en User talk:Erlyrisa

Bone cutter

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bone cutter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bone cutter. Mbisanz (talk) 11:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PROD-declined

I have declined the PROD-nomination. The article does indeed need references, though. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Yeah I dunno, --where are the doctors!? , or the manufacturers' of the implements they use. The medical tools section is very bland, especially so when comparing to the metal and wood sections... I guess it highlights population demographics.

,but on a side note, I don't really care, I just went through a writing stint on Wikipedia when I first found out about it, and saw a few holes about a topic that I happened to know a little about.

Proposed deletion of Gang-Nail

The article Gang-Nail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

wikipedia is not a dictionary; no notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BE——Critical_{__Talk} 03:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rotary reciprocation

The article Rotary reciprocation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oscillating reciprocation

The article Oscillating reciprocation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary term

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

S.char.|.mi.| ::e Shleimiel203.17.70.53 (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Remote Control Phenomenon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Remote Control Phenomenon, Erlyrisa!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to help address the improvement tags placed on this article? Thanks for your help.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Remote Control Phenomenon

The article Remote Control Phenomenon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to be gibberish. Google returns no results on the topic except for mirrors of Wikipedia. No other pages link to the article and it contains no verifiable citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. v/r - T P 15:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]