User talk:Danaphile

DYK for Moon River and Other Great Movie Themes

-- Cirt (talk) 12:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Andy Williams articles are brilliant. They are really well sourced. I've created a few classic pop articles over the years, and I have a collection of articles I'd like to create here, if you're stuck for ideas :) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Williams

Hi Danaphile,

I have quite a bit of Andy Williams on vinyl. If you need/want a scan of original LP jackets or 45rpm label scans of a particular recording, I'm likely able to help. All the best, 78.26 (talk) 09:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Always good to have a potential backup. Danaphile (talk) 00:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Danaphile. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Andy Williams Discography and recording dates

Danaphile, do you have any kind of complete discography of Andy Williams with recording dates? Something showing which songs were recorded on which dates?Bellczar (talk) 07:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a discography right now, but from what I've seen on Wikipedia, recording dates aren't usually incorporated into a discography page. That's why I've included them on the album pages I've created if the dates were available. Some of his Columbia albums were reissued with specific dates for each song indicated in the CD booklet, but the majority of those from the 1960s did not have that information included. The dates I've included on the pages for the albums he did for Cadence came from an article in Billboard magazine in which the singles had specific dates but the recording dates for albums did not specify which song was recorded on which day. Everything I have right now is already posted on the page of the album where the song was first included. Danaphile (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for quick reply. Do you have recording dates for singles, especially those not included on albums? I would be interested in seeing them offline and not necessarily posting them on Wikipedia. Do you have any plans to write up his 1954 Label X sessions?Bellczar (talk) 02:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do have a paragraph about Label X written. As far as non-album singles, I got my information from "The Complete Columbia Chart Singles Collection." I'm away from home because of a death in the family and probably wouldn't be able to give you any specific dates until September when I get back. Did you have specific songs you were interested in? Danaphile (talk) 03:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For Song Sung Blue and your other music articles. It's rare to encounter album articles so wonderfully referenced :). Ironholds (talk) 04:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Certification updates

First off, Andy Williams's 1984 " Greatest Love Classics" Album was certified Gold...... Second, We got a problem. Remember when you fixed my " The Very Best of Andy Williams " Mistake ? Apparently, there are three albums with the same name and two of them were awarded Silver Certification on July 22, 2013. If you look up Andy Williams Albums with Gold Certification, You will find an album released on 10/5/2009 titled, " The Very Best of Andy Williams ". That Album got Gold. Now if you look up Andy Williams Albums with Silver Certfication, You will find that the 2009 Album did not get Silver at all. Instead, Two Albums of the Same Name were released in 1996 and 2000 and they got Silver Certfication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.30.97.95 (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC) ....................... Okay, the 2009 Compilation Album, " The Very Best of Andy Williams " was awarded Gold by the BPI without it being awarded Silver first.... that was why I was confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.30.97.95 (talk) 18:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I haven't replied sooner. I had a busy summer. I wrote to the BPI about The Very Best of Andy Williams, and I received a response from someone in their research department who was very appreciative of what you found. He wrote, "Unfortunately at the moment our online database has no way of telling them apart, so the certifications get bundled together. This is because quite often titles get re-released, and if we were to set the automated database so that it created a new record based on revised release dates, then quite a few reissued albums would end up having multiple entries. Obviously, the downside is that these wrongly combined entries happen instead, but we'll have to think about if there's another way around it next time there's some work done on the back end." So that's something for us to look forward to. Danaphile (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1966 onward ?

