This is an archive of past discussions with User:Fade258. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Thanks for understanding. You made a comment at Draft:Will Reeve that YouTube is not a reliable source. Could you please correct your comment so that the writers of this draft don't think you think there is a problem? Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 02:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
WP:ATD-I clearly states that: "unilaterally moving articles to draft space ("draftifying") should generally be done only for newly created articles (as part of new page review or otherwise) or as the result of a deletion discussion. Incubation is not intended to be a "backdoor route to deletion"". The article was created in 2014, and if you have issues with the article take it to AFD. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 15:24, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations such as names of organizations or products need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.
For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for your guidance. I will remember this things when I report any user from next time. Best regards ! Fade258 (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD G13s
Hello, Fade258,
I've noticed that you have been tagging some stale drafts for CSD G13 deletion a little early. Please look at the page's edit history and do not tag drafts for deletion sooner than 6 months since the last human editor edit. You can find the drafts coming up for eligibility soonest at Category:AfC G13 eligible soon submissions. Thank you for your work. LizRead!Talk!20:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This is to bring to your notice that, i will be editing the Wiki page of Dr Kastutirangan as per his request. Most of the changes are based on his curriculum vitae which i have optioned from him and his "Space and Beyond" which is an biography book edited by BN Suresh, Springer Publication https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-33-6510-0. I will also be adding external references where and when necessary. If you need any additional information/clarifications please do flag it to me before you remove the content.
Cbsingai (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
CB Singai
First of all, Thanks for your contribution on Wikipedia. You had added huge bunk of information without providing sources. So, I removed that material. I knew that you are new to Wikipedia so don't get panic if your edits were reverted. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 02:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for you support Fade258, Support page you have sent is helpful. I have added the reference
Thanks to your recommendation, sir, I already edited the article and learned to put the references, if it is not too much trouble when you have time you can review it. Thank you very much and I am in your favor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seiyukaras (talk • contribs) 22:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Well done ! Thank you for your response. Keep editing and contribute on Wikipedia and I will review your draft soon. Please sign you post by using four tidles ~~~~. Fade258 (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Would appreciate some more feedback on citations issue for this page and how to improve for publication. Were more needed or were they set out incorrectly?
Many thanks,
Claire Leaf (talk) 04:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Request on 04:50:35, 22 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Claire Leaf
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi there, Fade258, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm pleased to see you intend to help us turn more red links into blue ones. I see you have already created several well presented stubs on women cricketers. In connection with further additions, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. You can use our Redlist index to find the names of women who might deserve to have biographies on Wikipedia. This includes a short crowd-sourced list on Nepal as well as one automatically created from Wikidata. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!
Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:
Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.
I notice that you added yourself to our 'host' list some while ago, but haven't had a chance to help out much yet. That's fine. But be aware that we do remove inactive hosts from time to time.
I will be there after 22 January this month. Currently, I am busy with my studies. So, I request you to not remove my name from that list. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 14:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Fade258. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Hi Fade258. Nice work with maintaining the various T20 articles, especially those on the Pakistan Super League! Your work makes a difference for readers who want to keep track of the latest. Mar4d (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
@Mar4d:, First of all, I would like to say thank you to you for giving me this PSL Barnstar. This Barnstar motivates me to do more regarding PSL related articles. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 14:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Nepal squad
Hi- Yes, I was in the middle of updating by clearing a dodgy reference and redoing the players based on the Kathmandu Post. You just added Sagar Dhakal to the bottom of the list when I had already readded him higher up :) Bs1jac (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Dirgha Man Chitrakar ===question about comments===
Hello Fade258,
I wanted to ask you about the article that you recently commented on 29 January 2022: Dirgha Man Chitrakar. I have added primary and secondary sources in the article that are reliable, verified and published. Dirgha Man is one of the most important early photographers in Nepal so I do think his post qualifies as a subject for a Wikipedia article. His photographs make the largest collection in Nepal so I am a bit confused when you say that the references mentioned do not show significant coverage but only in passing.
I have more newspaper and magazine articles, exhibitions and Nepali books that have covered Dirgha Man's work. I will add that to the article but I wanted clarification on your comment before I made these changes.
I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you so much.
Hi CristeenaC, Yes, You are free to add those sources if they are reliable. You can add newspaper and magazine articles, Nepali books that have covered Dirgha Man's work as you mentioned above. I will look those edits you have done in Dirgha Man Chitrakar. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 08:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Pandey (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Orphaned non-free image File:Lucknow Super Giants.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Lucknow Super Giants.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi. Firstly, thanks for all your work on IPL stuff. There's lots of really good stuff and I appreciate it.
