|
User talk:Curb Safe Charmer/Archive 2
Assess tableHi Curb! Further to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Schmalz: User:Swpb made two fine templates last year, {{assess table}} and the accompanying {{source assess}}; I recall using them in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giles Roberts. I thought you would like to know about them, I find them very usefull. Kind regards, Sam Sailor 13:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC) G2 tagThe G2 tag says that it does not apply to user sandboxes, so I have removed it from User:SovietSeal/sandbox. I agree that it was an annoyance to the reviewers. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
On Breakup of Yugoslavia (my draft)My draft covers the 1941 Partition of Yugoslavia, not the Breakup. You see, I provide sufficient citations and cover the entire thing. Now, I aim for it to become a stub, and to be worked on by the community. GermanGamer77 15:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC) better?!--Mr.M-G-S-X-J-J-U-M-R-T-E-E v.-Schmalz (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC) 16:24:40, 6 February 2018 review of submission by Alice Laird
Alice Laird (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Please remember to check for copyvioHi Curb Safe Charmer and thanks for your work reviewing drafts. Please remember to check for copyright violations. The particular one I saw was Draft:Iota draft one, which had extensive copying from here. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
01:08:23, 13 March 2018 review of submission by Shyamu111
Shyamu111 (talk) 01:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks re: Sentientism articleHi Curb - thanks for your feedback on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sentientism (I'm a newbie at this). I've added more references now to strengthen the relevance. Thanks JamieWoodhouse (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC). About my draftBeing a general seceratary appears to be a thing in the city level as, it is a ruling party and secondly it is a capital city . So being at. capital city is directly related to the state politics Anonymous17576 (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello Curb Safe Charmer, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
ACTRIAL:
Paid editing
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
News
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 18:51:10, 4 April 2018 review of submission by 2405:205:C82B:5652:1268:6DB5:EE67:DC41
2405:205:C82B:5652:1268:6DB5:EE67:DC41 (talk) 18:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC) A Barnstar
Hello :) I have seen that you are one of the participants of the Wikiproject YouTube, I thought it important to tell you that this article is considered for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juanpa Zurita . I'm going to warm the rest of the WikiProject team. Bye :) --Viajaste (talk) 11:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Big Loud Records was a draft you declined in December. I took the draft and added to it. The company is notable as a record label that has produced a #1 hit on a major chart (Fix (Chris Lane song)), and many of the label's other releases are notable enough for articles. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Baden Powell Service Association (Canada)I have changed the references so that they refer to material that has Creative Commons licensing. Let me know if there is anything else that I can do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imasham (talk • contribs) 00:11, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
I've made you aware of this before. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC) 07:57:30, 30 April 2018 review of submission by 178.248.249.175
Hi Curb, in short my reasons: There is no other way for many professionals (especially HR) in this field to find out a standard naming for this new Enterprise function. I can add other privacy certifications like this one: https://www.identitymanagementinstitute.org/cdp/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIhce397zh2gIVw5TVCh2hKg_-EAMYASAAEgLST_D_BwE but in eality the IAPP is the industry standard. It's not promotional: try to search yourself on Google for Privacy Certification (for professionals, not for a whole company): simply there are basically none, and even the other one I just listed above is not recognized (requested) like IAPP's (sse in the real-life job offer below). Not sure which references I can put as this won't be found in books or univaerstity press publications. The only references you will find are real-life jobs offers (in USA and EU), here are few examples (and look that most of them do require IAPP certifications (CIPP/CIPM) just because it's the only one industry recognized (e.g. requested by BIG 4s and big ompanies like Microsof etc.). Probably it's because IAPP it's the only certification body for Privacy certification which at today is accredited by ANSI https://iapp.org/news/a/iapp-certifications-granted-ansi-accreditation-under-international-iso-standard/): So overly promotional was not intended, it's just the reality. I am not a IAPP employee, nor I am paid from IAPP in any way. I am an EU citizen, IAPP is in USA. I wish we had in EU something like that, ut we do not have. A list of Job (even Microsoft looks for a privacy manager!) https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/privacy-manager-salary-SRCH_KO0,15.htm Other Examples from job boards (those links won't last forever) https://www.cwjobs.co.uk/job/manager/lawrence-harvey-job81142504 https://www.indeed.com/viewjob?jk=719fa268e444296d&from=serp&vjs=3 https://www.markssattin.co.uk/job/data-privacy-manager-jobid-dataprivzf0612zfjg https://www.indeed.com/viewjob?jk=9af836893413d0dc&tk=1ccanqu5t0m9358n&from=serp&vjs=3 https://job-openings.monster.co.uk/Manager-Cyber-Privacy-London-London-EN-UK-E-Y/31/b84474d8-a8ce-441e-ac5d-71b9faf1c5bb http://www.timesjobs.com/job-detail/it-telecom-software-job-in-motorola-mobility-inc-belgium-jobid-h6XFNofp3Y5zpSvf__PLUS__uAgZw== http://jobs.jobvite.com/careers/ringcentral/job/oT5Z6fwN?__jvst=Job%20Board&__jvsd=Indeed Hope this will give you a better perspective, sorry for being lenghty. 178.248.249.175 (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC) A cookie for you!
