User talk:EntirelyTrue

Welcome!

Hello, EntirelyTrue! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 10:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of The Huang Trap

Hello EntirelyTrue,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Huang Trap for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 04:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EntirelyTrue, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi EntirelyTrue! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tirelessly Working Contributor

EntirelyTrue is awarded with the TWC award
Congratulations. ThanksMachine (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Vandalism

Hi. I noticed you reverted my edit on Abuse of notation as "possible vandalism". It was not vandalism. I was removing an unsourced statement which has been tagged as possibly original research for four months, and which is at best poorly explained and at worst simply incorrect. Mr. Granger (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: revert to vanished user

That wasn't vandalism, I was blanking the talk page of a user who was renamed as part of Right to Vanish. Andrevan@ 22:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd.

Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. took the "of" out of its name! Historically, it was "of" and now it isn't. I found it out a few minutes after creating the Imperial Tobacco of Canada Ltd. article. (Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Barnstar

Hi there, I just came across a welcome message that include a barnstar just for joining wikipedia. I think it is a nice gesture but perhaps it does not meet the intended use and that it may encourage over-use as per barnstars. What do you think? Flat Out let's discuss it 10:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in my message, it should not encourage the over-use of barnstars, but to encourage them to edit with quality. You know, many people strive better with a little bit of head-start as well as encouragement. ;) EntirelyTrue (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Redlinked. Hence it shouldn't be linked." who said you that? Take a look at Wikipedia:Red link, redlinks are often useful. My best, Cavarrone 10:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you no doubt expected, this account, like your previous accounts, has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to help build the encyclopaedia. You have used this account to evade blocks on other accounts, and you have posted totally fictitious claims to various pages, including re-creating a hoax page that has been deleted numerous times under various titles. Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing hoaxes or any other kind of fiction. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EntirelyTrue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my only account. I have also been reverting/undoing edits which I think or know are vandalism.

Decline reason:

The evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AsIGooglePackupYaBagsInUrOldSkin/Archive makes it pretty clear that this is not your first/only account. only (talk) 09:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.