplace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 20:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Fransplace. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Courses Modules are being deprecatedHello, Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated. Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC) Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyHello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list. Thank you! --WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Fransplace/draft article on Confucius StatueHello, Fransplace. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "draft article on Confucius Statue". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Acalycine (talk) 03:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
ReplyHi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Draft articles should be posted as such, in draft space, not in sandboxes. Problems with the article include
The editor needs to make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, check that she can find independent third party sources and read Your first article. Personally, I would suggest that that the editor starts again from scratch, but if you prefer, I could restore, clean up the worst of the opinions and promotion and move to a draft for referencing to proper sources. Let me know how you wish to proceed. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Peer reviewHi Fransplace, Was the OLES2129 class instructed to add their new articles to Wikipedia:Peer review? Or did you make use of some resource that suggested this? I've already raised the issue in the Wikipedia:Education noticeboard, but Wikipedia:Peer review is typically low volume, and most often used for more mature articles that have multiple contributors. Have you considered having students assigned to review each other's articles as a first step?Dialectric (talk) 18:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Minor EditsThanks for your comment at the Education Noticeboard about what's happening with the articles from your course. As a note, that comment should not have had the minor edit tag. That tag should only be used in limited circumstances like fixing a typo. You can see more about it at the link. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 06:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
useful toolsSee User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Also see Wikipedia:AutoEd/core.js Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Fransplace. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Hurley: The Man who Made History has been acceptedThe article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 20:58, 26 December 2018 (UTC)OLES2129Hello Fran. I notice several of your students striking requests at Wikipedia:Requested articles. Would you happen to know anything about this? I only ask because the appropriate action for students to take is to remove a request from RA once their article is complete. Striking only makes the process straining for the users that patrol this section of Wikipedia, who would see this as either a page already created or that a subject is not notable for the encyclopedia, which I do believe the subjects are notable if the students intend to work on them during the semester. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
OLES2129 students and image uploads/image useHi Fransplace. It appears that some of your students or at least students belong to OLES2129 at the University of Sydney are working on various drafts as part of a class project. I've come across their various drafts because they've been flagged for violations of Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. The students in question are VerumRex, Austinameo and Cecelia Chen Puying. These student have been trying to add non-free files to their drafts or user sandboxes which is not allowed per the aforementioned policy. The files have been removed on multiple occasions by different editors, but the students continued to re-add them. Anyway, I asked a Wiki Ed advisor named Shalor (Wiki Ed) for help with this at User talk:Shalor (Wiki Ed) and she left some user talk page messages for the students. I've also left some user talk page messages for the students as well. I'm not sure how often the students check their user talk pages, but perhaps you could mention something about this to them during your class. You might also want to mention something about Wikipedia:Image use policy and c:Commons:Licensing as well because image use and licensing can be quite tricky and mistakes are often made. FWIW, mistakes are OK as long as they're not being repeated over and over again, especially after warnings were given. Repeated violations or relevant policies and guidelines related to images in particular is one of the things which tends to dealt with rather harshly and often leads to an administrator quickly blocking an account to stop any further disruption. So, if your students have any questions about image use, they can always ask for help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or even the Wikipedia Teahouse. Wiki Ed even has a training module specifically developed to help students with all things image related. Since 99of9 is also listed as one of the contacts for OLES2129, I've pinged him in this post. However, if you could also let him know just in case, then maybe he could let his students know about the training module as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
University of Sydney CourseI like that you are giving courses on Wikipedia. But could you please request your students to check what they link? And only link when it adds something to the article? Yesterday I worked on Cider Syrup, what was severely overlinked en included 74 links to disambiguation pages. Today I came across Eastern Ethics in Business, overlinked and with 40 links to disambiguation pages, and Rural Industry in India, overlinked and with 11 links to disambiguation pages. I am worried by now. The Banner talk 22:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC) OLES2129: Thank you!Hi. Over the past few weeks, I've been reviewing a lot of the articles written by your OLES2129 students. Thank you for teaching this course! The collection of drafts I've been reviewing have been interesting, well-written, and on important topics which are enhancing the encyclopedia in many ways. Wikipedia is a victim of its own success, attracting anybody and everybody who wants to use it for self-promotion, SEO, and advertising. It's is truly refreshing to see that there are still folks in the world who want to write the kinds of articles your students are writing. Thank you again, and please let your students know how much this is appreciated. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
References  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC) Poor quality article by OLES2129 studentFransplace, I came across the article Predicate crime because I saw a reference to predicate crimes in the press, and didn't know what they were. It was an awful awful article in almost every way a Wikipedia article can be awful. It was incoherent, unclear, and poorly written. The writer clearly didn't understand the topic and grossly misrepresented the sources. Large amounts of irrelevant material are included. In the end, I had to delete almost all of it because it was irretrievably bad. I then looked to see who had added this low-quality material, and found that it was a certain User:Pattywinter, who had apparently written it for a course called OLES2129. Now, I really really want to support new users on Wikipedia, and I'm very enthusiastic about encouraging university students to learn how to contribute to Wikipedia. But there has got to be some sort of quality control. Clearly no one at the University of Sydney reviewed the Predicate Crime article. Take a look at Pattywinter's final version. Forgetting the fact that it is disorganized, rambling, and generally wrong, it includes incoherent sentences like "It is an illegal action that opposed the public order and against the Law", "there was the Vienna Convention where the attention to money laundering is a phenomenon", and "Fines can be separated to the jail sentence" (from the original "Fines can be separate from, or in addition to, jail or prison sentences") and in ll cases the garbled paraphrase is in any case utterly irrelevant to the topic of the article). Footnotes are incorrect or incomplete. This sort of material is not only a waste of Wikipedia editors' time, but a serious disservice to our readers. I implore you to exert more editorial control over your students' contributions! Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC) OLES2129Fransplace, I come to you as one of the instructors of OLES 2129: Writing for the Digital World. I was first alerted to a problem when I came across the editing of Cookieminicatt at Spider roll. This student's writing on this page is unacceptable, and I have tried to warn them of this but they are pretty insistent on their very poorly written and formatted version of the page. From their user page, I find that they are being tutored by lboikov as part of this class which you are apparently running. I further find that there is an entire discussion of this class's prior activities at the Wikipedia Education Noticeboard. I hope that you will better monitor the activities of your students. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC) PS: Might I recommend that you clean up your user talk page? Someone sent you a message at some point that completely hosed the formatting! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Thank you, (@WikiDan61:). I'm very sorry to hear about this. I coordinate this course and have written to the student's teacher, who monitors the work of his student. You've written to him too. There are 15 teachers on the course and we do our best. Our students don't usually engage in edit wars and I apologise on behalf of us all. I note the earlier archived discussion took place during 6 months of inactivity. Our our course in that instance had finished 5 months earlier and I was recovering from major surgery. We appreciate your help and the considerate way in which you communicate with our students. We do impress on them the importance of treating all editors with respect and will reinforce those messages. Fransplace 13:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Horror Newsletter - August 2020
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest! Greetings! The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC) Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse
—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)  Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. A cookie for you!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Discussion at WP:THQ § Student had material removed
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
GreetingsHi Fran: Just dropping by to say hello; I've been helping one of your students (KyleA94) with an assessment for the chestnut-bellied sandgrouse article. In the future, please feel free to ping the WP:BIRD group if you've got a student who would like to work on a bird article. We're happy to help answer questions, provide editing tips, steer research, suggest or provide references, give article assessments, etc. With 20,000+ articles in our remit and only 40 or so active members, we could use all the help we can get! ;) Best regards, MeegsC (talk) 13:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC) This Month in Education: November 2020About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 07:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
This Month in Education: January 2021
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 17:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: January 2021
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 15:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: February 2021
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 07:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
This Month in Education: March 2021
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 11:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Fixed your talk page archivingHi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. I also decided to change it to use incremental archives, since you already have /Archive 1, and the next one will just be /Archive 2 --rchard2scout (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC) This Month in Education: April 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 22:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: May 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 17:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Glad to have your help!Thanks for being so encouraging to these young writers. (Isn't this a cool story of which to be a part?) It always helps me when just for doing the right thing, someone pats me on the back and says thanks! Encouragement like yours is motivating. If we can help you, I'm certain wikipedians are standing by to do so. Don't be shy if you need to learn something or need student coaching. I'm even farther away from Sydney than Nashville. BusterD (talk) 01:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC) New message from Chess
This Month in Education: June 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: July 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: August 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 13:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: September 2021
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: October 2021
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:40, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!Greetings, It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page. Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC) You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list This Month in Education: November 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education: November 2021About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Students editing Paralympic Wikipedia articlesFrances - I would love to talk to you about including Paralympic articles in your course if that is possible. We still have so much to be done and there are lots of options that could be of interest, from stubs to images, etc. Tony.naar (talk) 09:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC) This Month in Education: January 2022This Month in Education Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 17:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
This Month in Education: February 2022 Please help translate to other languages.
This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 2 • February 2022 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
This Month in Education: March 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 3 • March 2022 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
This Month in Education: April 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 4 • April 2022 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
A kitten for you! Happy editing! Wikianonymous09 (talk) 04:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This Month in Education: May 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 5 • May 2022 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
This Month in Education: May 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 5 • May 2022 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue
This Month in Education: June 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 6 • June 2022 In This Issue
This Month in Education: July 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 7 • July 2022 In This Issue This Month in Education: August 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 8 • August 2022 In This Issue
Ten Years on Wikipedia!
Invitation to join the Ten Year Society Dear Fransplace/Archive 1, I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC) This Month in Education: September 2022This Month in Education Volume 11 • Issue 9 • September 2022 In This Issue
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