Request on 20:31:30, 4 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Manuelpm1977
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Clifford_Graf Manuelpm1977 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC) spamming that is really really rudeare you trolling me? Flylikeaneagle69 (talk) 06:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC) please help me with my new pagelets start over, can you help me with my new page - what is an example of a good source for utan vicitims of crime ? !!!!Flylikeaneagle69 (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC) 08:30:03, 5 May 2018 review of submission by Hans thore smedbold
Thank your for your comments and advise. I´m currently at the board of both IOHA and OHTA and we have in the board this week discussed the need to increase the visibility of our organisations. One actions is to create a Wikipedia page. The text was ment as a place holder, for a more detailed article about our association. Therefore using material from our own web page was not considered being a violation of the copyright. However, I will both review and enlarge the article in the comming weeks. To be accurate and transparent there will be similarities between the wiki page and our associations web page. I hope this will be within the guidelines.
Vetting or other curation of wikipedia knowledgeThank you Curb for your guidance to us wikipedia newbies. I will start to work on the federated identity article for including much of the info in my original artcile, but it will substantially change the flow of that article (as well as prune dead artifacts currently in it). If those changes generates disagreements, how and where will that be expressed? Secondly, at some point is there a way to indicate that some set of "domain experts" have vetted the topic? I intend to get a number of the key federated identity developers to review the article when finished, and would like to add that element of trustworthiness to the article. Kjklingenstein (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)kjklingenstein
Not sure what to doHello! Recently my draft article Park Ji-min (BTS) was rejected due to the fact that another draft existed waiting to be reviewed. You recommended that I merge my draft with the other one: Draft:Park Jimin (artist). I proceeded to the other page to do just that, however I discovered that the other draft was rejected on 22 July of 2017 because another draft Park Jimin (musician) was waiting to be reviewed. (what a trail to follow lol) I went to that page to then merge my draft only to find that it doesn't actually exist. What would you recommend I do? CazzaaaAAAAAAAhhh (talk) 10:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Actually, about Draft:Matt Briglia, what you described was Matt's company channel. His personal channel is at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfSX3cB8NjxuRCEbB6YVPbw. Oh, and you can also look at his musical.ly here[1]. 108.24.75.44 (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 17:04:37, 27 May 2018 review of submission by 80.76.166.229
Thanks again. 80.76.166.229 (talk) 17:04, 27 May 2018 (UTC) Request on 15:48:15, 30 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by 190.221.61.138
Hi. kindly asking for more detail on how much coverage sources are needed. E.g I could add youtube VEVO channel, spotify page, itunes, magazine interviews... thanks
Westcliff School of SkillsGood day Curb Safe Charmer I respect your decision to possible delete my article. I however would like to have it remained. My reasons are: It has coverage in: • Newspapers • Published history books • Government related websites Furthermore the school has been involved in a movie issued in 2010. The school has a history and has been in existence for 65 years. Your kind consideration would be appreciated Regards
Thanks for the advice User:Barry Ne 04:21 2 June 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 3An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Heart of Madame Sabali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC) Arrion Springs Draft RejectionHey Curb Safe Charmer, Earlier you rejected a draft for an Arrion Springs article. Your reasoning was, and I quote, "...a professional league player is presumed notable if they've played in at least one regular or post season game, but from my understanding that's not the case for Springs. He's a rookie and hasn't played for the Chiefs yet." If that is the case, then how come other rookies (drafted and undrafted) have their own articles? If you want to check, there are other undrafted rookies like Eddy Wilson (American football) or even Spring's teammate Malik Reaves. While I admit that the article needs more sections and detail, it should at least be passed as an article first. AntonLeGo (talk) 19:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Curb Thanks for your comments on my edits for Fellows & Sons and the creation of the article Fellows Auctioneers. I am sorry if I have gone about it in the wrong way, i thought that by stating my job title and employer in my edits, I was adhering to the terms of use. If I use - {{paid|employer=Fellows Auctioneers}} in the future, is this allowed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandra Whittaker (talk • contribs) 12:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Curb Safe Charmer, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects. Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC) Help much appreciatedHi Curb, Thank you for reviewing my recent article. I would really appreciate any help you can offer in getting the article approved. It was my opinion that the submission was completely unbiased and was based on other published leasing companies in the field to ensure this unbias and make as useful as possible to Wikipedia readers. The references are well-regarded media publications that I believed were helpful to the article, please let me know if this is wrong, as I said, I based it on other similar entries that are published. Many thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmilyJBray10 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Notability and acceptanceGood day Safe Charmer Kindly read my response in a positive way as I am respectful towards any reviewer (always been and have great appreciation for the voluntary work they do) What is the definition of notability? Should one target an author of an article? Should one look at the author or the article? Unfortunately there are people who take Wikipedia as a source self-up liftment. Unfortunately there are articles that have been accepted with one or no source. That doesn’t make once own article acceptable.(One wrong does not make one right) These articles with no or little references should be targeted. Newspaper articles or citations are difficult. Did the person or institution provide the information? Did the journalist write the article because it was really notable? If a guy that, for example came third in a major sport event but got major coverage, is included but not the guy that won or even came second, because they got less coverage? True there is also false news. That makes it even harder. Then there are authors that are active and those that are less active. If you are active you should be evaluated on article and not on activity. For editors or reviewers it’s also difficult to be experts on all subjects. This is where objectivity plays a role; much more has to be done on an unknown subject than on a known subject. My whole story is just to get at the ground rules, which are at most difficult. One has to remember that this is an encyclopedia. My belief is that: • Lay down the ground rules for an subject. • Evaluate the article based on the ground rules. • Reject or accept the article on the ground rules. An author which article does not comply should then accept the declination. I belief Wikipedia is a living encyclopedia and would love to be part of its growth. Ethical intent should be number one obviously based on facts and sources Barry Ne (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Safe Charmer With no malicious intend how is Uplands College notabible? I am not an administrator but would like to nominate it for deletion Barry Ne (talk) 19:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Greetings. You moved over to that AfD comments made by various editors in the Talk page of the contested article. I'm not aware of a Wikipedia policy that allows this. We have only the likes of WP:AFDFORMAT. In fact, I find that what you did distorts the conversation; it's like drafting editors up for participation. (Note that, at least so far, I have not made any suggestions of my own in the conversation.) If there is a policy allowing what you did, please point it out. If there is not, I believe the comments must be deleted. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Your thread has been archived
Hello Curb Safe Charmer, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC) You annoyingly keep obstructing my contributionI'm really trying to contribute to wikipedia, but you keep blocking my first article. There are thousands of articles with less or worse sources than mine. My goal is to contribute, not to do a perfect article. I am trying to improve and expand articles related to my country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markman 12-123 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for un-Drafting Ja'RonHe keeps popping up, so I think you were right to do all that work (that would have taken me weeks of figuring out how to do it). My ISP keeps shifting my Internet address, but I went back and found your note, then answered the survey. The footnote on your talk page bothered me so I attempted to isolate it. - 173.20.155.123 (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC) Can you please review this page. as it is as one of the few schools in Jing'an District, apart fropm EasyMandarin, which has a wiki page. After publication I hope to complete with an education section on Jing'an and list all the schools. HanyuSP KaoS (talk) 01:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)hyskps
List of people from JerseyI am working on the List of people from Jersey and on Jersey in general. I see your remarks on your user page and your essay on YouTube people. I will read about sleep on that subject, as I uncertain about it.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Curb Safe Charmer, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) Ref tagLeopold Mozart Centre was a long ugly red link, so I translated from German, just for beauty. Tag it no inline, but there's an official website for a university type organisation. You can also look for refs, - I have no time, sorry. Just curious: for whom do you add such tags? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Park Ji-min draftsI've attempted to redirect all the drafts for that BTS singer to Draft:Park Ji-min (singer, born 1995), and copied your note over there about the AFD. Feel free to point the other redirects that have spawned to that one. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Curb Safe Charmer, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC) revision deletioRThanks for requesting a revision deletion at Rebecca Alexander. I can sort out which versions need to be revision deleted but if you could identify a link to the source that would be helpful.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
