|
User talk:FcsuperWelcome! Hello, Fcsuper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place
minor barnstar
Links in the article BibleJust want you to know, a long list of internal links has recently been deleted from the article Bible because they basically all served the same purpose and were therefore redundant. If you wish to insert an additional link, I suggest you make your case on Talk:Bible before adding the link. Thank you. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 19:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC) BibleI am all for compromise, but changing Jewish to Judaism doesn't solve the problem you seem to be concerned with - at best it is semantics, at worst it actually is worse because something can be Jewish (books by IB Singer, for example) without being associated with a religion called "Judaism." which is why I reverted. Slrubenstein | Talk 16:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
No. I don't know what went wrong, my intention was to rever only one edit of yours! Slrubenstein | Talk 17:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Tech CoastThere were some coding problems in the AfD discussion. I fixed it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 23:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks! -- fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) 00:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Tags moving in "Jehovah's Witnesses" articleI'm just new here. I didn't see the previous tag was there. They do need to be in there, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandmelon (talk • contribs) 05:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Re: 3RRI am currently trying to get discussion about edits made by Cmmmm, who has so far not co-operated in the proper process for resolving the dispute at the Controversy page. As regards Mandmelon, though I disagree with some of her arguments, I do agree with her approach.--Jeffro77 (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) if you need help with your reports just leave me a blog.--Mindoshawn (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC) November 2008
Merge discussionOne of the articles that you have been involved in editing, Token-object reading, has been proposed for a merge with Psychometry. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. - Steve3849 11:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC) I'm afraid we have a bit of a problem. Just because the entries aren't explicit as to their importance, doesn't mean we remove them. In fact, it is just the opposite; you're supposed to look at the source and expand the entry. I've restored the entries you've removed because these deletions don't make any sense and I'm having trouble understanding why you removed them. Please continue the discussion on the talk page. Viriditas (talk) 07:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Continuing to delete items from a list without trying to merge them per the discussion on the talk page is not helpful. One of the items you recently deleted was discussed while the other was not. Further, the rationale you provided in the edit summary was somewhat strange, as the date of publication is used as a historical data point on Wikipedia, such as in discipline by year lists. Here, we are talking about the food history of the burrito. If you are willing to help research and write the history section of the burrito article, great, otherwise, these edits are not helpful. Please remember that there is no strict, black and white rule that we use when we determine the merit of inclusion, but rather a flexible, shades of gray approach that requires looking at the big picture. It may help to use the talk page to describe your own vision of the timeline article, using other lists as support. Viriditas (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
ANI noticeHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Fcsuper. Thank you. —Viriditas (talk) 05:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC) ViriditasPlease stop pointing out his misbehavior on the article talk page. If his behavior is bothering you, the ANI is open. It's clear that confronting him with his own misbehavior only makes the situation worse [2]. --Ronz (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
SpaceClaimThanks for the help on the SpaceClaim page. Look any better now? Bcourter (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC) bcourter New Page Patrol survey
HeyIn an attempt to get past the impasse that has been reached re the capitalisation of I in intro on the Star Trek into Darkness article, I have created two additional sub-sections where users can put their for/against argument comments in without getting caught up in Beating a dead horse. These sections are purely for providing reasons and not for arguing back and forth, although discussions are welcome to continue in the above section. If you could come and give your view that would be great. MisterShiney ✉ 21:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Yield sign Straw PollSince you were involved in the move discussion for Yield sign, please checkout the straw poll over at Talk:Yield sign#Proposal to close discussion and share your thoughts. Thanks Tiggerjay (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Orphaned non-free media (File:SolidWorks logo.png)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 13Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Model-based definition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Hi, December 2015
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Fcsuper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Nomination of 888 (band) for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/888 (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 01:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)  The file File:Broomfield-colorado flag.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
){kind=link}
