User talk:Darth Stabro

Naďa Profantová

Thank you to review article about Naďa Profantová I add a paragraph to text about her She oversaw multiple projects for GA CR, conducting field research in Klecany, Tismice, and, in collaboration with M. Kuna, in Roztoky u Prahy. She has authored and co-authored eight books as well as numerous studies.

*waves happily*

Your GA nomination of Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Imbluey2 -- Imbluey2 (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for James Michael Reardon

On 18 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Michael Reardon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after he did not come home for dinner, James Michael Reardon's assistant priests found that he had died in his basilica while praying? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Michael Reardon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James Michael Reardon), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Third Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)

On 19 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Third Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the offices of Hamm's Brewery in Saint Paul, Minnesota, were built on the site of the city's third cathedral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Third Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Third Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hamm Building

On 19 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hamm Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the offices of Hamm's Brewery in Saint Paul, Minnesota, were built on the site of the city's third cathedral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Third Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hamm Building), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: rollback of my edit of Line2

I had added a note on the Talk page requesting that someone help me CE I am using a tiny touchscreen with difficult fingering. Please ADD A TAG (idk how or would do it myself) to that page as OUT-OF-DATE ! Line2 I went to considerable work , probably 20min+, have a disability, and would hv appreciated some editorial assistance, instead of a simple rollback. I get that you are very busy and hv other priorities even on Wikipedia, not to mention irl. thank you for all that you do. 50.39.255.126 (talk) 05:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to take a look at it in the next week. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 05:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota)

The article Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota) for comments about the article, and Talk:Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Imbluey2 -- Imbluey2 (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary

On 20 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the clergy of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis were upset about the sale of Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary after its closure? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Second Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for St. Gregory the Great Seminary

On 22 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. Gregory the Great Seminary, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that St. Gregory the Great Seminary was founded in a former juvenile mental hospital? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Gregory the Great Seminary. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, St. Gregory the Great Seminary), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for vitamin E

I responded to a query about the hook I proposed for vitamin E. You reverted my reply. An editor reverted your action. Did you act because you believed my reply was in the wrong place? David notMD (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:David notMD, I'm not quite sure how that happened. Accidental misclick of the rollback button I'm guessing, but I'm not sure what page I was looking at when it happened. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 21:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It got fixed, so no harm. David notMD (talk) 04:33, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Darth Stabro, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
Pbritti

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Pbritti (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Minnesota Pioneer to its Patrons

On 26 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Minnesota Pioneer to its Patrons, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American president Zachary Taylor is mentioned in a poem about the conversion of Saint Paul? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Minnesota Pioneer to its Patrons. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Minnesota Pioneer to its Patrons), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Darth Stabro, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Sohom (talk) 01:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darth stabro

Your edits are bias and not factual. Why would you add a section of indictment on someone who's charges were dropped and indictment was clearly bias as the witness against Carolina was a reporter who didn't even know her in 2021?

As well, have you added that section on others? no other politician who has been indicted and charges dropped have a section of indictment on their wikipedia page? seems odd that you insist on that.

If you read public records Orange County clerk of courts, you can see the details. The articles you publish are bias in nature.

Thank you for understanding and operating in a neutral unbiased way. 71.42.26.86 (talk) 18:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to cite verifiable, reliable sources to support what you would like to add. The fact that charges were dropped does not make the charges no longer newsworthy and does not mean you can remove them. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 18:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the charges were dropped. If you view the Orange County Clerk of Courts, the document clearly states charges dropped. The remaining context was added by bias news outlets that Amesty actually sued. The main witness against Amesty was the reporter you continue to cite. Please view Orange County Clerk of Court records for further information. 71.42.26.86 (talk) 18:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the link https://myeclerk.myorangeclerk.com/DocView/Doc?eCode=zNick4MBcFQTQHhlnIyi%2ByHwSnjmOoLQWbIZKzNxjdNrhJvQu6f9B97AIv2pMUv8%2FZitZpd7V5arWW60%2BZvQB0%2B63sJtduJ3BajPPaVTn3dThho3WhMgMfKMlx0IImCJwqiv1MmJF%2BA3wgMlxAUmXQ%3D%3D 71.42.26.86 (talk) 18:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All that those documents say is the "parties have engaged in discussions to resolve this case". The idea that charges were dropped because there was a lack of evidence is unsupported, and if anything the wording of "engaged in discussion" supports the idea that some terms were agreed to, as reported on. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 18:25, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Snowflake Breach