rejection for my postHi, my 2 wiki was rejected just now https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:LEAP_Market and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Red_Ideas_Holding_Berhad and have another one pending for review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cloudaron_Group_Berhad. Is it possible to let me know the reason the 2 articles was rejected? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:LEAP_Market for instance, it's a new topic about the stock exchange in Malaysia, if you refer to wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MESDAQ , this is the second board which was accepted with no reference at all. It was accepted and the reviewer hoping that someone can expend the content. LEAP Market is something new and i believe many people is interested in this topic. At least with the information i provide, someone can expend it rather that totally decline something that is useful. As for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Red_Ideas_Holding_Berhad, this is the first 2 company that was listed and i think most of the people will need to know what kind of business can be listed in this new stock exchanges. Please let me know and Thanks in advanced.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Inblues (talk • contribs) 07:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Javier Martín-Torres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armilla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Request on 16:19:51, 26 November 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by GarretBever
Hi Curb Safe Charmer, I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for the valuable feedback about my first major entry. I would like to contribute to more topics in the future so I value the information you provided. In your feedback, you mentioned that the references used for my submission did not show significant coverage (reliable secondary sources). I did try to mainly include third party press releases , as well as link the relevant terminology to other Wikipedia articles. Any suggestions or tips about this would be greatly appreciated. This will allow me to correctly remove/ replace those sources, reword the material, or find stronger sources. ( whichever you think that I need ) I am in fact not being compensated by this company to create this article. The reason this topic interested me is because I often find myself reading Wikipedia entries about a business before I use them. I have not used this business and I am not a customer either. I thought this would be a fun and easy way to build a catalog of useful content for the site. I really tried to create an objective and history based piece of content, so I’m not entirely sure which part of the content exactly hints to that, but most likely that portion should be changed as well whatever it may be. I don’t believe I included any direct links to the site, I was pretty sure that was not required, and not allowed. I look forward to your response. Best, Garret Bever GarretBever (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Matthias Grob A tag has been placed on Matthias Grob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC) Hello Curb Safe Charmer,
 This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Channel Islands and LondonLast June I went to Jersey for three days, not long enough, but I hope to return in the spring of 2018. I spent a fortnight in London then. I have been working on Jersey and the Channel Islands all year, and I see your contributions there. I am not sure where you are located now, but with the Internet we are all deigital neighbors. Are you open to working with me on these subjects?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 10:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template. Disambiguation link notification for December 19An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miguel García-Garibay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solid state (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Happy Holidays
Disambiguation link notification for December 27An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xiaohongshu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC) Thank you, re: approval of first pageJust a quick note to say thanks for approving Charles Richard Whitfield, which happens to be my first Wikipedia page. I appreciate your input. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caw35slr (talk • contribs) 08:05, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 11An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC) Something smells in general with this editor's edits. Recently they've been cramming Norwegian language stuff into articles about Shetland - also a pastime of Special:Contributions/185.49.74.145, who also likes to fiddle about with the leads of articles about places in London. Both of them seem very keen to plug various kinds of separatism (eg changing "British" to "English", "Cornish", "Yorkshireman"). Worth keeping an eye on? Pinkbeast (talk) 12:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
Curb Safe Charmer Ref: the Jordan-Pooley-Farrar affair I was trying to take a nap, and the thought rolled over in my head. The title is non descrip... meaningless, unless you knew about it. For the sake of clarity I think it should be named something like the Cecily Jordan-Greville Pooley Dispute. It is more than account of a breach of promise suit. It is a first stone cast in the pond for women's suffrage and equal rights. For the first time in history the woman was the defendant in a breach or promise case. (Equality is not a one sided issue). But the whole affairs shines a light on the societal and legal attitude towards women. Where women are simply the property of men, and have limited rights. When you moved it did you also delete the Heading Aftermath. I believe that it also important and should be expanded, as regards the societal impact. Of course WP does not permit going off on a lecture or off the rails and that can be taken into account. Finally the template is no longer appropriate and