Hello, Dinman01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you are referring to the article described below, it was deleted per a deletion discussion, which means that it should not be recreated unless you can address the concerns raised in the discussion. If you can do that, you should write a new article as a draft using the Article Wizard and submit it for a review. 331dot (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am referring to the article below. I would like to re-create and will attempt to address the concerns raised in the discussion. Thank you. Dinman01 (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent W. Colton (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
@MicrobiologyMarcus:I received notification of my article Kent W. Colton being declined because submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Are you able to provide a little more detail so that I can revise before editing and submitting again?
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:
review WP:REFB for help with formatting references, external links are not suitable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kent W. Colton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Dinman01!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus[petri dish·growths]19:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I re-submitted the article Kent W. Colton on March 9th and it is currently under review status. Is it possible to have an expedited review since it is a re-submitted article?
There is no way to guarantee a speedy review, be it for a new draft or a resubmitted one, they all go into the same category. Drafts are reviewed in no particular order by volunteers. Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, most people (myself included) don't do reviews or re-reviews upon request. That said, when I've reviewed pages that have addressed their issues, I'm happy to evaluate. I'll take a look at it when I'm doing AfC reviews next but I won't promise that I will approve it or decline it (sometimes if it's close and I've WP:INVOLVED having reviewed it before, I will let another reviewer make a close call determination, especially if the prior declination was based on WP:N—although a cursory glance above shows I may have had WP:IC or WP:PROMO concerns originally). If I see some areas to improve on or something that's lacking, I'll try and come back here to provide concrete feedback. microbiologyMarcus[petri dish·growths]20:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've left some maintenance tags in the article, and I've converted your referenced authored section into a plain wikilist using the {{cite book}}, though you may want to review and see if {{cite journal}} may be more applicable. Note that in that template, you can use digital object identifiers to create links to the authored works as you would in the references section.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kent W. Colton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Kent W. Colton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
