User talk:Damian Yerrick/2005-2007

GNAA

(Summary: SPUI informed me that the form of the name of the GNAA wasn't patterned after the names of copyright industry trade groups.)

Blast from the Past!

Damian! I last saw you fourteen years ago, at Weisser Park Elementary! Do you remember Joe Brennan from the Knowledge Master Open Team (aka "Geek Squad?") We went down to Lexington, KY with Mr. Schott, Kraig Kumfer and Ross ___ (his last name escapes me at the moment) to compete in that other academic tournament (the name of which also escapes me). Wow, that was more than half a lifetime ago! What are you up to these days? Drop me a line sometime here or at my user page. Take care!

Talk:The Time Machine

BTW, did you ever get around to writing that novel of yours...? — Rickyrab | Talk 15:29, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I lost interest. --Damian Yerrick 16:25, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin and Hobbes

Hello. A long time ago (back in 2001!!) you made an edit to the then-nascent Calvin and Hobbes article. I wonder if, despite the intervening years, you might be able to provide the source for the information about Custom Vehicle Graphics. I'd like the article either to provide a reference for that fact, or for that part to be removed if it cannot be verified. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

I wish I could. I got it from the company's web site, which apparently no longer exists. I'll genericize the reference. --Damian Yerrick 01:56, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

By the way, if you hadn't noticed, Calvin and Hobbes made it to Featured Article status a while back. It's regressed somewhat since, but it's still something I hope you can feel pleased about, having contributed to it in the early stages. Alanyst 21:26, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

labialization

Hi Damian, I think if you look in a mirror and say sip, then ship, you'll notice some lip rounding with ship that you don't get with the other. I'd be interested to hear if you don't; I'm under the impression that light labialization of sh etc. is fairly universal in English (and perhaps western Europe). kwami 2005 July 3 07:01 (UTC)

I don't see nor feel any labialization of my own esh sounds. --Damian Yerrick 3 July 2005 14:40 (UTC)

Indiana Wikipedians

Hello! Please consider adding yourself to Category:Indiana Wikipedians. Thanks! Kurt Weber 7 July 2005 02:51 (UTC)

Flood fill

Damian, could you explain what's going on with Flood fill? I don't dispute the correctness of the "east-west optimization" — I removed it only because I think it makes the article a little source code–heavy. But I really can't figure out what you mean by "Tetris" and "Columns" — it doesn't seem to be what a lot of other Wikipedians mean by the same names. See Talk:Flood fill. --Quuxplusone 01:10, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voting on wikipedia:conlangs has started

Since you've been part of the discussion I thought I'd let you know. Do spread the word to others who would like to vote on it too. --Kaleissin 14:35:14, 2005-08-29 (UTC)

Nominal #'s

My face is burning. I barely looked at you entry, and assumed it was left over from the exchange we had earlier. I'm generally not that bad, but I was fighting off a rather pernicious vandal attack for the last few hours. DV8 2XL 22:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Keane Imitation

I removed the link from the word "imitated" to "Precious Moments" you've made in the article for Margaret Keane. One, because imitation is in the eye of the beholder. Two, even if Ms. Keane's work was purposely imitated, surely Precious Moments is not the only imitator. I think the article on kitsch does a good job of linking them together. --Emana 21:48, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MMC

Added some info to your question about MMC, here --Zelda 18:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

(archived to User:Damian Yerrick/Barnstars)

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Women's suffrage: Grand merging and reforms!

Hello there, I thought you might be intersted in contributing to the discussion in Women's suffrage#Grand merging and reforms!. Thank you, __ Maysara 20:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SNES

I notice you changed the image at Template:SNES because the previous image wasn't a SNES controller. I just wanted to point out that the template doesn't actually have anything to do with the SNES, just the Nintendo Wikiproject. That being said, I don't really care what image is there, as long as it's not claiming fair use. Pagrashtak 05:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Word Jaggies?

Thanks for updating that old "anti-cabal" image on my talkpage to the new "there is no cabal" image that superceded it. I have a question though: what on Earth do you mean by "Be careful with the use of the word jaggies"? ~CS 23:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For each use of the old image, I took a sentence near the use of the image and replaced the operative word with "jaggies". --Damian Yerrick (☎) 02:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one

Very nice :-) [1] Just zis Guy you know? 18:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping of the Weird Al Screencap

Was this really necessary? I think you're talking the idea of 'free' a bit too far there mate. 203.109.245.204 10:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some editors are just anal-retentive about what makes a detailed rationale, even in cases where one of the blanket rationales applies. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 14:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Argh!

LOL!! Having seen you for years in pocketheaven forum, now I find you have a Wikipedia user page. You're cool, man! Congrats for your playful mind.

PS: Oh, don't bother ask me who I am, just a random lurker. Your GSM player is neat :)

PS2: "infinitespin.ytmnd.com" LOL LOL LOL!! You are a fascinating guy.