should be removed. Such a template does not belong in mainspace, and the issues raised have been addressed and corrected. What do you think?Oldperson (talk) 22:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC) Matthias Grob pageWe have added multiple references to this page, can it be reinstated on Wiki? If not, what else needs adding? Thanks ;) Robinsonnick (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Jordan Pooley Farrar affair@Curb Safe Charmer: Thank you for your edits on the Jordan Pooley Farrar affair. The name of the article has been bugging me. It just doesn't seem descriptive. I would like to move it to the Cecily Jordan v Greville Pooley dispute. What do you think?Oldperson (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Curb Safe Charmer On reflection I think a rationale is needed for change of name of article. By analogy A notable dispute between Jones v Smith when Jones inadvertently threw a baseball through Smiths window. Would the incident be referred to as Jones Smith baseball affair? I think not. Besides there is no information in the last name only. However a Cecily Jordan v Greville Pooley dispute does provide information. What do you thinkOldperson (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC) The Return of Cicely Jordan FarrarHi Curb Safe Charmer, I guess this is related to the preceding. (Are we all getting tired of Cecily yet?) As you know, I've been trying to salvage the Cecily Jordan Farrar article from the redirect. I consulted with[[u|the road is long}}, as he mentioned the draft idea and asked him to look over the draft, which he did. But I didn't originally think you would care, as you seemed focus more on the Jordan/Pooley article. But, I could've brought you in as well, since you put the redirect out there in the first place. First, I'm glad you took a look at the article, and thanks for your edits. It felt like you were okay with the latest, even though it's a radical revision. Also, I saw you even put a link to the Cecily Jordan Farrar article in the Jordan/Pooley. That felt like a compliment. Thank you again! Here's where I'd like to consult with you again. Right now, I am trying to work with the admin to remove the redirect. Are you okay with that? Also, I'm asking the admin who take care of speedy deletions for help to get the redirect removed, but this is a strange case. The links built to the old article mainly point to a biography. Any links to the new one will be pointing toward a legal case, I think. Any advice for how to get this all sorted so the two articles can go their separate ways? To my mind, they have become quite separate. Thanks!Wtfiv (talk) 04:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC) It's fixed. Thank you very much!Wtfiv (talk) 07:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Oldperson , I'm glad you are interested in this issue too, but its been fixed, the redirects have all been accounted for- kudos to the WP admin team Wtfiv (talk) 07:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC) The Channel Island English article notices.Thank you for notifying me about the article being discussed at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard, which is about Channel Island English. I have indeed been working on articles about the Channel Islands, Guernsey, Jersey, Sark, and other islands in the waters near Normandy, France. My question to you is who is notified by you or others about that discussion. I can see that some editors who worked on that aarticle are not notified on their talk pages. --Dthomsen8 (talk) 04:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!_by_Ron.jpg) Many Thanks (re: Stanton Cohn) --Meeplistener Meeplistener (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanton Cohn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Draft:How to predict the mean flow in the ocean listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draft:How to predict the mean flow in the ocean. Since you had some involvement with the Draft:How to predict the mean flow in the ocean redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC) Javier Martín-TorresHi Curb, I receive this message from you: "Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Javier Martín-Torres, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)" I would like to know in what sense my recent contributions of Javier Martin-Torres were no constructive because I try to change the previous version of the text according to the Wikipedia policies and guidelines exactly to solve the issues were indicated: This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (November 2018) This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (November 2018) This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (November 2018) So, I would appreciate so much if your can guide me a little bit about how can I change the existing version for other one which solve the issues detected in the previous one. Thank you. Kind regards. José — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josgor (talk • contribs) 17:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Curb, I did al the changes you mentioned yet. Thank you for your help. Kind regards. José — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josgor (talk • contribs) 09:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC) Draft:Green ManismI appreciate you not deleting my article. Do you have any recommendations that would increase my chance of this article being published? I've been trying for awhile but I just don't know what to fix. I thank you for not instantly deleting it, and giving me the opportunity to improve my article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paper Luigi Enthusiast the Second (talk • contribs) 13:24, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Draft Rejected because Reference Behind Paywall; what to do?
