en User talk:Davidprior Jan-Jun07

Salt Trade

(Copied from User talk:71.220.127.97 by Davidprior for context)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Salt Trade. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Davidprior 15:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. It just seemed like having such a broad topic redirect to a subtopic stub is a bad idea. Maybe we could get some people to put actual information about the salt trade in, instead of a silly redirect. 71.220.127.97 00:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(reply posted on both talk pages) I don't know enough about the topic to make that judgement. If you feel a seperate article is warranted, then by all means get rid of the redirect, and add a new article; but please don't just blank the page leaving nothing there. Cheers, Davidprior 01:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CB&I

I deleted the redirect as CB&I have not been associated with Praxair in a decade. I don't have time to write the article at the moment, but if you go to www.cbi.com/about/history.aspx you can see Praxair bought CB&I in 96 and floated it off in 97. To leave the redirect is deceptive. To simply blank the page is lazy. I chose the latter. Richardscott76

Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)

It has been proposed that the following criteria be removed from this guideline: 1. The commercial organization is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications.3 2. The commercial organization's share price is used to calculate one or more of the major managed stock market indices.4 Note this is not the same as simply being listed on a stock market. Nor is it the same as being included in an index that comprises the entire market. The broader or the more specialized the index, the less notability it establishes for the company.

We are close to evaluating consensus, please join with us in the discussion. --Kevin Murray 04:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hepatotoxin

i removed that redirect because i added it at requested articles, if the redirect is in place it suggests that the article has been made and it that way nobody creates it. nl:Hepatotoxine, and still the chemical is not the same as the condition, please revert it. reg . Mion 13:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert on the subject, but would've thought that most users would've found the redirect better than nothing. If you felt it wasn't, and was perhaps confusing, it could've been listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, blanking the page but leaving it there is more likely to confuse readers.

I've knocked something together from the dutch article you mentioned, using machine-translation, then fixing the grammar - Its at my scratchpad (permanent link: [1]) - I've requested it be moved over the redirect - I see from your user-page that you speak both English and Dutch, and from your comment I assume you know more about this subject than me (not hard) - perhaps you'll be able to improve the article. Davidprior 15:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you´ve written an article on the subject, based on the nl: one - Cheers, Davidprior 18:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remake is done, and i placed the article on the redirect, listing on the page is only when you need a mod, which isn't the case. Thanks for helping, Cheers.Mion 18:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shortpages

Hi David, sorry I was not able to reply to you earlier; I have now replied to your questions on my talk page. Schutz 23:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Pierce

I don't know why, either- thank you for catching that! I think I accidentally left my account logged in on a shared workstation; there are several oddities from around that time that look like half-completed or erroneous things I can't remember or imagine why I would have been doing. Thank you for the fix! -FZ 15:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April Fool's Day

If you still want to put a lipogram on the main portal, I'm up for it. --Lkjhgfdsa 19:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:April_Fool%27s_Main_Page#Not_really_a_joke.2C_but_quite_creative_nonetheless[reply]

Dummy Edit

This is a dummy edit to satisfy the requirements of w:User:Interiot/EditCountOptIn. Davidprior 20:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David, If you are still interested in Erlang-C calcualtions, I can help. Using the textbook formula for Erlang-C calculations is almost never the "right" approach. If you are interested in discussing further, I would prefer to do so via email. Thanks. 66.109.219.209 20:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Davidprior/Jan-Jun07