User talk:FenixFeather/Archives/2014/March

This is an archive of past discussions with User:FenixFeather. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Payal Rohatgi edits

Hello Sir,

    This is Payal Rohatgi herself. Do let me know what references you need for clarification as I was just updating my information personally. My email is [e-mail]. Also i am not experienced in terms of edits much. Your help would be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.87.225.185 (talk) 05:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 

Hello Madam,

    This is kind information taken from your site wikipedia based on map and information provided i have said pallava king's ruled chennai.

"Pallava" redirects here. For other uses, see Pallava (disambiguation). Pallava Empire Kingdom ←

2nd–9th century CE  →

→

Pallava territories during Narasimhavarman I c. 645 CE. This includes the Chalukya territories occupied by the Pallavas. Capital Kanchi Languages Tamil, Sanskrit Religion Hinduism Government Monarchy King

-  555–590 CE Simhavishnu 
-  882–897 CE Aparajitavarman 

Historical era Ancient-Middle Ages

-  Established 2nd 
-  Disestablished 9th century CE 

Today part of India

The Pallava dynasty existed between the 2nd and 9th centuries CE, ruling a portion of what is today southern India. They gained prominence after the eclipse of the Satavahana dynasty, whom the Pallavas served as feudatories.[1][2] A number of legends are associated with their origin.

Contents [hide] 1 Origins 2 Control of Regions between different Tamil Kings 3 Other conquests and expansions 4 Birudas 5 Languages used 5.1 Writing system 6 Pallava Chronology 6.1 Early Pallavas 6.2 Later Pallavas 6.3 Early Pallavas 6.4 Middle Pallavas 6.5 Later Pallavas 6.6 Others 7 Kadava Dynasty 8 Other relationships 9 Religion 10 Pallava architecture 11 See also 12 Notes 13 References 14 External links

