Hi, I've found you have deleted the airplay chart info in China.
But obviously, you are not familiar with Chinese and the internet situation in China.
You may check the offical web site of Hit-FM, and found it is only something like a blog in myspace.
The resources you "removed info that was sourced by an unreliable reference" are not unraliable at all.
If you would like to check the info's reliability, you may try to download the records of the radio to verify the information. Parabola1999 (talk) 06:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, Crystal Clear. I noticed that you've written a few more GAs for the MJ Wikiproject (well done!), and was wondering whether you'd be interested in taking a look at Dancing the Dream (currently at FAC) and leaving your thoughts at the nomination page, as the article is not getting much outside input from other editors. Regards, Pyrrhus1617:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Crystal Clear x3. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
billboard magazine/invincible album
hi , would it be possible to put in the intro something that reflects the Invincible albums overall legacy in the 2000's. By this i mean replacing whether in 2004 or 2009 it had a bit more sales, with the recognition by the "Billboard magazine readers poll" as album of the decade,in a boldface or italic letters to highlight this achievement. thank you--72.144.62.86 (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Crystal Clear x3. You have new messages at SMasters's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Orphaned non-free image File:Dirty Diana Music Video.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Dirty Diana Music Video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
I hope this is the right place to reach you (this sounds rather unorthodox), but I also raised a question in the "Coverage concerns" section in the Invincible GAN that I felt should be addressed regarding the album's sales after Michael Jackson's death. Respond there whenever you get a chance. Thank you, –MuZemike06:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Out of random curiosity, was Jackson's recording of the song "This Is It" discovered before the This Is It concert tour was planned/named and was always meant to be released, or was it discovered after Jackson's death and while the movie was being created in an incredible coincidence? This doesn't have anything to do with an article, I was just wondering =]. liquidluck✽talk07:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The "This Is It" song was found by Jackson's brother's after his death when they were sorting through his stuff and the song's title and the name of his tour, which led to the "This Is It" movie and soundtrack, were just a coincidence because his record label stated that they had no proof to suggest that he had plans to ever release the song. Crystal Clear x300:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've given it my second look, done a few tweaks, and there's just one thing left to be done, which I have noted on the review page. CanadianPaul01:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I've reviewed Number Ones (video), but I have some concerns about its comprehensiveness, so I have requested a second reviewer. In the meantime, there are two smaller concerns with the article that need to be dealt with so please check those out. CanadianPaul02:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article Penélope Cruz you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Penélope Cruz for things which need to be addressed., but you know that I am reviewing it anyway. :-) –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The song "Heave Can Wait" (from MJ's Invincible album) was suppose to be released as a single but was canceled after the conflict with Sony Music, so it's notable enough to have its own page. If you want to join the MJ Wiki Project add your username in this -> "{{ }}" to the active users list : ). Crystal Clear x321:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am happy to help with the copy edit though I am concerned about the May 3rd deadline. I do not know if I will have enough time to get through the entire article by then. I will do the best I can, but you should leave the request on GOCE open highlighting the deadline in case another editor is available to help out. I will start on this as soon as I can, possibly tonight. Thanks. dtgriffith (talk) 16:14, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just assessed the article and read through the GA review. There is a lot of copy editing to be done that I will not be able get through before this tight deadline due to my real world schedules and obligations this weekend. Sorry, I wish there was more time available. However, I am happy to help with copy editing over the long-term if you don't find someone else to meet your deadline. dtgriffith (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review, it was very detailed :)
So basically ive correct about 90% of what you've listed. What i have left to do is....
The song's composition is not discussed very much in the composition section, are there any reliable sources that discusses anything about the songs content?
Basically I've looked everywhere, if i stumble across something else ill add it, but for now, no.
Musicnotes.com (which is used in the article) has information on the songs chord progression.
The images used in the article should have alt text.
Honestly i dont have a clue what that means, so please explain...
Also, why are the names of the publications she was interviewed by in the article? What notability do they have to be mentioned?
That i left, im not sure how i could correct it, any suggestions?
