User talk:Democfest

Welcome!

Hi, Cement4802. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Altitude

Hi Cement, I had to undo your edits to the Sydney and Australian tallest buildings article, with regards to Altitude: you had not provided a reliable source which confirms that Altitude is currently in the topped-out phase. Feel free to add said content back in, once you've provided said source. Best, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't introduce content that is unreferenced, as you did at List of tallest buildings in Australia. Sydney's skyscraper count (completed and topped-out) is still one less than Melbourne, per CTBUH. Best, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opening title of "Ambulance Australia" television program.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Your recent editing history at Article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Note: The CNN article is under discretionary sanctions which you have violated:

• Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period).
• Enforced BRD: If an edit you make is challenged by reversion you must discuss the issue on the article talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit) before reinstating your edit. Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts.

I suggest you revert your last edit. Also, there is a discussion on the article talk page.[1] O3000 (talk) 13:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you have issues with habitual edit warring - the warning here applies to Clementine Ford (writer), too. Based on your edit summary here, please also review WP:ONUS. VQuakr (talk) 09:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Carlos Maza; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 04:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Antifa (United States); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SharabSalam (talk) 11:32, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019 II

Your recent editing history at Steven Crowder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. O3000 (talk) 12:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carlos Maza, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 20:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Australian residential architectural styles

Hi there. Thanks for your additions to Australian residential architectural styles. I've been working on this article on and off over a number of years and really appreciate your well-sourced additions. However, I've had to remove Toxteth Park, Glebe as it's actually Victorian Italianate. And Juniper Hall, Paddington that was already there is actually Victorian Georgian and not Old Colonial Georgian (in fact it was listed twice!). I'd really appreciate if you could add citations to each property's architectural style if you plan to add any more images. That really helps if an image is challenged. Many thanks, once again. And keep up the great work :-) Cheers. Rangasyd (talk) 05:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. I've also been working on the Australian non-residential architectural styles page which was and is still a bit oversaturated with architectural examples from Victoria, so it would be great if we could get some more examples from across the nation as a whole. Cement4802 (talk) 08:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A pleasure. The same issue applies with citations for the non-residential arch. styles. Yeah, I hear you the dominance of Victorian examples. I've been adding NSW over the years; but I'll try to give a national perspective. @Kerry Raymond: Any imagery from Qld that you wish to add to Australian non-residential architectural styles would be appreciated; especially where it's unique to your state or a landmark example. And perhaps suggestions on who to reach out in Tas, and SA/NT? @JarrahTree: Same re WA, if you're interested. I'm sure there would be good examples and images from Fremantle that could be used, if you can find citations that clearly articulate their architectural style. Many thanks. Rangasyd (talk) 11:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Can you please stop for a minute. You're adding properties to Australian non-residential architectural styles that are already listed in other categories; and you're adding them in the wrong category without references. eg. Department of Lands building is NOT Victorian Free Classical, its Victorian Renaissance Revival. Can I ask that before you add (or take off any more) you please add a reference that clearly shows the relevant architectural style. I'm fixing up VFC right now. I'm hyperlinking where possible, adding citations and sorting into alphabetical order. Re Glebe... do we really need four buildings from the one suburb to demonstrate the style? It's not about numbers on this page, it's about getting the best representative mix across Australia. Cheers Rangasyd (talk) 11:50, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the sources I used to determine the architectural style of buildings might have conflicted with other sources which have already been used on this page, especially since different architectural features from different periods could have been added on to existing buildings. I'll try and avoid this next time.Cement4802 (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For Queensland, if you go to the Search the Queensland Heritage Register webpage and choose the Advanced Search option, you get the option to search by Style which ranges from Art Deco to Tudor (but curiously seems to omit plain old "Queenslander" which is a dominant residential style). That list of styles (plus Queenslander) would appear to be a good starting point for Queensland architect, plus the search capability means it's easy to find examples of those styles (noting that as these images are CC-BY licensed, I have uploaded many of them to Commons to make life even easier). Kerry (talk) 01:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cement4802: Some of the sources I used... Please add the reference from now on so that we can see if it's from a reliable source; or maybe we can provide a better source. A lot of work in QLD and NSW has been done to extract data from the relative state heritage registers for items of state significance; and work has also been done on the Commonwealth Heritage List for buildings of national significance. We should use these buildings as the stand out examples of both residential and non-residential architecture (and the same for the other states/territories). Each of these properties has a Wikipedia article. Thanks
@Kerry Raymond: Great work as always. Cheers Rangasyd (talk) 12:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rangasyd, just to clear things up a bit, all of the additions I've made to both the residential and non-residential articles are now sourced from NSW's State Heritage Register. Though I'm not sure if it's wise to cite every example from the same source, otherwise it'll get repetitive. Thanks - Cement4802 (talk) 03:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cement4802: It is very wise to add a citation to every entry that clearly indicates why a property has been placed in a particular category. And please be judicious in your selection of examples. We don't need three examples from the same suburb of the same style. As this is an article that is focused on Australian residential architectural styles, examples should be sourced from across the nation, not just one city/suburb of one city. I have made many more corrections. And finally, please add a reason for everyone of your edits. We have to second guess why you doing things - a brief description goes a long way. And there is no need to use the words "File:" or "Image:", if located with <gallery></gallery> Cheers. Rangasyd (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney infobox montage...cabal of editors with the same tiresome excuses!