Origins[edit]Outline of South Asian history History of Indian subcontinent 7000–3000 BC: Stone Age[show]Mehrgarh Culture (7000–3300 BC) 3000–1300 BC: Bronze Age[show]Indus Valley Civilization (3300–1700 BC) – Early Harappan Culture (3300–2600 BC) – Mature Harappan Culture (2600–1900 BC) – Late Harappan Culture (1700–1300 BC)Ochre Coloured Pottery culture (from 2000 BC)Swat culture (1600–500 BC) 1700–26 BC: Iron Age[show]Vedic period (1500–500 BC) – Black and Red ware culture (1300–1000 BC) – Painted Grey Ware culture (1200–600 BC) – Northern Black Polished Ware (700–200 BC) – Maha Janapadas (700–300 BC) – Magadha Kingdom (500–321 BC)Haryanka Kingdom (684–424 BC)Shishunaga Kingdom (413–345 BC)Ror Kingdom (450 BC–489 AD)Nanda Empire (424–321 BC)Pandya Empire (300 BC–1345 AD)Chera Kingdom (300 BC–1102 AD)Chola Empire (300 BC–1279 AD)Maurya Empire (321–184 BC)Pallava Empire (250 BC–800 AD)Sunga Empire (185–73 BC)Kanva Empire (75–26 BC)Maha-Megha-Vahana Empire (250s BC–400s AD)Satavahana Empire (230–220 BC)Kuninda Kingdom (200s BC–300s AD)Indo-Scythian Kingdom (200 BC–400 AD)Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC–10 AD) 21–1279 AD: Middle Kingdoms[show]Indo-Parthian Kingdom (21–130s AD)Western Satrap Empire (35–405 AD)Kushan Empire (60–240 AD)Indo-Sassanid Kingdom (230–360 AD)Vakataka Empire (250s–500s AD)Kalabhras Empire (250–600 AD)Gupta Empire (280–550 AD)Kadamba Empire (345–525 AD)Western Ganga Kingdom (350–1000 AD)Kamarupa Kingdom (350–1100 AD)Vishnukundina Empire (420–624 AD)Maitraka Empire (475–767 AD)Huna Kingdom (475–576 AD)Rai Kingdom (489–632 AD)Chalukya Empire (543–753 AD)Shahi Empire (500s–1026 AD)Maukhari Empire (550s–700s AD)Harsha Empire (590–647 AD)Eastern Chalukya Kingdom (624–1075 AD)Gurjara Pratihara Empire (650–1036 AD)Pala Empire (750–1174 AD)Rashtrakuta Empire (753–982 AD)Paramara Kingdom (800–1327 AD)Yadava Empire (850–1334 AD)Solanki Kingdom (942–1244 AD)Western Chalukya Empire (973–1189 AD)Lohara Kingdom (1003-1320 AD)Hoysala Empire (1040–1346 AD)Sena Empire (1070–1230 AD)Eastern Ganga Empire (1078–1434 AD)Kakatiya Kingdom (1083–1323 AD)Kalachuri Empire (1130–1184 AD) 1206–1596: Late medieval age[show]Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 AD) – Mamluk Sultanate (1206–1290 AD) – Khilji Sultanate (1290–1320 AD) – Tughlaq Sultanate (1320–1414 AD) – Sayyid Sultanate (1414–1451 AD) – Lodi Sultanate (1451–1526 AD)Ahom Kingdom (1228–1826 AD)Reddy Kingdom (1325–1448 AD)Vijayanagara Empire (1336–1646 AD)Gajapati Kingdom (1434–1541 AD)Deccan Sultanates (1490–1596 AD) 1526–1858: Early modern period[show]Mughal Empire (1526–1858 AD)Maratha Empire (1674–1818 AD)Durrani Empire (1747–1823 AD)Sikh Empire (1799–1849 AD) 1505–1961: Colonial period[show]Portuguese India (1510–1961 AD)Dutch India (1605–1825 AD)Danish India (1620–1869 AD)French India (1759–1954 AD)Company Raj (1757–1858 AD)British Raj (1858–1947 AD)Partition of India (1947 AD) Other states (1102–1947)[show]Zamorin Kingdom (1102–1766 AD)Deva Kingdom (1200s–1300s AD)Chitradurga Kingdom (1300–1779 AD)Garhwal Kingdom (1358–1803 AD)Mysore Kingdom (1399–1947 AD)Keladi Kingdom (1499–1763 AD)Koch Kingdom (1515–1947 AD)Thondaiman Kingdom (1650–1948 AD)Madurai Kingdom (1559–1736 AD)Thanjavur Kingdom (1572–1918 AD)Marava Kingdom (1600–1750 AD)Sikh Confederacy (1707–1799 AD)Travancore Kingdom (1729–1947 AD) Kingdoms of Sri Lanka[show]Kingdom of Tambapanni (543–505 BC)Kingdom of Upatissa Nuwara (505–377 BC)Kingdom of Anuradhapura (377 BC–1017 AD)Kingdom of Ruhuna (200 AD)Polonnaruwa Kingdom (300–1310 AD)Kingdom of Dambadeniya (1220–1272 AD)Kingdom of Yapahuwa (1272–1293 AD)Kingdom of Kurunegala (1293–1341 AD)Kingdom of Gampola (1341–1347 AD)Kingdom of Raigama (1347–1415 AD)Kingdom of Kotte (1412–1597 AD)Kingdom of Sitawaka (1521–1594 AD)Kingdom of Kandy (1469–1815 AD)Portuguese Ceylon (1505–1658 AD)Dutch Ceylon (1656–1796 AD)British Ceylon (1815–1948 AD) Nation histories[show]AfghanistanBangladeshBhutanIndiaMaldivesNepalPakistanSri Lanka Regional histories[show]AssamBalochistanBengalBiharHimachal PradeshMaharashtraUttar PradeshPunjabNWFPOdishaSindhSouth IndiaTibet Specialised histories[show]CoinageDynastiesEconomyIndologyLanguageLiteratureMaritimeMilitaryPakistan StudiesScience & TechnologyTimeline v · t · e

The Three Crowned Kings refers to the triumvirate of the Chola, Chera and Pandya dynasties, which dominated politics of the ancient Tamil country, Tamilakam, which was made up of the regions of Chola Nadu, Chera Nadu and Pandya Nadu. The Pallavas found no mention as indigenous rulers as they are offshoot of the other kingdoms . The earliest Tamil literature which throws light on a region associated with the Pallavas is Ahananuru which identifies two Tiriyans — the elder Tiriyan in Gudur, Nellore district, with a kingdom extending to Tirupati or Thiruvengadam; and the younger Tiraiyan whose capital was Kanchipuram.[3] The Sangam work, Perumbanarruppatai, traces the line of the younger Tiriyan (also known as Ilam Tiriyan) to the Solar dynasty of Ikshvakus; later Tamil commentators identify him as the illegitimate child of a Chola king and a Naga princess.[3]

