User talk:Fighting Poverty

Welcome!

Hello, Fighting Poverty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly.

Also, remember that Wikipedia has a policy of "neutral point of view". That basically means you can't say things like "abc is the best country in the world" or "xyz manufacturing has consistently made the best products". It means you're more than welcome to edit and improve articles on anything you like, including stuff on housing and poverty, but avoid expressing your opinion, and stuff like that.

Again, welcome!

—George8211 / T 18:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fighting Poverty, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Fighting Poverty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Greetings FP. Could I suggest you stick to WP:Suggested sources and avoid the Daily Mirror like the plague! This particularly applies on high profile wp:BLPs. Suggested sources are much more difficult to justify removing unless the facts have been covered elsewhere so that wp:undue applies. Regards JRPG (talk) 09:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poverty

Thanks for all your advice, help and support. May I draw your attention to a new section on Poverty in the David Cameron article. Fighting Poverty (talk) 09:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bit short of time atm. I expect the Cameron article will be vigorously pruned -see wp:BRD as most contributions are ..but as you have wp:rs you can rewrite it meeting those complaints. Always assume people want a neutral article and are trying to be helpful. Some are! I usually get my own point across and can help you do the same with yours. Regards JRPG (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could I suggest that you shorten it so that sources specifically mention DC ..e.g. the Guardian & CPAG articles. If you can, you should state how he plans to tackle it -ensuring parents work, I believe. The rest should go probably go into First Cameron ministry. JRPG (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Re Osborne, can I suggest you persist with the excellent Independent article ..but NOT the daily Record -a tabloid. See wp:Suggested sources. Remove the existing article from the lead -as someone will probably do anyway. :) Add a section intended to give his political views on foodbanks. Say that according to the Independent he has never visited one -see WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV claiming they are not part of the welfare system. Add that he was criticized by .. You can also wp:BRD as the reason for the reinsertion. I would expect it to stay. JRPG (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP

Hi Fighting Poverty, Just letting you know that I've moved the question that you raised on WP:BLP to the associated Talk page Wikipedia Talk:BLP. Please look there for any answers. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 08:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Cameron

Hello, when adding newspaper citations to this or any other article, could you please note that it is necessary to give the name of the newspaper and the date of publication. Also, the names of newspapers go in italics, and the titles of newspaper articles go in inverted commas. Thanks -- Alarics (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions to Jobseekers' Allowance

A great deal was taken out. I'll be away for a few hours, please help and advise. Fighting Poverty (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - first, we rarely put links in quotes. Secondly, a link to an organisation that disbanded in January 2006 in a 2007 quote is clearly inappropriate. I appreciate the intent but not the result. Doug Weller (talk) 12:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Multiple account question". Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]