I actually posted a response to your last comment on the Talk:Sydney page. However, User:AussieLegend removed it. Can you believe that? He has the gall to remove something I wrote simply because he did not like it. It's ridiculous. Have you considered taking it further? These same editors can't keep their rigid control over the Sydney page forever. Ashton 29 (talk) 14:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tell lies. The response is still there. Only the personal attack was removed in accordance with WP:RPA. It wasn't removed because I did not like it. Another editor agreed that it was a personal attack. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely Ashton 29, a few stubborn editors in complete denial have held up any sort of progress on the page for at least a decade now. I have consistently maintained my position and I've always tried to get the ball rolling, but everyone else seems to chicken out and give in whenever the few select editors in opposition pull up their same old tired excuses, which is weird given the overwhelming majority of editors are in opposition to them. I can simply only sit and watch, unless we get more editors with some actual balls to just push forward. It's certainly very frustrating.- Cement4802 (talk) 03:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any ideas on a formal process we can put forward, or where we can take this? Ashton 29 (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened up a request for a dispute resolution here. Would appreciate your input on the conflict, hopefully a user with non-biased views can help us achieve a resolution or compromise. Ashton 29 (talk) 08:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashton 29:As witnessed with the complete lack of participation in your dispute resolution, this is one of my main gripes with the community of editors involved in Sydney's page. Where are they? They'll support the move for a montage and they'll happily share the same frustrations with the lack of progress, but once it actually comes time to taking drastic action or making a move, they vanish into thin air. I hope they know that it takes more than two editors to actually push away the anchor holding this proposal back. It makes no sense for them to collectively complain yet lazily take no action to resolve this. - Cement4802 (talk) 08:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cement4802: Suddenly there's a bunch of users united in their opposition. It's like AussieLegend or somebody has canvassed them to come and voice their disapproval. It just seems like totally circumspect, almost sly or vindictive behaviour, to me. Some of the editors who have suddenly added their names to the list of opposition to the montage hardly ever edit the Sydney page, or haven't really contributed much in months/years. Suddenly they want to stake their claim in the anti-montage sentiment? It's rubbish, mate. Absolute piffle. Ashton 29 (talk) 15:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashton 29: Absolutely. Several editors that i've been having disputes with over seperate unrelated articles, especially those political in nature, have decided that they'll use their personal grudge against me to come on over to the page to likewise target and harass me. It's a disgusting mob mentality. For the record, an moderator on the dispute resolution page has actually ruled that you didn't actually make any personal attacks or cause any disruptive editing. The only thing you've violated so far is not consulting everyone you were creating it, but the main point remains. I've seen the constant harassement and attacks on your page coming from (talk), and all of his claims have been rightly refuted. It seems he also has a history of harrasement and sending out false, unsubstantiated claims if you look through the archives on his talk page, and i'd suggest that he himself is actually in violation of several wikipedia policies.Cement4802 (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashton 29: - All of the editors who have recently posted are active editors who have edited Sydney previously and who have participated in previous discussions. No doubt they have Sydney on their watchlist and have become tired of the situation. Accusing somebody of canvassing without proof is unwise at the best of times.
@Cement4802: - Similarly, accusing people of opposing you because they have some grudge against you is uncivil. If you have had conflict with so many editors then perhaps you should try to look objectively at your edits and try to understand why you have been opposed. As for the DRN discussion, no admin said anything. The editor who mentioned disruptive editing is a volunteer and not an admin. In any case he did not mention personal attacks at all. Finally, Accusing somebody of harrassment is unwise at the best of times. Ironically, posting bogus warning templates to another editor's talk page, such as the one that you posted to mine, could be seen as harrassment, especially if you persist. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend: Accusing people of personal attacks when no such thing has occured, and proceeding to do the same thing to other editors, is just as, if not more disruptive. The edit warring warning was justified, as your recent editing at the Sydney page shows that you have been disruptive in your edits by constantly reverting edits that you disagree with. For an experienced editor like you, i hope you should know that such disuptes should be resolved in the talk page, not in the form of constant reverts and disruptive behaviour that borders on vandalism and harassement. Should you continue with these behaviours, discplinary action can be taken against you. In fact, you have quite a long history of harassement, disruptive behaviour, edit warring and blatantly accusing other editors of actions without any substantiated evidence. - Cement4802 (talk) 11:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing people of personal attacks when no such thing has occured, and proceeding to do the same thing to other editors, is just as, if not more disruptive. I agree, and both you and Ashton 29 should not do that. The warning that you left on my page was completely inappropriate as there was no edit-warring. If you believe there was, then by all means submit a report at WP:AN3. Either do that or remove the baseless allegations that you have made in the above post. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:23, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend: Again, please be mindful of the fact that you and another editor have been just as guilty of using personal attacks when you disagree with someone. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. And the warning was sent over for good reason. If you can't accept the fact that your behaviour has not been up to scratch, then focus on improving it instead of denying it.- Cement4802 (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is blatantly untrue. I would suggest that you read WP:NPA and WP:EDITWAR after which you should apologise. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to apologise for something you have done. Your actions were in line with the definition of edit warring - Cement4802 (talk) 02:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you refuse to take any action I'm afraid I have no alternative. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Ashton 29 - Increasingly problematic editing and personal attacks. AussieLegend (✉) 17:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Please note, I'm only advising you of this because the last time I opened an ANI discussion and didn't advice tangentially involved editors, somebody got upset. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the word claimed