I notice that for the Andy Williams Albums from 1962 to 1965ish, you added some new information or at least reconfigured them. Are you going to do the same for Williams's Albums from 1966 onward ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojoju1998 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm in the middle of going through and making changes to all of his album pages. Danaphile (talk) 13:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Edit wiped out the Contents box"

I'm not sure what you mean by this? I am looking at my edit on Lonely Street (album) and I don't see anything wrong with the page. I don't know why you reverted me. --Jennica✿ / talk 21:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Something buggy with the page must have been happening. I couldn't understand why what you were doing would have caused the Contents box to disappear. I was looking at it last night and it wasn't there, and again this morning I looked at the revision before yours where it showed up and then it disappeared when I looked at yours again. Glad everything is back to normal. Danaphile (talk) 22:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danaphile, no you have no offended me. I made a mistake re sales of Bobbie's version. She got a silver disc for it. I remember her being presented with it on TOTP. I'm not bothered about changing anything as it's really not important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tripplepoints (talk • contribs) 11:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Source for older Australian certifications

Hi, responding to your message on my talk page, unfortunately I don't know of a reliable source for pre-1989 Australian (ARIA) certifications. These were not annotated on the printed ARIA chart until April 1989 or thereabouts. Some earlier (1988) certifications are listed on the annual charts on the ARIA website, but it only goes back to 1988 (the year that the ARIA chart commenced being produced in-house). If you are not aware, there is an ARIA certifications subforum here, where maybe you could ask - http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=subforum&subforum=46&pages=1 . To my knowledge, though, there is no publication that lists pre-1988 ARIA certifications. Also, the platinum and gold certification levels were higher pre-1989 - it was 100,000 shipments for platinum, and 50,000 shipments for gold. It appears to have been lower (50k for platinum, 25k for gold) earlier in the decade, though.Nqr9 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. I appreciate your input. —Danaphile (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"

Hi! I know you love music and I was wondering if you might like to review the (brief) article for "Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)"?--MagicatthemovieS MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Up Where We Belong

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Up Where We Belong you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Up Where We Belong

The article Up Where We Belong you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Up Where We Belong for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Up Where We Belong

The article Up Where We Belong you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Up Where We Belong for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Information for Andy Williams.

https://www.bpi.co.uk/brit-certified/


Andy Williams has some new Certifications if you want to update his Discography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:CF00:5C0A:D825:7E45:4336:4C0 (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification! I added a column to the Singles discography section so I had a space to put them. Danaphile (talk) 02:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reddy-Best.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reddy-Best.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reddy-More.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reddy-More.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year"

Hi! I'm sorry for not leaving an edit summary. The only reason why I decided to join all of the charts in one was because that's how the other Christmas songs charts are usually organized. ManuelButera (talk) 23:08, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mathis-For.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mathis-For.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mathis-GoodUK.jpg

Notice

The file File:Mathis-GoodUK.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very similar to standard cover. Fails WP:NFCC#8

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mathis-UnforgettableCD.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mathis-UnforgettableCD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two cover arts at FFD

Hey there. I listed your uploads File:Williams-Most.jpg and File:Williams-Christmas.jpg at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 December 13. --George Ho (talk) 02:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Williams-Christmas.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Williams-Christmas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited What a Feelin', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Why Me? (Irene Cara song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motif.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breakdance (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flashdance... What a Feeling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Midnight Express.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reddy-I Am Woman.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reddy-I Am Woman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spandau Ballet release dates

Hi,

It's great what you've done with the Spandau albums and singles. Am surprised they had been so lacking in content on Wikipedia prior to your work! Anyway, I don't completely trust the release dates given in the George Gimarc book. Some in the book are right (as I've corroborated with other sources) but he also gives release dates of Tuesday to Thursday as well as at the weekend, which I'm pretty sure was never done at the time in the UK – records were either released on Friday (particularly in the early '80s) or Monday (particularly from '84 onwards). Note I am not 100% sure on this, but it is what I have gathered. All the sources I've managed to find on Spandau release dates say Friday, whereas Gimarc (apart from a few) says Monday. Looking at other Chrysalis releases at the time, they were released on Fridays, so I would have thought all of Spandau's releases were on that day as well. I have a source and will change the dates for "Muscle Bound"/"Glow" (although confusingly it was reviewed in Record Mirror the week before so am assuming that was a pre-release). I will leave the other singles as they are as I can't find any evidence to change their release dates.