In the writing section it should just say "Kesha said", and/or "when interviewed about the song's lyrical content" rather then saying things like "In an interview with Esquire,"
In the Chart procession and succession section why is the chart table hidden?
If you want to be bold and change it, go ahead, it have it that way since there is sooo much information it in, it just looks more appealing the way it is (in my opinion)
I'm not sure how to change the chart table. For the record GAs like Bad Romance also have lots of information about its chart procession and succession and there tables are shown. Crystal Clear x318:11, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The credits and personnel section needs some type of sourcing. Crystal Clear x3 07:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
80% of all GA articles ive looked at, say the have a source, but there are unclickable. i got the information from the CD booklet, the best ref i could give would be to a picture of the Credits.
You might like to run through this article and make it crystal clear that "Scream" does not appear on the DVD. Also, if I have not said already, well done on everything you have achieved with regard to Jackson articles. Wish I still had the motivation and time. — R216:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to do with editing, I was just wondering and thought you might know =]. Did Jackson's label already intend to release This Is It (song) before naming the This Is It (Michael Jackson concerts) concert series "This Is It", or did they discover the demo after he died and decided to release it, and both the song and the concert series have the same name by some bizarre coincidence? liquidluck✽talk01:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The "This Is It" demo was discovered after he died, the concert's and the song's name is just an odd coincidence. Thanks for asking : ) Crystal Clear x301:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There was a Who Is It music video. No, it is not the one shown on MTV or VH1. This was about MJ discovering his 'girlfriend' was cheating, as the video shows she was a prostitute. Because of this, he leaves the area in a helicopter. Here is a link to the music video for the rare music video [1]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daboyle250 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why did write that in this diff("Who Is It" was recorded by Michael Jackson in 1990 for his eight studio album, Dangerous, which was released the following year.[1] The track was written by Jackson and produced by Jackson and Bill Bottrell.[1] "Who is It" was released as the fifth single from Dangerous on August 31, 1992, by Jackson's record label, Epic Records. The track's music genre is credited as being R&B and New jack swing.)? I am currently reading the album liner notes of an original Dangerous pressing. The only date is shown in (C)1991 MJAC Music and nothing else, so why did you write that?Carmaker1 (talk) 20:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Allmusic has that info? It would be really nice to find a solid source clarifying the recording dates for Dangerous tracks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.16.32 (talk) 23:27, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Crystal Clear! How are you? Congratulations, i am hugely impressed with your works on MJ articles. Everyday when I turn on my PC, I immediately visit the list of your contributions to see what new have you done. I would like to ask you about the article Smile (Charlie Chaplin song). I think it would be better to split the Michael Jackson part into a new article. There are a lot of covers, and who would write so many of it in one article. What do you think? Thank you.--MajklDzekson (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments : ). Regarding the "Smile" song, since the song charted on the UK chart, I think that it would probably be better if his version was to have its own article. Crystal Clear x308:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you !!