I suggest that you read WP:CLAIMED. In fact, the whole page. I'll save a bit of time by quoting: "Said, stated, described, wrote, commented, and according to are almost always neutral and accurate." "To write that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying a disregard for evidence". Doug Weller talk 14:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out - sockpuppetry

The IP which made this edit geolocates to New South Wales, Australia. Was that you editing while logged out to evade the 1RR restriction on the page? If so, you need to know that that is prohibited behavior and can lead to you being blocked or banned from editing the encyclopedia.

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NorthBySouthBaranof, edits were indeed made logged out but that was out of pure convenience. If I'm not mistaken, I believe you may be referring to the Andy Ngo article, where an IP address made edits on the page. I witnessed that too. I did indeed make edits logged out, but that was out of pure convenience on a different unrelated page. I have no connection with the IP address on the article. Thanks for letting me know though - Cement4802 (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 14:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:AussieLegend. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 04:49, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Cement4802. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. AussieLegend (✉) 02:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that if you decide to post a retaliatory warning on my talk page, further action will be taken. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Sydney

Hi there,

I've noticed Crown Sydney is listed on Wikipedia as having topped-out, with you having made these changes a month or two ago. However, I can't find the source to corroborate this. I've found this source from Crown (February 2020), which speaks of a WP:FUTURE topping-out in March (which, for all we know, could have been delayed due to COVID-19). Yet, I'm not finding any secondary sources. Considering it will be Sydney's tallest building, I'd imagine there would be a lot of coverage.

As such, I don't actually think it has topped-out. Instead, it appears to still be in its final days/weeks/months of construction. I'm happy to be wrong though, so can you please provide the source you based these edits on? kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 15:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'll cite some secondary sources for the topped out status. My apologies for the unsourced edits, I should have known better.

On a quick unrelated sidenote, if I'm not mistaken I believe I've seen your username around on the online development forum skyscrapercity? - Cement4802 (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cement!

I'm wary that the source appears to report on the same source I provided above... a bit of circular reporting going on. But I won't pursue this further, considering it does look like it's in that awkward phase between UC/TO (and could very well have TO per the sources provided).

And yes, guilty as charged! I don't frequent it as much, but it's always handy to know what's going to happen with developments before they hit the press. You're on Skyscrapercity too? —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, i'm a regular on that forum. I'm quite active over there and my username is almost a mirror image of my wikipedia username, so you really can't miss it. I'm surprised you didn't get the subtle hints that indicated this, such as my suspiciously odd confidence that crown was topped out without any sources (yes, i know i shouldn't be relying on forum information), the nicking of cul's crown photo to be used over here ("richard braddish" would be him) and all the contributions i've made to skyscraper and transport related topics on wikipedia haha. - Cement4802 (talk) 05:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I feel so silly. I have indeed seen your username plenty! it just didn't click... so many names, I'm pretty hopeless remembering at times. Yes, it may be controversial of me to say this, but Cull is probably one of my favourite people over at Ozscrapers. He knows his stuff and likes accuracy which is always good. And yes, I know the feeling re forum information... it's a pity we can't use this often privy information, but I guess it's still good to have the advantage of at least knowing what's coming next and what to look out for. Hope to bump into you more at the forum! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where we are at re: Sydney montage

Well, I thought I'd start a new subsection on your talk page because AussieLegend keeps hijacking the discussion. Currently, Merbabu has proposed a weekly (or similar) rotation where we have a single image and then a montage, vice versa. How does that sound to you? HiLo48 was particularly stubborn, and dug his heels in, point blank refusing this suggestion as did AussieLegend who very inaccurately labelled the discussion a dead horse, to suit his own agenda about closing the discussion so his single image wins. It's interesting the same few users consistently refuse compromise, yet as soon as you add a montage they ask you to take it to the talk page, presumably under the guise of discussion and "compromise"..and yet you simply can't discuss anything with them. Their minds are made up. If I went and added a montage now, he'd revert it, yet I'm not really sure he has the credibility to do such a thing given how many people now have put the names to the support, how I've CLEARLY used the talk page many times (so it doesn't simply look like edit warring or non-constructive editing/vandalism as he might portray it to be whenever a montage is added), and how silly his ownership of the Sydney page is starting to look. Ashton 29 (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, anything to get the ball rolling I'm all for it - Cement4802 (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it seems like one step forward, two steps back with these editors. AussieLegend, in particular, is becoming more and more controlling. He is even undoing edits on the Newcastle page. I wonder how many other Australian pages he has an ownership style of editing of.Ashton 29 (talk) 09:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citing podcasts

Hi, with regards to your recent edit to Lando Norris, when citing podcasts and the like, it would be helpful to readers and other editors if you included a time stamp (see Wikipedia:Citing sources#Sound recordings. Don't worry about doing it for Norris, but for future refernce. Thanks,
SSSB (talk) 08:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

