User talk:Esperanto97

This is Esperanto97's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1

Picture of the day

Rhinanthus angustifolius, the narrow-leaved rattle or greater yellow-rattle, is a species of plant of the genus Rhinanthus, in the broomrape family, Orobanchaceae. It is an annual wildflower, native to temperate grasslands in much of Europe, and north and central Western Asia. The yellow flowers are mostly visited by bumblebees. This R. angustifolius inflorescence was photographed in Kulna, Estonia. The photograph was focus-stacked from 80 separate images.Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus

Archives

Archive 1

You might be interested

In reference to this edit summary,[1] and this section[2]...you might be interested in this SPI I created some time ago.[3] Admin RegentsPark and user Kautilya3, who, like me, dealt with the sockmaster in the past, also believe that Kami2018 = Saladin1987. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon:, if there's any way to stop him from editing and start your investigation all over again (it seems outdated), I'm in. Handful of his edits and relevant contributions are simply awful; they may even qualify as vandalism. --Esperanto97 (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The Commons Barnstar
		Thanks for adding historical maps to corresponding articles. They have really enhanced couple of atricles substantially. Keep up the good work! Alterego Wayne (talk) 06:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of referenced information, again

Dear Esperanto97, being a neutral editor, I invite you to check out the recent contributions by Kami2018, to whom you recently gave a "last warning" on his talk page. He is currently removing refs and reliably sourced content from articles related to the Khalji dynasty. For example, see these edits: [4], [5], [6], [7]. In his edit summary, he claimed that the source he removed was "not credible" (?), although historian Vladimir Minorsky, who is cited, is in fact one of the most trusted academics on the subject. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khestwol, I personally does not have any discrepancy with that user; I simply came across his edits at recent changes page where I found out that a handful of his edits were completely disruptive. I guess it's just about time for you (editors who have to deal with him often) to take your cause to ANI and request an indefinite block for him as these well-founded accusations are indeed piling up. Moreover, such users as LouisAragon, Kautilya3, Regentspark suspect him of sockpuppetry claiming that he is the same person with Saladin1987, who was indefinitely site banned years ago for similar behaviour by a unanimous community consensus. You could use their materials on that as well if you like. Good luck! --Esperanto97 (talk) 09:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]