User talk:Delldot/Archive 10

Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12→Archive 15

First new post!

Response.--Padawan Animator (talk) 18:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

For handling this unblock request. :) Acalamari 03:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ha ha! You're welcome. Got yourself a little friend there, huh? ;) delldot talk 09:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Heh, heh, it seems so! Acalamari 18:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Images

Do i need permission from the website to use a image?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkwildy69 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the note. Yeah, unfortunately, it's worse than that: the site has to actually release the image under a copyright license compatible with the GFDL, so pretty much anyone can use it (i.e., just allowing Wikipedia to use it isn't enough). You can request permission by following the directions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission#For images. Under very limited conditions, a picture may qualify as fair use, but you have to be pretty familiar with that policy to get that to work. Let me know how I can help with any of this! Peace, delldot talk 06:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

NBN

Why did you revert back the article.. I just updated it with the new info. You may contact me at edisongotan@nbni.tv for more info.

NBN

Sorry.. Did some mistakes...

Hi Edison, thanks for the note! I'm pretty sure I didn't revert anything by you, at any rate nothing that I saw in the history of the article you mentioned. If I did, it was a mistake (which I make a fair number of!) so sorry about that. Let me know if you need any help or advice about Wikipedia! Peace, Delldot on a public computer (talk) 23:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

I am just popping in to wish you and yours a very Happy & Healthy holiday season. May 2008 bring wonderful things for you. I also want to thank you for being my mentor and being so patient and kind to me. You have helped me when I was in need and your unwaivering support has been wonderful to help me keep trying even when I felt I couldn't go on. Thank you very much for excepting me and helping me through out my time here. It is really appreciated by me. Happy editing, --CrohnieGalTalk 17:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 16:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Vic Railways C Class

Thank you so much for what you've done!

I really aprechieate it, but there are some other things we need to do.

Firstly, I would like to add on my behalf half that I have edited the article slightly so that it makes more. It's more like a 'fill in the gaps' thing.

Secondly, If you look at the external links you will see that I have added a photo. Could you please put in on top of the specifications table so that it looks more like the other articles?

Thirdly, If you look at the other related articles you will see that there are tables explaining about each of the locomotives. I will try to have a go at it my self but if it is unsuccsesfull can you make one?

Finally, can you make other articles like G class, X class S class etc. because they need as much attention as the other ones. By the way can you permadently delete the M and W class articles because they dont exsist, though there is one that is missing the V class, can you add it to the list?

I strongly suggest to reply back to me ASAP to discuss this furthur.

See Ya!!!!!

WikiSandbox1 (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

By the way can you reply on the Replys/Responses section of my talk page if thats okay? thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSandbox1 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Wow, WS, really excellent work. You've turned Victorian Railways C class (diesel) into a very respectable article. I'll work on the suggestions you made. My main recommendation for the article is that it should have references for every assertion, so you should be including the info of the sources from which you got the material.
The photo looks good, but I'm not sure Wikipedia will be allowed to use it; do you know who owns the copyright? If you do, you can Upload it to commons if you agree to release it under the GFDL so pretty much anyone can use it for more or less anything. If you don't own the copyright, you'll have to get permission from whoever does, which I can help with if you like.
About the templates, I've made an empty one at User:Delldot/Box of sand. You can fill in the values yourself (feel free to edit my sandbox), or you can tell me what you want them to be and I can add them.
I don't know anything about the subjects, so I'd be uncomfortable creating the articles myself. But I'm glad to help you fix them up when you make them! :)
What list were you asking me to add the V class to? And from what do I delete the M and W class?
Thanks for all your hard work WS, I'm really impressed. Peace, delldot talk 06:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply on Victorian Railways

Gee, Im suprised! Thanks for the reply!

When I saw the article, I made some slight modifications to it using my own knoledge, I then saved it, only to find some else do that! It dosent matter who edits it, as long as it makes sense, which is most important. and What do you mean by references? I can remember where some of the info came from. I dont know if thats handy or not.

When you metioned something about the template, I was confused because when you edit them, its hard to find where everything is, so now that I found it, I what your talking about. By the way, someone has already put something similar to that, only half done!

Just to ask, how to do keep administrators quiet, by that I mean, why do they bother you about speedy deletion, and how do you become one?

Dont worry about the V class, M class and W class thing because Ive got that under control already, though there are some problems with creation articles.

With the photo(s), I dont know what your talking about, so Im partly relying on you do something. But dont worry because I will put the photo under this reply with the website underneath it so that you know all the sources of the photo. By the way, how come theres a chance it wont be used?

Is my new nickname WS, if so, just state why. is it because its easier for you rather than WikiSandbox1!

If so, reply again. Its good to keep in touch! Also how come it took you so long to answer my reply!

I appreicheate it, and I hope you dont mind but I will use that template for all articles, also I have started on 2 other ones, H and S, and they have been fixed up propaly by other users and finally, theres some other user that wants to join in as well and his user is --Dan027 (talk) Im going to reply to him as well


Thank you, your Amazing!!!!!! Plus look at all the info i left at the bottom.