Please do not repeat the canvassing evident at diff or diff. The second also contains gratuitous attacks on named editors and is doubly prohibited. Bear in mind that just as you are frustrated and struggling to get your preferred outcome, so are others. And just as you are editing in good faith, trying to improve the encyclopedia against clueless opposition, so are others. At any rate, canvassing is a serious issue which you can enquire about at the WP:Teahouse if needed. The bottom line is that blocks will follow anything that looks like canvassing or personal attacks for the next couple of months while the issues at Talk:Sydney are discussed calmly and politely, and then digested. Johnuniq (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnuniq, canvassing is a stretch, considering my and Ashton 29's level of involvement in the prior discussions and lack of participation in the RfC. Which similarly involved users who disagree with Cement4802 should they have notified? --Cjhard (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the level of involvement: that's why I didn't think about a block. However, it is canvassing and the second diff is a personal attack. Anyone at the Teahouse would explain that you don't notify individuals about an RfC with certain possible IAR exceptions, such as notifying a subject-matter expert who has not been involved in disputes at the article concerned. If notifying editors who have, for example, edited an article, all such editors would have to receive the same notification. That might be cut off to all within the last year. The bottom line (explained at my first link above) is that selective notification is not on. It's "just" a guideline, but it is taken very seriously. There is no need for anyone to get overly excited: the only point is that it should not be repeated (and particularly opponents should not be mentioned unless at a noticeboard). Johnuniq (talk) 07:37, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnuniq I'll refrain, but just so you know the other editors have been just as guilty of "personal attacks", especially after I took the right initiative to notify one of them about the (previous) ongoing ANI discussion, to which he hopped on board with his trusty partner in crime to make some snide, mocking remarks that I had forgot to sign my comment (quite hilariously childish actually). I'm not asking you to tell them off or anything (because i'm not that type of guy, and unlike certain editors here who shall remain nameless, wikipedia is not my life), im just pointing out that such behaviour is quite widespread across all editors involved, and i reckon my comments were actually rather mild in comparison. - Cement4802 (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know it's on both sides and that's why I'm trying to hose everyone down, particularly during the RfC period. Johnuniq (talk) 10:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation clutter

In editing Antifa (United States), as you did here, please beware of Wikipedia:Citation overkill. Five consecutive references, especially in the lead, are excessive. NedFausa (talk) 05:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. It's just that such edits are usually really controversial in nature, and based on the history of the page, "over egging the pudding" with sources seems to be necessary to get an edit across. But I'll refrain in the future - Cement4802 (talk) 05:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misrepresentation of sources concerning Antifa

Just one example.[2] - it simply calls the group controversial and " The term is used to define a broad group of people whose political beliefs lean toward the left -- often the far left -- but do not conform with the Democratic Party platform." Do you not even read your sources? See WP:HEADLINE. Doug Weller talk 10:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question is have YOU read the sources. They all describe ANTIFA as being far left or conforming to far-left ideologies. Nothing has been misrepresented and stating otherwise could suggest a bit of bias - Cement4802 (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. FDW777 (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block from Antifa (United States)

To enforce an arbitration decision and for 1RR violation, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

El_C 15:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks mate!! much appreciated. have a nice day :) - Cement4802 (talk) 07:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not acceptable. Please restrict yourself to the facts and avoid personal comments. You were blocked for violating policy. Nothing more, nothing less. El_C 07:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This will be your final warning about engaging in personal attacks. There will not be another. El_C 08:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any similar comments about any editor and you can expect anything from a full topic ban to an indefinite block. Doug Weller talk 09:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for multiple personal attacks after warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

El_C 10:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fire engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Beach Fire Department. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated logo for The Today Show Australia

Hello,

You have uploaded an outdated logo for The Today Show Australia.

The new logo is available on Google Images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.78.246.6 (talk) 04:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC) (Fork99 (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC): moved from top of page to correct spot + added heading)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:7 News Australia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:7 News Australia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ABC News Australia.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ABC News Australia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Today Show Australia logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Today Show Australia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kia Forte into Kia Cerato. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crayator (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blablubbs were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crayator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crayator, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Blablubbs ^(talk • contribs) 11:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenland Centre Sydney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greenland Centre Sydney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your move of DJR Team Penske

Hi. I have reverted your undiscussed move of DJR Team Penske. If you still want the article to be renamed please start a requested move. Thanks. A7V2 (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise I have reverted your other undiscussed moves of Supercar team articles. The long-standing convention has been for team articles to use generic rather than commercial names, as the latter change frequently, while the former are more stable. Dvzk (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The articles have existed for many years without this known commercially as that you are seeking to insert. Per WP:BRD the onus is on you to make the case for it being added, I would suggest at a central location such as the Talk:Supercars Championship to gain the most opinions. Please consider the implications of WP:3RR before reverting again. Dvzk (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Today Extra Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Today Extra Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Bank logo with text.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Bank logo with text.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Opening title of "Ambulance Australia" television program.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Opening title of "Ambulance Australia" television program.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Bank logo with text.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Bank logo with text.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Formula 1 logo 1950.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Formula 1 logo 1950.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenland centre sydney artists impression.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greenland centre sydney artists impression.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brad Jones Racing logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brad Jones Racing logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Irwin Racing logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Irwin Racing logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kelly Racing logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Racing logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Bull Holden Racing Team logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red Bull Holden Racing Team logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shell V-Power Racing logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shell V-Power Racing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Team Cooldrive logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Team Cooldrive logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Matt Stone Racing logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Matt Stone Racing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Penrite racing logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Penrite racing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alstom Citadis 305 (Sydney) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alstom Citadis 305 (Sydney), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alstom Citadis 305 (Sydney) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coding

