|
User talk:Fngosa/Archive 1August 2009Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:August 18, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Similar to one you left at 17 August. What gives? Favonian (talk) 06:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Solwezi Central A tag has been placed on Solwezi Central requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding September 2009 (UTC)
poco poco es mi trade markpocopoco! i conceived that word. it means extremely joyful and boastful. please, leave your comments at the bottom and i will respond appropriately. my response may include deleting your comments, replying on my talk or on your talk page, banning you from posting on my wall, or even reporting you for being SO GOOD. ha ha ha la la la l al la a lol read this
August 2009
Your recent edits
Removed prod tag from File:Suleiman Mousa 1946.jpgI have removed the {{prod}} tag from File:Suleiman Mousa 1946.jpg, which you proposed for deletion, because the page you proposed for deletion was not an article. If you still think the page should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to it, as proposed deletion is only for articles. Instead, consider using WP:FFD for this page. In some cases, a speedy deletion criterion may apply. Thanks! -- Atama頭 05:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC) Re:wishesThank you for your kind words. I doubt my RfA will pass, but I appreciate your support. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 13:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Talkback You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Questionable redirectAre you absolutely sure that this redirect is correct? The reason I requested it is because it was a requested article here, which describes it as "incredibly useful in solving an ordinary differential equation with homogeneous coefficients, this transform involves guessing a general solution of an exponential raised to the negative [kt] power." I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure this does not describe the heaviside function. Raul654 (talk) 22:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC) Actually, further googling suggests it's an alternative name for the S transform. Raul654 (talk) 22:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC) See this, page 2. I'm not sure if it's the same thing as the S transform or not, but it's definitely not the heaviside step function. Raul654 (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Fb team Stoke CityRe. diff, you wrote: "sorry guys, does Fb mean facebook? if it does, then the template isn't worth to be on wikipedia, and i wont support it. thanks for your contributions...Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 14:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC)" Fb team means football team, of which there are many ... See Category:Fb team templates England. Regards, 86.153.202.134 (talk) 14:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Admin coaching requestHello, Fngosa. Sorry, this is going to be a long read. I recently came across a request on a non-admin's talk page (which was temporarily on my watchlist) asking if they would coach you to become an admin. I also took up your user page invitation to see your contributions as an editor. As you only have 149 edits, plus 21 deleted edits (which is a high percentage), with respect I would say that it is far too early to consider going for admin. My advice to you would be to gain more experience as an editor by observing others. Rather than concentrating on "policing tasks" such as patrolling new pages, recent changes and vandalism -- and moving on before you've had a chance to see whether other editors revert your edits or pass comment -- you might consider the following, which worked for me:
I'd also:
Just a thought (so please feel free to ignore my intrusion (and no, I'm not an admin)). Thanks for being here and contributing, and good luck! Esowteric+Talk 09:52, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
What are you talking about?Where do you come off accusing me of vandalism? You should know what you're talking about before making such accusations. Also read WP:Don't template the regulars. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC) I have also reverted your speedy deletion template and reinserted the redirect, as Hafan y Môr is a real holiday park owned by the named company. Speedy deletion does not apply per your tagging as the page is not patent nonsense. Please familiarize yourself with the categories for speedy deletion. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 23:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Hannari tofu declined
Primitive copypaste. Please do some researchYou added a copypaste template to the top of the disambigation page Primitive, but you have not filled in the source URL so this is of little use to other editors. As far as I can see a google search on the text in the lead paragraph shows only sites that mirror Wikipedia content (i.e. have taken material from this article), not material copied and pasted into this article. Please check this and remove the copypaste warning. 86.149.22.126 (talk) 09:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: The Complete Silly Song CollectionHello Fngosa, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of The Complete Silly Song Collection - a page you tagged - because: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Tim Song (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Tetamashimba.JPG Thank you for uploading File:Tetamashimba.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 01:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
SEPTEMBER 2009Speedy deletion declined: Laakson PalloseuraI removed your [[WP:CSD#A7|]] tag from Laakson Palloseura (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch, because the article does not meet that criterion. It states that the club is in the Kolmonen league. This is an assertion of significance, because we have other articles about clubs in the same league - see Kolmonen. — Sebastian 04:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your nice reply, and for doing the research! You're probably right that the club is not notable -I don't know much about soccer and Finland - and I have no objection to deleting it. I only objected to speedy deletion, because the criterion for that is not the same as notability. — Sebastian 20:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Template:Latest stable software release/FoxmailRe. edits to Template:Latest stable software release/Foxmail
To our newest Rollbacker I have just granted you rollback rights because I believe you to be trustworthy, and because you have a history of reverting vandalism and have given in the past or are trusted in the future to give appropriate warnings. Please have a read over WP:ROLLBACK and remember that rollback is only for use against obvious vandalism. Please use it that way (it can be taken away by any admin at a moment's notice). You may want to consider adding {{Rollback}} and {{User rollback}} to your userpage. Any questions, please drop me a line. Best of luck and thanks for volunteering!
Fair use rationale for File:Lilly_Temboa.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lilly_Temboa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC) File:Mad_president.jpgI have tagged File:Mad_president.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Tetamashimba.JPGThanks for uploading File:Tetamashimba.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2009 (UTC) File:Pestalozzi_Uk.jpgI have tagged File:Pestalozzi_Uk.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC) File:Fortify_logo.jpgI have tagged File:Fortify_logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
See also AfDevInfo image permission.jpg. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 12:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC) ReplySign your posts. When chastising your fellow Wikipedians about their edits, particularly when saying their edits don't make enough sense, please in complete sentences also. On a different note, I did goof by leaving out the word "REDIRECT" and I'm genuinely glad someone caught that quickly. Texasreindeer (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Illmind discographyI'm currently working on the article; I'm not finished. YesYesY'allBanger (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Cecile HaussernotHello Fngosa, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Cecile Haussernot - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. decltype (talk) 14:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
dePRODing of articlesHello Fngosa, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:
Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) September 2009
Block messagesI notice that you left a block notice on someone's userpage, recently; please note that only administrators can block users from editing. WP:WARN has a complete listing of template warnings you might want to use, instead. If you believe a user needs blocking, various forums including Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents might be able to help you out. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
|
