Brilliant work on Foundation (nonprofit organization) and Private foundation. I'll check out the org wiki project.EECavazos 19:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I inspired a WikiProject template in a template created by you and also boldly integrated another of your templates as it was, into WP:THINK. I hope it is acceptable to you, if it is not, please let me know, I did it in recognition not as an abuse. TopTopView (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Be that as it may, it's hard to see how many of its uses are relevant. For instance, it's in the Water memory article (which is how I came across it) but has, as far as I can tell, nothing to do with chronology. If it's meant as a Wikiproject-member specific fact-check template, I think you really should use the standard one, since, as it stands, the chronological only serves to confuse. If it's actually meant for chronological dating and ordering problems, make the phrasing more specific, and put it there. Adam Cuerden talk 11:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That is a good example. If we use "fact" there, it will call for sourcing that experiment or fact, however if we call for chronology, we are requesting a source that indicates when that was done Daoken 11:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your changes to {{Infobox Organization}} have prevented it from displaying images and functioning properly. It might be best to create a test version first and work out the problems before making changes to the main template. Playing around with the main template will affect all the pages that use it. --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I noticed the problem while viewing the article on International Association for Plant Taxonomy. The last altered version of the template displayed the name of the image location instead of the image itself. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not understand what you mean by "all the old boxes". Will "What links here" not tell you which pages incorporate the template? --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I can tell you that the problem is fixed on the computer I am using right now, but that is not the same computer / OS / browser I was using at home when I spotted the problem. I won't be able to say whether the problem is fixed for my home computer setup until this evening PST (US). --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Update The glitch that appeared when I was uploading the new version of the infobox, was solved two days ago with no further problems, I have uploaded the new enhanced version, it shows perfectly in all linked pages. Daoken 11:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Template:WPCouncilRec has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated Template:Histfact (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:31, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Histrefeval has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Multidisciplinary WikiProjects, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Histrefm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 12:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Histref and Template:Histrefverif have been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Timeline Tracer. You are invited to comment on the discussion at these template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 23:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Articles needing help, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry on the
categories for discussion page. Thank you. --
Bsherr (
talk)
00:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