WikiSandbox1 (talk) 05:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi WikiSandbox1,
  • Your references question: references are reliable sources that you get your information from. All information on wikipedia must be already published in sources, and you have to be able to cite these sources if any of your info is challenged. You should write where you got each piece of information from as a reference, I can help you with this. Info that's not already published is considered original research and is not allowed in articles. It is handy that you remember where you got the info, you can write that in the article (or tell me, and I'll help).
  • Administrators: The way to keep us quiet is to understand the rules for inclusion of articles, for example, read WP:CSD#Articles so you'll understand what not to do with your article. If your article doesn't meet those criteria, it shouldn't be "speedied" (deleted without discussion). In general, if someone bothers you about something, ask them for an explanation, and try to fix whatever it is they're concerned about. You did a great job with that in my case!
  • How to become an administrator: You request adminship at RFA and the members of the community discuss whether you are trusted enough to become an admin. You really can't pass an RfA until after you've spent enough time (say, 6 months to a year) and made a significant number of contributions to the project (say, 3,000+ edits). This is because administrators are very trusted members of the community, so people won't support you becoming one until you've demonstrated a very solid understanding of the project and its policies and made a significant contribution. But you're doing great, carry on like this for a while and you can become one if you decide you want to!
  • Photos: Did you take the picture yourself, or did someone else take it? Wikipedia can only use photos if they're released under a certain license, the GFDL, or a license compatible with it. If you took it, you own the copyright and can release it under the GFDL. If someone else took it, they own the copyright and we can't use it unless they release it under the GFDL, which it can be difficult to do. Since the picture is already on a website, we'd have to get that site to write something saying it releases the picture under the GFDL, which might be a pain.
  • I was just calling you WS for short (heh, too lazy to type the whole thing out). I'll call you WikiSandbox1 if you like.
  • Sure, you can use the table for the other articles. If I change my sandbox and it's not still there, just look in the page history for the revision where it's there (presumably the one with yesterday's date).
  • Sorry to take so long to reply, I get distracted easily :)
Hope this answers your questions, let me know if you have more! Peace, delldot talk 08:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Daniel

If you look a tthe top of the page on the Daniel article, you will see the disambig message
This article is about the Biblical figure called Daniel. For other uses, see Daniel (disambiguation).

Since most other Daniels are named after this Daniel, you will need to set up a a new article about your particular individual. -- mrg3105mrg3105 10:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

An error? delldot talk 10:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean?-- mrg3105mrg3105 10:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I mean I wasn't the one who changed the article - I just changed it back to how it was before they did that.  :) delldot talk 21:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

SPSU Edit

Thank you so much for your comments on my talk page, I will work hard (soon) to provide a worthy page. I'm trying to fix my universities WikiProject page, but half the tables and info is now missing, but shows up on the talk page for Southern Polytechnic State University. I was not logged on when I first started, but I eventually logged on. Please view the page for me and let me know why 70% of my work is now missing, including original items I did not put on.

sirkevinalot 11:14, 27 December 2007 (Sirkevinalot (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC))

My reply delldot talk 06:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Finally

Thanks for this. Per Wikipedia:User_page#Removal_of_comments.2C_warnings, I know I can do that. 124.197.7.160 (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Cool :) delldot talk 06:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Slant revisions

sorry about that. i actually do have an account but i didn't realize i wasn't logged in. i added some outside sources that mention Slant Magazine. hope that helps! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prufrock79 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey again, thanks for the note, and good job finding the references on Slant Magazine! I'm impressed by your hard work to improve the article. But keep working on it, it still needs more. Another thing is that I'd look for references that actually feature the magazine (i.e. the whole article or piece is about the magazine, or it discusses it in detail) rather than just mentioning it. Remember, you must be able to back up each claim in the article with reliable sources, those sentences that aren't backed up can be removed at any time. Anyway, great work so far. Keep in touch! Definitely let me know if you need help with anything. Peace, delldot talk 06:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a WikiBunch!

Thank you for fixing the page for me. You're right, after typing in all those tags and format codes, etc, the eye can miss about anything! You're a great help! I'm also reconsidering my own page, I've heard stories that you mentioned...my state's former Lt. Governor fell into a trap like that. Have a great New Year! (Sirkevinalot (talk) 23:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC))

Thanks Kevin! Keep in touch :) delldot talk 06:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

paul wall

Paul wall was a great man with grillz. Isn't that factual evidence that he has grillz in his mouth. And also the second statement I made about being white, well wasn't that true too? So why are you thinking im vandalising. You have no rights of proving both statements of mine were wrong thus not being allowed to call it vanadalism. Furthermore, you are wrong and I am right. Thanks, Karim Ahmed

Perhaps he did have grillz, and they could have been beautiful and able to steam up a thousand chickz on them, but that evidence needs to be cited by reliable secondary sources in order for it to be included in the encyclopedia— particularly on articles about living people; otherwise, they will be removed and repeated additions of them will be treated as graffiti (or, as we term it here, "vandalism"). Peace out, yo. --slakr\ talk / 01:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Used Cars

Hello,

Sorry for leaving the external link Used Cars under that section. I just thought that browsers who are loking for a used car can do so on our site

Regards, Louis Louisrix (talk) 14:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 16:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

ATF

Hey, due to your recent comments re:Ottawa Panhandler's Union, I've decided to cordially invite you to join, or just check out, the Anarchism Task Force we've started up. I don't know how much editing you do around anarchism-related articles, but an extra pair of eyes and typing hands could always do us some good. Cheers! Murderbike (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! delldot talk 22:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Of course! I'll tell ya, at the moment I'm casually working on improving the CNT article, and even more casually the Alexander Berkman article. I feel like both of these subjects have the potential for being at least Good Articles, with some help. I'm not the best writer, but I have a lot of time for doing research. I was thinking of posing the idea to the Task Force of a collaboration to get these articles significantly upgraded, I'm sure any help you could offer would be much appreciated, whatever your expertise is. Murderbike (talk) 23:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Cool! I don't do much content adding, but I do a lot of copy editing. So you + me can probably make some good articles! Let me know when you're ready to have me go over them. Peace, Delldot on a public computer (talk) 05:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

WP

"No Wikipedia. Because anybody can go in and edit it." "Wikipedia isn't accurate." At school, I've been constantly frustrated with the way many people look at Wikipedia. I'm sure that a wiki can thrive even through anybody can edit it, right? Maybe it would be a good idea for schools to teach students how to be good Wikipedians? Happy editing,--Padawan Animator (talk) 18:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Editing User pages-thanks!

