User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2016/September


Mangling citations

your edit here mangled the first citation, removing the pipe between the second author and the title. Frietjes (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

The citation was crap anyway, so why the fuss? Easily fixed. Eric Corbett 00:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Cambridge

I don't know how many talk page stalkers read Eric's page these days, but could you take a look at Talk:Cambridge/GA2 when you've got a minute? I am quite annoyed it has just passed GA when it clearly (to me at least) shouldn't have done, and I probably don't have time to sort it all out myself. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

I've chipped in there. This appears to be a good faith editor who's trying to run before he can walk, so I don't want to get too heavy-handed; see also this thread on his talkpage. ‑ Iridescent 17:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Cheers for that. I agree that the purpose is to show the article needs improvements, rather than just haranguing anyone's efforts. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)