User talk:ElegantEgotist

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyvi Estephan has been accepted

Nyvi Estephan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Pbrks (t·c) 13:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendel Bezerra (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xegma was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Xegma(talk) 09:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ElegantEgotist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Xegma(talk) 09:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felipe Castanhari (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Likely notable, but the article needs to be a lot more concise and needs to avoid WP:Puffery. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felipe Castanhari has been accepted

Felipe Castanhari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 05:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and summary request

Welcome!

Hi ElegantEgotist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Adding a summary when you save your edit will make it easier for us to know what/why your are making a change. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 14:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NJZombie (talk) 20:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the middle of working on the Caligula article, so could you please wait?

Message Haploidavey (talk) 14:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chill lol ElegantEgotist (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wendel Bezerra

Information icon Hello, ElegantEgotist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendel Bezerra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toupée, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Morecambe & Wise Show. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per hidden note, the disambiguation is intentional ElegantEgotist (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wendel Bezerra

Hello, ElegantEgotist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wendel Bezerra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu (t • c) 18:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nathalia Urban

Hi, I notice you have removed the accent from the name Nathália several times on the page. The accent appears in her byline and also in her personal Twitter account. Is there something you can share about this please? Thank you I am trying to understand the correct spelling, as I would understand the spelling that the individual used would be the right one? Thanks Nayyn (talk) 14:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So why the main article doesn't have the accent my man? ElegantEgotist (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]