User talk:Darkknight2149/Archive2 2

Hellraiser

Why is Hellraiser: Judgement written in the way you have here? It has never been stylized like that, has it? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oxygene7-13: He was referring to Hellraiser: Judgment, but those exact words weren't used in the immediate quote. Hence the brackets. It's a well-known technique when simplifying or distributing quotes. The "no-wiki" template is used because people keep mistaking it for a faulty attempt at linking it to the Hellraiser: Judgment page, and they keep trying to "correct" it. DarkKnight2149 21:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly what kept me from correcting it. So... that last sentence is part of the quote then? If so, fine with me. If not, it looks a bit weird. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean. The last two sentences are a quote, yes. DarkKnight2149 16:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
the DO NOT CHANGE message witheld me from editing, the 2 brackets in the middle of an article look weird to me but if it's part of the quote, it's fine with me. I hope I have explained it clear enough now. Thanx for answering and I won't bother you anymore on this subject. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 10:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Untitled DC Comics film series

Hey! I've been jamming this draft (about the upcoming Elseworlds-like DC film banner) out for about a day or so and I wanted to ask if you'd be interested in helping? I feel like there could be some stuff I missed and there are a few other things I have to do (on Wikipedia and in real life; I'm also not too experienced in film articles) and I've noticed you seem to be experienced in superhero film-related subjects. JOEBRO64 00:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64: I appreciate the offer. I wish I could help, but I haven't really been editing as much as I would like to. I have a lot on my to-do list (which is pretty backed up), including helping Paleface Jack finish work on a Leatherface draft, completing a Professor Pyg draft, getting Halloween (2018 film) to GA quality (which I haven't even touched in forever), and fleshing out User:Darkknight2149/Child's Play (2019 film).
One day soon, I'm going to have to set aside a day and say "Okay, it's time to start knocking out my Wiki-tasks." On my off-time on Wikipedia, I have lately just been monitoring a few articles and doing a task or so a day. Thankfully, I no longer need to file a complex case request (which would have gone on forever...) and I already finished Hellraiser: Judgment (awaiting GA review). If Joker (character) is nominated for FA, which it's already up to standard IMO, I'll also help there.
TL;DR: I have a few tasks that need to get done and I wish I had as much time for Wikipedia as I used to. DarkKnight2149 02:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Professor Pyg is practically done, so that's something. Just need to add a few more of his appearances and then that task will be mostly out of the way. The Child's Play draft is lowest on my priority list, since it has barely been started. DarkKnight2149 02:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I'm not as experienced here as I am with Wikia, do you know how to upload images without them getting removed??? I gave the copyright guidelines a read and they're just too much. How am I supposed to upload images from Gotham and not get them copystriked? Kingofsting87 (talk) 20:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For copyrighted and non-free images, I'd give WP:NFCC a read. The cliffnotes version:
• Non-free images have to serve a very specific encyclopedic purpose on the mainstream Wikipedia. I.E. the usual "primary means of visual identification" images at the top of the article and images in the body article that serve a commentative purpose. You can look through featured articles for examples of when to use copyrighted images, as those represent some of the best that Wikipedia has to offer.
• In comic book character articles, it is occasionally okay to upload an image of a specific notable version of them in the In other media section (for similar reasons of visual identification).
• When uploading non-free images, there is a form you must fill out on the page, specifying - what article you are using it for, who the copyright holders are, what purpose it serves, and how it will be used minimally (example: intended for single use in a single article for a specific purpose).
• Non-free images that aren't used in at least one article will be deleted by an administrator or bots. Non-free images can only be used once and only in the article it was uploaded for, unless an additional rationale is filled out explaining why it was added to another article.
Hope that helps. As far as writing goes, articles about fictional characters can't be written in an in-universe perspective unless you are discussing the plot in designated areas, virtually all claims have to be verifiable and backed by a citation to a reliable source, no original research or synthesis of published materials is allowed, all articles must be of a notable topic and told from a purely neutral point of view, and trivia/fun facts aren't allowed. Basically, Wikipedia tries to be a legitimate encyclopedia that anyone can edit, although most articles don't end up meeting the standard for various unfortunate reasons. DarkKnight2149 21:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremiah Valeska

Edit wars are kinda pointless, could you please explain what's wrong with my edit? Kingofsting87 (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:NCF issue has already been explained. Wikipedia has strict non-free content policies and we don't use multiple non-free images with separate rationales where only one is necessary. Then there's the text about "while Jeremiah is depicted as a psychotic narcissist, obsessed solely on "bonding" with Bruce Wayne in twisted and disturbing ways", which simultaneously violates WP:OR, WP:NPOV, and WP:CS. You also removed informative text backed by the sources in the article to add it. Wikipedia is very strict about everything needing a source. We aren't allowed to make stray observations ourselves. DarkKnight2149 22:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. However i'm not sure "sociopath" is the right word to describe him Kingofsting87 (talk) 15:31, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't see that. I think that may have been added when another user did some rewriting. DarkKnight2149 15:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jerome Jeremiah.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jerome Jeremiah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

False information on the Hannibal Lecter article.

