User talk:Deathawk

Hello Deathawk and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Hot Wheels & Categories

Hi. Thanks for the edit to Hot Wheels, but it's not necessary to add the Toys category, because it already was part of the category Toy cars and trucks, which in turn is part of Toys. See Wikipedia:Categorization for more details. RoySmith 2 July 2005 02:06 (UTC)

XBAND

A user claiming to be the originator of this article has been reverting this back to 'his' form, before all of your cleanups. I'm trying to talk to him about it, but would you mind keeping an eye on the page for the next week or so, in case this gets out of hand? --InShaneee 03:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fishcam

As per your talk page question at Talk:Fishcam, Fishcam is not related to Netscape Fishcam. -- Longhair 09:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Full years

WP:MOSNUM#Usage of links for date preferences - this is what i am following. - Hbdragon88 21:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Permanent Hiatus

Deathawk, you need to put back what I had for my page, Permanent Hiatus . That's ridiculous. You messed up the entire article. Change it back IMMEDIATELY. Cueball 15:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fire drills in Wisconsin

Thanks for the information! I've reworked it a little bit for easier readability, but all in all, it was quite helpful. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

category:College and Univeristy Types

I think that renaming Category:School types was a good idea, however, the new category has a typo and does not conform to Wikipedia's capitalization style (in the titles of categories and articles only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions). A more minor point is that in other categories, university comes before college (as in Category:Universities and colleges in New York). I think the category should be called Category:University and college types. Keep up the good work! btm talk 02:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second the observation that the category name is misspelled. I've found out a little about how to fix this, though you may already know how better than I do. See Category talk:College and Univeristy Types. Thanks for your contributions, --Jdlh | Talk 18:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know, I've made the appropriate changes to the category. Cheers! btm talk 22:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists

Why did you remove the * sorting from the categories Religion-related lists, Geography lists, Culture lists, Art lists and Society lists? Did you see the comment describing the layout of the Lists category page at the top of that page, or on the talk page? --JeffW 16:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It makes sense to put the most common way of searching a category near the front, especially the top level categories. And it isn't unprecedented. Take a look at Category:People where it has a bunch of People by ... categories sorted before the alphabetical listings, which is basically the same thing I did in Lists.

Category:Disasters

I appreciate your initiative with the categorisation in the Disasters category. However, several of the categorisations were duplications and I had to revert them. I hope that you do not mind. Please do join us at the WikiProject for disasters. --rxnd ( t | € | c ) 21:58, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Personality

I want to know why me being in the Category:Internet Personalities annoys you so much. Please stop removing me from categories i'm in. And "you're not an internet personality" is not a valid rebuttal. User:Raccoon Fox - Talk 18:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks,. i'm not trying to be mean or rude or a bully...i'm just sick of people vandalising my page, and changing which categories i'm in....i do try to keep myself to proper and appropriate categories, though. User:Raccoon Fox - Talk 19:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Boy Wario Land

You're actually the second person to ask me this, so I'm going to put the reasoning in the article's talk page now.

I changed the article because:

  1. The box says Virtual Boy Wario Land
  2. The cartridge says Virtual Boy Wario Land
  3. The title screen says Virtual Boy Wario Land
  4. GameFAQs, MobyGames, GameSpot, and Planet Virtual Boy all refer to it as Virtual Boy Wario Land.
  5. Note how it never says "Wario Land for Virtual Boy". The "Virtual Boy" is part of the subtitle of the game, much like how Eternal Darkness' full title is actually Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem.
  6. Most importantly: It's really just a rearangement of words from "Wario Land (Virtual Boy)", so what does it really matter? This way drops the parentheses and looks better.--SeizureDog 06:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

C2 Judgement Clay

In response to your message on my talk page, it seems that that list was originally added by User:Nadnerd, and thanks for helping clean the page up. Kil (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Category:Canadian inventions

Your recent edit to Category:Canadian inventions (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Space trade

You might like to revisit the discussion to consider an alternative course of action that has been suggested. Uncle G 14:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Association

I suppose my little joke was rather inappropriate. I was just saying basically many people can be become addicted to this. Sorry. Simply south 18:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... your association didn't quite come out right but i have created speculation as to how it may link with the military. Simply south 18:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Open Society

Hello, I just discovered that you recently made Category:Open Society a parent category for Category:Democracy, when I'm sure you meant to do the inverse. I've already taken care of the problem, and Category:Open Society is now a sub-category of Category:Democracy. Working with categories can be very tricky, even confusing at times, so it's important to take your time and be very careful -- and then check the results to be sure that they make sense. Regards, Cgingold 22:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

afd comments

In light of my latest comments and information on The 3rd Birthday] please reconsider your vote.⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 20:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's StarCraft articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining the StarCraft WikiProject? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all StarCraft articles. Here's some project-specific information for you:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the STARCRAFT project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.

Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Darts

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Darts. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 03:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Criterion Collection films

I have nominated Category:Criterion Collection films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 21:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Kinect Sports

I have nominated Kinect Sports, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinect Sports. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kayau Voting IS evil 03:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HIB edit

You may want to check what you thought was going on in this edit, where you state that information was being removed. All that edit that you undid was re-add a reference that was removed from the previous edit. Note that that section exists in the "Response" part of the article and not wehre HIB#4 is being discussed, as it is about the abuse of the system towards the Steam sale. --MASEM (t) 04:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Going by the edit you undid (see above), the only thing that my reversal of your change was restoring a citation that someone had just outright removed, nothing on the content of the article (certainly nothing about soundtracks). I've double-checked and I'm not seeing where the soundtrack information is being removed (I don't think I would remove that anyway, since it would have been source-able). You may want to double check to to find out what you think went missing. --MASEM (t) 13:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

donkey punch

Your input in a prior RFC on this topic has been mentioned, so you might want to opine at Talk:Donkey_punch#Roadmap. --John Vandenberg (chat) 09:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Super Mario Galaxy 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drive Angry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Season of the Witch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tips & Tricks

The article Tips & Tricks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Magazine does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMAGAZINE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deadbeef (talk) 06:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:04, Wednesday, January 8, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


RW: Charli XCX

In your edit, you added information, but with the source you added, it linked back to this. I reverted the edit because technically it was unsourced and I did not add anything. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Depression Quest DYK

Just to let you know that I've submitted Depression Quest for DYK, and I've named you as one of the co-authors - see Template:Did you know nominations/Depression Quest. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geometry Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levels. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Depression Quest

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Cwobeel (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let's Play. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tear in My Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Renegades (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond the Valley of the Dolls

Your Bold edit has been reverted, as there is no community consensus for the wholesale deletion of "In popular culture" sections, and there hasn't been for years and numerous RfCs.

Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, BMK (talk) 04:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jar Jar Binks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing cast sections in film articles has to stop

Removing casting news doesn't justify removing source material. You may not agree how it looks, but it is encyclopedic and any reader has a right to know who and when that certain cast member joined the movie. So stop removing cast sections and source material about it. BattleshipMan (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate listing of information, The listing of when a cast member joined a particular project, while useful some of the time, is more often than not indiscriminate. Look at Toy Story for instance, it's a "good" article and yet you'll find no mention of when Rex's or Ham's voice actor joined: It's not that information isn't out there it's just that it doesn't amount to a whole lot. Production sections should tell the story of how a film comes together, therefor each time a casting descision is listed it should easily lead to the next. The sections you've restored don't do that. --Deathawk (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Casting information are considered encyclopedic, whatever you agree with it or not. Your actions removing them and the source material that has them doesn't justify anything you think of and you don't have a better reason for doing that, which is considered disruptive and removing legitimate source content. I'm gonna tell you something right now. You're gonna stop removing source material that have casting information and you're gonna behave yourself. Because if you keep on doing that, you could very well face disciplinary action and could be blocked from editing for a time being. And if you think you reason your way out of this, try me. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I don't appreciate you threatening me, we're both here for the same purpose and some Wikiettiquette would be appreciated. Anyway I already made a note asking for consensus on The Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film about this so that we can, as a project whole, try to come to a consensus. --Deathawk (talk) 16:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever. I'm just don't like when editors removing legitimate sourced material, among other things that other editors and I don't agree with. Anyway, I voiced my reasons in the Project Film page. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Nelson

Please add Jill Jones to the Associated Acts category. Whenitstimetoshine (talk) 22:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Walker VII & Roger Rodas

Give info about this. EnchantingZucchini (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please expedite the plagiarism investigation on Zendaya's page

The page is just blank right now. If someone made the mistake several years ago when Zendaya was still a minor, to add copy'd and pasted information, that still shouldn't obscure the knowledge that one can get from that page. It's been blank for almost a month now. This is ridiculous. Just rewrite it and move on.