Set up a user page.

How do we properly use Wikipedia? Want to set up a user page with info and photo of a person. What is the proper way to do so? We just received two nasty vandalism warnings which was uncalled for. People should provide info instead of calling a simple mistake vandalism. Obviously there is a difference between the two.

Any assistance would help.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freda Stevens (talk • contribs) 22:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

king abdullah's page

nothing new delldot,just wanted to thank you for your last edit there.wish all human rights activists were like you :) Grandia01 (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! delldot talk 15:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

User info boxes

Hey, how's it going? I've been meaning to ask you about something. On many user profile pages I've noticed lots of interesting user info boxes, and I was wondering where people get those and if there might be some sort of a big collection of those for users to pick and choose from. I was also thinking of making one that says "This user is a padawan animator," and even "This user is a member of the Lightbox Order." This sort of thing seems like lots of fun! Happy editing,--Padawan Animator (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Replied to this note and #WP. delldot talk 15:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Response.--Padawan Animator (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

A newbie

Hey Gscshoyru, I have a small concern. You know I admire your antivandal work and appreciate all you do. But I noticed something and I thought I'd let you know about it because I appreciate when people come to me with stuff. You reverted this and left a level three warning - I think it was a newbie mistake, and it hurt the new user's feelings that you reacted sternly. Maybe next time leave them a personal note explaining where to leave messages? You probably just saw that they were blanking the user's page and didn't notice the content of the message, totally understandable for vandal fighting, so definitely no big deal. But I thought I'd bring it up, since they brought it up to me. Thanks again for your hard work! Peace, delldot talk 22:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Wow... oops. That was a bit harsh, and wrongly placed, was it not? I screwed up; misread the situation by reading it too quickly. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll be more careful next time, it should not happen again. Gscshoyru (talk) 01:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Cool, that's what I thought, that it was just an accident. :) Thanks for being so receptive to my comments! Keep up your good work. Peace, delldot talk 02:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow, look at that, I did the exact same thing like a few minutes later. What a doof! We all make mistakes, huh. delldot talk 15:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

jack anderson; heat pipe

What kind of nonsense is this? Changing my critical and constructive revisions to Jack Anderson and heat pipe. There is more knowledge on these subjects that i can provide that wikipedia has not. I would appreciate if you would stop being an ass bag and let me make my changes. Thank you, The real Jack Anderson if you have any problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.224.219 (talk) 02:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

These edits? I stand by my reverts. delldot talk 02:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

rise of the tyrant

hey im not trying to vandalize the rise of the tyrant page i just think the page should be dedicated to an upcomming band instead of an album for a band that has already reached its peak, please let me know something soon as possible and please dont stop me from editing thank you for your time

) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riseofthetyrant (talk • contribs) 02:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
My reply delldot talk 03:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

um... dude

Rise of the Tyrant is a notable band, Beginning of a Tragic Ending is a band who on jan 1st will be changing there name to rise of the tyrant they have been planning this name long before the album ever came out but wanted to wait until the new year to do so, because of booking information/complications if you need proof goto www.myspace.com/riseofthetyrantmusic they have fans all over the US so please take me seriously in making another page i promise im not trying to be difficult i just want ppl to respect the upcomming music scene and be able to look at our wiki thanx again for your time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riseofthetyrant (talk • contribs) 03:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

My update delldot talk 03:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks for the help so far,

thanks for getting back to me, im actually in the band, im not trying to adjatate anyone at wiki but what exactly do i need to do to get this wiki? can you please help im really confused i can give you links to all of our websites (currently named under beginning of a tragic ending) as soon as JAN 1st they will all be renamed to Rise of the Tyrant, again i appologize for tampering with the page but im new to this lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riseofthetyrant (talk • contribs) 03:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 03:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

You have mail

I just wanted to let you know I sent you an email. Please let me know what you think of the situation when you get time by "responding to the email" of course. :) Happy New Year! --CrohnieGalTalk 23:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Replied to the email. delldot talk 13:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, I think you deserve this!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I award this Barnstar to Delldot for the continuous vandalism fighting and beating me to the reverts. Also, keep up with the humour on IRC :)

Happy New Year! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 14:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Awww... Thank you! :D Delldot on a public computer (talk) 03:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

New article

how can I start a new article, so the name would not be delete again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.232.214.223 (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the note! The first thing that you should know is that a person has to be notable in order to have an article in Wikipedia; they need to meet the criteria at WP:BIO. If we're talking about Antoine Zammit, I did a quick Google search on him and I don't think I see enough material on him to make an article. See, every article has to have reliable sources that are independent of the subject in order to back up every statement made in the article; this is our very fundamental verifiability policy. So if not enough has been written about the subject, we can't have an article on him. If you are Mr. Zammit, please also see WP:AUTO for an explanation of why you shouldn't write an article on yourself.