The most modern version of Tetris I play is Tetris DX, using Goomba. My first original Tetris game was Tetris Plus, and it got me hooked for hours. Somehow I was disappointed with the GBA version of Tetris, and Tetris for DS just got worse. They don't do them like they used to. It may be Henk Rogers' fault as you say :)

--Michael Retriever 16:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

y-delta transform

The resistor reference designators in the y-delta figure don't match the equations below it for the new figure that you have placed in Y-Δ transform. Were you intending to change the equations too, or was this an oversight? Ken6en 02:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I didn't notice the error in the image when I blindly followed an SVG supersede link. Anyway, commons:user:Tibault uploaded a corrected version to Commons a few days ago, but for some reason it hasn't shown up on WP yet. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 03:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has already reverted the image back. I'll put the new SVG in if I see it. Ken6en 04:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apple II survey

I'm conducting a survey about the Apple II -- any former users are invited to participate. I found you were active on Apple II related articles.

Come to User:Applephreak/survey

Applephreak 19:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award, good job

(Archived to User:Damian Yerrick/Barnstars)

The Price Is Right

A NEW CAR!!!!!111 It's yours if the cite is right.

Hey...I'm the one who made public the existence of unaired episodes of The Price Is Right. I'd like to provide citations for them, but I'm really not sure how...the only public documentaion of the episodes' existence is in things that I wrote and thus don't feel comfortable adding as references, and the only other way to prove it would be to actually acquire CBS Programming Practices's files on the episodes (which I'm pretty sure I theoretically could do, but it'd be a lot more trouble than it's worth). Some suggestions, maybe? -TPIRFanSteve 03:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everything on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. Gather evidence of the unaired episodes' existence, publish the evidence on your fan site, report it in Wikinews for practice, and then shop it around to various reliable sources. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 05:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

definition of polycube

Hi,

I saw your edit on pentomino. I understood that polycube is what each piece can be 3D. The puzzule here is by pieces 2D configured cubes. AIEA 01:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, it's the subset of pentacubes that correspond to the pentominoes. That's what I was trying to get at. See Talk:Tetromino#Tetracubes where 208.58.249.130 desired more rigor in the distinction between tetrominoes and tetracubes. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 02:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. What IP user 208.. says is correct. And the 3D pentomino puzzule uses subset of pentacubes. Your new revision makes less confusing. Thanks. AIEA 21:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NINTENDODS.PNG

The image was used to illustrate the Nintendo DS itself. There are already a few free images of just the Nintendo DS. Also, if we were illustrating the video game, we'd be better off with full screenshots instead of having also showing the DS. I suppose Orphaned fair use replaced would have been a better tag... Hbdragon88 03:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by which? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 03:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that user had uploaded just a plain Nintendo DS with only the welcome screen up, and Image:NDS.jpg is also a free image of the Nintendo DS. Hbdragon88 05:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We could just easily Photoshop the firmware screens out, I guess. Hbdragon88 05:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A quick word of thanks

Thank you for editing the Defense Message System subsection that I had tagged when I was up late and too tired to make the corrections myself. I apologize for making more work for you. —CrazyDreamer 08:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image logos

That user just uploaded Image:Nintendo_DS_Default.PNG, which contains an image of the logo. Is this a truly free image, or does it fall under {{logo}}? Hbdragon88 01:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly an expert here. Try asking in the image's talk page. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 03:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Damian Yerrick/Bookmarks

Hey, someone has brought this subpage of yours to my attention, and it appears to be a very long list of external links. Per policy, Wikipedia is not a repository of external links, so it may be subject to deletion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. However, I noticed you haven't touched the subpage since 2002, so if you feel don't need it anymore, you can tag it with {{db-user}}. --Coredesat 08:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Someone"? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 16:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A fellow administrator, actually. I recognized your name from the Bemani community and figured I'd just send a message rather than go through a MFD. --Coredesat 21:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help Prevent Article Deletion: Religious Perspectives on Dinosaurs

Hello, I'm leaving you this message because I notice you've made at least one significant edit to the Wikipedia article Religious perspectives on dinosaurs. The article has recently been nominated for deletion from Wikipedia, and there is considerable support for that position.

I'm hoping you'll help me support the continued existence of the Religious perspectives on dinosaurs article by registering a keep vote on the article's request for deletion page. The article contains some good information, and represents an unobtrusive way to present notable minority viewpoints about dinosaurs that cannot reasonably be elaborated on in the parent article. It shouldn't be deleted simply because the viewpoints it presents aren't "scientific."

Thanks! Killdevil 03:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To viewers at home: Might this be recruiting meatpuppets?

Are we going in the right direction?