Hello! I’m sorry if this is the wrong way to contact someone - I’m new to Wikipedia and don’t know what to do with the interface.

I’m trying to contact some sort of mod or admin about the user K.S.Morgan, and I saw that you had a previous exchange with them about the false information they’ve been repeatedly posting on the Hannibal Lecter article. I guess they’ve been doing this for years...

It really pains me to see false information in the article, and I want very much to fix it. The article was fine for a very long time, until K.S.Morgan put the false info in just a few days ago. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 20:35, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@VictimOfEntropy: Thanks for notifying me. After two years, Morgan is pretty much the only user asserting this and they apparently have been reverted by other users besides just me since 2018. If it continues, I'm reporting them for edit warring. Pretty much everyone (including those at Talk:Hannibal Lecter) has contested this, Morgan violated the three revert rule recently, and even the show's entry at List of dramatic television series with LGBT characters states that they aren't in a homosexual relationship. Insisting they are is like saying that Batman and the Joker are in a gay relationship, or that Mads Mikkelsen and Hideo Kojima are in a gay relationship... DarkKnight2149 01:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Morgan also doesn't seem to understand that this and this are (quite obviously) jokes... DarkKnight2149 01:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yo

Did you read Batman: Damned #3 by any chance? I'm planning on nominating the article for GAN soon, but I didn't read the third issue and I'm afraid in this copyedit I made some plot details misleading and/or incorrect. If you did read it would you mind checking? (it's 100% fine if you didn't, I just want some other eyes on the article, as I seem to be the only one who regularly edits it.) JOEBRO64 01:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My copy is ordered, but hasn't arrived in the mail yet. I have the first two issues and I will give it a look. I started typing Superman: Year One about a month ago and started some edits at User:Paleface Jack/Leatherface (Revision) (around the time I rewrote Jerome and Jeremiah Valeska), but then got distracted in real life again. I'm going to try and get back to work tomorrow, so I'll check out the Batman: Damned article then. DarkKnight2149 01:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll be more than happy to help you with Superman if you need it. JOEBRO64 01:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DarkKnight2149, I hope you don’t mind my reaching out, and I hope this is the right place to reach you (Wikipedia’s interface is still confusing)... I just have some questions about an edit I just made that isn’t showing up on the page itself. On the page for Jack Crawford, I noticed that his wife “Bella” wasn’t listed in the info box. I tried to mimic the formatting of the other categories in the info box to add “significant other = Phyllis “Bella” Crawford”, and I think I got it right; but for some reason it isn’t showing up on the actual page... I’m always scared to make edits, afraid I’ll mess something up, so I don’t have nearly enough experience with Wikipedia to have any idea what’s going on here. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 00:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Might have been the "_" symbol that was causing it to be invisible. After copy/pasting the section from Template:Infobox character, I managed to get it to work. DarkKnight2149 01:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I really appreciate the help :) Hopefully I’ll get better at this some day, and will stop having to come and bother you lol... VictimOfEntropy (talk) 02:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheJoebro64: Alright, sorry for the delay. About to take a look at it. DarkKnight2149 06:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dick Grayson Batman Pyg.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dick Grayson Batman Pyg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hellraiser: Judgment

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hellraiser: Judgment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hellraiser: Judgment

The article Hellraiser: Judgment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hellraiser: Judgment for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 20:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hellraiser: Judgment

The article Hellraiser: Judgment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hellraiser: Judgment for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SL93 -- SL93 (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hellraiser: Judgement

I noticed the extra work you added for your featured article nomination and that you have a support already. Great work! SL93 (talk) 04:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comics characters disambiguation

WP:NCC#Between characters of different publishers says:

If a character name has been used by more than one publisher, use the publisher name to disambiguate. Example:

Opera hat (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks. :) Opera hat (talk) 21:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CVUA offer