However, maybe I'm mistaken about who you want to write the article on. If you feel that your subject meets WP:N and you have sufficient reliable sources, you should definitely create the article! You'll need to create an account, since page creation is currently turned off for anonymous editors. Then I recommend working on the article first in your userspace, i.e. any page beginning with your username and a slash (an example of a page in my own userspace would be user:delldot/note). That way you can get others to look at and help you before you move it to the main article space (pages with no prefix). Please let me know if you want any help or further explanation of this! Peace, Delldot on a public computer (talk) 03:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Ghanaian Cedi

Sir/Madam -

I recently made some edits to the Page on the Ghanaian Cedi, but saw a note that you said I was vandalizing it. I just made some more edits to the page, and would like to talk to you about them if you disagree. I am not trying to vandalize the page, but merely to bring perspective to it. I lived in Ghana for several years, and have some knowledge of what I write about.

To be honest, I have just started my editing career on Wikipedia, and am not sure how all the protocols work. The edits I made to the Ghanaian Cedi page were my first. I thought I would start there, and see what happens to my edits before I try other pages.

Please let me know your thoughts.


Tobking —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobking (talk • contribs) 19:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Tobking, thanks much for the note! I'm glad you've joined Wikipedia and are contributing to the project! I don't think I reverted you or left a vandal warning for you. Someone from the IP address 169.244.92.162 changed 'new cedi' to 'gay fag', and I reverted them and left a vandal warning for them. But I'm sure that wasn't you, your own contributions have been valuable. Your edits are currently the last ones to have been made to that page. Maybe you saw my note to the vandal and thought it was to you?
About your question, definitely let me know if you need any help, I'm glad to offer it. My biggest recommendations would be to always cite your sources from which you get the information you add, especially when adding things like numbers or quotes (using the Cite.php referencing style can be a little tricky at first, I can help if you like). Another really fundamental thing is our policy that all material should be written in a neutral tone, but I saw no problems with that in your edits.
Thanks again for helping out with the project, I'm really glad you've decided to share your knowledge! Sorry for the confusion with the vandal warning thing, but like I said, I'm pretty sure I never reverted or left a message for you. Definitely let me know if you need any help with anything, I'll be more than happy to offer it. Peace, Delldot on a public computer (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


Delldot - Thanks for the comeback. It's all still very new and confusing. I may have mistaken your warning to someone else as being for me. Thanks for your advice on getting started. I may contact you again if I need some pointers. Cheers, Tobking —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobking (talk • contribs) 13:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, glad to have gotten the chance to clear that up :) Definitely keep in touch! Peace, delldot talk 13:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Delldot

Keep up the great work! --Kukini hablame aqui 14:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! :D delldot talk 14:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply on Victorian Railways

Hello Deldot, its me (you could guess)!


Thank you for the reply. Yes it does answer my questions but I need to clarify some things regarding articles.


  • Notification

I am going to start on the Victorian Railways P class, to get that out of the way. Also did you manage to talk to Dan027? if not, well i was just wondering.


  • References

Most of the information I gather is from my own knownledge or from a site (which is most of the time Vicsig) explaining and simplifying the info out so it makes more sense. Though even Wikipedia can give info as well. I can remember quite clearly the websites and photos but I'll need to do it. Fast. Possibly after I finish writing this reply. I will read the process (if there is one) and make a start.


  • Template

dont worry about explaining. its fine


  • Annoying Admisitrators

Yes, well I have goten used to it anyway. They mentioned something about writing 'Hangon' and a reason why it shouldnt be SD. (speedy deleted) Though they post a note on your Talk Page about this nonsense (its a waste of space). I wanted to clarify that. Also, I noticed that sometimes Administrators add this picture and some text saying 'Hello, this is a message from a automated bot'. Can I ask you what is, what it does, how you stop it and when you writing replys, how to paste in in?


  • Becoming an Admisitrator

Who are the members of the community? And it seemes like thats a lot of time and editing to become one. I dont know if I have that much time to spare. They would trust you alot, no joking around or they will probably kick you out of the commity. Apparantly, as an Admisitrator you have the power to block other users from editing Wikipedia. What sort of things would you need to do and how do I do that?


  • Photos

What a pity it is that you have to have to ask someone to use it. There fantastic photos, no doubt about it but I probably dont have the time to do it. If you dont that sucks, though if you do thats great. Im trying my best not to ask for alot.


  • Nickname

Good that you told me why, if thats so, go ahead with it


  • Using Templates

Other users have already made some form of start to it. Its kind of not finished, I will do it though.


Its okay people have stuff going on and they just dont have time, like me! (sorry i didnt reply quicker)

I hope you had a wonderful New Year, and make the best start to 2008

WikiSandbox1 (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


Also, did you look at the link I gave you on the last reply? and i really enjoying the fact that we keep in contact with each other + try to reply soon and whats 'deldot on a public computer?'

heres something random.

My reply delldot talk 04:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

2008!

Happy new years! Hope it was a good safe one, Tiptoety talk 08:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Same to you. Peace, delldot talk 04:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info

Hi delldot,

Thanks for the info, now I just need to find the link to the song lol.

Happy New Year! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 13:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

article on antoine zammit

I am not antoine zammit, but a very good friend of him. Antoine is the founder of search Malta, one of Malta's most used search engine. click on this link

http://www.maltamigration.com/links/searchengines.shtml

then go to www.searchmalta.com to see the search engine.