There are several communities in Kalahasti and Thirupathi area which were compensated to Andhra during state partition which belongs to Tondaiman clan, who are Tamils. PT Srinivasa Iyengar states 'Tondaiyar' means the "tribe whose symbol was the Tondai creeper".[4] Tondai or Coccinia indica is commonly known as Kōvai in Tamil in modern times, but the name Doṇḍe is the ordinary name for the plant in Telugu. However, Telugu did not exist during Pallava rule.[4] Synonyms of Doṇḍe, Tonde or Tondai (Coccinia indica) are Cephalandra indica and Coccinia grandis.

The Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of South Indian History Congress also notes: The word Tondai means a creeper and the term Pallava conveys a similar meaning.[5] Since Pallavas ruled in the territory extending from Bellary to Bezwada, it led to the probability of a theory that the Pallavas were a northern dynasty who having contracted marriages with princesses of the Andhra Dynasty inherited a portion of Southern Andhra Pradesh.[6]

KA Nilakanta Sastri postulated that Pallavas were descendants of a North Indian dynasty of Indian origin who moved down South, adopted local traditions to their own use, and named themselves after the land called Tondai as Tondaiyar.[5][7] KP Jayaswal also proposed a North Indian origin for them, putting forward the theory that the Pallavas were a branch of the Vakatakas.[5] The association with Vakatakas is corroborated by the fact that the Pallavas adopted imperial Vakataka heraldic marks, as is evident from Pallava insignia. The Pallavas had on their seal, the Ganga and Yamuna, known to be

Best Regards, M.Madhan mohan Chennai — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.177.233.178 (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

If that's true, then that information should probably go in the "History" section rather than the "Name" section. But thank you anyway for trying to improve the article!

nirvana (buddhism)

You said I didn't cite sources, but I did. And you claimed that I presented original research by drawing conclusions from multiple sources. But I didn't because I just talked about a single topic (what nirvana is) as discussed in multiple separate sources side by side. I didn't say, "I can derive the ultimate truth about nirvana" etc. I let the traditions and texts speak for themselves independently and didn't derive any new thing from them.

After reviewing again, it seems like you are right; I was premature in deleting your text. I'll restore it and fix some style problems. FenixFeather (talk) 06:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Oh, wow, thanks! Yeah, I'm happy with the way you presented it. I'm glad this worked out. Buh-bye.

Unsorted

Hi,

I will add the edit summary back.... Because I have a whole shelf of materials to add, so I'm a little bit rushing.

Thanks.

Hi FenixFeather,

I added the summary in the edit summary. I have a question, is this mandatory for all edits that are protected?

Thanks,

Sundios — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sundios (talk • contribs) 21:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

It's not mandated, just recommended :) I thought your edit was great! It's just that it helpful so that people can decide more easily whether they need to look at the edit or not! FenixFeather (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

"vishnu' edits

thank u my dear friend. i've noted ur point. will do for sure. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirtuh (talk • contribs) 06:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

edits on Zilla (Rapper)

I wanted to know what wasn't cited with Reliable sources so that I can add it. The page is great, but it's missing alot of information in regard to this particular artist...

Bk (76.30.237.2 (talk) 08:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC))

Armando Muniz

You made a mistake! I was preparing to cite it when you removed it! I was trying to figure out to make the "headline" correct. His name is Armando Muniz not Armando Mu`niz. Can you please return what I have written. I'm the chief lead writer for www.doghouseboxing.com. I will cite my site and my name...Thanks, John J. Raspanti — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.66.220.252 (talk) 08:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for stopping by. You can access the last version of the article before the revert here. If you press the edit button, you can also access the source of that version. See the tutorial I linked you previously for more information on how to use tools to help you cite your sources. Thanks! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 09:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetic history of the Iberian Peninsula. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

My images are deleted

Hi. I just inserted four valuable images about Chinese research forces in MH370 event. Unfortunately, the images are deleted today. I am expecting an explanation for this.

Thank you.

