User talk:Finister2

April 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Doctor Who (2010 series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 14:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Master (Doctor Who), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You can't hide behind a page blanking. Add unsourced information to an article again and you could be blocked. magnius (talk) 18:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've blocked you for 12 hours for adding original research and unpublished synthesis of material. Once the block expires, please provide proper sources for your additions and discuss anything controversial on the talk page. for the benefit of anybody watching this page, you are perfectly entitled to remove anything from your own talk page, including this message with the exception of declined unblock requests which must remain while you are blocked. If you feel the block is in error, you may contest it by using {{unblock|your reason here}} and another admin will review it but you should read WP:GAB first. May I suggest you refresh your memory of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH while you're blocked. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Hi, Finister—may I enquire, out of interest, what you are doing on your userpage? :) ╟─TreasuryTag►stannator─╢ 18:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Finister2

User:Finister2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Finister2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Finister2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►presiding officer─╢ 19:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please do not create malicious redirects, as you did with List of Ashes to Ashes episodes. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. magnius (talk) 23:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please don't do stuff like this unless you can provide a reference from a reliable source. It's original research.

Cheers, TFOWRpropaganda 18:32, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Valeyard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. magnius (talk) 23:26, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User page - MfD discussion

This is to record that User:Finister2 was nominated for deletion on 4 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Finister2

Category:Finister2, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 06:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Master stories, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. U-Mos (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Rassilon stories

A tag has been placed on Template:Rassilon stories, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

there are only two applicable stories, rendering a navbox almost entirely useless

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Rassilon stories|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. U-Mos (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rassilon Stories

Template:Rassilon Stories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. magnius (talk) 18:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main antagonist

Stop. Just stop. You have had countless comments, reversions, and warnings. Please heed them. --Ckatzchatspy 21:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning - you insist on repeatedly adding your text about antagonists to articles, despite the fact they are consistently removed. --Ckatzchatspy 20:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing, despite multiple warnings.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ckatzchatspy 09:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silence (Doctor Who)

The article Silence (Doctor Who) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced pile of speculation and original research without the vaguest hint of notability. I am really shocked to find a sci-fi-related article in this sort of state...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ╟─TreasuryTag►estoppel─╢ 15:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silence (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silence (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silence (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ╟─TreasuryTag►estoppel─╢ 17:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of Pair of Kings episodes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 14:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Batman: Arkham City

In the future, please leave edit summaries when you edit articles, especially ones that have just been released. People having to check your work, such as myself, have to read your edits without knowing what you have done, read them and get spoiled about who is in the game that was just released. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 10:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Young Justice edits

Hello, Finister2. You have new messages at Talk:Young_Justice_(TV_series)#.22Additional_cast.22_too_long.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Jack Sebastian (talk) 11:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who templates

Hi there. Please stop recreating templates like {{Weeping Angel stories}} and similar. The community has decided in a deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 October 13#Template:Weeping Angel stories) that such templates are not desired for multiple reasons, so they will just be deleted again after recreation. See also WT:WHO#Return of the templates. Regards SoWhy 16:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who templates

Please be aware of the following discussion. Thanks. --‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 19:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Young Justice edits...again

As was suggested before - perhaps too subtly - you need to discuss edits like the one you recently offered here. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of material, be they cast names or whatever. The material you removed in favor of a generic list was full of citations. Please stop removing this cited improvement and use the article talk pages to express your view. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 00:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:ZatannaWeakness4.png

Thanks for uploading File:ZatannaWeakness4.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SecretRescue1.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mayur (talk•Email) 14:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

A discussion has begun about your recreating previously deleted navboxes here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who#Navbox return. Your input is welcome there. MarnetteD | Talk 15:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Finister2, please note that the templates have been removed and deleted. This is not the first time that you have recreated templates deleted per a deletion discussion. --Ckatzchatspy 16:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganising templates

Thank you for reorganising the templates. However, this is a new edit, which when reverted, should be discussed on the talk page before being redone (WP:BRD). Please add a discussion explaining your reasoning for the new organisation at Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Doctor Who. DonQuixote (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ah..not good with starting conversations, I have Asperger Syndrome. Finister2 (talk) 09:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the bat-villains

Please use the talk page for {{Batman}} to discus the changes you want for the article. Continuing to revert to what you want will result in, at best, the template being locked.

- J Greb (talk) 00:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zygon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Power of Three (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frankenstein's monster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Madagascar characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Stanley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ben 10: Omniverse, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Legion of Doom (Super Friends)

A few things:

  • The template's scope is based on the group of villains from Super Friends.
  • Adding shows that are tangentially, at best, is not a good thing. Adding shows that need to be explained by pointing to Legion of Doom (Super Friends) is worse.
  • Adding redlinks is a no-no. Navigation boxes are for existing articles only.
  • As with most team navigation boxes, this is limited to the initial character. Adding every last character that may have been associated with something that might be the LoD bloats the template to unusable proportions.
  • Anything related to Smallville is OR or fan speculation. It has been removed repeatedly from the base article because of this.
  • Look at WP:BRD. Your bold change to the template has been reverted. Do not just reapply, in whole or in part, what you want to be there. Engaging in a discussion on the template's talk page to show there is consensus supported by guidelines for the change. If you continue to edit war or disrupt the template, two things can happen: 1) you could be blocked from editing or 2) the template could be locked.

- J Greb (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turbo FAST, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Bell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Private Walker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel May. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Finister2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:DoctorWhoCompanions

A tag has been placed on Template:DoctorWhoCompanions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- AlexTW 10:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:DoctorWhoCompanions

Template:DoctorWhoCompanions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- AlexTW 12:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Master comics

Template:Master comics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Finister2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who: The Third Doctor Adventures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Platt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm DonQuixote. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Thirteenth Doctor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Looney Tunes

The characters you added to the main cast aren't main characters. I ask that you cease this behavior right away because you are inserting false information. I have reverted it to the way it was before. :) Yay Dad (talk) 01:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SecretRescue1.png

Thank you for uploading File:SecretRescue1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Finister2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mad Hatter (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alastair Duncan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star-Lord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]