|
User talk:Faizan/Archive 19
Editing News #2—2016Editing News #2—2016 Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter  It's quick and easy to insert a references list.  Place the cursor where you want to display the references list (usually at the bottom of the page). Open the "Insert" menu and click the "References list" icon (three books). If you are using several groups of references, which is relatively rare, you will have the opportunity to specify the group. If you do that, then only the references that belong to the specified group will be displayed in this list of references. Finally, click "Insert" in the dialog to insert the References list. This list will change as you add more footnotes to the page. You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor. Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Arabic and Indic scripts, and adapting the visual editor to the needs of the Wikivoyages and Wikisources. Recent changesThe visual editor is now available to all users at most Wikivoyages. It was also enabled for all contributors at the French Wikinews. The single edit tab feature combines the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. It has been deployed to several Wikipedias, including Hungarian, Polish, English and Japanese Wikipedias, as well as to all Wikivoyages. At these wikis, you can change your settings for this feature in the "Editing" tab of Special:Preferences. The team is now reviewing the feedback and considering ways to improve the design before rolling it out to more people. Future changesThe "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta. The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including: Arabic, Hindi, Thai, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Urdu, Persian, Bengali, Assamese, Aramaic and others. The team is working with the volunteer developers who power Wikisource to provide the visual editor there, for opt-in testing right now and eventually for all users. (T138966) The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. It will look like the visual editor, and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices around September 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list. Let's work together
If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 21:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 04 July 2016
Punjab edit-a-thon Hello friend, Eid Mubarak!
Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 05:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 21 July 2016
The Signpost: 04 August 2016
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
The Signpost: 06 September 2016
The Signpost: 29 September 2016
New newsletter for NotificationsHello You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia. That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements. Please subscribe! All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC) Editing News #3—2016Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia Did you know that you can easily re-arrange columns and rows in the visual editor?  Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row. You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor. Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support. Recent changes
Future changesThe visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic. The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list. Let's work togetherDo you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce. If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 14 October 2016
Asian 10,000 Challenge inviteHi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC) WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final resultsThe final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC) We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 4 November 2016
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Faizan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 4 November 2016
WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes. For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):
Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address. After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth. The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email). Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 22 December 2016
Merry, merry!From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 17 January 2017
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
Copyright problem on History of Gilgit-BaltistanMaterial you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03086530903538269. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be parphrased, and some was removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC) March 2017 WikiCup newsletterAnd so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:
The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles. So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent edit to Pakistan. You are, of course, free to edit any article on WP, including this one, but this article is in the midst of being copy-edited in response to a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. I began yesterday and will continue today. I would appreciate it if you would wait to make further edits until I finish copy-editing the article and post the GOCE template on the article's talk page. If you think the article has major problems regarding content and sourcing that should be addressed first, let me know and I will put the copy-edit request on hold. – Corinne (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
April 2017 You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 1947 Jammu massacres. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC) ARBIPA sanctions reminder This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Kautilya3 (talk) 08:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
CitationsHi there. Are you writing the citations in cite books format by hand? If you are, please consider using the: Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books. All you need to paste the URL of the book you are looking at in the Google Books page, and click "load." The page will then give you some choices (such as author name: straightforward or last/first etc, or citation style "cite book" or "citation" and it will automatically generate the reference tag, which in the case of the Google book you used, will give you: <ref name="KosinskiElahi2012">{{citation|last1=Kosinski|first1=L.A.|last2=Elahi|first2=K.M.|title=Population Redistribution and Development in South Asia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tGiSBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA6|date=6 December 2012|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-94-009-5309-3|page=6}}</ref> which is more complete, and quicker, than the one you have. It also changes the URL to the more neutral (books.google.com). I typically remove the date and month of publication, just leave the year, and sometime also shorten the publisher's name, in this case just to Springer. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Partition of IndiaPlease try to understand that this is a contentious page with a long history of nickel and diming by Indian and Pakistani editors. Such a page require a high level history; otherwise everyone and their brother will find some author, perfectly reliable, who is seemingly supporting their favorite family prejudice or nationalist history. I'm not saying you are doing that, but that you are opening the page to that. The page requires high-level source, preferably well worn textbooks that have already been vetted somewhat for UNDUE etc. It is true that after the 1946 elections, the League's case became stronger, but to cherry pick words such as "plebiscite" is to distort the history. The truth is that the Congress won 90% of the seats in the Central Legislature that were not reserved for Muslim candidates and formed the Central Government. Further, it won absolute majorities in eight out of 11 provinces, including NWFP, and formed provincial governments there. The League did not win an absolute majority in any state, but did win the vast majority of the Muslim vote, including all 30 seats reserved for Muslims in the Central Legislative Assembly. You can't do Google searches for a particular view point, or worse yet, a particular politically charged expression and then add that viewpoint or expression by adding the sources you found in your search. Otherwise, the page will become a mess. You have to understand a topic in some depth first, as treated in the high-level sources, and then summarize it. There are Wikipedia pages Indian general election, 1945 and Indian provincial elections, 1946 and Nehru was he prime minster of the Interim Government of India until August 1947. Your edits need to be in consonance with other Wikipedia pages. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC) PakistanHello, Faizan - I saw your recent edits to Pakistan. Of course you are completely free to edit the article, but I thought I'd mention that the article is still in the middle of a copy-edit by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors in response to a request made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. If you read Talk:Pakistan#There is a lot of blue going on in parts of this article, or User talk:Corinne#Mind if I help out on Pakistan?, you'll see that Jasphetamine offered to help me (it's a long article, and I've been rather busy), and we agreed to complete different sections of it. I just finished my sections today and handed it over to Jasphetamine. But, of course, if you hadn't seen either of these two discussions, you wouldn't have known that. If, for some reason, s/he does not take up the rest of the article in a day or two, I will finish the sections that I did not do. Perhaps you wouldn't mind waiting until the copy-edit is finished before making further edits. Your input is, of course, entirely welcome. Best regards, – Corinne (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gilgit-Baltistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zorawar Singh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Partition of IndiaI have added my comments at Talk:PoI. If you think there is consensus, please add your text to the article body; otherwise somebody else will :) Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Editing News #1—2017Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter Did you know that you can review your changes visually?  In visual mode, you will see additions, removals, new links, and formatting highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.  Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.  The wikitext diff is the same diff tool that is used in the wikitext editors and in the page history. You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor. Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and adding the new visual diff tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving the visual diff tool. Recent changesA new wikitext editing mode is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. The 2017 wikitext editor has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. Go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures to enable the ⧼Visualeditor-preference-newwikitexteditor-label⧽. A new visual diff tool is available in VisualEditor's visual mode. You can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. More features will be added to this later. In the future, this tool may be integrated into other MediaWiki components. [8] The team have added multi-column support for lists of footnotes. The Other changes:
Future changes
If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC) Blocked for sockpuppetry
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
 Faizan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) UTRS appeal #18484 was submitted on Jun 10, 2017 12:47:16. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 12:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC) The Signpost: 23 June 2017
WikiCup 2017 July newsletterThe third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine. Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed. As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed). If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC) The Signpost: 15 July 2017
Nomination for deletion of Template:East Pakistan
Unblock request Faizan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Hi. I would like to bring this to attention that my account was hacked by an Australian user User:Towns Hill in 2017. I admit that my account security was insufficient and that my passwords were stolen and the ID was hijacked. I apologize to the Wikipedia community, This was my last edit on 4 July 2016. I have been too depressed due to the block in particular and life in general. I and Towns Hill are not the same individual and that can be seen with the difference of style in edits starting 2017. All the socks belonged to Towns Hill but since Towns Hill was associated with me, I had to get all the users as my sock puppets. I am a responsible user and that was evident by 5 years of my editing history. I never had socked nor I did this time, only the fact that Towns Hill hacked my account got me maligned. I know that does not clear me of SP, but I just wanted to tell it to the community. Nevertheless, I take full responsibility that my account was used inappropriately and against the Wikipedia policies. I assure the Wikipedia community that I have got everything back in control and have reset the password. I request you kindly for a second chance please. I assure you that this will not happen again and I will take care of it in the future. Please give me a second chance. Faizan (talk) 13:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: I'm sorry, but once an account has been compromised it can not be unblocked. For one thing, we have no way of telling if this is the original user talking to us now or the hacker. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Operation Zarb-e-AzbOperation Zarb-e-Azb, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. I know you are blocked, but there are options for you to get unblocked or make a fresh start. I don't think this article will retain its status without your help so I hope you avail yourself of one of these options AIRcorn (talk) 05:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Islamic Greetings
Nomination of Shahzad Malik for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahzad Malik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzad Malik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC) Nomination of The Start and Restart of Play (association football) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Start and Restart of Play (association football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Start and Restart of Play (association football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prisencolin (talk) 19:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Asia challengeThe Asian 0.23%
|
