|
User talk:Eperoton/Archive 4
ThanksThanks for your help on Avedis Zildjian Company. I was thinking it as a bit of a mess, and wondering how to get it to a good state. I had some dinner, came back, and you had fixed the mess, which allowed me to add many references.96.127.244.201 (talk) 07:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab:Dear Epteroton, this is the second time my edits are reverted, so please help me to improve my edits. I explain my edits already on the talk page. My problem is there no sources for the following points: -"strict prohibition" esp. including mosques --> no reference -"the Saudi government renovated the tomb of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab" --> references does not say that -"important place of visitation" --> insult Thanks a lot --Yortas (talk) 11:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Honor KillingHello, I wish you are good. You have reverted my edits on the article of Honor Killing, which is exactly the deletion of stoning as a manner of killing which has no reference to anyone was killed by this method. And I want you to make a distinction between what is traditional and what is religious; because stoning is the punishment for anyone married whom has made adultery even the the one is male or female If the ifs of adultery is complete (adultery has to be shown by 4 good not lier men and they and the show has to be about the penis of the man into the pessy of the woman not any thing else), and the government is the responsible of that not anyone else. And If anyone kills her sister for example for adultery he will be punished. People always mix between traditions and what is religious, even If these traditions are false and evil according to the religion. Yes there are woman killed by guns, knives etc, but stoning there is no reference on that, and If anyone try to do it he will do it outside the home what means everyone around will see him and he will be punished by the government by killing in the most of time. هارون الرشيد العربي (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
MuhakkimaDear Eperoton, thank you for your message. John Mylonelis (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)John Mylonelis ArbCom 2018 election voter message Hello, Eperoton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Revert Owaisi on Sufism ArticleI have no idea what you were thinking when you wiped the Owaisi order from the history of orders. But it was not well-explained nor well-thought. RS? You can refer to scholars of Islam and Sufism such as Godlas, wikipedia's article on the subject (which I suppose you should also delete for consistency) or the many books on the subject (eg Sufi Orders in Islam pgs 13, 87. Please undo this.
Your thoughts?Bkerensa removed Ja'fari jurisprudence. With this edit summary, "Removing Jafari and the argument for this is that Oxford while a generally credible academic source is not authoritative on Islam. Much of the academics at Oxford are either Ex-Muslim, Non-Muslim or members of a minority non-mainstream sect like Sufism or Shia Islam both being very small minorities of Islam. Jafari which is referenced here is not considered by any credible mainstream theologians to be a maddhab." Yet according to;
Disambiguation link notification for February 20Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slavery and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC) You might be interestedI'm working on this now (User:Calthinus/Islamo-Christian Civilization) and then bring into the main space maybe next year or so. I thought perhaps you'd have access to other writings relevant to the topic and might be interested? I'm busy right now anyways so no pressure, but thought I'd let you know. --Calthinus (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Islam articles and balanceHi, Basically, I am a bit new, but I saw that articles about Quran lack a lot of information. Feel free to correct me, as I cite sources to correct these articles properly. Thanks --SleeplessNight12 (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
About editing.Dear Editor, I request you not to edit Religious contents if you don't have enough knowledge about It. Garib Jilan (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Disambiguation link notification for April 22An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC) ScheherazadeDo you think I'm out of line in the language-coding debate? The IP is very insistent that I "prove" that the name Scheherazade is Arabic and not Persian. I ask because you were previously involved and seem to know a bit more about the context than I do.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fatwa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. The article Fatwa you nominated as a good article has passed DYK nomination of Fatwa