Hi there - I'm afraid I completely botched my last edit at ANI, to the extent that I'm not sure whether you got the ping. I realise that you've been around a while, and I don't want to come across as patronising, but if you'd like a quick run through the CVUA curriculum, including discussion of BLP stuff and when not to revert, you'd be welcome. If you don't fancy it, that's totally fine of course - but I'd recommend that you accept at ANI your reinstatement of that content was a mistake, and say that you'll be more cautious in future. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 18:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am fully willing to accept that I was wrong about BLP, after multiple editors (excluding the IP WP:SOCK currently disrupting the thread) have informed me so. I apologise for placing WP:COI first. While I won't accept CVUA in the immediate future, I will definitely be more hesitant to restore any content (excluding cases of obvious vandalism) to BLPs in the future. DarkKnight2149 07:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Darkknight2149, understood. Just so you know you're not on your own, I was involved in a similar situation once myself. An IP with no other edits was removing a bunch of negative stuff from a BLP. They weren't using edit summaries at all, we're ignoring attempts to communicate, and were edit warring against a number of patrollers (myself included) who were knee-jerk reverting them. When someone actually checked the citations though, they turned out to be trashy tabloid sources about the subject's sister, and the material was a flagrant BLP violation. The IP was in the right, and we all got a bit of a roasting at ANI. Ever since then, I've been a lot more circumspect about restoring negative content to BLPs - I'll either investigate it fully, or I'll leave it for someone else to deal with. Just think of this as a learning experience - everyone makes mistakes, it's what you take away from them that matters. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 15:37, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween (2018)

Hi, I'm italian so I apologize if I make mistakes. Halloween movie has won Best CD for The Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Awards, here's the link, that's also what IMDb says, but I read that it has also won best film of 2018, right? --BincoBì (talk) 11:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar (Marvel Comics)

Just a neutral notice of an AFD I welcome you as an colleague an opinion on. Jhenderson 777 18:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emperor Blackgate on the cover of Detective Comics.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emperor Blackgate on the cover of Detective Comics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

False Information on the Hannibal Lecter article - Part 2.

Hello again! I hope you’re doing well :) It’s been quite a while since we last spoke, but the same issue from before seems to have resurfaced:

Someone (an *anonymous* someone, this time) is again trying to make a claim on the Hannibal Lecter article saying that Lecter and Will Graham were in a sexual relationship in the TV series, even though they most certainly were not.

I’ve had to revert them twice within the last 7 hours. The second time that they added the false information to the article, they also added something about Bryan Fuller’s Twitter account - I guess maybe that’s what’s gotten them confused?

What would you recommend that I do? As popular as that “ship” appears to be in FanFiction, the anonymous people who try to add things like that to Wikipedia normally give up after they’ve been reverted once; but this one seems a lot more determined, and I’m afraid that they’re going to try it again.

I’m really terrible with conflict, even just online stuff - it makes me feel sick, and causes me to lose sleep. I’ve been keeping an eye on these pages for quite some time now, because I care very much about the characters/story being accurately represented, but I’m afraid that I’m likely to just give it up to avoid conflict if this anonymous person keeps pushing...