Since I don't like brutals RVs and in fact your contribution is true (so this is a bit controversial), I decided to drop you a few lines. I write about the new addition about voxels on the heightmap page. I am unsure it is a good idea to consider this. I see this mainly as opening a can of worms. I was considering removing the thing (or maybe reword it in another paragraph?) for a few reasons:

  1. Are voxels necessary? I am not sure defining a heightmap in function of another "extraneus" term is good. By accepting a link with voxels, we suggest the reader to take a note on the concept. Unless strictly necessary, I would try to be minimal.
  2. What's the abstraction level? Mathematically speaking a heightmap is a 2D->nD function. It can also be seen as an array of pixels, values, attributes and now voxels. This isn't really a problem with your contribution but more with the article in general. While we are here, we may get a point on this.
  3. Are those really voxels? There's obviously some reference to a space subdivision but the relation to voxels does not seems to be trivial. I am not sure it would work with float heightmaps (fractional voxels? no way!).

I also do not understand from where you take the three dimensions of the voxels. In a certain sense, the heightmap sample value will be the height but when it comes to widht and depth that's another business since the sample is applied to points. Intuitively, the space partition (again, assuming it's non-fractional) will be the voxel "grid" but those voxels won't really exist since we care about the corners only. It's again a problem with abstraction level. The idea of thinking at "voxels" seems just a bit overkill... in fact it seems more rational to express all the coordinates in "terrain space" and xform it to real geometry space. Although the difference is mainly on expressing the terms, this cannot be left out.

While we are here, thank you for your work on the Wiki! I wish you an interesting new year!
MaxDZ8 talk 10:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I'll answer the article-related issues on the article's talk page. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 15:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ihateapple

Don't encourage this shit ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Over 600 exact phrase Google hits for ...

"Benoit balls"??? That is truly sad. (I used to know some people named Benoist, same pronunciation. I don't want to know if that one shows up, too.) Fan-1967 00:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Benoit#Clanging? might interest you. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 00:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So then shouldn't We (disambiguation) have a possible link to the French word for "Yes"? People wouldn't be that dumb, would they? Fan-1967 00:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, I found this first on the search list. Looks like the author believed it to be accurate. Fan-1967 00:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No CPU!

I'm not going to quibble at the change you made to PostScript ('cause your point is basically correct) but if you go back far enough, you'll find that the LA30 dot matrix printer built by Digital Equipment Corporation really didn't contain anything you'd call a CPU or even microcontroller; it was just a bunch of random logic strung out in such a way as to realize a dot matrix printer. But by the time of its successor, the LA36 (ca. 1976 or so), there was a real microcontroller in place, executing a recognizable microprogram out of ROM, using an ALU, RAM, and I/O resources, etc.

Atlant 14:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrorsoft and Tetris

The claim about Mirrorsoft and Tetris may not be as wrong as it first appears. Mirrorsoft was a company owned by the late and somewhat unlamented tycoon Robert Maxwell. Mirrorsoft and Spectrum Holobyte succeeded in acquiring the rights to Tetris, although there was subsequently controversy over whether Robert Stein was legally entitled to them. The IBM-PC version of Tetris was released by Mirrorsoft and Spectrum Holobyte, as this page from the BBC website based on the television documentary shows. [2] --Ianmacm 21:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of the roles of Andromeda and Mirrorsoft in the history of Tetris (see Tetriswiki:History), but the "Microsoft Tetris" column of the color table refers to the Windows 3.x version of Tetris included with Microsoft Entertainment Pack. Mirrorsoft never imposed any color assignments on its licensees, unlike The Tetris Company since 2001 (see Tetriswiki:Tetris Guideline). --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 22:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Coburn (band)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Damian Yerrick! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule .+\.ytmnd\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent Feedback Help!

I'm looking for someone to give feedback to my page Cellular Manufacturing

Please help!

Meganlaw15 06:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Art intervention

Re. your edit summaries, you may well be right, but it's not something I'm aware of. Could you point me to where the guidance is on placing images below headings, not above them. I've always assumed it was optional, depending on other factors. Thanks. Tyrenius 00:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, you might be right, per WP:MOS#Images. But for another, a blind person using a speech reader would hear the image's caption before the heading, which would be confusing. Don't float an image on the left unless you have to. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you raise this on the MOS talk page to get a consensus for implementing it. Until that happens you can't insist that it is done. Tyrenius 00:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wii games

Hey there Damian,

I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! -Digiwrld1 21:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian no.1

Gulp! I thought that the wikipedia with no. 1 as User ID was Jimbo Wales, or one of the developer, but I've checked and it's you.

Why not putting it on your user page? It's quite an important record here ;-)

Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 13:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Humility. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 14:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MPEG layer 3 =

Guys, I've searched all over and can't find what the nitialization MPEG stands for. I would have expected your guys to have written it into the article somewhere, or did I miss it? I think it would be a good thing to add. Robotics1 18:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you type MPEG in the search box, it takes you to MPEG, which redirects to the article that you ask for. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 18:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Synthesis Theory

A new wikibook at [[3]] has been started. It may interest you to edit / help out!