Hello. thank you for your comments on the 2024 Snowflake data breach page. Can you please review it again to see if i have made successful introduction edits ? thank you SinaTheMaw (talk) 07:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)

The article Second Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Second Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota) for comments about the article, and Talk:Second Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leo Christopher Byrne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Glennon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for First Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)

On 5 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article First Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the city of Saint Paul, Minnesota, was named after a log chapel (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/First Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, First Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is an awesome DYK, and article too! Do you know if those gavels still exist? I wanna hold one. Panini! • 🥪 05:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Panini! There is a gavel in the collections of the Minnesota Historical Society. I don't think they're into people holding it on normal occasions though. You might have to try to become an archbishop. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 00:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota)

On 6 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that St. Peter's Catholic Church is the oldest church in continuous use in the state of Minnesota? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Saint Peter's Church (Mendota, Minnesota)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Hamm Jr.

On 8 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Hamm Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the FBI's first successful use of silver nitrate to identify fingerprints was in solving the kidnapping of a brewery executive? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Hamm Jr.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Hamm Jr.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

William Lee Neal

Are you gonna talk with me about the page, or will you just string me along and pretend I have a say only to delete it within a week? If you'll discuss this with me, meet me in the forum you created. ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 15:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ContributingHelperOnTheSide, deletion discussions are just that: a discussion. Other editors will join in. If there is no clear consensus for deletion, the page will stay. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 16:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. I wasn't sure if there were certain admins or users here who overrode their own rules. ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Darth Stabro,
It was inappropriate to withdraw an AFD and then take action on it yourself by draftifying the article. This effectively overruled any consensus that might have come out of an AFD discussion only reinforces your opinion and what you wanted to happen with this article. It would be fine if the article had been draftified out of a consensus decision ro do this but in that case, the AFD discussion should have continued until a consensus among participants had been reached. You should withdrawn an AFD deletion nomination as a way of keeping the status quo, not as a way for you to get around a consensus decision. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Liz, it was not a way around a consensus. As stated in the AfD, I did some more in-depth searching and found more sources that existed that verified the topic met the GNG. That is why I withdrew, nothing more, nothing less. I draftified the article because it simply is not ready to be in mainspace - again, nothing more, nothing less, not a way around deletion. I want the article to exist! I went in to make some improvements to it this evening and saw it needs significant work to be up to an appropriate quality, not something that can just be quickly fixed. It has terrible in-text citations, synthesis, and outright incorrect information. I considered the AfD over and done as I had withdrawn, even if no admin had formally closed it yet. The drafitification was entirely separate. Should I have waited for the discussion to close? Was being bold and draftifying an article that does not need Manual of Style standards not appropriate because I had been involved in the deletion discussion? ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 01:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you're telling me the Westword article isn't factual, thank you for clarifying. That was where my primary information was coming from. I should've listened to my doubts more from such a lengthy extent of coverage with a lot of shock factor language. What else do you need from me? ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seems factual enough, but it seems like you may have misread some things, like the part about the car; he didn't steal a car, he shoplifted a toy car, for example. So there's things like that that need to be double checked. I cut out a lot of the stuff that I couldn't verify quickly and got the article to a length that is more appropriate; there's still more work that needs to be done, like putting the appropriate in text citations where they need to be and trying to use more than just the one source for the majority of the page. Expanding information about his arrest and the trial itself would be good. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 22:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jijin

On 11 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jijin, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that for cultural reasons the jijin was permitted to be worn by Catholic priests in China even while celebrating Mass? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jijin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jijin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Coon Rapids Dam

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Coon Rapids Dam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Coon Rapids Dam

The article Coon Rapids Dam you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Coon Rapids Dam and Talk:Coon Rapids Dam/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 19:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Your signature currently uses a template ({{Smallcaps|Darth Stabro}}). This is against the guidelines for signatures (WP:SIG#NT) and actually just caused an unexpected result, see this bug report. Just use <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Darth Stabro|Darth Stabro]]</span> instead, it also produces Darth Stabro. Happy editing, —Kusma (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ah, thanks! ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 21:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]