You keep deleting tons of clear spaces in the infoboxes, spaces that are added to help editors see what is what. You also keep adding "File:" to the images in infoboxes, please stop doing that. Thanks.  Mr.choppers | ✎  04:10, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're still not being very clear. Clear spaces with the lead images in the infobox? With other info? I've just made another edit to try and address those problems I think you're specifiying, but you'll have to be more clear with what you find wrong. The images I am trying to reinstate are objectively better in fitting in with the rest of the article. - Cement4802 (talk) 04:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Click this, you will see that a large number of blank spaces (highlighted on the left) were removed in your edit. Might be a problem with your browser, but it didn't happen with your most recent edit. I don't have a lot to say about the choice of images.  Mr.choppers | ✎  05:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fastback/Liftback/Hatchback

Fastback simply describes the shape of the rear of a car. Hatchback/liftback, on the other hand, describe defined functions and the shape of the rear. Your edits needlessly confused matters and at least the edits at Fastback were not in any way supported by your sources (one being a rhyming dictionary). Fastbacks can be sedans, coupés, or liftbacks, just as how the Daihatsu Applause is an example of a notchback hatch.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We can meet in the middle; ive reverted back on the hatchback article, where the definition was CLEARLY a lot more confusing before, with a larger number of unsourced edits and conflicting definitions. I might tweak some definitions here and there but the edits i made on the hatchback article were clearer and more coherent in explaining the differences in body shape. This also includes descriptions such as "fastback" in the article which like you just described, has nothing to do with the functionality and thus now has even more reason not to be compared to hatchbacks. The focus should be on hatchbacks vs liftbacks primarily, where they share the same tailgate functionality. - Cement4802 (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New South Wales Police Force flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New South Wales Police Force flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename "B-segment" to "B-segment (Europe)" & Create new "B-segment (Worldwide)"

I have a proposal to make two separate pages, one for Europe and the other for the world:

B-segment (Europe) B-segment (Worldwide)

That would stop the dispute and everyone would be satisfied.

What do you think?

Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.149.229 (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Box truck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freightliner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Commons licenses

Re: [3], do you understand Creative Commons licenses and the requirements to comply with them? See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/. The Flickr page also says "Some rights reserved," and given that we do not give photo credits, much less links to the photographer's site, in the articles that use them, the uses will not comply with the terms of that license. General Ization ^Talk 05:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons allows CC BY 2.0 images, otherwise i wouldn't even have been able to upload the image to wikimedia commons in the first place. There are countless other images on wikimedia commons that aren't under a public domain licence. If that isn't the case, then you may as well just delete most of my uploads from flickr - Cement4802 (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it to the folks at Commons to sort it out. I assume you'll take your cue with regard to the other Motor Verso photos you've uploaded and linked to here from the outcome of that nomination. Thanks for making your case on the page there. General Ization ^Talk 06:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what an IMU 100 interior looks like.

Go buy one of those images from a stock website or something. Literally found one with just a few seconds of searching.

117.20.71.138 (talk) 07:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, but I really only just source these images from the train's wikimedia commons gallery. The image i put in was placed in the IMU 100 series category and I just went off of that, so not entirely my fault. I'm not from Queensland so I'm not awfully familiar with all the intricate details of the QR rolling stock, i'm simply here to improve the articles with what's available. I'll try and source a more accurate image - Cement4802 (talk) 08:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transperth C Series.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Transperth C Series.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Police vehicles in New York City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freightliner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Reynolds (racing driver), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Reynolds.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mazda Demio

Hello, Cement4802. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mazda Demio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hi, it's me again. Like I said, a lot of people on the Facebook appreciation group for the NSW TrainLink D set say the earliest these trains will enter service 2022. Every time I say "best case scenario Q3 2021", they say "no 2022". Please tell me which source information you read that says it's been outlined that the new trains will enter service in 2021 not 2022 and send it to me because I need to know when exactly in 2021 they will enter service. Edgar Searle (talk) 08:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the personal anecdotal opinions of a few people on a facebook group do not count as being a reliable source. As per Wikipedia's policies, information is sourced from reliable and official material, such as news articles, press releases or official government statements. This is the cited article in question, which outlines that the trains will be introduced in 2021. [1] Although it doesn't specify when in 2021, we still write our articles corresponding to what is written in official reliable sources. It doesn't matter if you personally disagree with the source. Unless you can find another reliable, unbiased source that specifies a different date to what is already displayed in the article, the date should remain as "2021". - Cement4802 (talk) 09:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but again, outlined does not 100% mean it's true. And like I said, it's unlikely we're gonna see them enter service while Sydney is in lockdown at this rate. I need a source information that provides an exact date of when it will enter service. Do you think leaving the Facebook appreciation group for the NSW TrainLink D set is a reasonable response? Edgar Searle (talk) 22:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is not a reliable source. Again, until you can find an alternative reliable source that has a more specific date for when they enter service, the current date should not be changed. It doesn't matter if YOU personally find it incorrect, it's the best source we have at the moment - Cement4802 (talk) 01:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also another thing, as to traction equipment but I'm not sure if you know anything about them. I've been reading the best source information I could find, but I couldn't find which type of transistor technology (IGBT or SiC) these trains use. I know that these trains will be using VVVF inverters supplied by Mitsubishi Electric, but I don't either know yet if the motor (obviously I know now that your only motor choice is in a 3-phase configuration, and AC motors are now required for VVVF drives in order to vary the frequency) will be a regular induction motor or a synchronous motor with permanent magnets. I'd appreciate it if you could provide me a reliable source of information such as a website or a PDF document that says which type of motors these trains will use, ensuring that it at least says IGBT or SiC. Edgar Searle (talk) 02:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Hit a few up champ! Great job with your Wikipedia edits and see you soon:) EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 04:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Water Head Office