Current Usage for Shaykh Al Islam or Shaikh Ul IslamIn current era , Shaykh Al Islam or Shaikh Ul Islam term is used for Sayyed Madni Miya Ashrafi Jilani, Plz also help me in making a article for this personality http://madnicollege.com/ http://maml.org.uk/about-us/ https://www.islamimehfil.com/topic/11580-biography-of-huzur-shaikhulislam-hazrat-madnimiya/ https://archive.org/details/T.VAurMovieKaSharaiIstemalURDUShaykhAlIslamSyedMadniAshrafiAshrafiJilaniKichhauchhaSharif shariaHi. this should be kept. It just mentions that he established throughout the indian peninsula, in fact he was one of the few south asian emperors to have done so, nothing more. Also the jizya was stopped during the 3rd mughal emperor's time, but Aurangzeb, the 6th, re introduced, so i see nothing wrong with that part too. Thank you.--81.151.103.144 (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstart for you
Whether you are a Muslim or not, want to avoid WP:PERSONAL, you deserve this award--81.151.133.233 (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
ZakatHey Epeeroton, I wanted to added this "The Encyclopeadia of islam states that according to Modern scholars the term was borrowed from the Judeo-Aramaic word "zakhutha" or righteousness, as evidenced by its orthography in the Quran, and it has been suggested that zakat was formed to rhyme with salat, another borrowing from Aramaic. While the use of the noun zakhutha, contrary to the related verb Zaka for alms, is not attested in Rabbinic literature, it functioned in targumic literature as the Aramaic equivalent for the Hebrew s'daka, which had from its original sense of righteousness come to serve as the ordinary term for alms and was borrowed with this sense into Arabic as sadaka." to the etymology section of the Zakat article. But, I wanted to know your opinion beforehand. I know that you're interested in islamic topics. So I didn't want to add the paragraph boldly without consulting a more experienced editor. Regards -TheseusHeLl (talk) 02:53, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Edit summariesHi. It's best not to use Edit summaries to send messages directly to other editors. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Triple talaq@Eperoton: Please respond to what I have asked here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Divorce_in_Islam#Reversion_of_edits FatwaThere's no section on the very common misconception. A bit of digging needs to be done within one particular section of the article, which is why I figure at the very least a hatnote could help. Wolfdog (talk) 20:54, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Fatwa On 19 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fatwa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Osama bin Laden issued his 1998 fatwa proclaiming jihad against the U.S. and its allies, many Islamic jurists stressed that he was not qualified either to proclaim jihad or to issue a fatwa? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fatwa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fatwa), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC) Help with Arab Slave TradeHello, I'd like your opinion on this disagreement in the Arab Slave Trade article. I've removed mentions of Barbary Pirate slavery and Ottoman slavery since the sources backing them don't mention they're part of an Arab Slave trade. There have been reverts and another user who seems to be policing content without being an administrator claims that because the lead of the article mentions disagreement on what Arab slave trade is, editors can refer to it however they want. CaliphoShah (talk) 01:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Shia Islamhey I noticed one you undid one of my revisions on the shia islam wikipedia page I wanted to let you know that I removed it because whatever written wasn't true I know that because I am a shia muslim myself and we also believed in the same Quran as the other muslims there do tend to be a specific group of muslims that do believe in what is mentioned, but its a very small minority which is considered by the majority to be extremists. It is, therefore, not a collective belief of all the shia muslims and might actually be offensive to a lot of people. I am removing the edit once again hoping you won't undo my revision again And I'd also very much like to see the link that supports this information as well Hoping for a reply from you soon! Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narcomoc (talk • contribs) 14:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
"European colonialism" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect European colonialism. Since you had some involvement with the European colonialism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. George Ho (talk) 07:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC) Sexual Slavery in IslamGreetings Eperoton. I seem to have some concerns regarding a newly created article Sexual slavery in Islam and have gotten into a dispute. On the face of it the article seems reliably cited with citations given in academic form. However, on closer inspection it does seem to have POV issues as well as some others, which I have highlighted on the talkpage. I refer this to you because you seem to be a frequent overseer on Islam related pages. My question is simple (although you can offer more input if you have the time). Do you think that the article strikes a certain POV (particularly the latter part) or am I just seeing things? The question is relevant to whether I should pointlessly escalate a dispute. Thank you for your time39.37.184.243 (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
|
