User talk:Dwayne/Archive1
Blanking your user talk pageAlthough you are perfectly entitled to blank your user talk page, please bear in mind that all the previous contents can be seen via the history of the page. Deletion notifications and warnings are still available for anyone to see. Also bear in mind that if you remove a warning from your page, the deletion confirms that you have read and understood the warning. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 08:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC) AIVWhenever you see someone keep on vandalizing shortly after they've already gotten a "final warning" on their talk page (like Jgvpiff did), you can report them directly to AIV. There should be a button labeled "arv" among the ones added by Twinkle which can make this a lot easier. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 01:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Re: FalseYes, you are correct. You did not get rollback yesterday. The incident I was referring to occurred on September 15th, 2009. I misread the date on the logs so my bad. I would also like to also take the opportunity to kindly remind you that incivility of any sort is not tolerated on Wikipedia. Making comments like "What are you talking about, Your making my reputation look bad because of what you put as a note. If i dont get a response from you in 15 mins i will remove the lie automatically" are a surefire way to get yourself blocked for incivility. I understand you may be frustrated but this not the correct manner to address others' mistakes. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Another false revertHi Dwayne, Once again, I advise you to take more caution when reverting edits as vandalism. You recently reverted an addition to the sandbox and warned the user who did nothing wrong. The sandbox is not an official article, and is a place a user can test their edits. Warning a user for something they didn't do wrong may also make them not come back to edit again, as they might feel that they are hurting the project when trying to help it and may be scared to edit again. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Shared IP addressI dont have the faintest idea what you are talking about Wayne.. Please stop contacting my children through the media of wikipedia or i will report you.. Yours sincerely, Paula —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.16.159 (talk) 00:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
WayneWhat are you talking about? My children are both under the age of 10.. I'd be very impressed if they had even gathered the concept of vandalism.. --81.108.16.159 (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh Dwanye not WayneI'll have to ask my husband but since the accident he hasn't really been doing much of anything.. All the best Dwanye --81.108.16.159 (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk to me, not a hamsterSee above. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.16.159 (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC) My UsernameDwayne -- We have already had this conversation -- last month (on September 13th). I explained to you then that this is the username I have to keep as part of my unbanning agreement. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 00:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Tiny mistake when reporting vandalsHello again, you're doing a great job reporting vandals to AIV. Just a tiny thing I've noticed though is that when you report someone, you are doing it correctly except that you edit the part of the page that says: * {{IPvandal|IP address}} brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ For example, you do it here. That is a template to show users how to format their report, and should be copied into the section below it, as you do. It isn't a big deal, as the bot corrects this, but just pointing it out. Less work for you ;) Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
if you are a human im talkin to, that wasnt vandalism, i was testing something, and i already had the intention of removing it. So eat it ho. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.134.210 (talk) 00:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
|