Hi there. I'm not sure what your objection to including the Chinese name is precisely. However, the hotel is definitely branded bilingually on the ground - have a look at the main sign at the front door on Pitt Street. The fact is, this is a hotel which is owned by a Chinese government-owned company and operated by a chain which is also Chinese government-owned. It is helpful for readers to be able to connect it to the rest of the chain, for which the Chinese name is much better known than the English. It is also notable that this is the first foray of the Chinese government into building new luxury hotels - and that content is referenced. Ownership and management does not seem to be of interest to you, which is fine, but it is of interest to other readers reading about hotels. Most other articles on luxury hotels note this information. --49.255.252.131 (talk) 05:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mazda Demio

Hello, Cement4802. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mazda Demio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:20, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Crayator

Hello, Cement4802. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crayator, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understood

It's me again. When you had removed my constructive edit to Alstom Metropolis (Sydney Metro) you didn't actually read that the source was listed at the bottom of the article, separate from the other references. Please ensure you read all references, external links, further reading and sources included in an article very, very carefully before checking its revision history. I've moved it to the reference list for now, but I can't get the PDF link to work; you're gonna have to purchase it on the link provided. Edgar Searle (talk)

Edgar, that's not how you cite sources. Unless it's an external link (usually only used for official government/company websites), you need to properly add a full citation that includes a reference number next to the text in the page, and the full reference in the footnote section at the bottom of the page (basically like all the other citations you see in wikipedia pages). If you're not familiar with doing it manually, there's an easy, simple cite function in the visual editor. - Cement4802 (talk) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I had to temporarily do it that way because I couldn't get a PDF link to work like I said, so to download and read that full source you will have to purchase it on the link provided. I can't change the link unfortunately, so we'll just have to look for another link that allows us to download without having to pay, because when I downloaded the PDF, Chrome gave me a warning that the file from the URL couldn't download securely, so I pressed "keep" and then it downloaded successfully. Edgar Searle (talk) 04:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Crayator

Hello, Cement4802. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crayator".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --Ferien (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hi, Cement4802. I note that you have removed well-sourced text from Sky News Australia[4] and have changed the description of the network as being "widely considered to have a significant right-wing to far-right bias" to "conservative to right-wing bias". When you were reverted, by two different editors, you edit warred to reinstall your versions, in preference to going to the talkpage to attempt to get consensus for your versions. This is disruptive editing. Please don't revert again, and use the talkpage. Bishonen | tålk 09:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The edits were made without any consultation from the talk page. I'm simply reverting the page back to how it was before. I'm not the one making any new edits - Cement4802 (talk) 09:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? You are arguing that just to add one sentence updating an earlier view by the same person needs approval on the talk page? Where did you get that idea? Doug Weller talk 09:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reFill must be carefully checked every time

In your edits of 15 September 2021 of Daniel Ricciardo, you installed some thoroughly bollixed references, including the unworkable

{{Cite web|last=readNovember 24|first=Will Dale2 min|last2=newscorpau|first2=2014-8:13AM/* global newscorpau */ const coralComments =|last3=coralComments|first3=newscorpau coralcomments; const talkUrl =|last4=comments)</span>`; }); });|first4=`${coralComments talk}/api/v1/comments-count?ids=`; fetch then then innerHTML = `${data} comments`; document querySelector innerHTML += ` <span>}|date=2014-11-23|title=Ricciardo’s ‘unbelievable’ race from rear|url=https://www.ntnews.com.au/sport/daniel-ricciardo-caps-off-stellar-2014-formula-1-season-with-charging-fourth-at-abu-dhabi/news-story/19cfe34708c392b7c85035e4f8b2f4b4|access-date=2021-09-15|website=ntnews|language=en}}

which I corrected to

{{Cite news |author=Will Dale |date=November 24, 2014 |title=Daniel Ricciardo caps off stellar 2014 Formula 1 season with charging fourth at Abu Dhabi |website=NT News |url=https://www.ntnews.com.au/sport/daniel-ricciardo-caps-off-stellar-2014-formula-1-season-with-charging-fourth-at-abu-dhabi/news-story/19cfe34708c392b7c85035e4f8b2f4b4 |access-date=2021-09-15}}

and there were two others like it that I also fixed.

