|
User talk:Faizhaider/Archive 19
Archive From MAY 2013 to AUGUST 2013 Invitation to vote on an articlehello. since you are an editor of the article Ammar ibn Yasir, would you be interested in voting for it to make it a featured article or not? thank you for your time Grandia01 (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC) WP:FOOD Needs You!Hi there Faizhaider! I've noticed you have yourself listed as a member of the Food and Drink Wikiproject. Unfortunately it looks like the project has been slowly sliding into inactivity except for a couple of people. That makes me a sad potato, and nobody likes a sad potato amirite? If you'd like to turn my frown upside down, can you do two small things? First off, go here and add {{Tick}} ( Second, go to the project talkpage and participate in a discussion about how to make the project more active, and how to go about making articles in our area of interest a lot better. You don't want to make me cry, do you? Potatoes have a lot of eyes you know. So come on, join in! :) — The Potato Hose 18:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC) Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
Inglish89653242 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.186.232 (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 5Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sufi Comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Better ideaHey man, I think Sa.vakilian had a better idea than AfD for sorting out the hadith article mess. Check out my talk page - I think his suggestion might be the way to go and given that you're active and take an interest, we will need your help if we go that route. MezzoMezzo (talk) 12:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Requesting Your Mediation, PleaseAs Salaam Alaykum, I would like to formally request a respected WP editor (such as yourself) to mediate in the Muawiyah I article page between my own personal efforts at improving the article to give it a three-dimensional, and above all, an ACCURATE historiographical presentation of traditional (mainly Sunni) standard Islamic literature. I have, as of recently, been under what seems to me, unfair double standards being applied by fellow WP editors Toddy1, and just within the past 24 hours, MezzoMezzo. I would sincerely like if you can find the time to read through the discussions in the Muawiyah I Talk Page (I know they are rather lengthy), between myself (Flagrantedelicto) and fellow WP editors/users Johnleeds1, Toddy1, and now MezzoMezzo. I feel that there is unfair accusations and implications toward me, while I feel that there is a clear double standard being applied in the way the article has been presented. I am now involved in, what appears to be, an unwanted edit war with MezzoMezzo. But please READ the discussion in the Muawiyah I Talk Page first and foremost, so that you may get a clear picture as to what is transpiring and my own serious concerns in regards to this matter. I am concerned with the misrepresentation of predominantly Classical Sunni literature being labelled Shi'ite POV and being rejected even though they are bonafide cited sources. What has been happening is that what is essentially Salafi/Wahhabi-influenced POV of Caliph Muawiyah I is being misrepresented and misleadingly labelled as SUNNI perspective. Again, if you read through the discussion in the Muawiyah I Talk Page, you will get a clear picture of why I get the impression that WP editors Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo are really not manifesting an impartial participation toward the subject of Muawiyah I. Will much appreciate it if you mediate in this matter. Flagrantedelicto (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC) I am a declared SUNNI. And I would like if you could carefully read through the Muawiyah I Talk Page of the current archive. I know it is a lot of material, but it is essential for you to fully understand the nature of the obvious double standard and partiality being applied by both the above MezzoMezzo, as well as Toddy1. Both of whom are essentially voicing the same positions. As for Johnleeds1, we did come to a mutual understanding which has common ground after differences of perspectives and some attrition. MezzoMezzo and Toddy1 (whom I get the strong feeling are together on this), appear to be a different matter. I would highly appreciate it. And thanks for responding. Flagrantedelicto (talk) 09:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mir Babar Ali Anis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Edit war on Muawiyah II was just going to let you know that I had posted over there but got distracted. When I wrote out the reply I typed your name using the {{user}} template but with a ":" rather than the "|". Doing that sets of the spam filter for two websites that use variations on your user name. Using the "|" works, Faizhaider (talk · contribs), though. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Interested?I was wondering whether you'd be interested in mentoring Johnleeds. He has frequently misrepresented sources and also violates due weight and riginal research. Pass a Method talk 07:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC) First Fitna and Muawiyah IWhile I did not cite any references for editing the First Fitna, I did add references for the editing I made for Muawiyah I. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.195.9.142 (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC) This is a replica of an entry posted in the Muawiyah I Talk Page. It most likely will be deleted there by the WP editors, so One of my concerns is that some of the citations on this article and the one on Yazid I are really second-hand (though claimed to be first-hand). If the editor who put them there does not really know what is in the sources, he/she cannot know whether he/she faithfully represents what they say. For example, on the page on Yazid I, Flagrantedelicto added a bit saying that Tabari Volume 19 said that Yazid was a tyrant - but when I checked Tabari Volume 19 it said that rebels being besieged by government forces referred to Yazid as a tyrant. This comment by Toddy1 is a complete lie because in this link to the excerpt to Tabari’s Volume 19 (which is a cited source in the Yazid I article), there is unequivocal documentation that Yazid I was indeed thought of as a tyrant by the chronicler Tabari. Right from the Foreward, it is stated that Tabari wrote this piece in opposition to the persona of Caliph Yazid I. See link below.[1] And this comment by MezzoMezzo in referring to Toddy1’s original lie, is consequently a worthless conjecture based upon a bald-faced lie. --since you already uncovered at least one instance of academic dishonesty - will take forever. Toddy1 further did not inform anyone of the slight edit that Toddy1 did by adding a brand new link to the Shia Pen website, when the old link to Answering-Ansar.org was dead for some time now. This was to obviously plant supporting “evidence” to assist MezzoMezzo’s BAD FAITH accusation that there are copy-pasted citations in the Muawiyah I article. Granted if one does internet research, one will discover (as I had) that Answering-Ansar.org has since become Shia Pen. But the fact that Toddy1 entered this link to support MezzoMezzo’s suspicious suppositions is questionable in itself, as it was done very discreetly and Toddy1 didn’t deem it fit to inform anyone of it. Here is a bibliography of references: Is from al-Tabari, Abu Ja'far Muh. b. Jarir, ---, Ta'rikh al-rusul wa 'l-muluk, Ed. M. de Goeje, Leiden, 1879-1901. Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Ahmad b. Nur al-Din (d. 852/1449) Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, 12 vols., Hyderabad, Deccan: Da'irat al-Ma'arif al- Nizamiyya, 1325-27/1907-10. Volume 5 page 110 Lisan al-Mizan, 7 vols., Hyderabad, Deccan: Da'irat al-Ma'arif al-Nizamiyya, 1329-31/1911-13. Ibn Sa'd, Muhammad (d. 4 Jum. II 230/16 Feb. 845 C.E.), Kitab Al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, 9 vols. in 15, ed. by E. Sachau, Leiden, 1905-1940. Volume 4 page 134-135 Ibn al-Athir, 'Usd al-ghaba fi ma'rifat al-sahaba', in al-Matba's al-Wahbiya, ed. and compiled by Moustapha Wahbiar, Vol. V, 1920 al-Tabari, Abu Ja'far Muhammad b. Jarir. Tarikh al-Rusul wal-Muluk. 5th edition. Edited by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim. Cairo, Dar al-Ma'arif, 1977. Ibn Athir, 'Izz al-Din Abi al-Hasan 'Ali b. Muhammad. al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh. Vols. 1 & 3. Beirut: Dar Sadir, 1965. Ibn Athir, 'Izz al-Din Abi al-Hasan 'Ali b. Muhammad. Usd al-Ghaba fî Ma'rifat al-Sahaba. Vol. 1. Cairo: al-Sha'b, 1970. Ibn Hisham, Abu Muhammad 'Abd al-Malik. al-Sira al-Nabawiyya. Vol. 1, edited by 'Umar 'Abd al-Salam Tadmuri. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-'Arabi, 1987. Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad. The Life of Muhammad. Translated into English by Alfred Guillaume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955. Ibn Kathir, Isma 'il Abu al-Fida'. al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya. Vols. 1, 2 & 3, edited by Ahmad Abu Muslim et al. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, 1985. Ibn Kathir, Isma 'il Abu al-Fida'. al-Sira al-Nabawiyya. Vol. 1, edited by Mustafa 'Abd al-Wahid. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al- 'Arabi, 1980. The cited sources in the Muawiyah I article which do not portray the Umayyad caliph in an unfavorable light are not so much copy-pastes, but widely circulated bibliography of Classical Sunni literature. Names of authors and works whom neither Toddy1 nor MezzoMezzo can pronounce. MezzoMezzo is not only a tinhorn “editor”, but a two-faced, underhanded, deceptive liar. One who proved to be arguably the biggest wimp in WP. Rather than accepting an invite to a debate to substantiate his arrogant claim of knowing the Arabic language better than most native speakers, he evaded and eluded the debate. Knowing full well that his bluff was called out. The following statement by MezzoMezzo could imply that his “In-Laws” are native Arabic speakers and his sources for his knowledge in Arabic— Between my in-laws and I, we have original Arabic copies of many of the sources listed; many more are available with reliable English translations on Google Books This article seriously needs the full participation and involvement of a WP editor such as Faiz Haider, Seyyed, and some active members of the Shi'a Islam task force. Since there is truly an absence (of not only Old School/traditional Sunni Muslim WP editors), but a genuinely neutral, objective team of editors who are working on the Muawiyah I article. The efforts of Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo are essentially worthless, as not only are they latent pro-Muawiyah POV pushers