|
User talk:Doniago/Archive 13
Partial RecallEek, I guess that Total Recall thing was a bit slack of me. I misapplied a policy which I understood went for list articles: that one doesn't need to source when the same information is adequately sourced in the main article. But, it certainly wasn't a list article, and now that I look, I can't find that policy anyway. I shall rectify forthwith. Just so you don't think ill of me. Sheavsey33 (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
21 Jump StreetHi- I saw your recent reversion of my reversion at 21 Jump Street. I'll admit I didn't pay close enough attention to the source (obviously, IMDB is not a reliable source); I just saw that an IP had blanked the entire Production section while claiming the show was filmed in New Orleans (he presumably was referring to the movie) and so reverted it. I see now that there's no justification for all the level of detail that had been provided. However, I'm not quite sure why you supported blanking the section entirely as opposed to just trimming the trivia and adding a citation needed tag. It's entirely verifiable that it was filmed in Vancouver (a couple of seconds of digging found this [1] and this [2]). I've done so now. Grandpallama (talk) 15:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC) Creating userboxes for Die Hard franchise and ERHey, there. We will need to create userboxes for fans of the Die Hard franchise and The television series ER because of I'm fan both of them. BattleshipMan (talk) 03:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC) ThanksI should have come here earlier instead of cluttering up Edgar's talk page so let me just say thanks for you last post there and I too am sorry that we butted heads and apologies for any offense that I caused. Cheers and happy editing (whenever we get to do that!) MarnetteD | Talk 03:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
The Lion, the Witch and the WardrobeIt is an undoubted fact that two well-known children's books used a similar literary device of children entering a magic wardrobe and getting into magical lands. You need no source for this fact except the two books themselves. I don't know if C.S.Lewis was influenced by Kastner or reinvented this device for himself, and I did not write any assertions about that. Noting the similarity between the two books is in my view quite legitimate and relevant information.Andreas Kaganov (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Oops...In fixing your edit conflict, it looks like you inadvertantly dumped a whole lot of text. See [3]. You might want to go back and correct that. --Jayron32 19:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC) TemplatesWhat are maintenance templates? --86.175.84.166 (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
That was an accident --Tempy1 (talk) 17:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC) Talk:Armageddon (1998 film)#MC/RT scores
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:21, 10 October 2012 (UTC) Maint. TagI got your message about removing a maint. tag in the article on John Holmes, and if I did I must have had something accidentally higlighted and deleted it without realizing it. Since you know which tag it is, go ahead and put it back. I didn't realize that I had removed it, but I must have over highlighted what I was editing. Sorry about that. The Moody Blue (Talk) 21:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "The Disney Afternoon". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 17:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC) UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supplies)I reversed your removal of my addition of "Buck-Boost Transformer" to the section on Autotransformers. I changed "Buck-Boost Transformer" to a link to the WIKIPEDIA article. Paulmmn (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC) --Paul E Musselman Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC) The content I added was ok!I don't think the content needed to be deleted. I watched the film several times, and found out the information I added. The content I added should help! If you watch the film, you see earthquakes strike everywhere! UsefulWikipedia (talk) 02:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted the content I added to the article for Outbreak. I watched the episode of the Pretender on Hulu and thought it would be an interesting piece of information for the article about the film. I took note of the way the virus was used in the episode, I cited the episode and linked back to the Wikipedia page that lists the episodes in Season 1 of the Pretender, and I even specified that it was a fake virus so it wouldn't be in-universe. What was the problem?24.59.131.149 (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
in the firefly universe the humans have terraformed a new galaxy and not a new solar system i know they says its a new solar system in some of the time, but here's the thing a solar system is too small for a the alliance to have problems with keeping in order. The wiki page stats: "In the 26th century, humanity has left an overpopulated Earth and moved to a new solar system, colonizing many planets and moons. The Alliance has won a war with the less established planets of outer star systems". Outer star systems!!! so there is something wrong on that page anyways. And i know where the misunderstanding is from. it is from one of the version of the firefly tv show intro, the actor who played Shepherd Derrial Book(not 100% sure it was that actor) states that they terraformed a new star system, but in a another version of the intro the actor who played Malcolm Reynolds (again not 100% sure it was that actor) stated that they terraformed a new galaxy. When you think about it is the most logical thing, when you think about the huge number of planets and moons in the show and the distance between them. Again i know with our technology is a long distance between planets, but this the year 2517 (or something near that) we are talking about. We have probably discovered warp speed or something similar to it, if we can terraform planets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.26.24.151 (talk) 23:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Episode 4 Malcolm Reynolds said: "here's how it is: earth got used up, so we terraformed a whole new galaxy..." shepherd said(first in the episode: train job (ep2)): after the earth was used up, we found a new solar system and hundreds of new earth was terraformed and colniest. Well that is a huge solar system then, with hundreds of planets, when we have eight planets and only 4 of them is solid, we have dwarf planets but the temp is like -230 celsius on pluto and i don't think it is warmer on Ceres. we can in theory terraform planets like mars because it is very like the earth in many ways and the temp can be nice. and nicer if it got a earth like atmosphere. And i know the was talk about moons to, yeah the are many moons in our solar system jupiter have around 60 but only 4 that is any real size. and i also is talking about the wiki page of the movie: "In the 26th century, humanity has left an overpopulated Earth and moved to a new solar system, colonizing many planets and moons.The Alliance has won a war with the less established planets of outer star systems" those two lines in the plot summary is a contradiction. How can they have won wars on planets of outer star system if there are only one star system. joss is a really great director and writer, but he is saying two things in the television series, and again it is more logical that it is a galaxy rather than a star system. in fact it is more easier if he had said they moved out of the old star system and moved into new ones. like in the Ender's game series, where the colonised several star system to not be vulnerable to xenocide ever again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.26.24.151 (talk) 05:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
okey i give up, joss is not Gene Roddenberry, who made a world that made sense. if you look at the Serenity: The Official Visual Companion he writes what you have been saying. even if it makes no sense. and watch firefly on netflix there is the two prologues i been talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.26.24.151 (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC) One year ago!You wrote something on my discussion side. I am sorry to answer only now. I am seldom here! Yours, --Bufi (talk) 13:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC) IMDb as ReferenceHi. Thank you for letting me know IMDb was not a reliable reference - I did not realize that. I wlll not use again. Thanks again!--Fraulein451 (talk) 18:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2012 (UTC) Nov 2012Thanks for your message on my talk page. Will keep that in mind....--Merlaysamuel : Speechify 16:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
ColecoVisionI added a bunch of citations to the ColecoVision page. Why were you worried about the small changes I made anyway, when there are lots of other things on that page that have no citations?— Preceding unsigned comment added by ColecoAdam (talk • contribs) 20:39, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
From what I can see, it's time that this user be reported...despite the fact that his edits are sporadic. Flyer22 (talk) 01:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC) |