Moral: reFill and the visual editor's citation tool are powerful and useful tools, but results are not guaranteed and must be carefully inspected each and every time. Australian news sites are particularly likely to get messed up. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:7 News Australia.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:7 News Australia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10 News First.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10 News First.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision re; Dominic Perrottet`

Not sure why you consistently keep reverting the edited piece regarding the Dominic Perrottet article. It's unnecessary, and pointless.

Ditto, why do you keep reverting a perfectly good page? - Democfest (talk) 07:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Bank logo 2020.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Bank logo 2020.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fire and Rescue New South Wales flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fire and Rescue New South Wales flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New South Wales Rural Fire Service flag.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New South Wales Rural Fire Service flag.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NSW Police Force flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NSW Police Force flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seal of New South Wales Ambulance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of New South Wales Ambulance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Transport for NSW - Buses.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Transport for NSW - Buses.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Salesforce Tower Sydney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Salesforce Tower Sydney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Team Sydney Racing logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Team Sydney Racing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Medicare logo (Australia).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Medicare logo (Australia).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:56 Pitt Street, Sydney (concept render).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:56 Pitt Street, Sydney (concept render).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sillitoe tartan question

Your view would be appreciated in the section titled Photographs here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sillitoe_tartan --Dreddmoto (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New South Wales Ambulance flag.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New South Wales Ambulance flag.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New South Wales Ambulance Roundel.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New South Wales Ambulance Roundel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stadium Australia logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stadium Australia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Democfest. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Democfest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This came as a surprise. Not sure why I was blocked for sockpuppetry by the accounts Unicorn123SL and Democfesty (clearly copying my account name), when I was the one who has reverted multiple disruptive edits carried out by this user Unicorn123SL. These reverts can be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Unicorn123SL&offset=20220224212304&target=Unicorn123SL. Now why would I be reverting my own edits? This user has clearly used my name as a cover up for their disruptive edits, and in the process, dragged me down as well. This clearly wasn't studied properly - Democfest (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Democfest/Archive. The sockpuppetry has been confirmed by a checkuser, one of a handful of users who have a special tool for accessing technical data of accounts. Bishonen | tålk 08:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Democfest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Is there any way i could appeal this further? I invite you all to check my own edit history, and see where I've (at least in thee last year or so), been disruptive with my edits in any way. It should be very clear that I was the one reverting Unicorn123SL's edits, and it wasn't a sockpuppet account of mine. I understand that we both have very similar interests in editing, but I hope you all manage to see that I have been pretty tame and constructive with my edits. Is there possibly any way that another investigation into this claim of sockpuppetry can be carried out. If anything it would only affirm the decision if I'm really found to be lying or disruptive. Again, please go through my own edit and contribution history again Democfest (talk) 09:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the information in the SPI, which is confirmed by a checkuser with access to technical evidence. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Democfest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand the reasons given for the block. However, I would absolutely beg for an administrator to review my edit and contribution history again. I understand that the technical anti-sock puppetry systems in place are solid and reliable, however I can wholeheartedly put my hands up and say that I have no relation to the accused user in any shape or form. Again, can my edit history and contributions please be reviewed at least again one more time? Or alternatively, can I request to be posted to the administrator's noticeboard for my account to be thoroughly reviewed again? And as I've stated before, there is also evidence showing that I was the one also reverting Unicorn123SL's edits, evident here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Unicorn123SL&offset=20220224212304&target=Unicorn123SL. I hope I'm able to be spared a chance in this situation Democfest (talk) 6:01 am, Today (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Block was a mistake, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unicorn123SL -- RoySmith (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith:, @Drmies:. In Drmies's comment, they confirm Democfesty = Democfestys = Unicorn123SL. I agree, my use of checkuser shows all three accounts are  Confirmed to each other. Note, interestingly, we forgot to block Democfestys and I have now done so. However, based on my reading, Drmies didn't confirm those three to this account. I think this is perhaps a joe job. Drmies, you may well see something I missed and may have meant to indicate the three accounts were indeed tied to this, but I think that wasn't your intention and I think this was just a misreading of your comment. Admittedly, I also misread your comment initially; off-by-one error. :) --Yamla (talk) 12:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this is confusing. It's clear that when ScottishFinnishRadish created the SPI, they (accidentally, I assume) created it under the wrong username. When I performed the blocks, I looked at the original note from Drmies, but didn't catch the difference in names, so I just went ahead and blocked using spi-helper, which automatically picked up the usernames as contained in the SPI. I just ran some checks. I agree that Democfestys, Democfesty, and Unicorn123SL have exactly the same technical data (i.e. "confirmed"), and Democfest appears to be unrelated. There is one interesting tidbit, however, which I'm not sure I should divulge in public, so I've just left a note on cuwiki. Before I unblock, I'd like another CU to look at that and give an opinion on whether it's significant or not. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot and Bishonen: who handled the first two appeals. See my explanation just above this. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would definitely be my error in creating the SPI. I apologize for that, especially to Democfest, who has born the brunt of this mistake. Democfest, I am truly sorry for my screw-up in creating the SPI, and I apologize for the mark on your block log, and the stress it's caused you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I try to be as ... what's the word, as conservative as I can with these identifications, and I linked the three--but not this one. RoySmith, I responded to your note over that. Democfest, as far as I can tell...well, please be patient for a minute while we sort this out. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the process of backing this out. Give me a few minutes. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you're good to go. My apologies for all the inconvenience this caused you. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Democfest, apologies from me too. And you clearly have someone who dislikes you to the point of harassment, for which I'm sorry--you are not the first Wikipedian to suffer from this, and you won't be the last, I'm afraid. If you think something like this might be happening again, please feel free to call on one of us--or, if you like, look at this page for the Trust & Safety team, who might be able to assist. RoySmith, thank you for clearing this up. Drmies (talk) 15:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My sincerest apologies

