User talk:Dunbarx

Scrabble

Thanks for the input on Scrabble, but Wikipedia is very big on sourcing all of its material - it's inappropriate to use "anecdotal" evidence for anything, as the encyclopaedia would quickly descend into a war of rival, uncheckable anecdotes.

By all means write up the "Scrabble words" phenomenon, but you should find a reliable source that's already documented it, so that you can quote it directly. A newspaper or magazine article would be fine. --McGeddon (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of programming languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livecode (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fire Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Island

What on earth was this edit? Looking at the content, it seems you reverted numerous improvements to the article. In fact, after your edit are several by other users fixing the mistakes you created. If I didn't know better, I'd call it vandalism since you don't even bother to explain why you made the change in the edit summary. Opencooper (talk) 19:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your comments here. I do not know what you mean, nor can I locate the edits in question.
I have lived on Fire Island for 65 years, and I think I know something about it.
Please do let me know what the issue is...
Craig Newman Dunbarx (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]