User talk:Djinn112

This user may have left Wikipedia. Djinn112 has not edited Wikipedia since 12 January 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Retrosior archivum meum nuntios multos habuit, itaque paginam novam feci. Si vis, id videas hypercatena hac. Ad archivum retrosior ireas e pagina illa.

Kyberia De Jinni Alternamentos Ad Encyclopædiam Dicet

Look man, I will only ask this once. I'd apprecate if you'd stop editing my contributions. Your only reason for it is that I word things differently than you, big deal, I don't care. I hope you don't lose sleep over lame stuff like this, editing wars are really annoying. Cyberia23 07:01, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Actually I think I came on a bit strong, I'm not pissed off. My complaint was, when it comes to words I italicize and periods I place, you seem to be nitpicking what I do by changing it behind my back, and that is what is annoying to me. So I'm was asking you to stop changing my formatting.

Yes I'm aware of editing rules, yes I know anyone can change anything. Yes I'm completely cool with that. However I feel the formatting guidelines are wrong, and I suspected that you are going out of your way just to make sure I'm corrected at every turn. So all I'm saying is, if you make a change to something of mine that I don't think warrants an edit, I will change it back as many times as I have to. It may lead to an editing war, where one or both of us could get kicked off Wikipedia for it, or ends when one of us gives up and gets over it.

I asked Wikipedia about the problem of "U.S.S. vs USS" but I don't think they will be changing the system on that. Sad, but so be it I guess, however, they are just GUIDELINES not rules set in stone, so you won't be drawn and quartered for violating them.

I don't have a problem with you personally, I don't even know you, and I don't have a problem with or your contributions to articles, your inputs are good as well. However, you mentioned you don't like calling Classic Trek "Star Trek: The Original Series" because thats not what it's real name. Well in recent years since Next Gen and other Trek series followed, classic trek is commonly refered to as "The Original Series". You might as well spell it all out instead of saying "TOS" which I think is being lazy. You have to write the whole thing out for the link anyway, might as well keep it. As Spock might say, the logic seems flawed.

Anyway, Have a nice Thanksgiving Cyberia23 20:25, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Jinni Thomas De Libris In America Consultat

Reference question: I see you added this to Avoirdupois. "The British colonies in North America, however, adopted the system as it was". Can you help me know what system of pounds was used in 1827 in New England, specifically upstate New York? Thanks. Tom - Talk 16:14, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)

I think this says definitely avoirdupois for the common New England settler. Am I right?

"Since the troy pound was smaller than the commercial pound units used in most of Europe, medieval English merchants often used a larger pound called the "mercantile" pound (libra mercatoria). This unit contained 15 troy ounces, so it weighed 7200 grains. This unit seemed about the right size to merchants, but its division into 15 parts, rather than 12 or 16, was very inconvenient. Around 1300 the mercantile pound was replaced in English commerce by the 16-ounce avoirdupois pound. This is the pound unit still in common use in the U.S. and Britain. Modeled on a common Italian pound unit of the late thirteenth century, the avoirdupois pound weighs exactly 7000 grains. The avoirdupois ounce, 1/16 pound, is divided further into 16 drams.

"Unfortunately, the two English ounce units don't agree: the avoirdupois ounce is 7000/16 = 437.5 grains while the troy ounce is 5760/12 = 480 grains. Conversion between troy and avoirdupois units is so awkward, no one wanted to do it. The troy system quickly became highly specialized, used only for precious metals and for pharmaceuticals, while the avoirdupois pound was used for everything else." http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/custom.html

Ramus-Homo De Jinnis Custodia Exscribendi Quaeret

Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to...

1. ...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
2. ...all articles...

using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. So far over 90% of people who have responded have done this.

Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff. So we use their licenses too.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. It's important to know, even if you choose to do anything so I don't keep asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 14:31, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

G.D.R. De Pagina Navium Mirandarum Rogat: Quis Nautilus?