This is really on me, as I messed up when opening the SPI report. Again, I want to apologize to you, and the admins that had to clean up the mess, for my mistake, and I'm sorry for the trouble it caused. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings, it happens to the best of us - Democfest (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of alt text

Please do not remove alt text from images. It serves to make images in articles more accessible to blind and visually impaired readers. While I am assuming on good faith that your removal of alt text from images in 2020 Formula One World Championship was an innocent error, please be conscious not to remove alt text without some clearly-stated reason in future. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TfNSW Sydney Ferries logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TfNSW Sydney Ferries logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:180 george street parramatta.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:180 george street parramatta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Broadcasting Corporation logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian Broadcasting Corporation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^(My talk page and contributions) 03:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashfield railway station. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ford Performance Vehicles logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ford Performance Vehicles logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney images

Hi there, good work on the Sydney images. I'd recommend adding pictures of Sydney Central Station, Parramatta, and Darling Harbour.

Cheers Poketama (talk) 07:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i did consider central station and darling harbour, but central doesn't seem to be as significant of a cultural landmark as the other examples i ended up picking. Darling Harbour - i really struggled to find a quality image that physically fit into the photomontage (most of the images are wide panoramas) and most of the shots of darling harbour are simply too far away to make out any detail. Parramatta, i dunno about that - that's an entire suburb, not a specific place or landmark Democfest (talk) 11:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SBS Australia Logo.png

The file File:SBS Australia Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:SBS Australia Logo (2019).svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oscar Piastri. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Groverlynn (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seven News logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seven News logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 18:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New South Wales Ambulance Roundel.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New South Wales Ambulance Roundel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holden logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Holden logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:One Sydney Harbour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:One Sydney Harbour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian IP

Is it time to try to block this Indonesian 158.140.167.44 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) whose life mission seems to be adding thousands of pictures to every article? I am pretty sure we have explained WP:NOTGALLERY to them ad infinitum in the past, but since it is impossible to carry out a conversation with an ip I can't say for sure. Is it even worth the trouble to block an IP address? Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely a nuisance. I'm suprised no one else has found him/her unbearably annoying yet. You have my support in restricting/blocking the account but we'd have to go quite far in doing so as the IP address keeps changing every now and then. Absolutely sick and tired of cleaning up his/her mess everyday. Democfest (talk) 00:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Western Sydney Airport - artist's render.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Western Sydney Airport - artist's render.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Renault Trafic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 10:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

158.140.167.0 is a sockpuppet account if you're unaware. I apologise if my revert may have messed up some formatting, but check out his VERY long sockpuppet archive page - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex Neman. Would be great help if you could crack down on his accounts Democfest (talk) 10:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wow, that's an insane amount of sockpuppetting. Yeah, I'll be on the lookout for that person when I have the time. Tube·of·Light 10:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject you may be interested in

Hi, there is currently a proposal for an Australian Transport WikiProject. I thought you may be interested due to your edits and interests in transport in Australia. The proposal can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport. If you are interested, add yourself to the Support section of the page. Thank you! Fork99 (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Weet-Bix logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Weet-Bix logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mitsubishi Mirage Pictures

I do not know why you have to edit the pictures out, versions like the Mirage Cyborg-R and Lancer GTi are special and have specific (visual) upgrades, so they are definitely a nice addition. I can assume most people visiting this page want to see which model looks like what, especially these perfomance versions - I let the others out. Also, three or four pictures in a gallery are NOT excessive. And the pictures have a good quality and are far from bad. I don't know what your claim is, but if these pics aren't good enough for you, then I'm clueless which picture is. Greetings - Grünkohlaktionär (talk) 16:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Volunteer Rescue Association NSW.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Volunteer Rescue Association NSW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Do not add slurs, images, symbols, or other content meant to attack, harass, threaten, or disparage certain people or groups based on nationality, race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or other factors. Such content is not tolerated by Wikipedia and as such may be hidden from public view at any time by an administrator (or in extreme cases, suppressed). Articles or files of which the only purpose is to attack, harass, threaten or disparage certain people or groups are speedily deleted. If you add hateful, derogatory, or bigoted content again, as you did at Junlper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CJ-Moki (talk) 22:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is GENDERID issue. The discussion is about the topic Junlper. Thank you. CJ-Moki (talk) 23:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding slurs to a WP:BLP article and deliberately misgendering them contrary to MOS:GENDERID, as you did at Junlper.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parramatta Light Rail.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parramatta Light Rail.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NSWPF Flag.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NSWPF Flag.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WA Bush Fire Service Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WA Bush Fire Service Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Allianz Stadium logo.webp

The file File:Allianz Stadium logo.webp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Allianz Stadium logo.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Rabe, Tom (2021-04-01). "Transport Minister confident in new train rollout despite union dispute". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-05-12.