Aspie

How to avert the tragedy? Tyciol 01:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating my header thing. I haven't read that thing in forever. It's true, I want anonymous contributors to talk as well if they so wish. Tyciol 21:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Er, thanks again, I suppose that is easier to read. Tyciol 22:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Xbox DVD "remote"

"The Xbox DVD "remote" is more than a remote: it contains the DVD decoder software on solid-state memory."

That sounds incredibly unlikely to me. MrD 11:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The software is on a solid-state memory inside the remote control receiver. Want me to dig up three different citations? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 12:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hold up! You didn't say "receiver", you said "remote"! I'd be interested to read the citations anywho. :) MrD 13:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By now, I forget which article it was. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 19:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On this...

Highly unlikely; descriptive text should be okay; it's the images that some people have copyright problems with. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 07:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So how does the text "sphere with a great circle interrupted by a small circle" infringe copyright any less than an image derived directly from said text, as seen here? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 16:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Damian Yerrick - It's a good idea to post about WikiProject:Law. This area of WP articles needs a good bit of work. Unfortunately, experts on other jurisdictions are few and far between. Sorry to be a bit irritable about it -- I've lately been a little frustrated with exactly this issue of people putting "globalize" tags on articles that are, by definition, US-based topics. Unfortunately a lot of folks don't understand the difference between legal theories and concepts on the one hand, and legal doctrines -- which are inherently local and specific -- on the other hand. Cheers, --Lquilter 16:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then what's the tag for "we need a new article about the theory that corresponds to this local doctrine"? Should I just toss it up at Requested Articles? --Damian Yerrick (serious | business) 16:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I thought you wrote on the talk page that you were planning to post it at Requested Articles? ... I'm not sure that we need a tag on the Nominative use article; the issue we're talking about isn't a problem with that article. It's really that we see a gap, or actually we wonder if there is a gap, in the general topics. Maybe just post it at Talk:WikiProject Law, if you're not actually sure there's a topic to write about. (I'm not certain of it, by any means.) --Lquilter 17:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I also went and refactored the "intellectual property" section of Requested law articles to attract copyright, patent, and trademark specialists. --Damian Yerrick (serious | business) 19:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Law

Your comments made me LOL. Thanks for doing cleanup. Bearian 19:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vitruvian

You've got interesting skills, perhaps you want to help me with getting my Vitruvian Man (2) into a kind of frame? Examples of my work also on :*Rob ten Berge

Thanks Rob ten Berge --Rob ten Berge (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "frame"? --Damian Yerrick (serious | business) 13:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A frame or square like for Vitruvian Man(1)by Leonardo. Perhaps you've got an idea how to fix *[4]into the Vitruvian Man page? Best regards Rob--Rob ten Berge (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the heart and naked woman on the right? That'd be a matter of copying each arm onto a new layer, rotating the arms at the shoulder ball, and then retouching the outlines to match. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious buisness

Well, there's no reason to link to a one line 'essay', really; links from the mainspace are usually reserved for policies, guidelines and other heavily used project space pages. We don't normally include topics on disambig pages that don't have their own articles, so the last one can go. And we don't need to link to Wictionary for "Serious" and "Business" individually; those links would belong on the articles for the individual words. -- Vary | Talk 17:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was a response to my draft disambiguation page User:Damian Yerrick/Serious Business. I have copied the remaining comments to its talk page. --Damian Yerrick (serious | business) 17:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Dolphin Emulator Picture

Can you update the rationale for NON-FREE IMAGE DISALLOWED IN User: NAMESPACE and say that the source was from http://www.emulator-zone.com/doc.php/gamecube/dolphin.html

Masky (Talk | contribs) 21:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 21:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


3D tetris clone

It's obvious, it's the best 3D tetris clone. Do you know any other 3D clone that is better than Crystal Cubes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.26.58 (talk) 00:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not what I know; it's what the reliable sources know. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retro Remakes[5] is a reliable source —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.26.58 (talk) 05:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My text editor counted only 433 characters written about Crystal Cubes, and WP:SPS states that blogs are generally not considered reliable sources because they have no peer review. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 13:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

are largely not acceptable as sources, not at all. that site is respected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.27.155 (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even if so, it would go on List of Tetris variants, not on Tetris. The Tetris article is about products using the TETRIS mark under license from Elorg or The Tetris Company. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i apologize for that mistake. i will add it to the right article/section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.166.169 (talk) 04:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Internets

An article that you have been involved in editing, Internets, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internets. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 02:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D.S. notability

I tagged it since it lacks sources, wasn't a single, and might well fit into the HIStory article better. That article's a mess though, so one step at a time eh? (The Elfoid (talk) 00:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]