Finally, I'm assuming/hoping you're going to be creating an article for "Communication". Smash Hits gives a date of 28 January 1983, but (again it's mainly conjecture this) I think it was released a week later on 4 February. I have two reasons for this: first is that if it were released on the 28th, it would have charted on the Record Business chart released on 31 Jan (below the top 30 was based on airplay and sales). However, it charted in a low position the following week, which fits with a 4 Feb release date. The second reason is that on Ukmix, the weekly top 200 from 1983 onwards is being published. If "Communication" had been released on 28 Jan, it would at least, given the popularity of Spandau, have entered the chart on the week ending 5 Feb, but instead it didn't enter until 12 Feb.

I hope that all makes sense and apologies for going on, DPUH (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the corrections! It's funny you should mention Smash Hits with regard to "Communication". My practice has been to move on to the next article for a couple of weeks before posting one that I've finished so that I come back to it with fresh eyes to catch any mistakes, and because the Gimarc book only goes through 1982, I had to start looking at magazines beyond just the reviews to see if I could find release dates. I've always lived in the U.S. and never really looked at the UK ones before I delved into the Spandau catalog. So I was going to be posting 28 January, and your logic makes perfect sense. How would you cite a release date like that when what makes sense is not explicitly stated? Danaphile (talk) 13:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If I were doing it, I just wouldn't give a citation and if someone challenged it (which is probably unlikely), I'd explain why or direct them here. I just don't think there is a way you can cite it, as there is no explicit evidence and it's more of an educated guess. DPUH (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, a slight side note... I've just been trying to find a source for the release date of "Gold". Record Mirror says Monday 1 August, but according to a tweet on the band's official account, it was released on Friday 5 August. Not the most reliable source, but it shows that even the 'reliable' papers at the time made mistakes (such is our luck!). DPUH (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice and the tweet info. My schedule won't be allowing as much time to work on it as I've had lately, but I'm planning to work on all of the releases in their catalog. Any discoveries are most welcome! Danaphile (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Only When You Leave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strangers on a Train.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined reference

HI, in this edit to I'll Fly for You you introduced an sfn reference to "Hadley 2004", but you did not define the reference. This means that nobody can look it up, and adds the article to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could fix it that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for catching that! I added a Bibliography section. Danaphile (talk) 12:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thank you for fixing it so quickly. DuncanHill (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Through the Barricades (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jethro Tull.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:COLHEAD

Hello. You should probably avoid doing this to chart tables so much or at all if you can avoid it, because it's actually a violation of MOS:COLHEAD. Typically we prefer to separate tables. I'm aware plenty of other articles do it, but they should not also. It should be worked on to be removed, not introduced into more articles. Thanks. Ss112 03:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. Danaphile (talk) 09:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined harvnb references in Through the Barricades

Hi, in this edit you added harvnb references to "Kemp 2004", but there is no such work listed,. This means that nobody can look them up. It also adds the article to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. It's possible you meant "Kemp 2009" (same surname, different year), or "Hadley 2004" (same year, different surname), or perhaps you actually did mean "Kemp 2009" but forgot to list the work. If you could fix the slip it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for pointing that out! I've corrected them. Danaphile (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heart Like a Sky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spinal Tap.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cashbox Review

hi @Danaphile, i love you Andy Williams Album Article, i'm here to ask, can i put cashbox review on Andy Williams Album Article? Samchristie05 (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, everyone is free to edit Wikipedia. Danaphile (talk) 01:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks Samchristie05 (talk) 04:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Music Choice audio-based music channels

Hi quick question on Music Choice beside Singer & Swings, Soild Golds Oldies, 70s, & 60s, where Andy Williams could be heard in Music Choice audio-based music channels @Danaphile? Samchristie05 (talk) 15:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I have no idea. Danaphile (talk) 16:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
do we think we shoud do Emperor of Easy: Lost Columbia Masters 1962–1972 (2020), Real Gone Music, & When You Fall In Love - Lost Columbia Masters 1977-1982(2024), Real Gone Music an article in the future? Samchristie05 (talk) 02:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They don't meet the notability guidelines for music, so I think it would be a waste of time. Danaphile (talk) 03:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]