You were able to solve this before, and I’m very hopeful that you could do that again, if you aren’t too busy. I’m really grateful for the help you’ve given me in the past. Hopefully it won’t be necessary again this time, though. I’ll go ahead and post this to you just in case. VictimOfEntropy (talk) 18:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I requested page protection for the time being. This definitely appears to be a WP:SOCK issue and you may need to open an investigation if it persists. I would recommend notifying Bignole and other users associated with the page. DarkKnight2149 10:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's also worth noting that K.S.Morgan themselves appears to be an WP:SPA whose edits pertain exclusively to getting "Significant Other - Will Graham" into the article. Then as soon as Morgan's claims are discussed on the talk page, they stop editing and multiple anonymous users & redlink accounts suddenly surface in the coming months to pick up where they left off. Yeah, this is definitely fishy. DarkKnight2149 10:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't visited this page in ages, so the mention surprised me. I'm passionate about the show in particular and I'm tired of homophobia. According to the show, Will and Hannibal have romantic feelings for each other. As per the moderator's request, apart from just adding Will to the table of being Hannibal's SO, I added a whole section about their relationship with credible links to the show content and creator's words. Not to Twitter, to actual officiel interviews. So, if there is SO section on Hannibal Lecter's page, Will Graham must be present there. However, I lost interest in this senseless argument, so if the mention was once again deleted and someone is trying to restore it, I have nothing to do with it. I just wish mods did their job of protecting valid edits to avoid such situations. K.S.Morgan (talk) 10:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not cast aspersions (I.E. "homophobic"). I just went through and double checked. Your account (a single-purpose account in itself) completely stopped editing in June 2019, when the matter was the discussed on the talk page. Every single account and IP address that has picked up where you left off since then was created (In the case of the IPs, starting editing) after June 2019 and every single one of them has zero edits anywhere else. This is definitely an WP:SPI issue. Even if it isn't you specifically (which I doubt), someone has been creating disposable accounts to edit war in your absence. That much is for certain. DarkKnight2149 11:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Well, the desire of so many people to delete the valid mention of the male person Hannibal is in love with is very strange, so I'm not sure how else to explain it. And yes, I made an account to watch over this page in particular. I'm not interested in much else and I'm not interested in still fighting over this topic either at this point. I don't use any other accounts - if I wanted to keep arguing, I woud have used this one. I haven't visited Hannibal's page since the last argument I had (and won). This show has many fans and the majority of them are aware of who Hannibal is in love with because it's a canon fact. So, maybe instead trying to determine who among them tries to re-establish this fact, you should focus on those who constantly deletes it. If you're a moderator, I think it's your job. As per request of another moderator, I spent time and added a section with everything you need to see that yes, Hannibal and Will have a romantic relationship and it's the core of the show that is officially confirmed. Any other words are redundant here. I feel like you're trying to blame me for something when I'm actually right and have been defending the valid edit for a while now. I left since then. If other people take over, you should consider why they do that and maybe direct your attention to those who try to delete it for whatever reason. K.S.Morgan (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There hasn't been any activity on the talk page since additional sources were provided that contradict an overtly homosexual relationship between Will and Hannibal. As soon as this occurred, all activity on your account ceased and disposable red link accounts & IP addresses started popping up and carrying on in your stead. You can see why the circumstances are suspicious. That's a pretty big coincidence if it isn't you. DarkKnight2149 11:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1) I haven't seen those sources provided in a discussion thread. 2) The provided information proves that Hannibal and Will are not in a sexual relationship yet. However, they are in love with each other, which has also been confirmed many times, including in that interview, and Bryan Fuller confirmed right there that the sexual aspect might be added in the future. So, what is your point, exactly? People don't have to have sex right away to be in a relationship. Again, for romantic part, all you need to do is check the section I provided, "Relationship between Lecter and Graham". It has several sources, including to the show and to interviews. Since you don't consider Twitter a credible source, I haven't included anything from it, but here it is Bryan calling their relationship "definitely queer" https://twitter.com/bryanfuller/status/975781320814092288?lang=ru Here is also a bit from an official interview that should clarify it: "Then, of course, came Hannibal. “The fourth show I created homoeroticized the Hannibal Lecter character from the Thomas Harris novels,” he said, “but it didn’t exactly homosexualize him. But there was almost a kiss, before he fell into the sea with the man he loved. Close, but no cigar…" https://www.themarysue.com/bryan-fuller-outfest-award-speech/ So, the relationship is canonically romantic. Sexual part hasn't been addressed yet but it might happen. These facts (along with the ones mentioned in my section on Hannibal's page) justify Will's title as Hannibal's SO since these two men are in love and it's a huge part of the show. I hope there won't e issues with this again. K.S.Morgan (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sources specifically state that Hannibal Lecter is omnisexual and Will Graham is a straight Male. This was covered in more detail at Talk:Hannibal Lecter. Likewise, there was no true relationship between the two, even if there was an attraction. At the end of the day, Will's true allegiance is with Jack Crawford and the FBI. The entire show was spent with them playing against one another. Will Graham certainly doesn't qualify as Will's "significant other". Bryan Fuller also didn't say that they weren't "ready to have sex yet", his point was that it isn't an overtly sexual relationship at all. Stating that it is is a blatant oversimplification. If we are going to say that Will is Hannibal's S.O, then we might as well say the same thing about Batman and the Joker. DarkKnight2149 12:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I'm sorry but I can see that you know the show badly. Will's allegiance is not with Jack at all. In the last episode alone, he sets him up, conspires with Francis, and gets innocent officers killed via his hands by leaking info to him, all to free Hannibal. Post-credits scene shows that Will and Hannibal are happily hunting