User talk:EthanKP

Welcome

Hello, EthanKP! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Nemesis63 (talk) 23:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

EthanKP, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi EthanKP! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Balaton Hill

I've moved this article to your sandbox as it's likely to be speedily deleted if left in mainspace in it's current state. NtheP (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Tessalit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Battle of Tessalit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eyesnore (talk) 00:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Kidal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Battle of Kidal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Satellizer talk contribs 00:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tearcoat Swamp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarendon County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tauran incident

Hi, I'm Rosscoolguy. EthanKP, thanks for creating Tauran incident!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey Ethan, good start but please include citations for all facts provided or they may be removed. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tezirzait, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MNJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An infobox is not enough

When you create an article, like Battle of Tezirzait, you must include at least an opening sentence which tells us what the article is about. An infobox is not enough. I've added the lead sentence here: "The Battle of Tezirzait took place at Tezirzaït, Niger, in June 2008." That means that someone finding the article in a Google search etc sees that first sentence and can see what the article is about. Please remember to include text, not just an infobox.

Please also remember to include sources for your articles: references to published information in Reliable sources, whether online or in print. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 21:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Konna

I have nominated Battle of Konna which have were asignificant contributer to for DYK. However there has been a few issues surronding paraphrasing which have to be resolved before the articlecan be approved. Just keeping you informed Finnegas (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Harem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cities and towns during the Northern Mali conflict, EthanKP!

Wikipedia editor DCI2026 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

As you enter more information into this article, an increased number of sources would assist it.

To reply, leave a comment on DCI2026's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Aguelhok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policy

You obviously do not understand Wikipedia policy. First, saying that adding references is a waste of time is a first big NO on wikipedia. You can not edit info without refs. Per policy any info that doesn't have references can be removed at any time. Second, saying that you created the article doesn't mean anything on Wikipedia. Per policy anybody can edit articles on Wikipedia and per Wikipedia policy article creators, like yourself, do not have exclusive copyrights to an article. Third, you are at this point engaing in edit warring which is also against Wikipedia policy. You have reverted me 2 times, per policy if you revert someone 3 times within a 24 hour period you can be reported to an administrator and blocked for a few hours, friendly warning. I do not understand your problem my friend. What I have been trying to do is make the article more encyclopidic and properly referenced. EkoGraf (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cities and towns during the Libyan civil war (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to NTC and Bayda
Battle of Goumakoura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to AFP
Battle of Tamassi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to UFR
Second Battle of Heglig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to AFP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Ifoghas

That article is about the battle in the Ifoghas mountains from February 22. What the French are involved in is a separate operation/battle in a separate part of northern Mali. What the Tuareg militants are involved in is also a separate skirmish. You can not combine all those separate battles into one battle. If you want to write about the French operations create a separate article. EkoGraf (talk) 15:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Biltine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Biltine and Chadian Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Namur (1914)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Siege of Namur (1914), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.firstworldwar.com/battles/namur.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:"Aguelhok.jpg".jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:"Aguelhok.jpg".jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:"Aguelhok.jpg".jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:"Aguelhok.jpg".jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Azawad flag

Greetings; I think there is a misunderstanding what the flag is supposed to be used for the article. Every other page uses the flag without the traditional symbol in the triangle. Everything I seen from the MNLA website doesn't include the symbol on that flag (but does on another flag) at http://mnla-arabic.net/index.php/photo.html. I know there is a photo of the other flag floating around, but out of all of the photos and videos I seen, the symbol-less flag is used. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, that the flag is more used for domestic uses. But the editor who created the image sully for the use of the Azawad article will feel disappointed if you just erase it completely with the other flag without the Berber symbol. It's just a flag and they are both for the same use but maybe you can add a different section of the article where you can illustrate the different versions of the flag, but I think you should just leave the traditional one to represent the country, plus it's nicer looking. EthanKP (talk · contribs) 6:03, 9 April 2013

I am not going to have the image deleted from the Commons; the flag does exist and I do not object. I am trying to harmonize the images and I can have one done with the Berber symbol. I think it would be better placed at the flag of Azawad article to show a variant. I'll see what kind of magic I can work up. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 04:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Azawad#Variants I added his image. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 04:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since the flag isn't confirmed as the state flag, after the searching of English, French and Arabic sources, what I did was I removed the flag from the article, but also removed the link to the article of the national flag. This is similar to what was done with the motto. Instead, I put the flag in the politics section and said "this is the flag of the MNLA, sources also claim this is the de facto" state flag." User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 02:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Yurkud (2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Attack on Kidal (2013)