@Maxjiang000: I wasn't the one who deleted the images. You should contact User:WWGB instead. The reason he gave was "what's with the dominance of Chinese ship photos? This was a joint international venture". So maybe it was a little unbalanced to add so many images of the Chinese search technology. But thank you for trying to figure it out on talk pages rather than engaging in edit warring. Also, don't forget to sign your comments! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 15:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

MH370

Satellite data analysis was used to confirm that the aircraft crashed at sea. AAIB has confirmed this. - Thecodingproject (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

If that is true, then please cite your source. See WP:REF if you need help doing so. And sign your comments, please. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 02:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26716572 or practically any other news website. - Thecodingproject (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

If you look at the article talk page, there was a lot of discussion on this announcement; the consensus was that the summary not be changed merely because of the Prime Minister's announcement. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 02:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Well it was all speculation until now, but with all these sources including the AAIB and Malaysia airlines, all indicating the Inmarsat satellite data analysis it's decisive that is the fate of this flight and is factual as we know. – Thecodingproject (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

It's all good now, someone fixed the summary. In my opinion, it's far more concise and less awkward than "Crashed at sea, yet, not found." – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 02:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I reverted the edit as it removed a good chunk of information which the majority seems to deem viable, so any further edits from now we both seek consensus.. agreed? I know your doing this in good faith unlike a lot of others. – Thecodingproject (talk) 02:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your edit was never made with consensus in the first place, and I don't see any indication that the majority deemed your information "vital." I know you're really interested in editing this article, but you don't own this article. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 02:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Thecodingproject has made a couple more edits to the infobox, but I can live with them, if you can! thanks for your support. Lynbarn (talk)

@Lynbarn: Yeah, those seem relatively okay. As long as they don't bring back the other stuff the editors already decided to change. And thank you! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 22:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Thought I reinstated the other edit

Then he realized I was making a different edit. So he reverted it again thinking it was the other. Then realized.

I'm not engaging in any edit war. – Thecodingproject (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

@Thecodingproject: Okay, apologies if I didn't assume good faith. Just be careful when you edit. Be bold but not careless. Don't change things to something just because you have a personal preference for something, and check the talk page before you make very visible changes, e.g. to the infobox. Very likely the stuff in the infobox was changed for a reason since the last time you saw it. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 22:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Total siyapaa

I have sited the budget and world wide collection. but budget as per my added 12 sources is 80 Million indian Rupees not 180 Million indian Rupees. Collection world wide is 102 Million indian Rupees not 100 Million indian Rupees.

Few users on that article are pushing POV. They do not have any source to 180 Million Indian Rupees budget claim but they are rating 12 sources provided by me for 80 Million budget as low quality. Even if my 12 sources are low quality still they are better then un sourced and typo error claim of 180 instead of 80 million budget. Please help here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Total_Siyapaa&action=history . 39.32.206.224 (talk) 14:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

@39.32.206.224: Thank you for dropping by this page! It's better to work this out than engage in an edit war. I will look at it and see if I can get a talk page discussion going. If it really is a problem then external help will be needed. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 14:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I do not know what is going on . An user Darkness shine has warned me of edit war blocking as per some 3 revert rule but he himself has reverted me so many times. Please bring third party help. This all is like a game I am feeling threatened my inter net will be blocked. 39.32.206.224 (talk) 16:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I discussed the issue with Darkness shine. You do need to stop reverting. I will look for a reliable source on the figures and cite it so we can resolve the problem. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 17:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Many many thanks for your gracious help but I have commented on that talk page this, ( No i do not agree because 99% of references available on inter net say 80 Million Indian Rs (8 Crore) budget. I mean 13 sources added by me + 115 other sources which I never added please see.https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=Total+siyapaa+budget+8+crore&newwindow=1&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:y&sa=X&ei=jTgyU8KLHOWw0AWMroDQBA&ved=0CBoQpwUoBQ&biw=1366&bih=653. Some one also removed completely referenced 10 days box office world wide gross of 102 Million (10.2 Crore). I think no one is ready to listen and want to do what they want. Should i leave to put my effort to find so many references still rejected and bitten like this? ) 39.32.206.224 (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