of the Salafi/Wahhabi ideology, they are unethical, deceptive, and unscrupulous. What is also evident with the editors Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo, is that there exists in them this irreverent breed of “converts” to Islam of Western culture who do not have Eastern sensitivities when propagating Salafi ideology. Who knows what ethnic hemisphere Johnleeds1 belongs to, but this editor seemed to be broadening his scope in understanding the authentic Classical Sunni Islamic literature. However, a Faiz Haider and the neutral CambridgeBayWeather are seriously need to keep the deceptive hypocrites Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo in check. As mentioned earlier in this talk page, the biggest masquerade and charade by proponents of Salafism, is that many conceal it under the label of Sunni Islam. Since the Sunni are the majority, there has been an unrelenting effort to convert mainstream Sunnis to Salafism. And due to the slow but steady awakening of mainstream Sunnis of the methods and tactics of the Salafi ideology, the Salafis disguise themselves under the Sunni label. Consequently, they are relentlessly misrepresenting Sunni Islam and deliberately misleading the public into thinking Salafism is Sunni Islam…When this is most certainly not the case. Wikipedia has been the victim of this deceit and encroachment. And if there are any WP Muslim editors who have any sense of integrity, self-respect, and personal honour, then they should at least try to rectify this misleading representation. In Saudi Arabia, the homeland and birthplace of Salafism, most all published works of Classical Islamic authors are censored and edited. Anything that does not fit in with the Salafi/Wahhabi aqeedah or religious conviction, is edited out. This is a fact to which anyone who is a non-Salafi, and who has travelled and lived in KSA knows. The Salafis have spent the past half-century vigourously establishing publishing companies all throughout North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Arabian Peninsula (including the Persian Gulf states), Syria, Jordan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, India, and Pakistan, to publish their edited (i.e., tampered) versions of Classical Sunni literature so it fits in with their aqeedah. That is why the earlier publications of Classical Sunni literature from the first half of the 20th Century (not the latter half), and the 18th and 19th Century publications carry the authentic, untampered works. The indefinitely blocked editor Flagrante Delicto was blocked for the specific reason by the underhanded, unscrupulous, and cowardly efforts of Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo. MezzoMezzo is counting on this very statement he made to deceptively manipulate the Muawiyah I article— Remember, most Wikipedia editors have never heard of any of these books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.150.223.177 (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Muawiyah I ArticleThis is a replica of an entry posted in the Muawiyah I Talk Page. It most likely will be deleted there by the WP editors, so I replicated it in this talk page. Please don't mind. There will be no further posts in this talk page by me after this. One of my concerns is that some of the citations on this article and the one on Yazid I are really second-hand (though claimed to be first-hand). If the editor who put them there does not really know what is in the sources, he/she cannot know whether he/she faithfully represents what they say. For example, on the page on Yazid I, Flagrantedelicto added a bit saying that Tabari Volume 19 said that Yazid was a tyrant - but when I checked Tabari Volume 19 it said that rebels being besieged by government forces referred to Yazid as a tyrant. This comment by Toddy1 is a complete lie because in this link to the excerpt to Tabari’s Volume 19 (which is a cited source in the Yazid I article), there is unequivocal documentation that Yazid I was indeed thought of as a tyrant by the chronicler Tabari. Right from the Foreward, it is stated that Tabari wrote this piece in opposition to the persona of Caliph Yazid I. See link below-- The History of Al-Tabari: Vol. XIX (The Caliphate of Yazid bin Muawiyah). Al-Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir. (English Translation by I. K. A. Howard). State University of New York Press. http://www.scribd.com/doc/114186278/Karbala. (Pg. 7). http://www.alsunnahfoundation.org/Academy/Karbala.pdf. And this comment by MezzoMezzo in referring to Toddy1’s original lie, is consequently a worthless conjecture based upon a bald-faced lie. --since you already uncovered at least one instance of academic dishonesty - will take forever. Toddy1 further did not inform anyone of the slight edit that Toddy1 did by adding a brand new link to the Shia Pen website, when the old link to Answering-Ansar.org was dead for some time now. This was to obviously plant supporting “evidence” to assist MezzoMezzo’s BAD FAITH accusation that there are copy-pasted citations in the Muawiyah I article. Granted if one does internet research, one will discover (as I had) that Answering-Ansar.org has since become Shia Pen. But the fact that Toddy1 entered this link to support MezzoMezzo’s suspicious suppositions is questionable in itself, as it was done very discreetly and Toddy1 didn’t deem it fit to inform anyone of it. Here is a bibliography of references: Is from al-Tabari, Abu Ja'far Muh. b. Jarir, ---, Ta'rikh al-rusul wa 'l-muluk, Ed. M. de Goeje, Leiden, 1879-1901. Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani, Ahmad b. Nur al-Din (d. 852/1449) Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, 12 vols., Hyderabad, Deccan: Da'irat al-Ma'arif al- Nizamiyya, 1325-27/1907-10. Volume 5 page 110 Lisan al-Mizan, 7 vols., Hyderabad, Deccan: Da'irat al-Ma'arif al-Nizamiyya, 1329-31/1911-13. Ibn Sa'd, Muhammad (d. 4 Jum. II 230/16 Feb. 845 C.E.), Kitab Al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, 9 vols. in 15, ed. by E. Sachau, Leiden, 1905-1940. Volume 4 page 134-135 Ibn al-Athir, 'Usd al-ghaba fi ma'rifat al-sahaba', in al-Matba's al-Wahbiya, ed. and compiled by Moustapha Wahbiar, Vol. V, 1920 al-Tabari, Abu Ja'far Muhammad b. Jarir. Tarikh al-Rusul wal-Muluk. 5th edition. Edited by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim. Cairo, Dar al-Ma'arif, 1977. Ibn Athir, 'Izz al-Din Abi al-Hasan 'Ali b. Muhammad. al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh. Vols. 1 & 3. Beirut: Dar Sadir, 1965. Ibn Athir, 'Izz al-Din Abi al-Hasan 'Ali b. Muhammad. Usd al-Ghaba fî Ma'rifat al-Sahaba. Vol. 1. Cairo: al-Sha'b, 1970. Ibn Hisham, Abu Muhammad 'Abd al-Malik. al-Sira al-Nabawiyya. Vol. 1, edited by 'Umar 'Abd al-Salam Tadmuri. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-'Arabi, 1987. Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad. The Life of Muhammad. Translated into English by Alfred Guillaume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955. Ibn Kathir, Isma 'il Abu al-Fida'. al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya. Vols. 1, 2 & 3, edited by Ahmad Abu Muslim et al. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, 1985. Ibn Kathir, Isma 'il Abu al-Fida'. al-Sira al-Nabawiyya. Vol. 1, edited by Mustafa 'Abd al-Wahid. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al- 'Arabi, 1980. The cited sources in the Muawiyah I article which do not portray the Umayyad caliph in an unfavorable light are not so much copy-pastes, but widely circulated bibliography of Classical Sunni literature. Names of authors and works whom neither Toddy1 nor MezzoMezzo can pronounce. MezzoMezzo is not only a tinhorn “editor”, but a two-faced, underhanded, deceptive liar. One who proved to be arguably the biggest wimp in WP. Rather than accepting an invite to a debate to substantiate his arrogant claim of knowing the Arabic language better than most native speakers, he evaded and eluded the debate. Knowing full well that his bluff was called out. The following statement by MezzoMezzo could imply that his “In-Laws” are native Arabic speakers and his sources for his knowledge in Arabic— Between my in-laws and I, we have original Arabic copies of many of the sources listed; many more are available with reliable English translations on Google Books This article seriously needs the full participation and involvement of a WP editor such as Faiz Haider, Seyyed, and some active members of the Shi'a Islam task force. Since there is truly an absence (of not only Old School/traditional Sunni Muslim WP editors), but a genuinely neutral, objective team of editors who are working on the Muawiyah I article. The efforts of Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo are essentially worthless, as not only are they latent pro-Muawiyah POV pushers of the Salafi/Wahhabi ideology, they are unethical, deceptive, and unscrupulous. What is also evident with the editors Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo, is that there exists in them this irreverent breed of “converts” to Islam of Western culture who do not have Eastern sensitivities when propagating Salafi ideology. Who knows what ethnic hemisphere Johnleeds1 belongs to, but this editor seemed to be broadening his scope in understanding the authentic Classical Sunni Islamic literature. However, a Faiz Haider and the neutral CambridgeBayWeather are seriously need to keep the deceptive hypocrites Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo in check. As mentioned earlier in this talk page, the biggest masquerade and charade by proponents of Salafism, is that many conceal it under the label of Sunni Islam. Since the Sunni are the majority, there has been an unrelenting effort to convert mainstream Sunnis to Salafism. And due to the slow but steady awakening of mainstream Sunnis of the methods and tactics of the Salafi ideology, the Salafis disguise themselves under the Sunni label. Consequently, they are relentlessly misrepresenting Sunni Islam and deliberately misleading the public into thinking Salafism is Sunni Islam…When this is most certainly not the case. Wikipedia has been the victim of this deceit and encroachment. And if there are any WP Muslim editors who have any sense of integrity, self-respect, and personal honour, then they should at least try to rectify this misleading representation. In Saudi Arabia, the homeland and birthplace of Salafism, most all published works of Classical Islamic authors are censored and edited. Anything that does not fit in with the Salafi/Wahhabi aqeedah or religious conviction, is edited out. This is a fact to which anyone who is a non-Salafi, and who has travelled and lived in KSA knows. The Salafis have spent the past half-century vigourously establishing publishing companies all throughout North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Arabian