User talk:Daniel L. Barth

This is an example sentence.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Also you have removed warning notices from User talk:Theeyes77. It is not normally acceptable to remove such notices from another user's talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 01:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC) .[reply]

Redirect needs to be deleted

Hello. Taxonomic redirects like those are not common so it needs to be deleted. Also, you add the article to the Gardena disambiguation if it hasn't been done. Cheers, ZooFari 20:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for letting me know that.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gardena brevicollis

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Gardena brevicollis has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Please also note that articles must be on notable subjects and should cite to reliable sources which verify their content. Please only repost the article in a form that meets these standards. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: You have an awesome Username!

Why thank you. I'm a bit curious how this came about though, mind explaining to me? RandomStringOfCharacters (talk) 04:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a test.

I am testing the post thing.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page MyVu has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 23:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to User talk:66.194.177.202. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alan (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to sign it?--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to User:Orangesodakid/Sign here please. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alan (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to User:Orangesodakid/Sign here please. Alan (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How was that inapropriate?--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, there was a misunderstanding. Please use the sandbox for testing the edit function, however; please do not use actual pages. Also, please don't force your guestbook onto others. I'm sure they will sign it if they'd like to. Heck, I'll sign it if you promise me that you won't ask anyone else to sign it. How does that sound? Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 00:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just an FYI, please don't use spam warnings for this; they do not apply for this. ZooFari 00:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you seem to misunderstand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a playground. Please see WP:NOT Triplestop x3 00:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's an issue with the sign books. ZooFari 00:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bay Trail Middle School

A tag has been placed on Bay Trail Middle School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. LAAFansign review 00:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Sandbox, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. This is a warning. Do not place bad language on wikipedia pages. Dwayneflanders (Talk) 01:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add random YouTube links to other users' user pages and talk pages. Remember, as you have been told in the past, Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Singularity42 (talk) 22:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phoebe ring

I have change the article you created to a redirect because you copied and pasted the content from Phoebe (moon). If you think there is enough content about the newly discovered ring to warrant a separate article, please propose the split on Talk:Phoebe (moon) before you split the article off. Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:51, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to User:Daniel L. Barth. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 22:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Tutorial (Citing sources)/sandbox. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 23:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Front page?

Hello! You put something on my talk page. I don't quite understand the message. Did the Monica C. Lozano article make Wiki's front page for some period? If so, I am very excited because I think it would be the first time a page I contributed to/created was featured there. --ACRSM 14:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to First Flight High School, you will be blocked from editing. You have been cautioned about edit tests/playful edits, more than once. Unless you improve your understanding of what the encyclopedia is, and how to edit it, you will eventually be unable to edit.- Sinneed 22:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC) - Sinneed 22:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that was constructive.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 23:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First Flight High School

Hello. Please do not use articles as a place of discussion as you did here. Obviously, you knew that what was added should not have been there, so instead of telling them about it in the article, you really should have removed it and posted the message on their user talk pages. It seems that the article has become somewhat of a playground for the students, and obviously it will have to stop one way or another. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 21:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I edited my thopughts there so the issue at hand would get more attention. It looked like a group effort of some freinds. Thay seemed to have planned it ahead of time.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think you're right about what happened, and they're now blocked, so, hopefully, that's over with. Next time if you want to get other editors' attention, a more acceptable method would be to post your comment on the article's talk page or at a place like WP:Editor assistance. No harm, no foul, just for future reference, you really shouldn't place in the article itself. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 00:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to do that in the future. I might forget sometimes though.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Daniel L. Barth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
71.87.159.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Giveleft2". The reason given for Giveleft2's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: PeterSymonds

  • Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You are not blocked. If the block on User:Giveleft2 is causing you to be blocked, that indicates that you are using the same ip address to edit. I reviewed some of your edits; all of the ones I looked at were non-useful, and made it appear that you don't quite understand what kinds of information are useful in an encyclopedia article. They're very similar in style to the edits of User:Giveleft2, and made to the same article. I'm okay with leaving this block in place, since it seems likely that you are the same person, and if you aren't, you're making the same kinds of unhelpful edits. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My edits seemed constructive to me. I thought some of the other users were vandalizing though.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I also blocked? Why do you not just block the problematic accounts?--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed every edit you have made to article space. Here they are:

I see you are editing again. Today, you made this change. This has several problems: WP is not a news source. It is an encyclopedia. There was no citation to back it up. Even if it were cited to the school newspaper, that is not a generally reliable source. The wording was way too excited... this was not a headline in a tabloid, nor a lead-in to an expose... it was the body of an encyclpedia article.- Sinneed 01:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to First Flight High School, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Diff:[1] Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 23:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was a mistake.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kodak

Nope, never worked for Kodak. I am familiar with Panorama Plaza though and shopped at a few stores there (including Tops and Burger King) when I pass by. TJ Spyke 01:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I used to live on 20 Fallbrook Circle. There is a big pond in front of the neighborhood. They doubled the size of the pond 1 to 2 years ago. I lived near a school district and near Wambach's.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24 hour block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue to add nonsense to WP

You have already been blocked. If you continue down this path of editing, you will be unable to edit. Stop now. Please read and understand the guidelines you have failed to follow, and wp:SOCK.- Sinneed 01:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck? I am not a sockpuppet.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

If you continue to add material about non-notable games to articles or talk pages, you will be blocked indefinitely. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was a while ago and I only did it twice. Besides the game is notable.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please don't add edit summaries that simply long strings of black text. They are highly distracting and not useful. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other people do so that means it is okay.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it just means they are also wrong. Singularity42 (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, you think most people are wrong and only a few are right?--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Most people? Most people don't do what you are doing. And don't be disruptive to to make a point. That includes making this edit after you were specifically requested not to. Singularity42 (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Have you ever done that?--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Enough. If you keep this up you will be blocked. Quite it. JoshuaZ (talk) 21:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's apparently causing some people's browsers to crash. See the discussion on the help desk. 99.166.95.142 (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How do I get my browser to crash?--75.139.104.69 (talk) 15:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk: JoshuaZ

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User Talk:JoshuaZ, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Gpia7r (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was not damaging. I was in the middle of a conversation with him.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You just did the same at [2]. Please stop trolling, you know what you're doing, and you will be reported for vandalism if it's done again. Gpia7r (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no, you do not understand. He likes it when I do that.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 21:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daniel L. Barth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You know I have been trying my best to be good on wikipedia. I read the rules and I follow them.--Daniel L. Barth (talk) 22:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that's trying your best, it's not good enough. We've plenty of vandals; don't need another. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daniel L. Barth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you just give me a day to show you how good I can be? If I do something that is not constructive does that mean it is vandalism?

I thought of a good idea. Maybe I can suggest future edits on my talk page and you people can do the edits for me.

Decline reason:

If you really want to, we usually have peeople do this: This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
  • Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you.. Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jimmy44512 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - Sinneed 23:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]