User talk:Draco ignoramus sophomoricus

Welcome!

Hello, Draco ignoramus sophomoricus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Firsfron of Ronchester 04:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scale charts

Hi Draco! Good news and bad news--good news is that I promised Bamboozlingbert a new scale chart a wile back and will definitely get onto this soon. Bad news--by "soon" I mean at least a week and a half because I'm going on holidays tomorrow. But more are coming, don't worry. Dinoguy2 (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greek again

Hey you helped me out in confirming the meaning of aliourophobia; wondering if you could check my latest contribution on the discussion page to 'apples and oranges' Eugene-elgato (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elate, euxaristw para polu....fainetai exete dikaion Eugene-elgato (talk) 10:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hey, do you know anything about agrotissa milk? Eugene-elgato (talk) 13:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And also, if you could check out Etymology. Under discussion is the etymology of etymology, where I think etumon means ready and everyone else thinks it means true senseEugene-elgato (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is somewhat ironic, but never mind ! Ultimately one would have to go back to the hypothetical proto-indo-european language; and beyond that, whi knowsEugene-elgato (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eupleridae

You discussed some issues at Talk:Eupleridae some time ago that remained unresolved; you may be interested in the new information I added there. Ucucha 01:35, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bathonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Oxfordian
Callovian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Oxfordian
Norian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tawa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Norian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Smok and Lisowice
Rhaetian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Smok and Lisowice

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize

Hi Draco, and thanks for your contributions. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

  • Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
    • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
  • Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 18:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...Have you considered them? Eric talk 00:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My edits are too many, too frequent, too minor and too homogeneous to add an explanation to them individually. I just add taxa in geological stages' biolists based on preexisting wikipedia info.--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding. While I disagree with your reasoning for not leaving summaries, you are obviously here to improve the encyclopedia and I ain't the cops, so I don't want to hassle you. I think if you do end up taking a moment to consider what it's like for other editors watching the articles you work on, you'll see my point. In any case, it would be a nice gesture to the community if you would at least consider using the show preview option to consolidate your edits. Thanks again for the improvements you are making. Eric talk 14:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your attention but please rest asured, in the rare occation where I am about to make some more drastical change than simply adding a taxon in a list I always consult previous editors of the article in both the article's talk page [1] and the more invested recent editors' talk page[[2]. Also the main reason I took the initiative to start editing was mainly because the specific articles I contribute to were seemingly too neglected to cause anyone emotional distress by changing them (and I'm extensively using the show preview and sanbox features but typos can always ascape one's attention). Jokes aside, I currently lack experience on editing etiquette so I just try to be as brief and non-invasive as I can with my edits and I'd appreciate some patience and tolerance by wiki veterans' behalf, thanks again for your guidance.--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gzhelian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holopterygius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pridoli epoch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guiyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your hard work, too!

Based on my watchlist I can see that you are also busy completing the geological stages' articles' biolists. Thanks so much! I think these are nice summaries of how life evolved through the ages. I'm not an expert. I use other wikipedia pages as a rough guide and try to figure out the age by typing the taxon name into google or google scholar. For fishes, the Handbooks of Paleoichtyology are always useful. There is also one on Paleoherpetology, but I don't have it. I think you did a nice job. And mistakes can always be corrected by other wikipedians. I'm quite new to editing here and might not know all the tools yet. Any advise would be appreciated.We can communicate here or through mail, both fine for me. --GleisReis (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pretty much the same here. I mostly use fossilworks since the site seems to be linked to almost every taxon's article (so I assume it's an acceptable source for wikipedia) as long as it does not contradict sourced articles' content, as is in quite a few cases, hope this tips helps you further. Thanks again for being reliable, it really motivated me to further outline vertebrates' evolutionary course since the Silurian, while originally I only aimed at only clarifying theropods' timeline and call it quits.--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 19:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fossilworks is surely a good source. Some open access studies feature a phylogenetic tree with genera/species plotted against time. They can be useful, too. Inevitably, there will be mistakes and also phylogenetic and stratigraphic placement can change with new data - but that's not a problem as we or others can always update and correct. I think you do a good job by adding formation names as this makes it easier in the future to spot potential errors in age determination. I'll try to add this info in the future, too. I'm currently a bit busy but will resume contributing in the next days. It's motivating not to be the only one doing it.--GleisReis (talk) 10:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the note. I don't know too much about Cretaceaous faunas, but I'll have a look. I'm happy to contribute to similar projects in the Paleozoic and Triassic. Keep me posted.--GleisReis (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Olenekian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anura
Sinemurian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anura

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olenekian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mawsonia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Lungfish you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Capitanian
added a link pointing to Basal
Induan
added a link pointing to Basal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Artinskian
added a link pointing to Comanche County
Capitanian
added a link pointing to Basal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]