Peninsula (including the Persian Gulf states), Syria, Jordan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, India, and Pakistan, to publish their edited (i.e., tampered) versions of Classical Sunni literature so it fits in with their aqeedah. That is why the earlier publications of Classical Sunni literature from the first half of the 20th Century (not the latter half), and the 18th and 19th Century publications carry the authentic, untampered works. The indefinitely blocked editor Flagrante Delicto was blocked for the specific reason by the underhanded, unscrupulous, and cowardly efforts of Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo. MezzoMezzo is counting on this very statement he made to deceptively manipulate the Muawiyah I article— Remember, most Wikipedia editors have never heard of any of these books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.150.223.177 (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the heads upHi, First of all thanks for the tips and pointers. I am new to wikipedia so I didn't really know how to sight my sources. Thank you for your guidance. I am not finished constructing the Malik Al-Ashtar page (still have a lot more information about him that needs to be known). In addition, I am planning on bringing more sources to add to the article. I have a quick question, you said that ""there is lot of content without any reference" which ones do you want me to reference because most of the sentences are referenced unlike the vary previous one (before I started editing). Furthermore, I have provided a link to the lecture which is audio not video (however I can link video if you want). As for the book by Sayyid, Kamāl I have linked an ebook version to the external links, so that people could read it for themselves if they don't believe the content. I understand that there are some linking issues that i will fix but overall I know that the references are reliable (and valid). Almost every sentence is referenced but if you want more I can provide it. By the way thank you for reverting Fadrulhisham edit. And also I have a question. There is a article about one of the companions of Imam Ali who's name is spelled wrong. The wikipedia title is Meesam Tammar. However, his name was Maythem Al-Tammar. Tammar was not his last name it was a title that means the date seller or palm tree because he use to sell dates. The article uses the right spelling but the title is wrong. Since I am new to wikipedia I don't know how to change it. But I have suggested in the talk page to change the article title. Once again thanks for the help and suggestion. I will improve the page (Malik Al-Ashtar). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabranos (talk • contribs) 01:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State Armed Police Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SLR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Disambiguation link notification for July 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Thank youThanks for the info and teaching meZabranos (talk) 19:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Conrad De Vito, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Italian, Capuchin and St. Joseph's Cathedral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Disambiguation link notification for July 17Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC) QuestionJust a quick question, does wikipedia allow dialogs, quotations, and/or primary sources? Thank you for your time. Zabranos (talk) 05:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The dialogs come from the book and lecture that its referenced to, word for word. Qwyrxian says wikipedia does not allow dialogs or primary sources at all but I just want to confirm that with you. If not then I'll regretfully remove it. Even though I believe that the diolog should not be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabranos (talk • contribs) 11:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC) File:Jammu-Kashmir-Maharaja's-flag-1846-1936.gif listed for deletionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jammu-Kashmir-Maharaja's-flag-1846-1936.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Article being constructedFaiz thanks for your help. Faiz please don't remove the primary sources yet from the article we are constructing. Leave the tags: non-primary source needed, third-party source needed, tags for the moment but don't remove the text yet. Wait until every one is free and we all be reviewing all the content and try to make sense of it. Thanks --Johnleeds1 (talk) 18:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Hi once againHi, Could you please move the article Abd Allah ibn Abbas to Abdullah ibn Abbas because its is misspelled. The proper spelling is Abdullah which means slave of Allah not Abd Allah. Abdullah is the proper arabic as well. Thanks! And keep up the hard work, love to read your edits. Zabranos (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shia Islam in Africa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malagasy and Lebanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Thank youThanks so much for the source! I will make sure to include it in the article. If you come across more sources could you please let me know. And thanks once again. Hope to hear from you soon. Zabranos (talk) 11:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