If you decide that we shoud create this article, please can you create it and then let me do the changes myself

I leave it up to you!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.232.214.223 (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey again, thanks for responding and for being so reasonable. I don't think that the link you provided is enough to establish his notability, are there other sources? That is, has he been written about in news sources, books, or journals? If we can't write an article with every claim backed up by reliable sources, we can't have the article. If you'd like me to create the article, please provide me with links to articles or other material written on him. Thanks much! Peace, delldot talk 16:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

James

Thankyou, i'm just begining to learn how to contribute photos to Wikipedia (after years of using it). I'm begining to upload files to wikimedia. JK —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesK1987 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! Like I said, glad to have you on board. Just drop me another note if I can be of any assistance. Peace, delldot talk 16:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

silet scream

I apologize if you regard what I've been doing is vandalism. This is the first time I knew I could recieve messages from other editors. I assure you I was not trying to disregard your warnings, this is simply the first time I knew I had been given them. There seems to be a double standard at work on this article. Vandalism is also removing content designed to improve an article without sufficient cause. Please allow me to explain. This article originally presented only planned parenthood's opinion that the movie was bogus. It was not neutral so long as it did not present the Pro-life, and the scientific position as well as planned parenthood's. There were no references to check on Planned parenthood's opinion and confirm it as a scientific one. Most Wikipedia articles have references so you can go to the original sources and check the facts for yourself. The only references for this movie that are given is a single book written from planned parenthood's perspective. In so doing, this article was about as neutral as a classroom history text on the civil war written by a Southern plantation slave owner. Pro life opinions were added to present the other side of the debate and then were removed by someone else-several times, which is also vandalism. Priests for life presents the other side of the story, but priests for life has been subsequently described as "attacking Planned parenthood." in further edits of this article Planned parenthood is never described as "attacking pro-life." It's almost as if someone has arbitrarily decided to censor anything negative said about planned parenthood-as if they are beyond reproach and every word they say is gospel. If references are given to prove that the claims being made about planned parenthood's business practices are true, or if references are added confirming the scientific validity of the movie under discussion, they are taken out as "lacking neutrality." This is sloppy scholarship, and it is not an honest report of the facts. It is an an attempt to control how people think about an issue by slanting the issue so that only one side of the argument is ever heard. This article will only be truly neutral when the truth is allowed to be told along with the counterarguments that other side of the debate wishes us to be aware of. To only tell the truth planned parenthood wants us to hear, and not the scientists, medical doctors, or the film makers, is to slant it with a very dishonest kind of bias commonly known in the communist world as propaganda. Again, I apologize, I did not mean to cause trouble, and yet the lack of objectivity in the dissemination of information on a controversial topic like this,may make some question Wikipedia's integrity as a valid source of truthful information --Dave M.D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.38.158 (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 17:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

silent scream

You said I should only add well substantiated facts from neutral sources, and yet two observations can be made: planned parenthood is no more neutral than priests for life, and I did reference my comments to other sources on the web, and they were removed-no one discussed it with me as you say I should do if I disagree with something I read on your site. They arbitrarily took it upon themselves to remove it without entering into that discussion that you say I should enter into if I disagree. Why are they allowed to edit without discussing it and not me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elrondaragorn (talk • contribs) 17:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 17:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy Healthy New Year!

I hope this year brings health, wealth and happiness to you and yours. I got your email and I agree with what you say. I hope soon to be moving but my email shouldn't change. If it does, I will be sure to update you. Thanks so much for taking care of me, being my mentor and my friend.  :) --CrohnieGalTalk 18:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for the kind words, Crohnie. I'm glad to have gotten the chance to work with you and become friends! Peace, delldot talk 04:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

About Wikipedia...

Maybe my question is a little dumb, but does every article cost Wikipedia money? Chris Iz Cali (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and one more thing...maybe a dumb question again, but oh well, how can i become an admin?Chris Iz Cali (talk) 01:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 04:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Hey, thank you for the answers, I appreciate it...Chris Iz Cali (talk) 04:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

:) delldot talk 04:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry Delldot

Sorry...my little brother did these changes on my computer... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.249.181 (talk) 05:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for the apology! Hey, you should think about creating an account, that way if we have to block him, you won't get blocked from editing too (plus you won't have to see annoying these vandal notices). It's free and easy, plus it has other perks too. Anyway, thanks for the note, see you around I hope! Drop me another note with your new username if you get one so we can keep in touch! Peace, delldot talk 05:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

problem

I have no way of retrieving previously removed content of "Silent scream" in order to begin a discussion asking why it was removed. Without a reference point, they can just deny they did it-and I don't even know who did it, but it's happened several times and the supposedly non-neutral material is no more biased than the planned parenthood opinion currently left in the article. The non-neutral planned parenthood content seems to be allowed, though my non neutral content isn't, and yet mine brings balance to the non-neutrality of planned parenthood's opinion, while removing it is a clear attempt to slant the article in favor of planned parenthood's bias. Furthermore, I've reviewed other articles on other subjects like "Richard Hoagland", where the author of the article has a clear bias against Mr. Hoagland's opinions that are clearly allowed. My non-neutrality was no worse than his in trying to give evidence of planned parenthood's deceptive and biased practices, and yet because it hurts planned parenthood, and not Mr. Hoagland, it doesn't seem to be allowed no matter what sources I cite to prove my case. The author of the Hoagland article cites sources and is allowed to keep his imput, however. Also, planned parenthood's evaluation of the movie silent scream isn't a neutral one. It is also not properly cited for verification as fact, but no one seems to care about moving that from the article-only my comments, that give the article more balance in the provision of facts from sources that contradict the opinions already expressed. Am I obligated to enter a discussion with people any time I make an edit to any article? I don't understand how this works-I've edited other things before, and to my knowledge, I've never been reverted before, so are there only certain circumstances in which you must open a discussion to change something? I would really like you to investigate what happened with the edits on this article, because frankly, the critics of what I tried to post seem to have a bias against anyone who questions planned parenthood-regardless of whether they cite sources to prove the claims they are making. I've noticed no Hoagland fans have been allowed to get away with this regarding material unfavorable to his position. ----dave m.d. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elrondaragorn (talk • contribs)