The RCB colours thing, however, I'm going to disagree about. I ran the colours through two of the recommended colour combination checkers at Who Can use and Snook. Although it's closer than some of the others, both fail WCAG guidelines I'm afraid. I've reverted on the 2022 page (thanks for starting that) for now, but am, obviously, open to discussion on this. White would be a better choice for text colour if you really wanted to keep the background, although my feeling is that we might be better with the tables just being standard colours.
At some point I'd like to get to the nav boxes at the bottom of the pages and check the colour combos of all of those. I'll take that to the wikiprojects involved first I think. Unless you have any thoughts? Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
DanCherek, I am worried when it was marked as potential copyright violation where as I think I didn't did any mistake. So, I did that. Sorry for that from next time I will not repeat this mistake. Thank you!Fade258 (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding. You're right, it was a false positive, but it's always good to have someone other than you double-check the report. You can imagine what a mess it would become if everyone started marking their own edits as "no action needed". DanCherek (talk) 02:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Not that this matters to you, but I made the changes I did to Isaiah Battle's page because it happened literally earlier tonight. He was just drafted by the Pittsburgh Maulers but I'm more concerned with building the offensive tackle table on the 2022 USFL Draft page (since nobody seems to be doing it) than citing one of multiple references that were closely following the draft. Your reversion, therefore, was unnecessary since you, of all people, could've Googled the draft results yourself to link the reference accordingly rather than take the lazy way out and undo all of the changes I made to the page. Devious Diamondback (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Are you new to editing cricket articles? Didn't you see how other umpires are listed in the previous matches? Please edit before learning to edit properly. Human (talk) 07:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry, I should have explained in more depth - we list the umpires for the match in A-Z order of their surname, regardless of the CI scorecard. Much in the same way that we list debuts for international matches. LugnutsFire Walk with Me07:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
@Lugnuts, Thank you for your clarification and sorry for mistake. Can you tell me in the same way can we do that in domestic league's pages also? Fade258 (talk) 07:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
No worries. I don't tend to bother that much for the domestic side of things. The A-Z order important in international matches, as with the debut players it will determine their cap number. LugnutsFire Walk with Me07:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Okay, don't I came here to scold you. Lugnuts is kind enough to explain things, I'm not. I'm a hot headed person and you reverting my edits pissed me off more than the actual edit. Reversion like that are mostly for vandalism. Although by now you should've known how edit these things. Human (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey, as listed on the page Sarfaraz Ali, I replaced your edits on Career, with my own as I believe it includes more information and falls more under WP:GNG/WP:N. Hope you don't find my edit offensive.
Thanks for this. Seeing as the Ireland games are taking place in England (Bristol), I've redirected it to the Eng/SA article, with the info in there. LugnutsFire Walk with Me08:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Creating redirects for players who do not meet notability criteria
@Lugnuts: Hi both. I just wanted to ask if there is a reason why recently a few players in international series have been created as redirects back to the series in which they are first selected. I appreciate that in the recent Global Qualifier there were several players who meet notability criteria according to WP:CRIC (i.e. due to playing in a global qualifier), but there is little information about them and hence creating temporary redirects reduces the likelihood of somebody creating an article before enough info is found (and hence reducing the likelihood of deletion proposals). But for example Semo Kamea redirecting to 2021–22 Nepal T20I Tri-Nation Series seems unnecessary as he does not (yet) pass any notability requirements, and so should simply be non-linked text similar to many associate players. Bs1jac (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Bs1jac, That redirect was created by me as yes he was selected as first time and the source had clearly mentioned and it will notable if he played any matches in this series. So, I had created that page which was redirected. Fade258 (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes I added the squad, but the normal pattern is to leave the player unlinked UNTIL he/she meets notability. He will meet the criteria if he plays in one of the ODI matches (not the T20 series), but until then it cannot be assumed that a player will meet the criteria. Ps: thanks for your contributions by the way. Bs1jac (talk) 14:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed the link for Semo (the PNG guy, right), and thought it was a bit odd. For the Global Qualifier, I'd done some redirects once a player had played a match in the Qualifier itself. LugnutsFire Walk with Me15:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
I think I have done mistake on redirecting that page too early as I thought that the source was enough to redirect at that time. Fade258 (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
No worries - Lugnuts sums it up quite nicely... redirects can be created when a player (or umpire) features in a match which allows them to meet the criteria. Of course, at that you point you could just create the article; a redirect can be used at that stage if, for example, you are not sure there is enough info for a full page yet. Bs1jac (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Posting here for info the above-referenced AfC comment:
"On the basis that there is no indication of notability here, and that this article has previously been speedily deleted twice, deleted following AfD twice, as well as rejected already at AfC review, I am rejecting this again. PLEASE DO NOT RESUBMIT without comprehensively and conclusively demonstrating notability per WP:GNG beyond any reasonable doubt. Thank you," -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi DoubleGrazing, First of I would like to say thank you for reviewing this drafted article. Yes, I had submitted this draft for review indespite of knowing that this was already deleted through AFD process and resubmitted assuming that now she has passed the notability criteria. In the context of Nepal the references mentioned by me is reliable and films played by her is notable and won the award as well. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 13:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, a few points in response:
The sources either are reliable per WP:RS, or they're not; it's not dependent on the context (Nepalese or otherwise). In any case, it's the quality that matters, of not just the sources but of the coverage they provide.