Was gong to make a 4th selection in the portal....Since you do all the article ...pls tell me what YOU would like to see in the portals next 5 spots...First an album article you got to GA..then a song from a GA article ...and so on!! ...no rush...but all upto you what is next!! :-) ...Moxy (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oops forgot...If you wish update this list here with your content and the other new GA and FA stuff pls do so!!!...I will do it in a week or so if you have not!!...Moxy (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I listed the song as C grade quality because for one, it was already listed as C class for R&B and soul music, as well as because it has numerous bare links, it has barely any discussion of the song's composition, the lead is not descriptive of the entire article, and their are numerous sections with unsourced info. Crystal Clear x322:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well do you not think it would have been more informative for you to have highlighted this on the talk page and given some specific examples? furthermore if that's how you felt why didnt you carry out the GA-Nom? simply downgrading an article without any explaination is not rude and unhelpful. Several editors want to see it pass GA and so im trying to edit the article bit-by-bit to see if it can pass. Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The reason why I did not review the article for GA is because I am not a GA reviewer, although I usually do leave additional comments during articles GA reviews. To be honest, I think that you should remove the article's GA nomination until the problems I've listed above are fixed because I would not be surprised if another editor were to review and GA quick fail the article. Crystal Clear x302:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Empire State of Mind" credits
Hi, I think the song's credits on the article are mixed with the album ones, I have the German CD Single and these are the correct credits, hope this helps. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 22:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PRODUCED BY SHUX. CO-PRODUCED BY JANET "JNAY" SEWELL-ULLEPIC & ANGELA HUNTE. WRITTEN BY S. CARTER, A SHUCKBURGH, J. SEWWEL-ULLEPIC, A. HUNTE, A. KEYS, B. KEYES, S. ROBINSON. RECORDED BY GIMEL "YOUNG GURU" KEATON AT ROC THE MIC, NYC. A. KEYS VOCALS RECORDED AT OVEN STUDIOS, NYC BY ANN MINCIELI. MIXED BY KEN "DURO" IFILL/THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARDS AT KMA STUDIOS, NYC. MIX ASSISTED BY JORDAN "DJ SWIVEL" YOUNG. EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC./J SEWELL PUBLISHING (ASCAP)/EMI APRIL MUSIC INC. o/b/o ITSELF AND LELLOW PRODUCTIONS (ASCAP)/TWENTY NINE BLACK MUSIC/GAMBI MUSIC (BMI). FEATURING SAMPLES FROM THE MOMENTS RECORDING "LOVE ON A TWO WAY STREET", PRODUCED UNDER LICENSE FROM AND BY ARRANGEMENT WITH RHINO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, A WARNER MUSIC GROUP COMPANY. USED COURTESY OF ROBINSON MUSIC GROUP, LLC. ALICIA KEYS APPEARS COURTESY OF J RECORDS.
Hey, Crystal Clear. I was wondering if you could watchlist Bubbles (chimpanzee)? An editor is chopping chunks out of the article with no consensus in order for the article to fit with thier own anti-Jackson views. Pyrrhus1610:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I've added the article to my watchlsit. If the editor makes edits without censuses I'll revert their edits and inform them to discuss the changes they would like to make on the articles talk page. Crystal Clear x310:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I say we restore the page to this copy -->here all this stuff is junk add by a 12 year old , i wish the lock on the page was better.Moxy (talk) 00:07, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the information for a understandable reason, because it was unsourced! I honestly do not care if another Wikipedia article does this or that, and how is this information "well-known", not every single living person on the planet watches SNL all the time. Also, even if the information was sourced it should not be included because its trivial. Crystal Clear x319:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: FA candidacy for "Speechless (Michael Jackson song)"
Hey, thanks for your assistance with this article. Could you possibly allow me to respond to SoniaSyle's future coments? Some of her suggestions are making the article lose clarity. And I'd rather have her oppose and the article not have the FA star, than decrease this clarity. Thanks, Pyrrhus1609:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Who says that information about the SNL spoof in We Are the World 25 for Haiti is "trivial", unneeded, and not sourced by reliable sources"? You? Ha ha.
