User talk:Emperordarius

Pyrrhus of Epirus

It is nice to provide historical additions about this article, but too bad... its unsourced and totally misleading. I' ve heard some albanian books during Hodja time wrote that the Molossians were an Illyrian tribe. Too bad these books are not yet far forgotten. If you feel offended by some historical facts stated on an article, its not bad to express yourself on the 'discussion' pageAlexikoua (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

better, express yourself in a Forum or Youtube where other people like you gather! ;)Michael X the White (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kaspersky Internet Security

Please see the discussion page for Kaspersky Internet Security. -TonyW (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement "Kaspersky Anti-Virus is the best anti-virus..."

That's not what the article you cited says, there is no "best" in the article; please reread the article and the edit summary from the last time a similar edit was reverted. Then review WP:OR, "Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources". Wikipedia sticks to what the citations say, it doesn't interpret them for readers. Thanks for understanding this. --CliffC (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sonic.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sonic.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kaspvir.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Kaspvir.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 05:01, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Norton AntiVirus, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --CliffC (talk) 19:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of G DATA AntiVirus

A tag has been placed on G DATA AntiVirus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Quanticle (talk) 19:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of G DATA AntiVirus

A tag has been placed on G DATA AntiVirus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Quanticle (talk) 19:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwar3.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:I4All.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greek stuff

Hey Emperordarius, I don't know what your problem with Greece is, but if you don't stop what you're doing, you're bound to get blocked indefinitely. Adam Bishop (talk) 08:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine empire

You have already violated the 3RR rule in Byzantine empire. This is the last and only warning you'll get on this particular issue. Please, refrain from further reverts.--Yannismarou (talk) 08:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread

I think it's time to stop edit-warring and defend yourself here. If you apologize for your inappropriate edits, and stop doing what you are doing you may still have the chance to avoid indefinite blocking from Wikipedia. Please, read the relevant wiki-policies, concering vandalism and edit warring, and please refrain from your inappropriate activity.--Yannismarou (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I notice that you have agreed to stop on Yannismarou's talk page, and with that in mind I am not blocking your account. However, if you continue your disruptive editing, you are liable to be blocked without further warning. Stifle (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletions

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Darius I of Persia, you will be blocked from editing. JGHowes talk - 00:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SuperAntiSpyware

A tag has been placed on SuperAntiSpyware, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Superantispyware-menu.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Superantispyware-menu.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SuperAntiSpyware

A tag has been placed on SuperAntiSpyware, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ros0709 (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Superantispyware-menu.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Superantispyware-menu.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Superantispyware-menu.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of G DATA AntiVirus

A tag has been placed on G DATA AntiVirus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of SuperAntiSpyware

I have nominated SuperAntiSpyware, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperAntiSpyware. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ros0709 (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of G DATA AntiVirus

I have nominated G DATA AntiVirus, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G DATA AntiVirus. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. seicer | talk | contribs 16:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Enigma message 04:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:NOD-detection.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:NOD-detection.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Asenine  16:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC) -- Asenine  16:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Kaspvir.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kaspvir.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Asenine  16:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC) -- Asenine  16:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've been here long enough to know that edits and summaries like http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexikoua&diff=prev&oldid=243013312 and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pyrrhus_of_Epirus&diff=prev&oldid=243014125 are entirely unacceptable. I've blocked your account; if you can't treat other Wikipedians with even the most basic civility, the next time your block will be indefinite. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For block evasion through an obvious sock account, Abeshi co (talk · contribs), I have extended this block to three weeks, from today. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:37, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is not MY account. It's either the account of someone who wants to block me for more time, or of someone I know. But that's not My account.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emperordarius (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reduce my 3 week blocking because I didn't create any puppet account

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. The edit patterns match. —  Sandstein  15:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And how did I create that account? I cannot change my ip address, since proxies are blocked in wikipedia, and I'm not so stupid to go in some internet cafes only to edit something that would have been undid soon after. Just for you to know, I told ALL my friends to edit those pages, because I want Wikipedia to be a REAL encyclopedia, not just a stupid website with untrue information. I don't care anymore though. You don't even care about your own website. It's full of people who are distorting and deforming the facts, and you don't do a damn thing about it. Instead, you ban users who are trying to correct those facts. And what about those other reasons you don't let a page to be created? Notability? Who cares about notability? And Encyclopedia's goal should be to provide information about as much thing as possible and as much correct as possible. Unfortunately that is not what you are doing. You are doing the inverse thing. Perhaps you are trying to save bandwith and you don't even bother checking wherever what people write is true or ridiculously false? This Wiki thing is becoming ridiculous and stupid, if you can't even decide whenever something is true or not. The more right people contribute, the better. The more stupid people contribute, the worse. The more lazy and unacceptable the administration is, the more unacceptable the wiki project becomes.

If it is so unacceptable, then you do not have to lose your precious time with it. If you don't care anymore, then let go. You're not needed anyway. --Michael X the White (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You gayreek don't open your mouth because it stinks of sperm, you don't have any right to talk. so STFU

Sorry, I forgot Wikipedia gave all rights to you and "ALL your friends".Sorry,again.--Michael X the White (talk) 16:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking about wikipedia, I'm talking about real life. All the world except for you gayreeks should be treated nicely, you should be executed.

Dear me, you just don't want to be nice. This edit is really, frankly, appalling. So I've extended your block, and this time you can't abuse the talk page either. If you think you've been treated harshly, the block message tells you the address of the unblock-l mailing list. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sony-ACID-Pro 1.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Sony-ACID-Pro 1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro(talk) 00:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC) --— neuro(talk) 00:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:360.2.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:360.2.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:VBA32.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VBA32.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dotfusc.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dotfusc.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FSIS08.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FSIS08.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]