User talk:Dingo1729Hello, Dingo1729, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place " List of largest empiresHello. I undid your delete of the record-breaking empires section as you claimed this had consensus on the talk page, which it did not; please take it there for further discussion if you want to challenge this. Thanks. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Hi, I feel like I gave my reasons for the deletion on the talk page. Maybe I should have left them there longer for someone to reply? The single response I got was in agreement. Do you disagree that this section is inaccurate, as I outlined? If you feel that you can make it accurate, that would be an improvement, but just restoring the inaccurate information doesn't seem good. Regards, Dingo1729 (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Discrete frequencyThe problem with an article titled "Discrete frequency" is that it is like having an article Automatic soap (the stuff you get from automatic soap dispensers), so I moved it to a title that does make sense. Although I have no particular idea where one might go with this stub, this appears to me a better solution than maintaining an article on a non-existing topic. You are right, the function produced as output by a DFT also has a discrete domain; I've adjusted the article accordingly. --Lambiam 22:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC) By the way, a signal does not need to be periodic to have a discrete frequency domain. Any weighted sum of sinusoidals will do; so-called discrete frequency noise sometimes manifests as a mix of almost pure whistle sounds that do not have common harmonics. --Lambiam 22:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC) GCHQ biographiesThanks very much for adding the birth information to Clifford Cocks' and Malcolm J. Williamson's biographies! Two questions: First, where did you get the information for Williamson? I'm writing a book on cryptography and I need to cite a source other than Wikipedia. Second, you filled in Cocks' place of birth as Altrincham, Chesire, but the Bristol honorary degree citation says Prestbury, Chesire. Do you know which is correct? Thanks! Doctorhook (talk) 15:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC) Redirect to Ginsberg's theoremI tried a few things and see you have also. I can't get anchors to work with either the {{anchor}} template or with headers. Have you had any luck? We'll see how the RfC goes. I think we're stuck with a soft redirect and no anchoring, so I'm not sure this is a solution. Jojalozzo 01:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Done Black Kite (t) 11:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Holiday Cheer
Disambiguation link notification for April 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central tendency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mode (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Disambiguation link notification for September 20Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Standard error, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bayesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Think before editing.Although in might be better described somewhere else, I brought it into context with an explanation, which for the end user isn't all that bad. If you felt that it was better explained elsewhere, add a link so the reader has both information instead of none. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Rupert Swift (talk • contribs) 20:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Average, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Integration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Sheldrake talk pageHi, Sorry it's impossible to have a reasonable conversation on the Sheldrake talk page because of a number of fans who take any discussion either off topic or into a silly argument. They seem to be incapable of judging his first career within the usual framework of science. The second part of his career he has spent outside of academia, while making claims about science in books targeted at a popular audience. If Sheldrake is right, as his supporters seem to believe, or even partially right, he would be the greatest scientific thinker of our time - his claims are that extraordinary. The community consensus is that WP:FRINGE should apply, and the arbcom agree, and that means we give due prominence to the criticism of him. Numerous points have been made by his critics several times, and these are summarised in the lead. I have also tried to incorporate several positive book reviews into the article. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC) December 2013Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Rupert Sheldrake. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 05:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi!Thanks for working in Limiting case (philosophy of science). --Damián A. Fernández Beanato (talk) 04:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Hi Dingo!
More
RM notificationSince you have participated in at least one Requested Move or Move Review discussion, either as participant or closer, regarding the title of the article currently at Sarah Jane Brown, you are being notified that there is another discussion about that going on now, at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move #10. We hope we can finally achieve consensus among all participating about which title best meets policy and guidelines, and is not too objectionable. --В²C ☎ 17:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC) Hi, |