The article Attack on Kidal (2013) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a news outlet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed itEthanKP (talk · contribs)

Oops

Sorry about the previous message. An IP was impersonating you, including with signature. That IP has been long term blocked. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 00:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahamat Déby Itno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chadian Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kidal suicide attack.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kidal suicide attack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AuburnPilot (talk) 19:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ethan, who is the copyright holder? Meaning, who is the person who held the camera in their hand, aimed the camera at the subject, and pressed the button? In order for the image to be acceptable to use here, because it does not meet our fair use requirements, the copyright holder must explicitly license the image under an acceptable license, such as the GFDL or the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 license. Are you in communication with the copyright holder? If so, could you ask him or her to forward a letter of permission, similar to the one found at WP:CONSENT, to permissions-en@wikimedia.org? If not, then the image is not appropriate for use here and will have to be deleted. --B (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the copyright hold is Abdelnasser Garboa as it says on the image's article and the website where i got it from,I'll ask him to personally give permission as long as the photo is not deleted. Thanks for the info.EthanKP (talk · contribs) 17 April, 20:13 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. WP:CONSENT should explain the permission needed. If he forwards a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, please note on the image {{OTRS-pending}} so that the image will not be deleted until after someone from Wikimedia's OTRS team has a chance to review it. It is best, by the way, if he use his an official email address (if applicable) or one that is shown on his website so that whoever reviews the email can know that it is actually from him. Please be patient in awaiting a reply - the backlog is insanely lengthy (3 months as of now according to commons:COM:OTRS.) --B (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Email has been sent, addressing the copyright issues etc. Will I be allowed to keep the picture on the article until the email is accepted??EthanKP (talk · contribs) 17 April, 22:51
I think that's reasonable - we can ping the OTRS message board and ask them to search and try and escalate rather than leaving it in limbo 3 months. --B (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Boston Marathon bombings, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WWGB (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Usually I give three warnings as that is what admin look for when it comes to disruptive edits. EthanKP seriously though show some respect for the dead. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked your account for a period of 24 hours. This edit is highly inappropriate and constitutes vandalism. You were warned by WWGB directly above and continued your unacceptable behavior. Should you wish to appeal your block, please read through this guide and use the {{unblock}} template to make a request. AuburnPilot (talk) 06:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No harm done i deleted the second comment Please block him again for 72 hours because he wrote inappropriate stuff on my page Alhanuty (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 03:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for an indefinite period of time. In particular, is this edit [1] Indef doesn't necessarily mean forever, it just means that I have no idea what period of time that is needed to prevent future discruption, and frankly, I don't think anything short of forever will suffice. Your entire edit history has been problematic and peppered with questionable edits, to put it mildly. As with any block I do, any admin is free to use their own judgement and doesn't require my permission to adjust or remove, although I do appreciate a note afterwards. I've been watching the activity here for a couple of weeks and your behavior is so abhorrent and counter to the goals of Wikipedia that I can't possibly see how I could be persuaded anyway. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 03:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 Xinjiang ethnic clashes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Han and Uyghur
Battle of Aguelhok (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Co

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fight for Tin-Hama

The article Fight for Tin-Hama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Fight for Tin-Hama – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bataar Enkhjargal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bataar Enkhjargal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bataar Enkhjargal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Latebird (talk) 12:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:"Capture of Konna.jpg".jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:"Capture of Konna.jpg".jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four days of Naples

Dear EthanKP, on 22nd January 2013 you do 4 revision edits under "Four days of Naples", on en.Wikipedia.

At 04:18 am, insert among the German "Commanders and leaders":

  • Arthur Von Studerheim.

At 04:19 am, insert among the Italian "Commanders and leaders" that:

  • Massimo Cadellno died in action, putting the following symbol "†".

At 04:32 am, insert among the Italian "Commanders and leaders":

  • Massimo Zercatti †;
  • Pietro Bitotti;

canceling though:

  • Massimo Cadellno †;
  • Voci Calzinato.

I would like to know these names from which source you took them. Could you mention the sources? Thanks, --Delehaye (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wadesdah

Notice

The article Wadesdah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wadesdah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wadesdah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadesdah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]