Hi, have you looked at the latest version of the article? I think the changes made may address some of your concerns. You can retrieve past versions of articles and differences between revisions by clicking on the "history" tab at the top of the article and finding dates of the changes in question (or just by looking at each one using the "last" links).
You're right that non-neutral info is not allowed. If you think the article is not neutral, you'll have to discuss it with other users until you can find a compromise. Honestly, the article in its current state looks pretty neutral to me; it's merely stating facts. It's acceptable to report that so-and-so notable party argued such-and-such, as long as you have a reliable source. Your info should not be removed without discussion if it is reliably sourced (note that an advocacy website is not a reliable source; go for a news piece about the advocacy group's argument). If someone has done that, you should address it with them, either on the article's talk page or the user's, and go through dispute resolution if necessary. Peace, delldot talk 07:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

with all due respect

With all due respect, the article is not reporting facts. I know for a fact that what planned parenthood says about its scientific research on the article isn't true, and I have not been allowed to post or cite that proof. This is not a neutral presentation of the facts where both sides are heard. -Dave M.D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elrondaragorn (talk • contribs)

It doesn't matter what an individual editor knows, it matters what's been reported in reliable sources. The reason I called that a fact is that it's a fact that Planned Parenthood published such a rebuttal. A reliable source says that planned parenthood says that, so that's includable information. As I've said, all you need to do is find a reliable source that covers the information you want to add, and you can add it (assuming it's relevant and conforms with other policies, etc). Peace, delldot talk 07:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

help

what would you regard as a reliable source. Priests for life is reliable-they don't lie or distort facts, and they use scientifically verified data, but if someone on this site doesn't accept anything as reliable unless it is from a pro-choice point of view, then those reliable sources can't be quoted. Also, where is this talk page you are talking about and how do I begin a discussion? ----elrondaragorn —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elrondaragorn (talk • contribs) 11:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Elrondaragorn, thanks for your hard work to understand the policies. Please read the reliable sources policy guideline and let me know if you still have any questions. Advocacy groups on either side of the debate do not count as reliable sources; it must be a neutral published source. Peace, delldot talk 19:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Help?

Hello.

I was wondering if you'd have the time and the will to help me with something. I understand if you can't.

Serb propaganda is as article that was started about a month ago and has been fairly controversial within the Wiki community of ex-Yugoslavs. Its stated goal was to

"describe efforts made by Serbian leadership to create fear and hatred and particularly incite the Serb population against the other ethnicities (Bosniaks, Croats, Albanians and other non-Serbs) and to describe Serb media efforts in justifying, revising or denying mass war crimes committed by Serb forces during the Yugoslav wars on Bosniaks and other non-Serbs".


From the beginning it was seen as POV and it was nominated for deletion but the result was to keep since no concensus to delete was reached. Myself being Serbian, I agree that an article like this is needed and the subject matter, however controversial, is more than appropriate given the amount of Wiki material about the Yugoslav wars. But I do have an issue with what's been happening since the decision to keep the article and I'm not sure quite how to handle it.

It is my feeling that a few of the major contributors are using the decision to keep the article as a carte blanche and the article has turned into a coatrack and heavy POV pushing from the Bosnian editors' side. There are 2 main examples of how this is being done:

1. Insertion of bold and accusatory POV pushing statements not sourced in any way such as:
  • Once the armed conflict had broken out, on some occasions the media openly incited people to kill non-Serbs.
  • After so many years of domination and with no competition, Serbian Television has been outstandingly successful in its mission to create a pliant population.
  • After his visit some of Serb media portrayed him [Bill Clinton] as the Al Qaida supporter.
  • Following such activities Serb propaganda tried to deny the genocide and to present victims as the terrorists or foreign Islamic fighters.
  • During the Yugoslav wars, Serbian TV propaganda described NATO forces which intervened against Serb forces attacking non-Serb civilians as the Nazi troops invading Serb lands. President Bill Clinton was portrayed as Adolf Hitler.
2. Copy and pasting of large portions of text from other articles related to the events. These texts describe the wrongdoings of Serbian armed forces in the conflict but do not explain anything about what role the Serb propaganda played in the events. Examples of copied text without context specific to the article:

2 of the major contributors of this article, namely The Dragon of Bosnia (talk · contribs) and Bosniak (talk · contribs) have become very aggressive towards editors with different views and editors that have altered their contributions, going so far to use the article's talk page to make following statements:

  • People should really use ICTY documents to stop serbian apologists and their nazi propaganda.
  • You might read more about what Serbian Fascist and Christian Terrorists are doing in the Balkans
  • But constant apologies from supporters of Serbian fascism, as well as ridicolous nominations of this wonderful article to be deleted are coming from extremists themselves. It is very disturbing to watch people portraying themselves to be objective, and yet stading in defence of Serbian fascists.
  • Islamophobia is trully a mental disorder, not an opinion

I am of an educated opinion that someone writing statements like these is wanting to present an opinion more so than they are trying to write an objective article. Bosniak (talk · contribs) has a long history of personal attacks, incivility and edit warring that have garnered him 7 blocks so far and I am seeing a continuation of the same trend here.