together. Your definition of SO doesn't fit either general standards or those set by Wikipedia. According to Wikipedia: "Significant other (SO) is colloquially used as a gender-neutral term for a person's partner in an intimate relationship[1] without disclosing or presuming anything about marital status, relationship status, or sexual orientation." Sex is not required for people to be considered SO. Will and Hannibal are in love. It's stated in the text of the show many times in different ways. It's shown in many ways. Bryan Fuller said, "This is a love story. A love story between a full-fledged psychopath and someone who has nascent psychopathic abilities.' Actually, Hannibal Lecter is not a psychopath; he's something else entirely. But it's a love relationship between two men: one of them is a cannibal, and one of them understands those cannibalistic instincts all too well." He said, ""It felt like we had to shit or get off the pot, ultimately, because there had been so much going on between these two men that when Will asks, "Is Hannibal Lecter in love with me?" it is very much about death and the romance between these two men. There is a quality to connections that go above and beyond sexuality. You can have this intimate connection with somebody that then causes you to wonder where the lines of your own sexuality are. And we didn't quite broach the sexuality. It was certainly suggested, but the love is absolutely on the table." You can find the links in my section. Are you still saying they are not in love? WHen the creator himself directly says that they are and that the entire show is a love story? K.S.Morgan (talk) 12:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My first question is why is this discussion happening here and not at the Hannibal page? Regardless of sock puppetry, it's the most appropriate place for it. Second, part of the solution to this problem is that the infobox is not a family tree. The "significant other"/"relatives" list is unnecessary and not appropriate, because per guidelines in-universe information should only be used when it is essential to understanding the character. There isn't anyone that needs to be added to essentially understand Hannibal Lector. His iconic status is like Jason Voorhees or Freddy Kreuger, it transcends other characters in his fictional life. You say Hannibal Lector and the average reader knows who that is. You say Will Graham or Lady Muraska and most are likely not to know who you're talking about. Additionally, that goes for the "Gender" and "Nationality" options, because one is obvious and it was never in question and the other is irrelevant Now, as I said on the talk page before, there has never been confirmation of Will and Hannibal being a couple. Just because there may have been homoerotic subtext does not make Will a significant other. Additionally, most of those sources only talk about it from the perspective of how Hannibal saw Will, not Will to Hannibal. So, even if there was true intention to say that both men were in-love with each other, it never played out on the show, the books, or the films. Thus, Will wouldn't even be added to the infobox regardless of his essentialness of understanding Hannibal.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 15:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why this discussion is happening here. I wasn't even participating until I was tagged in it on some baseless accusation. If SO box should be removed, great, but then Clarice shouldn't be mentioned as well as she is definitely not needed to understand Hannibal as a character. Unlike show!Will, who Hannibal's life revolves around in the show. Will is equally in love with Hannibal. I provided quotes from the interviews that cover the fact of reciprocity repeatedly. There are many more. The show itself has many points proving it as well, such as Hannibal being referred to as Will's "old flame", etc. The article is about Hannibal, though, so the focus lies on him. But regardless: as I said, I left and I don't intend to come back to this particular page. I prefer to have meaningful discussions, not one-sided ones where people evidently don't know the show and stubbornly ignore a million of facts proving them wrong. So, please don't tag me again in any talks, and don't be surprised that many people try to add Will into that box since Will and Hannibal are canonically in love with one another. I have nothing to do with these attempts, I've been gone for months. As a recommendation, removing the box altogether would be the best decision that would satisfy everyone, I think. K.S.Morgan (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is quite a bit to unpack, but the last I will say on it is go to the article talk page. I'd be happy to come there and discuss the infobox issues, the relationship between Will and Hannibal and the appropriate way to have it in the article, and anything else related to improving the article through reliable sources.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 15:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I presented quite a few sources that contradict the idea of an overtly romantic relationship between Hannibal and Will back in June, but despite all of this edit warring, no one has even used the talk page since then for whatever reason. I agree that any discussion regarding the article should be taking place there instead of here. DarkKnight2149 23:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter Million Award for Hellraiser: Judgment

The Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Hellraiser: Judgment (estimated annual readership: 455,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 19:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cypher (DC Comics)

Notice

The article Cypher (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable character, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cypher, as he appears in Detective Comics no. 657 published by DC Comics.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cypher, as he appears in Detective Comics no. 657 published by DC Comics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cypher, as he appears in the Beware The Batman TV Series.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cypher, as he appears in the Beware The Batman TV Series.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Pyg


Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Darkknight2149, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
★Trekker (talk) 13:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Season's Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Darkknight2149, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
JOEBRO64 18:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas!

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings".  :) BOZ (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはDarkknight2149たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 02:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Rtkat3 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Darkknight2149, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
adamstom97 (talk) 05:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy New Year Darkknight2149!

Happy New Year!
Hello Darkknight2149:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, ★Trekker (talk) 19:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.