User talk:Flashthomsom

February 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Madhupur, Deoghar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Madhupur, Deoghar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

U have no idea what I have done. I just added few schools and colleges name's and u find it promote vandalism. Huh ? Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I also added the governing body Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carmel School Madhupur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carmel School Madhupur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmel School Madhupur (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (schools)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Flashthomsom! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello Flashthomsom! Your additions to Madhupur College, Jharkhand have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Flashthomsom! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Berek (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate for your help for reviewing my article. Flashthomsom (talk) 12:29, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey berek, today I added a article about school which has been moved to draft space even after proving all newspaper website citation and government website links. Could u help me to move it from draft to article space. Article is about Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir, Madhupur Flashthomsom (talk) 11:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir, Madhupur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir, Madhupur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources, and the sources must be sufficient to establish the notability of the subject. (?) Furthermore, each material statement in the article must be supported by citation to one or more of the sources; currently many sections are unsupported. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I have added enough citation from the local newspaper even I added the board website which definitely is central government website of India, even after proving these much citation u rejected my article. Please do approve it Flashthomsom (talk) 10:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, there are several sections unsupported by any sources. If you cannot cite a reliable source, my suggestion would be to remove the unsupported content.
Secondly, there are not enough independent and reliable secondary sources to establish the notability of the subject. Schools are not inherently notable, they need to satisfy WP:GNG / WP:ORG, which I don't believe is the case here.
Thirdly, I did not 'reject' your article, I moved it to drafts, so that you can continue working on it to address the above points. The other option would have been to propose that the article be deleted — surely you wouldn't have preferred that? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't u remove those links that is creating trouble. Flashthomsom (talk) 11:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atleast help me which citation do I've to remove please Flashthomsom (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir, Madhupur (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 14:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir Madhupur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir Madhupur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir Madhupur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir, Madhupur

Information icon Hello, Flashthomsom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mahendra Muni Saraswati Shishu Vidya Mandir, Madhupur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are reverting someone's edit, at the very list you need to supply a reason. In this case, since this is a revert of an insertion, you should follow WP:BRD and discuss first. You were already warned twice about this. --Muhandes (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carmel School Madhupur

Information icon Hello, Flashthomsom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carmel School Madhupur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Peter Ormond 💬 19:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Peter please let me know why you are removing my edits even after providing valuable citation. Can you tell me how your edit is not unsourced when you made just some minor edit on the article with just simply different tone. Flashthomsom (talk) 19:39, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi,Peter you wrote this  Since 14 July 2021, the governor has been Ramesh Bais. Where as I have written that " Ramesh Bais is currently Governer of Jharkhand who took charge since 14 July, 2021

Can u explain why my edit is unsourced and u undo this Flashthomsom (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me in which are lines u found unsourced & disputed that violets Wikipedia policy. Flashthomsom (talk) 19:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deoghar Airport. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2600:1700:D0A0:21B0:34A3:8C98:350B:62D1 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madhupur subdivision, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

stop You have been leaving a welter of messages on various user talk pages seeking to canvass people to uphold whatever it is you wish upheld. I have no interest in whether you are correct or incorrect. Leaving all these messages is disruptive and must cease.

Please resolve this matter on the talk page of the article concerned.

If you cannot do so please use our dispute resolution process. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll keep this on mind and will not do it again. Sorry for the trouble. Flashthomsom (talk) 19:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carmel School, Madhupur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhupur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]