Getting to the point, I would like your opinion on what to do here. The one thing that I will not do is to start editing, deleting and reverting information I see as non-encyclopedic and POV because I do not want to get into an edit or revert war. There is already somewhat of a revert war happening with the POV tags and such being inserted and removed. I am not sure about nominating it for deletion because the article is fully salvageable and could turn out to be a pretty informative one if cleaned up properly. Protecting or semi-protecting it will do more harm than good, in my opinion. Please let me know, if you have the will and the time, what I could do to stop the very rapid degradation of this article into an edit war or a heavy POV piece of text.

Thank you for even reading this.

Peace! SWik78 (talk) 21:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 21:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply and your advice. I will keep you posted. SWik78 (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

BTW, please check the last edit of the article by Grandy Grandy (talk · contribs) and his aggressive edit summary. He actually reverted my edit and all I asked for was a source. Peace, again. SWik78 (talk) 21:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

803

hey man i'd like to create a page on the music scene in west columbia i have some good sources and i need to know what to do in order to create this page, after making this page i would like to try to make wikipedias for the notable bands within this genre/local music scene there are very many people looking forward to this, we annouced our plans of an 803 wikipedia at our last show and over 500 people signed a paper stating there should be a seperate wiki for rise of the tyrant(album) and (band) the article in large bold print beside the signature column said I would rather see a wikipedia for the upcomming band rise of the tyrant than for the album of an already signed band, im not trying to go behind your back and im sure their signatures wont help, but at the next show over 1000 people are going to be there and i was just curious if these signatures we've been occumalating are pointless please help me in getting R.O.T.T. on here, you can create the page using articles written about us in the paper, our about me, purevolume, official site, etc. i just want a little recognition on wikipedia, you've helped me so far more than you know, so again im asking to please help me with this,

Riseofthetyrant (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Riseofthetyrant

My reply delldot talk 02:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

I'm not wasting my time in such conversations. I'm now editing with caution starting now. I'm not interested in getting whipped by the arbitration committee nor am I getting arrested for my actions. I'm going back to war. I forgot this: iaNLOPEZ1115 (talk) 07:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for being understanding about it :) Sorry to come off as a bully. Peace, delldot talk 14:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Help plz

could u help me plz i took this picture of a cricket player in taunton 1999 and want to put it on the page of ALPESH VADHER. --Thevardonrushes (talk) 15:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou very much.--Thevardonrushes (talk) 15:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I have uploaded the image of Alpesh Vadher would it please be possible for you to place the picture of "Image:Cricket player in taunton.jpg" which it was uploaded as on to the page of Alpesh vadher the cricket player. --Thevardonrushes (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Caption1

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Global notability

I hope that you might be interested in participating in the discussion here -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

General Question

I am fairly new to using Wikipedia and I recently got in an argument with a co-worker. He said that anyone can edit wikipedia and that it is not monitored. I cannot believe that. If that were the case, there would be a lot of errors. I am concerned because I have found wikipedia to be a wealth of knowledge. My question for you is, are the edited articles reviewed before they are posted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.40.152.95 (talk) 17:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 17:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I apologize for the change that was made. It was my co-worker and he should have chosen a better method to prove that the site would go live after it was edited. I do have another question. How is the content verified factually? Is it more or less left up to the integrity of the contributor? Thank you for your time and assistance.

My reply delldot talk 18:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

What a concidence!!

What a concidence, alot of times I see a vandal edit, such as the one on Big Moe's death, I see that you reverted it before I got to it, and in a lot of other edits!! Chris Iz Cali (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Editor Review

Hi.

When you get the time, please review me at Wikipedia:Editor_review/Thehelpfulone.

Thanks!

The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 16:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Your sock

Just kind of wondering, Delldot, do you ever think you may be worrying a bit too much about someone hacking into your admin account? Has that ever happened before?

Speaking of administrating, do you ever think maybe some admins could be a bit nicer to users? I'm not referring to you, of course! See, I'm a frequenter to an online message board, and sometimes I think that a certain mod there could say things a bit more nicely. I wonder how to deal with situations like this.

I hope your Christmas was enjoyable!

Happy editing,--Padawan Animator (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm probably being way paranoid, especially since my work computer isn't even really that public. But it would suck to have the admin account hacked, so a little paranoia is in order. Mine's never been hacked, but a few other admins have had theirs hacked, and it was a pain dealing with the resultant mess (though I think in most of those cases weak passwords were to blame, not keyloggers).
Yeah, people are already supposed to be nice, including admins. There's WP:CIV and WP:BITE for example. I guess the best way to deal with it is to discuss it with them privately at first, and just let them know as gently as possible that it bothers you. They may not realize they're coming off as hostile, since it's so easy to misread the emotion behind people's posts. I guess if it's out of hand and that doesn't help, you'd need to get another, neutral person involved, or if it was really bad go through WP:DR. Peace, delldot talk 15:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
This user left a reply to your message.--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
My reply delldot talk 23:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
My reply--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Response--Padawan Animator (talk) 19:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
My reply delldot talk 19:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

align=leftThank you so much for the kind editor review. I really appreciate your taking the time to go through my contributions (and I mean all of my contributions) and write up such a detailed assessment--that was far beyond anything I was expecting! Admittedly, it may be a few days before my head is back to normal size, but that just comes with the territory....

I'll be keeping your comments in mind as I continue to edit. Thank you again! --jonny-mt 15:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

:D Glad you liked it. Peace, delldot talk 15:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Road accident deaths in Croatia

I had a problem listing this category as a link so you'll have to copy-and-paste your way to the category.