On the page Miranda class starship, you wrote

Named for the submarine Nautilus

Which Nautilus did the writers have in mind? Gdr 20:34, 2004 Dec 7 (UTC)

Danube-Class Starships

What was your source for this material? If you have copied it verbatim from the interweb somewhere or off a book, it is copyvio, and subject to a possible vfd. Avriette 22:55, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Need help on Prometheus page

Do you have a backup of this page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_class_starship

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AlistairMcMillan has vandalized the page by removing information outright from it. -Alyeska

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 22:42, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

For your work on U.S. presidential election, 2004, in Pennsylvania. You did the most boring work (really) needed on this page. Fee free to continue : We shall continue to improve this page until it reach at least the quality of Connecticut or New York.--Revas 17:27, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorisation

Greetings, Djinn! Please accept this message as an invitation to categorize your user page in the category Category:Wikipedians in Pennsylvania and removing your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pennsylvania page. This page will be removed when all users have been removed. Even if you do not wish to be placed in a category, could you take a moment to remove your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pennsylvania page? Thanks!

For more information, please see Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location. -- CComMack, fellow Pennsylvanian, on behalf of the User Categorization Wikiproject

Classic Rock

Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most like classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! RENTASTRAWBERRY ^FOR LET? röck 00:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 05:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wallace Stevens

Because you have edited the article, you are invited to participate in an Editors Poll on the Wallace Stevens discussion page. --Halcatalyst 18:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{User Pennsylvania}}

I was clearing out Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pennsylvania. I added this template to your page. Feel free to remove it, and thanks for understanding. --evrik 04:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, Djinn112. If you would like a cool signature made for you, be sure to contact Sean gorter at his signature shop! •Srgsp• 09:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC) PS I went to him and got this signature![reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

Image copyright problem with Image:Wroclaw_coa_1938.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Wroclaw_coa_1938.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Nick.com

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nick.com, by Wikipedical (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nick.com is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nick.com, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Nick.com itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Pennsylvania

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

• Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
• Join our mailing list
• Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 03:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Personal Access Display Device

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Personal Access Display Device, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Personal Access Display Device is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Personal Access Display Device, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 00:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Ferengi ship classes

I have nominated Category:Ferengi ship classes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 19:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yoshimi battles the pink robots dvd cd cover.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Yoshimi battles the pink robots dvd cd cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of NX class starship

An editor has nominated NX class starship, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NX class starship and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Borg cube ship over earth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Borg cube ship over earth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Zoölogy

I have nominated Zoölogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Snowman (talk) 10:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Oberth class starship.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oberth class starship.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marquee moon album cover.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marquee moon album cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Akira class starship.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Akira class starship.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --EEMIV (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isolinear optical chip

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Isolinear optical chip, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bargainville album cover.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bargainville album cover.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Apollo 18 album cover.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo 18 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RookChat

An article of yours is at AFD here. Iowateen (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Apples

A tag has been placed on The Apples requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Mooninites

I have nominated The Mooninites, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mooninites. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --EEMIV (talk) 19:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gordon Downey

The article Gordon Downey has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Throwaway85 (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hoss's Steak and Sea House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoss's Steak and Sea House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoss's Steak and Sea House until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 09:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Djinn112. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Julep

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Julep, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑ 22:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WilcoYankeeHotelFoxtrot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WilcoYankeeHotelFoxtrot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The spirit of the lamp listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The spirit of the lamp. Since you had some involvement with the The spirit of the lamp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. and similar redirects Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vitameatavegamin for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vitameatavegamin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vitameatavegamin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. TTN (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bjoerk listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bjoerk. Since you had some involvement with the Bjoerk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of double albums for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of double albums is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of double albums until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION ^(talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Star Trek wars and battles has been nominated for deletion

Category:Star Trek wars and battles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RookChat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RookChat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RookChat (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^(What did I screw up now?) 21:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mono Puff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mono Puff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mono Puff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^(What did I screw up now?) 04:15, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Bjoerk" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bjoerk has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17 § Bjoerk until a consensus is reached. QuietHere (talk) 10:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]