User talk:Flowerpotman/Archive2

USS Calvert

Thanks for the help, dude. Cmichael 06:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

322 edits

Hi, I'm responding to your comment on my talk page and your reverting of my edits. You have misunderstood my intentions. I was badly trying to create a disambiguation page for the number 322. I did not delete the information of the page. I moved it to a more appropriate title 322 (year). No information was lost. The first link on the 322 page as I made it was a link to the information previously on the page. Perhaps you can help me make a better disambiguation page. I might revert the 322 page back to my edits soon. Randomfrenchie 22:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Answer on your talk page. Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 23:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took your advice and reverted my edits. I put a disambiguation tag at the top of the 322 page. Check it out if you want to make sure it works. Thanks! Randomfrenchie 23:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit] Qaasim Middleton

No problem. It really did sound like some 12-year old putting his own bio in though. Vgranucci 01:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HEY!

dear flowerpotman... y cant i edit on wikipedia? i only did all that stupid stuff cuz u cant do it on any other website! im not a person on vandalism, gosh! --WOW Teeandbee77 23:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

sorry about the lemon thing. i was showing my friend something.....sorry for my carelessness and vandalism....plzz forgive me respond as soon as possible sincerelyDr.b&t 00:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon A. Harnois

Since it is a recreation that has already been deleted, does this mean we can CSD it? I already AFD'd it, sorry if I jumped the gun!--Xnuala (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we CSD it on top of the AFD notice?--Xnuala (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your advice!--Xnuala (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie Cherian

Hello. Good job picking that up. Pascal.Tesson 01:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

assuming she hadn't married two of the best tennis players in the world. No kidding. Don't tell Pete Sampras though! Pascal.Tesson 01:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP 67.91.76.242

Thanks for reverting 67.91.76.242's the vandalism of Edwin Oscar Smith High School. Any chance you're going too easy on 67.91.76.242's talk page since s/he vandalized 3 separate articles in the space of 20mins? (Just trying to get the feel of how the notification, warn, block process works) --Georgeryp 22:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism done to my userpage. Have a great day. --Valley2city₪‽ 01:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prodding of articles created by User:Screechy111

Hello. You recently proposed the deletion of two articles created by User:Screechy111 – Sunny side of the street and Murdar street. I'm just writing to let you know that the user has created three more articles on the same subject: Murdar Street, 'Sunny side of the Street', and Emily Birch. Just wanted to send you a heads-up. Cheers, Black Falcon (Talk) 05:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Message from Boomboxtherobot

soory i didnt no!!!!!!

Semi-protected

... as requested! Hey - you're from Ireland. Me too :) - Alison ☺ 04:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry about my IP adress

I share it with several people, and I keep switching, but that same person(don't know who it is) keeps using my IP address to add libel to your page. He vandalized my userpage also. Please accept my genuine apologies.Invisible Noise 22:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on your talk page. But, in brief: Absolutely no apologies necessary, but thanks for the message. Flowerpotman talk|contribs 23:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haiku warning day

happened to notice a reference to this from you on someone else's talk page. i'm guessing it never really actually happened... what an amazing idea, tho! tomasz. 10:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If possible, remove deletion tag

This was not meant to be an attack, it's possible that some of these people aren't retarted but that's the information I recieved. We will work together to find people who really are mentally retarted, once again, sorry. --Dutch land 22:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

How are you! Just wanna wish you a happy WikiDay!Invisible Noise 21:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

You're welcome. I was going to give him a warning anyways. Cool Bluetalk to me 22:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks

Hey, no sweat :-) Thanks for your help. --HappyCamper 19:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for being nice

And reverting vandalism on my userpage Ahahaha, it's me, Rahk_EX 12:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburger

Flowerpotman said: Yup, I did miss a bit on Hamburger. Thanks.

Don't worry about it. These things are so easily missed that they sometimes require being reverted twice so that multiple users' edits are reverted simultaneously.

Have a good wikibreak. Bobo. 02:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Arts Centre

Hi. Just noticed all the activity on the Phoenix Arts Centre article, which is still on my (far-too-big) watchlist from when I categorized it. I'm not sure if anyone has noticed, but the original article referred to a theatre in Leicester, while the current article refers to a different theatre in Hastings. Just a thought, but doesn;t a revert to the original article solve everything? Flowerpotman talk|contribs 20:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BOLD !! The IP has now switched and if you see the articles talk page is intent on mischief. Go for it! Pedro |  Chat  20:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work. I'll send you a UPS when I have a mo to save you any future Power Supply kicking issues !!! :)Pedro |  Chat  21:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

message

You're just a prick. Leave people's comments alone.Bold text 78.16.9.52

  • Ooooooh-kayy. Seeing as the message came in from a dynamically assigned IP address, there isn't much point replying on that talk page. However, from the similarity of the IP addresses, I presume this is in relation to me removing comments from articles last night. And the point is: I wasn't actually being a prick - well, not in this case, at least :O) - as you seem to think. It's how Wikipedia works. I suggest you try reading the Wikipedia is not a soapbox section. As it happens, the articles were about Irish politicans and parties, but it's nothing partisan (or indeed, party political) on my part; similar comments would be removed from any article. I just happened to be the first one to notice them. If you want a soapbox, a blog would be the way to go. Flowerpotman talk|contribs 00:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


angry impotchofreak

Give me my page back. I have a website and i can report you! It took me 2 years to make this and u delete it!!! You're my enemy.

Black X inc. Staff —Preceding unsigned comment added by Impotchomonfreak (talk • contribs)

Reply

Thanks for that. We aim to improve the new page as we go along! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdonaghy (talk • contribs)

User page vandalism

Thanks for spotting and reverting the vandalism on my user page. Cheers ww2censor 21:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother 8 (UK) Deletion

Top of the early mornin' to ya, mister Leprechaun,

I happen to be rather annoyed at the fact that you have deleted my information about the contestant Tracey who DID admit earlier on the show that she was the daughter of a farmer. Just because of your thirst for deletion and your clearly fascist views, it doesn't mean that other users can't responsibly add true information any more.

Yours, rather annoyedly

Bennedict Harris. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harris Morgan (talk • contribs)

Interesting

Thanks for reverting-reverting the Athenian democracy page. I reverted it, then noticed he/she had made another edit, so I wasn't sure what to do. Thanks again! JackTalk 00:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]