Hello Fletch the Mighty, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
GregJackP (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
...is actually a hoax. Mill United is an amateur club and will never get near the UEFA Champions (unless they are sitting watching...). He was also voted "World's Best Goalkeeper" at 5 years old.... (It pays to do a quick Google with these things. I do a lot with new accounts, and would like to welcome you to the fray.... Keep up the good work.) Peridon (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I didn't read the article very thoroughly, but it didn't sound right anyway. And thanks for the reminder about Google... I hadn't actually thought of that. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 16:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I wasn't quite sure what to put it under, and you're right that A7 isn't really what it's for. Thanks! I'll be sure not to do it again. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mugdha Vaishampayan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt,MICHAEL Q.09:16, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't really my area of expertise... I can take a look at the article's writing if you'd like, but I don't think I'm the right person to tell if it reflects the mainstream POV or not. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 17:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya, thanks for your notice. I suspect them to be the same person especially because User:Soewinhan talk page says he will not be able to contribute anything until 2012. As soon as my edit dispute with User:Hybernator started, User:Soewinhan popped out of nowhere and started commenting 3RR reports and started creating confusion. Okkar (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Do whatever you like. I have a practice of checking user contributions and talkpages whenever in dispute with me. And I found Okkar deliberately trying to defame The Irrawaddy. Since I have seen a dispute between two editors, I attempt to resolve from the right side. Also, the message "I will not be able to contribute anything until 2012" is not uncommon at my talk page. I also placed several retired tags and deleted them again. Anyway, Checkuser will find the right things. If you are still in doubts, see our edits at Sino-Burmese War and its talk page. It is user:Okkar who has at least five confirmed sockpuppets. Soewinhan (talk) 04:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above claim made by Soewinhan regarding so called five confirmed socks, please see the final conclusion reached by the admin - the decision was not as Soewinhan made out to be, therefore I'm not going to protest my innocent here again as it has already been proven. As usual Soewinhan just try to create confusion as he did on various other ANI and 3RR complaints.Okkar (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been closed; while it is clear that the accounts in question, if not sockpuppets, were meatpuppets of you. Canvassing for others to come to Wikipedia to support your disagreements is absolutely not allowed. Since they have not edited since their brief contributions to the discussion, however, I am choosing not to place any blocks for now. Be aware, however, that if you continue in this manner, blocks will certainly be appropriate. -- Natalya 13:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC) And you said you are innocent?
It's all right, although I'd appreciate it if you avoided it in the future! :) As I said, my observation hardly proves anything, but it was an extremely odd experience for me, and I felt that if it was important, it should be put out there for public view. Hope you understand. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Fletch the Mighty! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 19:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
