User talk:David Fuchs/Archive 03
You placed a speedy tag on Chris Nelson (photographer). The article's author has replied with comments on the article's talk page at Talk:Chris Nelson (photographer). --Eastmain 23:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Picture in speedrun articleHi there. I see you've added a picture of Cody Miller's speedrun to the speedrun article. It's very nice, but it's a little difficult to see what's actually happening. Maybe you could edit the summary of the picture to mention the part of the game it depicts, and preferably also the trick that Miller uses? Or anything that might be of interest, maybe similar to the Super Mario 64 image that explains the glitch that is used. —msikma (user, talk) 17:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Shopping In LondonHi David, I see that you posted a speedy delete to this entry. I was trying to briefly define the different shopping districts available to a visitor to London, including how to find all the best deals and where to find the sale shops, as I was unable to find any such entry of Wiki. (Y48jemma 18:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)) Critique requestHello! I've noticed you've been reviewing a lot of GA nominations lately, so I was wondering if you could take a look at this peer review request, please? My eventual goal is to get the article to GA. Thanks in any case! --VPeric 22:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
GA Nomination Flood (Halo)Hi David. First glance at the refernces not a problem but there are a couple that once you click on the URL it dosen;t appear to have the text in them that's in the reference. For your refernce these are
If those are sorted I'll happily raise to GA. Good work on the article BTW. BigHairRef | Talk 16:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC) I've checked the cites, should be no problem with them now. The On Hold will have to stay untill tomorrow as there's a minimum two day wait after it's put on hold but after that unless there are radical changes shouldn't be a problem. BigHairRef | Talk 12:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Flood (Halo)The article Flood (Halo) you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Flood (Halo) for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations. BigHairRef | Talk 13:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC) Thank You For The ReviewThanks for the review you gave of my activities. To be honest, I was expecting more negative results, but I am amazed to find out that is not the case. The articles I edit the most (such as Aly & AJ, Paris Hilton, and Fergie (singer), all interest me the most, and they're in my Watchlist. My Star Trek edits were done over several articles, but they're all on a similar topic. You probably noticed that a bunch of my recent edits include Haylie Duff, Hilary Duff, and Alexis Bledel, but again, these people interest me. As for WP: AIV, I would like to actually help out there instead of just report Users, but since that's an Administrator's task, there's nothing I can really do. At RfC, I have only reported some Usernames that I thought might be breaking the Username policies. With the Wikiprojects, I have thought about them, but I don't know which one to join. At the moment I'm happy with what I'm already doing, but I won't ignore the Wikiprojects; I'll just join one when it's appropriate for me to (that's okay, isn't it? Is joining a Wikiproject a requirement for certain things, such as Adminship?). One more thing, about my taste in music, was that a view you based on my edits, or on my Userboxes? :) Acalamari 17:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Editor review archivedThanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/David Fuchs/Archive 03, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Re: WP:Peer ReviewThanks for your input; I greatly appreciate it. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 03:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Re: ERThanks for responding well to the criticism. Heh, any time those pants need kicking, you know where to bring them! Peace, delldot | talk 04:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Hello. Could you please take a look at the article you have up for AfD and considering revoking your delete vote. The article has been worked heavily on since the AfD was first introduced, and now complies with Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:External links. Thank you. Havok (T/C/e/c) 09:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Your reviewThanks for reviewing me! I sure hope that program doesn't close; I'll read the discussion, and maybe participate. Good luck on your FP; it took me a few hours to get mine right (I'm inexperienced :). | AndonicO Talk · Sign Here 16:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Image needs removedPlease remove Image:Halo3finallogo.gif from your page as it is in violation with WP:FAIR#Policy, number 9. Thanks. Thunderbrand 00:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC) Your post to Jimbo's talk pageI think that Meta handles the type of situation you describe. DurovaCharge! 00:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Editor ReviewThank you for your kind works. I am getting more active with GAC have only rated two articles. And thank you for giving me your review I appreciate it very much. As for your advice on the WP:RFD I will get more involved. For the RCp I have been patroling for a week or two now and have reverted a number of vandalism attempts and just today I got three users banned. Anyway thanks you so much for your kind words and I am looking forward to hopeful meeting you later on. Thanks. Kyriakos 03:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC) My editor reviewHello David, thanks for your kind comments at my editor review. My previous user name was Budgiekiller in reference to my support of the local rivals of Norwich City F.C.. However, during my failed RFA, a number of oppose votes and comments came my way as a result of the name. So I changed it. However, that's an aside. Thanks again for taking the time to look over my contributions. The Rambling Man 08:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Regarding Devil May Cry 2I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to review this article and state the requirements for a Good Article candidate. I'm in the process of working on the Devil May Cry 2 article (though I've been taking a break from it for the last two weeks) and wasn't aware it had been nominated so soon as it clearly needs a lot of work. Cheers, Lankybugger 20:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Your EmailPlease check it, I have emailed you some information regarding what Itay told you. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 15:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC) Sigh... Been Autoblocked on the school compArb-TeamWelcome the Arbitration Team! Hopefully this gets started soonly. Yours, --Neigel von Teighen 14:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Age of Empires III, ReadyThe final improvements have been done; the article seems to be ready... --TomasBat (Talk)(Sign) 19:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Raphael Lataster deletionHi there, I request that my article on Raphael Lataster be restored. He is a prominent advocate of the Aramaic Primacy movement which has several pages on wiki, his name is also referred to in some of these articles. His friend and fellow advocate, Paul Younan, has an article on wikipedia with considerably less information, so why should my article on Lataster be unworthy? Please restore or show me what to fix. Thankyou, byrnes 777 Byrnes777 02:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC) DavidDear David--
|