The films may be notable, but unless she played leading roles in them (per WP:NACTOR), this doesn't confer inherited notability. The same goes for the award, which would have to be quite a major one to provide any notability.
Now, to some extent this is inevitably based on subjective interpretation and judgement, and I can only present my measured opinion; another reviewer might have a different take on things. But given the history of deletions and rejections, any further submission would have to be compellingly strong to stand a chance of not only passing AfC review but for any published article to actually remain live.
Hello, Fade258!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Rashida Beal
Hi! You were very fast in editing the newly created article. You spoiled my whole expanding work. Normally, editors wait some time to allow the creators complete their work. CeeGee15:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
I have nothing against your edits, your timing was not OK to me. You intervened in hurry. I lost my mass expansion when I tried to upload due to "Edit conflict". That was the problem. CeeGee06:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey! Could you give me your opinion on the most recent edits to Gujarat Titans? I'm wondering if it's another sock given the username and the edits they're making. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654517:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
=
No problem! I'll look over the most recent edits to the article and if they aren't meaningful/helpful I"ll just revert to before the sock. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654500:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello Fade258 -- I've declined these speedy requests. In the case of Draft:Haveli Shaikh Raju, always remember to check that the draft is actually literally blank -- in this case there was text hidden by accidental removal of the html hidden text delimiter. Draft:TPL Corp doesn't meet my threshold for G11, which is that if one stripped out all the promotional wording one would be left with literally nothing. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Removing false/fake name 'Shantanu Bhardwaj' from Chennai Super Kings 2021 page.
Hello Fade258
I request you to please edit and remove the name 'Shantanu Bhardwaj' from the 'Supportive Players' (Background) section from the Chennai Super Kings 2021 page which I believe is locked only for editing by Extended Confirmed Protection users or Admins. I assume you are an admin/such a user who has the power to do so.
A fake user named 'CSK Management' has in the past repeatedly added the name 'Shantanu Bhardwaj' to the players list section of several pages related to Chennai super kings and has been indefinitely blocked for self-promotion, vandalism and usage of blacklisted (fake) references. The user has now started adding this fake name to other CSK pages (Csk in 2019, Csk in 2022) from an IP address, and I end up removing this fake name, though he keeps adding it back. However, I am unable to remove this name from this CSK in 2021 page due to protection settings. I also request you to block the IP address (122.161.52.235) permanently.
Obviously, NO SUCH PERSON by the name 'Shantanu Bhardwaj' exists in ANY capacity related to CSK, and the user indulging in this is engaging in vandalism, self-promotion and misleading. I have mentioned this in my removal edits for the CSK in 2019 and CSK in 2022 pages. I have also already placed this request on the 'talks' page of Chennai Super Kings in 2021 page without logging into my account.
I hope you make the removal on this page and block and report the IP address/user immediately to prevent further corruption of the CSK pages. Awaiting your action and response on this issue!
Hi, First of all, I would like you remind you that I am not an administrator but I have rights to do so. As soon as possible, I will look into it and I will notify you. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 02:37, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
This article is missing prose, which means it fails notability for sports teams. Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. See WP:NSEASONS for guidance. Failing this notabilty guide, this article may be redirected to the main team page.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Here are three references about the coach's appointment. Not about the team.
This article needs more references to satisfy notability for sport. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hey! I noticed that on the draft Block Strike, it uses the icon from the app in 2016. Looking at the image it's credited to a Korean user, who's userpage has a link that goes no where on Korean Wikipedia. However, from what I'm finding, I find it hard to believe that user has ownership of the image. What's your opinion on it? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654517:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Blaze, Sorry for late reply. Well, I found similar image on the internet for the existing image on this draft. For me as well it is hard to believe to this user for the ownership of this image. Fade258 (talk) 08:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I might XFD (or whatever the equivalent on commons is) then since it's hard to actually know if the user owns the image. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654512:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Go ahead with the XFD, If we were wrong then any reviewing administrator will notify us about this image regarding our misunderstanding. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and nominated it. I stated that I believe the image is non-free but don't have enough concrete proof that it is, other than it being hard to believe the user owns the image. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654513:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
In response to your edit summary, I wouldn't know if there's anything incorrect since I don't actually watch any cricket (or any sports for that matter). I'm mainly just watching the indian cricket team related articles because of the persistent socking on them. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654513:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Ok, No worries. I just casually ask to you. Thank you for your valuable time regarding this matter. Thank you and cheers! Fade258 (talk) 13:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Done. Be aware while creating this draft where as this draft was already deleted 4 times as different reasons. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look at my stub submission for Araz Fazaeli -- I have added more references and external links where he is clearly the subject of the piece and resubmitted it. In general, I guess it's hard for me to understand the "burden of citation" for something as small as a one line factual stub. Specially for someone like this subject where one of his projects has work has already been deemed notable for an article in and of itself, so if you don't deem the references/links to be sufficient still, I'd appreciate your guidance re: how to improve it.