Hi @Curb Safe Charmer: Of this draft, which you rejected: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Twomey You said: "I cannot access the Courier Mail reference as it requires a subscription, but the other references do not provide the in-depth, reliable, independent coverage about Twomey necessary for there to be an article about him." The Courier Mail article has exactly the necessary coverage that you need. It's behind a paywall because lots of newspapers (ie. the credible sources that Wikipedia wants to rely on) have paywalls. Surely there is some way around this? I have an image of the print newspaper; would that help? I can direct you to the journalist's Twitter feed? Lots of the biggest newspapers on earth have paywalls, but are the height of information creditability. There must be a workaround here.
anagramsAfter reading your explanation of your username I went to this page and discovered one of the anagrams for my name is Royal Relative. I wish I'd known this thirteen years ago, it SO would have been my username. --valereee (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Request on 23:16:45, 13 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by PokeyPuppy
PokeyPuppy (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.17 Hello Curb Safe Charmer,
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Submission of The Great Adventure by The Neal Morse BandI do not understand why the page The Great Adventure was rejected. All other albums by Neal Morse and The Neal Morse Band have their own page. Being a part of the WikiProject Progressive Rock group means that we should be promoting all Progressive Rock Artists and their albums. If there is specific content you want me to add in order to have it accepted, let me know. I see other album pages that do not have as much info as this page has. I am going to be adding info to it in the future. Firstlensman (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Regarding Sengkang Central ResidencesHi received the message however I am not paid or affiliated in any way when I was writing the write up for Sengkang Central Residences. I'm looking to contribute to the community by writing more articles relating to real estate in Singapore. I'm really passionate about real estate in Singapore hence would love to contribute my skill set to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.228.120 (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Not Logged In & RepliedHi, I do not have multiple accounts. I'm using public wifi and replying to the message on Sengkang Central Residences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas Wong SG (talk • contribs) 21:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Request on 15:28:36, 11 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Sathya viji
Hi Sir, I have created a page for Saha Nathan. I have added references from multiple sources. I cited from other articles around the web. Could you please guide me in the process on how to make this article better so that it may qualify as a wikipedia article. Sathya viji (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Request on 15:41:23, 11 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Sathya viji
Sathya viji (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Sathya VijiSathya viji (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC) With reference to draft: Saha Nathan I have added sources from multiple websites. Kindly guide me on how to improve this article so that it is eligible for resubmission and acceptance Sathya viji (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC) @Sathya viji: You need to add references that show that Saha Nathan has been written about by others. They must have written about him in depth. They must be independent of him. They must be reliable sources. At the moment, I don't think any of the references meet those criteria. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC) Regarding my article I created on Kamini DubeHey Curb Safe Charmer, Thank you for reviewing my article. But I cannot understand where I am going wrong with it? Is there anything I am using as citation wrong or false? now even I have kept the article neutral. Please let me know specifically where I have made the mistake so that I can help contributing about the person I wanna make article of. Please have a look and revert. It would be helpful and kind of you if you would specifically mention where I have gone wrong so that I can make the mistake correct. Callmesiddie (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I got another article of mine waiting for the review. Is it possible if you become the volunteer editor to review my article. I can share the link with you. You may find it below. Please have a look and revert asap. Thanks link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rashtraputra Callmesiddie (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC) about my article on rashtraputraHello, Curb Safe Charmer thank you for your feedback on the article, as per your guidance I've made the required changes to the article and resubmitted it. Regards. Akash Sharma India (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Ware Junior Senior High SchoolHi Curb. Let me say that I should not have been trying to do serious Wikipedia work given what I had going on in real life at the time - my question about primary sources is a real facepalm moment and I have self-trouted - I know better (as I reminded myself in a GA review I am getting back to where I raised my own primary/secondary concerns). I will also say that while UK/US secondary schools be defacto notable doesn't bother me but I certainly have respect for those for whom it is bothersome - I have my own areas where I am troubled because I know the letter of the PAG back me up on something not being notable but for which it would never go that way at AfD. I also am not a fan of NAC at AfD have left a message for the closure suggesting he not close such discussions. I apologize if you feel I stepped on your toes by accepting an article you had declined - I tend to think that AfC promotes conservative acceptance rates when any prolific AfC reviewer (which I most definitely am not) should have some small percentage of accepts there that end up as deleted articles given the standard of "likely to survive at AfD" not being "will survive at AfD". When I independently come across an article Florida Army has done at AfC, I give a quick look at his talk page to see if there recent declines on there - he's an unusual editor in that he's quite experienced but also required to go through AfC (a restriction I support). Anyhow just wanted to follow up since I was busy as the AfD played out. I hope we have the chance to collaborate together, rather than be at odds, at some point in the future. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft: Nicolás Ibáñez ScottHi, Curb Safe Charmer! First thank you for your review about my draft. I would like to know what are those factors on my draft that doesn´t allow to publish, all the information there is true, and there are too many sources of information that support it. I have seen some biographies of similar entrepreneuers that are correct published (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Rodriguez_(entrepreneur)). Can you help me, please about what factors i have to correct in my draft? Thank you! Best Regards, Davidwriter8 (talk) 09:18, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
WormwoodThis is about WP:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Use of wormwood. Thank you. I have added three more versions of the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Curb Safe Charmer,
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250 Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Dada Narayan Singhwas not an MLA and the draftification seems good .... Am I missing something? ∯WBGconverse 16:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Request on 11:20:29, 5 June 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Darren.walker
My page submissions was denied as it was believed I was talking undisclosed financial stake for the post however this page was set up as an information page for the company I work for and receive no direct or indirect financial benefit as a result of this. Please could this be rectified and the information page now be published? Thanks. Darren.walker (talk) 11:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019Hello Curb Safe Charmer,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages. Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Concept MedicalHi, page substitution was declined because of less content and referral links. The page Draft:Concept_Medical is having enough content to publish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skgacharya (talk • contribs) 11:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Page reviewHi, you started reviewing my resubmitted page a few weeks ago and just wanted to check-in on the status of it. Thanks Vgreco15 (talk) 18:16, 10 July 2019 (UTC) deletion of Draft:Matthias GrobHi! I am worried that this page is going to be deleted soon! its true that most of it is autobiography, please help me out! it costed me a lot of work and I really tried to gather the correct links to articles that prove what I tell. I am an inventor, engineer and musician, not a writer or researching scientist. I am not good at proving, promoting and selling. I am still very busy to survive, mainly because I spent my best years to create and explain LiveLooping and did not get my share of the huge success it became. now my points are:
I see you have a lot of experience with such situations, so what would you recommend? thank you Matthias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matigrob (talk • contribs) 14:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC) Hi there! I have noticed that you have put an Afd template on the page named Advitya (Assamese film), despite of having proper online presence through various e-links. I request you kindly to take back the template away from the page. @Curb Safe Charmer: In response to this message about Kentucky HousewifeIn response to this message . . "Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The Kentucky Housewife, from its old location at User:Iluvwipdia/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you." . . . . . ..I'm really confused as I am new at this. I have finished editing this new article and would like have it considered for inclusion in wikipedia. I thought I had followed the correct process. Please advise on what to do so that "The Kentucky Housewife" is in the queue to be approved. Iluvwipdia (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC) Guidelines about my article@Curb Safe Charmer: Hey Charmer This is Robin from magicpin. I am in search of few patterns and changes that I should apply to make magicpin appear on wikipedia. It has been a great journey that magicpin has covered but we are not understanding what exactly you require. The matter of fact is, we are not hiring or paying somebody and to keep the trend safe and clean we are using our own editorials and correct info base to create this page. I hope you would suggest something better as you can log on to https://magicpin.in to know about this company and it credibility. Thank you and looking forward hearing from you.
Hello Curb,Hello Curb, I am not promoting any company or organization for any single compensation and I down my head if my edits makes you feel like this. Myself Venkatesh from the southern part of India, with keen interest I'm doing agriculture on my own land. I was looking to contribute content to Wikipedia and never succeed. If my writing way is promotional not in the encyclopedic way, sure I will change the way of writing and do please teach us who are willing to contribute. We are trying to give an identity for the companies doing a great job and make the world to know about the company and I believe the only way is Wikipedia. So I am doing edits on these companies located in our local region who are better in serving their customers like a god. So creating a great content with reference for this type of companies is difficult and I almost managed to do that with deep research about the company. Sure I will resubmit with mentioned non-promotional content and Here, I request you to publish a page which I resubmit an encyclopedic content for your review. Sincerely, Venkatesh S K
Understanding the submission process for my page.Thank you Curb Safe Charmer for your message about my page submission. I have never created a page on Wikipedia. May I ask what the usual process is, for my page submission. Apart from myself making any future edits to the page. When will/would my page be ready to be published, or is there more I need to do, to help this process?