@39.32.206.224: I feel like consensus supports the current state of the page. If you feel like the dispute is still not resolved, you can check the steps on WP:CONTENTDISPUTE and maybe ask for wider input from multiple editors (RfC request). I unfortunately cannot help anymore. I have no expertise in this topic area and thus cannot critically evaluate the reliability of one source as compared to another. The current compromise seems reasonable to me. – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 02:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Chaley Scott

I was trying to remove this page completely but am not sure how. I then deleted the content and you restored it. How do I delete or can you/someone do it for me? I am Chaley Scott and I want it removed. Thanks Chaley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaleyscott (talk • contribs) 04:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

@Chaleyscott: Hey Chaley. You should nominate the article for deletion. If there are potentially libelous claims, you can nominate it for speedy deletion. See WP:GD. Hope that helps! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 04:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi I want to nominate it for proposed deletion (not speedy). How do I do that? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaleyscott (talk • contribs) 04:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

@Chaleyscott: Here are the steps for nomination for deletion:

This section describes how to list articles and their associated talk pages for deletion. For pages that are not articles, list them at other appropriate deletion venues or use copyright violation where applicable. As well, note that deletion may not be needed for problems such as pages written in foreign languages, duplicate pages, and other cases. Use Wikipedia:Proposed mergers for discussion of mergers.

Only a registered, logged-in user can complete steps II and III. (Autoconfirmed registered users can also use the Twinkle tool to make nominations.) If you are unregistered, you should complete step I, note the justification for deletion on the article's talk page, then post a message at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion requesting that someone else complete the process.

You must sign in to nominate pages for deletion. If you do not sign-in, or you edit anonymously, you will get stuck part way through the nomination procedure.

• To nominate multiple related pages for deletion, follow the multi-page deletion nomination procedure.
• To nominate a single page for deletion, you can use Twinkle, or follow these three steps:

I – Put the deletion tag on the article. Insert {{subst:afd1}} at the top of the article. Do not mark the edit as minor. If this article has been nominated before, use {{subst:afdx|2nd}} or {{subst:afdx|3rd}} etc. Include in the edit summary AfD: Nominated for deletion; see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NominationName]]. replacing NominationName with the name of the page being nominated. Publish the page. The NominationName is normally the article name (PageName), but if it has been nominated before, use "PageName (2nd nomination)" or "PageName (3rd nomination)" etc.)

II – Create the article's deletion discussion page. The resulting AfD box at the top of the article should contain a link to "Preloaded debate" in the AfD page. Click that link to open the article's deletion discussion page for editing. Some text and instructions will appear. You can do it manually as well: Click the link saying "deletion discussion page" to open the deletion-debate page. Insert this text: {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ Replace PageName with the name of the page, Category with a letter from the list M, O, B, S, W, G, T, F, and P to categorize the debate, and Why the page should be deleted with the reasons the page should be deleted. If appropriate, inform members of the most relevant WikiProjects through one or more "deletion sorting lists". Then add a {{subst:delsort|<topic>|<signature>}} template to the nomination, to insert a note that this has been done. Use an edit summary such as Creating deletion discussion for [[PageName]]. Publish the page.

III – Notify users who monitor AfD discussions. Open the articles for deletion log page for editing. At the top of the list on the log page (there's a comment indicating the spot), insert:{{subst:afd3 | pg=NominationName}} Replace NominationName appropriately (use "PageName", "PageName (2nd nomination)", etc.) Link to the discussion page in your edit summary: Adding [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NominationName]]. Publish the page. Consider letting the authors know on their talk page by adding: {{subst:Afd notice|Page name}} ~~~~ If this is not the first nomination, add a second parameter with the NominationName (use "PageName (2nd nomination)" etc.): {{subst:Afd notice|PageName|NominationName}} ~~~~

Hope that helps! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 05:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

What makes you believe that posting another song of the same title for "revelation" is inappropriate when there are already a few there? -Matty McCloud

Please comment on Talk:List of common coordinate transformations

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of common coordinate transformations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

So why didn't you just remove the link to youtube that I posted and left the rest? I DID have a link set up to the black veil brides Wikipage in the appropriate section. I apologize for putting an external link, it is my 1st time editing a wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.247.79 (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

@74.65.247.79: In that case, feel free to add it back :) I must have not noticed the legitimate link! Sorry! If it seems like it's the right thing to do, usually it's okay to be WP:BOLD because someone can always undo it! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 06:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)