What the heck are you talking about? I NEVER threatened or acted uncivil towards you. I told you if you that if kept making un-constructive edits you would be blocked from editing. Also, Bossip is NOT a reliable source, its a online gossip site. Another thing, I do not have to "stop" anything because I'm doing constructive edits by removing your trivial unsouced crap that you keep adding to an article. How about YOU come off your high horse and find something better to do with your time instead of harassing me, cause I will report you to ANI is you continue to harass me. Crystal Clear x318:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bad Award — For helping get a Michael Jackson article to FA level
For your dedication to everything that is MJ! You have set a wonderful example for everyone else to follow. I present you with this award on behalf of the community. Enjoy. ...Moxy (talk) 00:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you kidding me? I've been reverting YOUR disruptive edits from those two articles. I, as well as another editor, have repeatedly said that the information pertaining to song's performed in the film was unneeded, fancrutf, unsoruced, and redundant, and I've been removing the single's box from the W.B.S.S. article because it was unneeded, unsourced, and was disrupting the references. If YOU continue to make disruptive edits and edit war then you will be blocked from editing. Crystal Clear x303:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa. No need for shouting. LIKE THIS! Now lets settle this like gentlemen. I've been the one who as been reverting your disruptive edits from those two articles. I've been trying to make the articles better but you keep on damaging them. I've actually seen Michael Jackson's This Is It and I can confirm those are the songs that are featured in the film. Maybe the songs performed is unneeded for you but for other people it is needed. Just because someone thinks that something is unneeded that doesn't mean you go around erasing everything. Another single box is needed for Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' 2008 because it's a another single. I don't know if you hate Michael Jackson or if you are just doing this to get attention but if you continue to make disruptive edits and edit war then you will be blocked from editing. Chelo61 (talk) 04:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First off, I was not shouting, I was using capital letters to get my point across, second, I do not "hate" MJ, I'm actually a fan of his, third, I am not reverting your edits for "attention". Regarding the single box for W.B.S.S. I did not think it was appropriate to have for the 2008 version because it was interfering with the reference list, but I guess it would be understandable if the single box could stay. However, I do not agree with keeping any of the information you want in the This is It article. The list of song's used in the film, is unneeded and redundant (his performances of the song's is mentioned in the content section), and its also unsourced, Wikipedia editors can not assert the information is factual just because they claim to have seen the film. Other information that I do not think should be in the article is the lists of songs with bullet points that, aside from being unsourced, is fancruft and unneeded information, listing out the song's Jackson was suppose to perform is unneeded because the article is about the film, not his rehearsal schedule. For the record, regrading the This Is It information, another editor had also removed the same information that an IP added, stating that they were removing the information for the same reason as me. Crystal Clear x305:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well well... your true colors are being revealed, Crystal. By the way, where's the "consensus" that, according to you, determined that the SNL parody on WATW 25 for Haiti is irrelevant and unneeded? It would be nice if you read Wikipedia:Consensus. I invite you to the WATW 25 for Haiti talk page to discuss this matter. --Boutros Boutros Boutros (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First off, do you have nothing better to do with your life than stalk a person's talk page? Second, where exactly have my "true colors" been revealed? You mean the colors of me that do not want unsourced, redundant fancruft in an article? Or the colors where I removed information that another editor had also removed for the same reason's as me? I said, and still stand by, my feelings that the crap, thats unneeded and unsourced, should not be in the article. I'll be more than happy to discuss this matter on the talk page of W.A.T.W.25. Crystal Clear x319:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure you have the best match of reviewers for Cry. If things go too poorly, you may choose to withdraw it and resubmit it at a later date.—Kww(talk) 05:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Crystal Clear x3 Plaease refrain from removing the lead in the Michael Jackson article. The lead Paragraphs hasbeen structured this way for a reason. If any edits are to be done it should br from this lead. To discuss edits please refer to Talk: Michael Jackson. Thank You.Hubbletelescope2 (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"I've removed the list of songs, again, it is unsourced. The article is about the film, not solely about information on his performances of the song's"
As we know, This film is a documentary–concert film, the majority part of the film is a concert, so the list of songs performed in this film is important information for it. It is true that "this article is about the film", but it is also true that "this film is about his performances of the songs". And the songs in the soundtrack is different from the songs performed in this film. Without the list of songs, the core information of the film lacked.
Obviously, source is important, but the film itself is the source for the song list. The detailed info of the songs performed, such as pre-recorded or live vocal may be unsourced, but the song list itself is not.
Parabola1999 (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I get what your trying to say, but, the table-list of the songs needs sources to back-up what it says in the "notes" section of the table-list. Also, the bullet-point-list needs sources and is unneeded because like I said, the article is about the film itself rather than Jackson's rehearsal schedule for the concerts. On another note, the entire list of songs is completely redundant, the songs performed in the film is mentioned in the "content" section. Regards, Crystal Clear x312:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the "content" section is not clear enough for the information. The better solution is to make the "content" section clear enough. Song list is the seential information for this film. And the film itself is really the song list. I'm afraid that you have confused with the "rehearsal schedule" and the "song performed", the deleted list is the content of the film, rather than the "rehearsal schedule". The schedule is different from the song list.
Best wishes,
Parabola1999 (talk) 11:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