This category was created in October of 2007 specifically to list Toše Proeski who is still the only person listed in that category. Do you think it would be ridiculous to nominate the category for deletion? I really don't see a purpose in having a category to which you can only be directed from an article about a dead singer only to find that you've been directed to a category page that only lists the name of the same dead singer? SWik78 (talk) 16:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 16:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
As always, thanks for your help. Peace.
SWik78 (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Sure thing! :-) delldot talk 17:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Okay. Now I'm getting worried that I've begun to annoy you.--Padawan Animator (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied to this and above reply.

ER

You wrote on my user talk page:

==Your ER== Hey, sorry you've been waiting so long for a review! I was about to do it, but I saw you replaced your talk and user pages with this box, and haven't contributed in a couple weeks. So I wanted to ask before I go to the trouble - are you still involved in the project and interested in getting reviewed? Peace, delldot talk 12:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Delldot, thanks for the response. I've been away from my computer for a few weeks following the birth of my third child, but I'm getting back into things now. If you're still interested in an editor review, I'd be very interested in what you have to say. --The.Q(t)(c) 12:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
My reply delldot talk 19:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Page Deleted

Hi

I received a message just now saying that the page which i created 5 mins back is deleted as it belongs to some organisations. Please note it does not belong to a particuler organisation. I work as a software engineer and I m crating a wiki page fo my colleagues to share knowledge. the heading I gave was Allianz Cornhill SD-Web Knowledgebase.

Shoban —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shobankr (talk • contribs) 16:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 20:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem

It is always a pleasure to work along side you. --Kukini hablame aqui 20:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words! Same to you. :D delldot talk 20:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Temple garment

Common problem with the article. It's an LDS editor deleting what they see as sacrilege. I've given the IP final warning.Kww (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 08:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Putnam City North High School Notable Alumni Section

Hi Delldot:

I noticed some of your edits and thought you might be able to help with the above referenced page.

I have attempted to pare their list of notable alumni down to those who have achieved something notable and worthy of recognition in Wikipedia.

Each time I have made changes to the page the same person has restored all of their hand picked selections most of which in my estimation are not notable as compared with other school's pages.

Could you take a look at it and see which alumni are notable and which aren't?

Thanks,

70.233.142.134 (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 42.647.375.399

My Replies delldot talk 04:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

My IP address has probably changed because of my movement since I started looking at that particular page.

I am new to Wikipedia and don't really know the ropes yet.

Thanks for your recommendation and feedback.

What percentage of Wiki editors / admins use their given name as compared with those who uses aliases?

Is there quick start guide on how to use wikipedia or contribute? I guess I could run a search within wikipedia to find out.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.233.170.93 (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 19:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Erm.

It is not unconstructive! I made it aboot meeee!

PS. I Love You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pr0nizzgud (talk • contribs) 16:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 16:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

request for help

hello delldot.hope that everything is going fine for you.can i ask you again to do wikipedia another favor(it's a small one actually this time)??please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN#Image_on_Adolf_Eichmann and see if you can help us out there.user animate posted this message after i included a book cover scan at adolf eichmann's page.he/she is unsure if that's ok.can you please help us out??thank you delldotGrandia01 (talk) 08:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 15:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Concussion

Keep up the good work! You've really improved this article.LeadSongDog (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Delldot on a public computer (talk) 07:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Ms.Deldot, please refrain from from talking to me the way you did. It was a breach of etiquette. I had already recieved a warning and did not need another. Thank you for your time!

Ms.Caucus —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.184.221 (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 06:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Format

Sometimes I wonder, why is all the text on Wikipedia all flush left as opposed to justified, along with block format paragraphs as opposed to indented paragraphs? I finally remembered to ask about this after I noticed my English instructor took five points off an otherwise perfectly good score on my paper because of my habit of writing in block format paragraphs, a personal preference inspired by the opening crawl in the Star Wars films. Block format paragraphs seem to feel much more comfortable for me to look at with my mind's eye, so I often wonder, how did this idea of indentations become so standardized, so very much pounded into our heads? Where did things like this all start?

Anyways, I have told Kurdt before that I think he comes off as a good personal attacker as well as a good mod, but I kept inadverdently forgetting to get to explain exactly what I was talking about, so I might as well explain what I was trying to tell him. I'm positive he already thinks that I'm an incredibly retarded li'l douche of a youngling, but it's not like he'll kill me or anything. I do admit that I think I would feel more comfortable with myself if I were to keep a much lower profile than usual over at I.A., so I think I'll just be a bit less of a frequenter, that I'll stop looking for things to say over there. Communicating with my art friends via blogs seem to be much more pleasant, so I guess I'll just blog around much more often. Which reminds me. I need to suggest a userbox for things like, "This user maintains an art blog." Happy editing,--Padawan Animator (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 07:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

adolf eichmann

hello again delldot. 1)at [1] can you please respond and see whats the problem with users Wily and Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )??animate is right,an admin has to stop their 3rr's!!! 2)do you agree with the change of photo info by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) at[2](that new rationale in my opinion is just pathetic,obviously the u.s didn't get that while eichmann was a nazi, that's actually seized nazi property, i forgot to add that in the description) 3)about rudy gulaini's comment,you're absolutely right that this was uncalled for.but i didn't bother to say anything since no one is going to believe the classic excuse of "someone else did it not me".i'll definitely change my password.thanks for the suggestion.regardless,im sorry it happenned,hope that you and all editors accept my apologies.please respond to my inquiries when you can.thank youGrandia01 (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 07:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


Archive 5←Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12→Archive 15