SleepyWhippet, In my first review, My decline reason was lack of sufficient reliable, primary sources, and independent sources to the subject. I will help you for improving this draft and as soon as possible, I will look your resubmitted draft. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 07:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
I sometimes edit the group fixtures section of ipl. Is there any problem? I mean you do it regularly. But sometimes I do it. By copying pasting another result, I just replace it with latest result. Floaty.flamingo (talk) 03:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Zimbabwe A cricket team in Nepal in 2022 instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zimbabwe A cricket team in Nepal in 2021–22, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
Hello, Fade258!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Request on 02:55:29, 11 May 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Garuda.samakhum.issarek
Hello, can we have someone who knows about contemporary art review this submission. I am afraid the person who denied the draft does not have significant knowledge about art publications and therefore has mistaken the publications referring to the subject of biography as insignificant.
GSI, In first, Thank you for contributing in wikipedia. Gently, I would like to remind you that, I'm the initial reviewer who had reviewed your draft. On my first review, I saw the issue of adding IMDB sources where I already mentioned that in my declined reason. Now, the issue which was raised by me was solved. Please see WP: Notability (people) and reliable sources for more information. As you can resubmit your draft if you improve it extensively. Thank you and cheers! Fade258 (talk) 03:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello @Fade258, thank you for being prompt and helpful about my other Draft (which I am still going to work on). In the meantime, I got increasingly interested in Wikipedia's Women in Red project and I currently have a couple of AfC submissions under the umbrella of that initiative that cover two female designers (Faye Toogood, and Jessica Corr), both of whom are quite well-known and feel like glaring omissions. Since you'd generously offered to help on my other draft, I was wondering if you could please review my recent submissions if you get a chance, and let me know your thoughts? Thanks again, SleepyWhippet (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
That's sounds good me too. I will see your draft soon until then you can edit your draft, if there is any minor mistakes. Fade258 (talk) 09:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Fade258 Thank you for reviewing, I'm a bit confused as to your rejections tho, I had already addressed the issues with the tone of voice and had Theroadislong approve the the tone is ok, and as far as sources Reliability are concerned, both of them have refrences to some of the most well known publications in the world. If I compare this to an article such as this one (which incidentally, is someone who had been writing about Jessica Corr 20 years ago, and is cited) with it's number and types of refrences then I'm even more confused. SleepyWhippet (talk) 13:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
I am aware of your concerns and most of the sources which you had added is where she works. And lacks some sources. If you add 2-3 more reliable sources as well as independent sources to the subject except this I don't see any issues regarding your draft. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 13:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Fade258 Thank you for the explanation -- I removed the link to her University and now only have it as an external link. As I have access to a Design Archive Library in real life, I was able to pull actual printed refrences and use those for inline citations. Furthermore Theroadislong had brought up another issue with additional citation being needed that directly references the text in the career section. And I was able to rewrite + add two additional well known sources. Do you have any further thoughts? SleepyWhippet (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@SleepyWhippet, Nice work regarding the way of improvement in your draft is good and taking in a good shape, keep improving and when you feel that draft is ready for submit then you can do that. Yes, Theroadislong is right but I think you are in solving that issue. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Fade258 I actually feel like I should submit it again as it is right now, I don't want to add any extra information, I agree with you about Quality vs. Quantity -- shall I take the comments off of the draft before I submit it? SleepyWhippet (talk) 16:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Fade258 Oh, and I just meant, if there were comments left by Reviewers such as yourself and Theroadislong that I have already addressed and checked with the commentator to make sure they're satisfied, do I delete them from the draft when I submit it again, so there's no confusion? Or do I leave them for the person who approves it to remove? SleepyWhippet (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@SleepyWhippet, Sorry for that, You are not allowed to remove those comments which was added by the AFC reviewer, it helps the AFC reviewer to review the draft in more efficient way. Fade258 (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