--2601:C5:4000:154A:1A7:30B0:BBEC:643C (talk) 02:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm yes, I see that's still an issue. I'm actually not checking up on the Zendaya page that much. I just one day checked up on it and noticed it was a blatent copy and paste from Allmusicguide. I'm not really sure what the process is for proceeding, I would maybe contact one of Wikiprojects attached to the talk page, and alert them and/or post an inquiry about what to do on The Village Pump. --Deathawk (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 5th Wave (film)

You're right - be bold. I cut back much of the meanigless fandom speculation in the "sequel" section, expecting even that to be hassled by fans (thus my inline note as well), when I should have just cut the whole darn thing. I tip my hat to you. Thanks. Jmg38 (talk) 05:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sing Street

Hi. Well if we take the 1st sentence you added:

The film is loosley based on Carney's own life in highschool, although he noted "The second Ferdia got the part, the film changed quite significantly" noting that Connor's family acts largely different from his own also stating "the biggest departure is that Conor is an incredibly handsome kid who can do no wrong, and is so full of confidence. I wasn’t like that at all. I had an inner belief in myself, but I didn’t walk around with that swagger. I didn’t look that way"
  • 'loosely' is spelled incorrectly
  • he didn't go to highschool. He lived in Ireland and therefore went to secondary school
  • there is no obvious relationship between the first clause about where Carney went to school, and the second about the movie changing when they cast the role of Cosmo, yet you have linked them with 'although'
  • there is a distinct lack of punctuation including at least 2 missing commas
  • there are 4 clauses in a single sentence, including 2 direct quotes. That's at least 2 clauses and 1 direct quote too many.

And that's just the first sentence. The rest is very similar.

If you want to make changes, make small incremental changes. Add a single new sentence. Expand an existing sentence. Add a single para to enhance the existing prose. I really don't believe the existing prose for that section is too bad. Can it be improved? Undoubtedly. Were your changes an improvement? No. Sorry. CalzGuy (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Deathawk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Deathawk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Your Highness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Improv. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

Recent Edits - August 2017: The Lego Batman Movie

Information icon Hi, my name is GUtt01, and I like to inform you that your recent edits, while a good contribution to the article in question and provided some good citations, had several errors and editing mistakes that had to be corrected. In addition, some information you removed has been restored because there was not a valid reason for its removal; there is no reason to remove information about who is recruited to the cast, particularly as this information also included who was assigned roles within the film's production crew (such as producers). If you like to make further edits to an article, try using the sandbox to ensure it will come out alright.

Keep on editing, mate. ;-) GUtt01 (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

koala15?

Hi Deathawk, were you ever able to get anywhere with kaola15 on his/her unsubstantiated reversions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnatdroid (talk • contribs) 21:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gnatdroid: I suspect your asking because you have a dispute with the user, in which case the best way to deal with it is to discuss the issue with koala on their talk page, barring that there are various Dispute resolutions available. Forgive me, for somewhat evading the question, however I do not want to get into unnecessary wikigossip or wikidrama. --Deathawk (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I was looking at your edits just now and it seemed that much of your edits which caused the conflict between you and Koala appear to be at the Barbara Kalik page where you deleted two references, which leads much of the information unreferenced. I think this is the cause of your conflict more than anything else. --Deathawk (talk) 05:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Deathawk!Gnatdroid (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Deathawk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

It’s also something not worded in a way that outright prohibits it. You removed a huge bulk of the sourced material from the article which is why I reverted you, and ask you undo the revert you did to me. When you think about it everything included in a film article is an announcement. They’re announcing casting, they’re announcing what went into the production. A key thing needed in most film articles are sources confirming things like casting cause otherwise it’s unsourced. Ultimately like I said the wording at MOS does not outright block that style of editing. So I’d appreciate the production section being restored. Rusted AutoParts 22:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve restored the content and began a discussion on the film’s talk page if you wish to further debate. Rusted AutoParts 22:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deathawk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deathawk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Alexander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magician (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Data-Fly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data-Fly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data-Fly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Busytown

Notice

The article Busytown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Busytown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Busytown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Busytown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]