Charles Reid (Painter)Hello Curb Safe Charmer. Thank you for featuring the Charles Reid (painter) page. I see there is a problem of copyright with my own website yet. As you Know I am the administrator and the owner of http://www.andremehu-aquarelles.com . I'm French artist Andre Mehu, and I'm not a female, Lize is my pseudo and isn't a female's name, and I feature my paintings on my website. First Graeme Bartlett ask me to create a CC License. I did it (CC-BY-SA 3.0) and he moved my article to the draft namespace. Then Anthony Appleyard declined the submission for review because unambiguous copyright infringment , this is why I decided to delete the article-87.php from my website to prove I'm the owner of it. Then Graeme restored the draft and move it on the article space. But now I dont know what to do, there is a pink box above the article. The article-87.php didn't sound encyclopedic this why I had to rewrite it and only kept some elements of it. If you want I can re-upload article-87.php , it is copyleft because I applied the Licence CC-BY-SA 3.0 . I know control is necessary Please could you tell me what to do? I look forward to hearing from you soon Regards --Lize56 (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Charles Reid (Painter)Hi Curb Safe Charmer, thank you very much for your reactivity. Will the pink box above the article be deleted when I restore article-87.php on my site? I displayed the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license at the bottom of the page. So I wrote at the head of the page "This article is copyleft, see at the bottom of the page", I wrote the date July 31, 2019 and the hour 23:12 (France). Now the number of the article is 88, as you can see: http://www.andremehu-aquarelles.com/en/article-88.php. I let you verify all is exact. Thank you for you help Curb Safe Charmer. I look forward to hearing from you soon Regards --Lize56 (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC) MerciHello Curb Safe Charmer, I saw in the watchlist that you did a great review of the article Charles Reid (painter). I thank you very much. Please could you tell me why the file "Fullziseoutput 1884.jpg" has been nominated for deletion. I found it on Wikimedia Commons. I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon Thank you very much again Regards --Lize56 (talk) 09:28, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Charles Reid (Painter) & Thank youHello Curb Safe Charmer, I thank you very much for your support. It's important to find a representative. Actually I don't really know if the article Charles Reid (painter) is in the space where reviewers can let comments and make corrections. I just know some revewers have suggested to correct the style. I did modifications. Do you know how to remove the box? There are mentions "failed verification" on two links I don't understand, both they link to the correct document I want they link to. Please could tell me where out of the draftnamespace is the article ? How do I do to remove the template message, I would like reviewers verify modification I did. Coud you tell me the signification of the mention "Failed verification" Thank you very much, Regards --Lize56 (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Merci, and about "Failed verification", Charles Reid (painter)Hello Curb Safe Charmer, thank you very much for your reactivity. In relation to "failed verification", I think the reviewer has been confused with the term "Zhujiajiao" which appears neitheir in Kelly Kane's article nor in the other link which is in chinese. In fact there are two Shanghai International Biennial. One of them is related to contemporary art and is nammed "Shanghai Biennale", like in French, its link is http://www.shanghaibiennale.org/en/ . The second is nammed differently "Shanghai Zhujiajiao International Watercolor Biennial" and is dedicated to watercolor. Unfortunately this site is in Chinese, without any translation in English, the link to it is https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/nuOlW822FLeh5SYzbd1M3A. Charles Reid's painting is the second of the list when you scroll down. First there is a picture of a clock, then a Charles Reid's signed portrait. This is the only link about this biennial. Kely Kane mentions "Shanghai biennial", she lacks precision, but she uses the term "biennial" which is related to the Shanghai Zhujiajiao International Watercolor Biennial. This is the unique link to this event. I've added categories:Category:National Academy of Design members, Category:American portrait painter, Category:Art Student League of New York Alumni, Category:20th-century American Painter, Category:American male painters, Category:American Illustrators, Category:American magazine illustrators. I ask for your understanding. Thank you very much Regards --Lize56 (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
thanks for your noteim not sure how to delete my draft page and what the difference is between that and the sandbox.. which is better to have reviewed.. thanks and sorry if these are dumb concerns please feel free to delete the old one if it will hurry along my new attempts review.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicalib (talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 August 2019 (UTC) Westcliff school of skillsGood day Curb Safe Charmer Thank you for your feedback. I have accepted your opinion on Kenridge Primary (as it is a primary school) Just three comments on the Westcliff School of Skills: 1. Yes a lot of schools are used in a Movie; however this school assist the technical part 2. I have added a section on rugby. I belief this notable – with the high percentage included in the provincial side 3. I have added a rugby player that achieved national colours Your kind consideration is appreciated Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry Ne (talk • contribs) 20:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC) User talk:AbhinplRegarding the draft you moved to draft space, I had moved it off the talk page because it didn't belong there, but there was an earlier draft in another sandbox. Is it okay to just treat that draft as if it is new, instead of keeping it together with the history of the other draft?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 14:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
|
.jpeg)
